134a Refrigerant
#4331
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:kyzKe.510$8c.446@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com.. .
>> cryo is its own specialized segment. cryo is not considered
> refrigeration.
>
> Another howler
and it doesnt change ----, liar. cryo is not refrigeration.
>> i have from the beginning.
>
> Not in the post where you made the boast!
TRANSLATION --> "i leave ---- out when i need to in order to try to make my
LIES stick, nate"
no ----.
> I've already spec'ed 'em... go back and read,
LIAR! you havent even told me what they are yet. just give me the settings
on the FCC stevie. ill give you a hint, the CC stands for "cycle control"
lol. you cant because you know NOTHING of cryo. :-)
> And just what gives you the right to speak with
> authority on atmospheric science?
thats just it stool, ive never attempted to speak with authority. ive
stated from the BEGINNING that its all belief and speculation. only LIARS
like you try to claim it as fact.
>> it is as it relates to refrigeration, which is the topic of our
> discussion.
>
> Physics, Nate
TRANSLATION --> "ill throw out smoke and mirrors because i have no response"
> How about this one?
> http://www.pe.gatech.edu/conted/serv...?COURSE_ID=543
>
> loser...
you STUPID and ignorant fool, that is a CRYO CLASS! i asked you for an
HVAC/R course that included cryo. ive already stated long ago that cryo was
its own specialized segment therefore its a given that it would have its own
classes. your claim is that its "refrigeration" which is why i want to see
it as part of an hvac/r standard curriculum. YOU LOSE, liar.
>> that does not make me qualified to work on it. as i said above, i never
>> said ---- about _knowledge_, my statement was about qualifications.
>
> Spin! More spin!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot respond to your statement that kicked my ***,
nate"
> Are you qualified to work on
> cryogenic refrigeration?
no, and i never claimed to be. im a refrigeration tech, not cryo.
>> because cryo isnt refrigeration.
>
> Then why did you deign to discuss it?
because it was irrelevant to our discussion. just another red herring in a
pitiful attempt at spinning the topic away from your own ignorance.
"two valves and a pipe" BUWAHAHA! :-)
> I'm afraid you'll have to point the 'continues'
> part out to us... nobody else here sees this.
lol LIAR. you just cant stop referencing my man parts. lol.
> Your command of TLA's is almost as amazing
> as your ignorance of your limitations... we can
> all see you hiding behind them, like they were
> the be-all and end-all of your schooling.
TRANSLATION --> "i dont even know the basic terminology nate" LOL
> Once again, if you'll relate what you think
> PMB means, I'll relate how I already know
> something about it.
TRANSLATION --> "please give me something i can google so i can pretend to
know something" :-)
> Time is no object... I spec'ed a usable
> substitute. In no way was I supposed
> to spec the *best* substitute... only
> a usable one.
LIAR! you gave me nothing but WRONG answers! you havent in any way given
me any reasonable solution. when you own it, ill give you the proper
answer.
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...04362e0709ebbd
and youre just as wrong back then! :-) you canNOT just bypass it.
>> and it doesnt matter, so long as it is in the system there is required
>> regulation so choke on that for a bit. :-)
>
> The TEV or Klixon will handle that... or didn't
> you realize this?
you utter FOOL! the expansion valve has NOTHING to do with regulating
pressure into the condensor.
>> LIAR! you said "two valves and a pipe" BUWHAHA! :-)
>
> How does this substitute for a three-port
> device? I was subbing for a two-port one!
NO. you were ------- up across the board. :-)
> Two-port device! Simple head pressure control
> application... no bypass.
youre WRONG -------. you have to regulate both ways.....or come up with
another PAINFULLY simple way of making the pressure regulate itself.....
BUWAHAHA! just own it boy, and ill give it to you. :-)
> Turns out that I was right on... and you were
> 'out in the cold, stuck on the roof'.
lol you fool, i was down in less than 10 minutes where your solution would
have meant spoiled product because it wouldnt work.
> I kicked your *** with it.
HA! tell me boy, when does 134a become restricted? and when is its patent
dated to expire?
>> i want to see ANYTHING from you that qualifies you to work on cryo or
>> refrigeration.
>
> I'm wiping the floor with you now, doesn't
> that qualify?
TRANSLATION --> "i can produce no proof because im LYING nate"
> You're the idiot cranking valves on
> the roof!
LIAR! that was YOUR recommendation! it was your failed solution that you
now sit and try to lie your way out of. :-)
>> LIAR! you can buy all you want throughout central america to include
>> mexico.
>
> I said 'civilized', moron...
ah, so mexico isnt a civilized nation? you fool. mexico doesnt play your
liberal games.
> My bad... manufacturing phaseout is due
> by January 2010. Sorry for the mistake.
just one of an endless list of your ---- ups.
> So all systems don't have the valve? Does
> an icemaker have the valve?
TRANSLATION --> "more smoke and mirrors"
ice machines are irrelevant as they have no need for either.
> no certification is required to work on
> cryogenic refrigeration systems that use
> non-harmful gasses. Satisfied? I am...
so if you know something about it, give me the settings on the FCC (CC =
cycle control, now google it and try to figure it out).
>> lol LIAR. you were never a chief site tech over anything cryo. you cant
>> even tell me what the PMB is, much less the adjustment proceedure.
>
> Well, you got the '***' part of 'assertion' right
TRANSLATION --> "youre right nate, i cannot answer the question"
> This is the second time you've attempted to hide
> behind a three-letter acronym... this makes you
> a jerk.
lol this just means im kicking your *** with your own ignorance. if you
knew anything about what you speak you would already know what they mean.
> Working pressures:
> <>
> The helium is
> sprayed in at 200psi, then pumped out by
> the fiber pistons at 65psi...
BZZT! NOT what im looking for!
> How can a person lie
you sure do manage.
> Read the polls, and suck them up. The lamest of
> lame duck presidencies is going down the tubes
> spectacularly, and the history books will have a
> field day with it. This one will stink for generations,
> count on it. And you're one of the ones we can
> thank for it!
lol.....polls my ***. you lost boy! :-)
> I confuse R22 and R12
no ----. you confuse many things because youre a liar with no real
experience.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:kyzKe.510$8c.446@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com.. .
>> cryo is its own specialized segment. cryo is not considered
> refrigeration.
>
> Another howler
and it doesnt change ----, liar. cryo is not refrigeration.
>> i have from the beginning.
>
> Not in the post where you made the boast!
TRANSLATION --> "i leave ---- out when i need to in order to try to make my
LIES stick, nate"
no ----.
> I've already spec'ed 'em... go back and read,
LIAR! you havent even told me what they are yet. just give me the settings
on the FCC stevie. ill give you a hint, the CC stands for "cycle control"
lol. you cant because you know NOTHING of cryo. :-)
> And just what gives you the right to speak with
> authority on atmospheric science?
thats just it stool, ive never attempted to speak with authority. ive
stated from the BEGINNING that its all belief and speculation. only LIARS
like you try to claim it as fact.
>> it is as it relates to refrigeration, which is the topic of our
> discussion.
>
> Physics, Nate
TRANSLATION --> "ill throw out smoke and mirrors because i have no response"
> How about this one?
> http://www.pe.gatech.edu/conted/serv...?COURSE_ID=543
>
> loser...
you STUPID and ignorant fool, that is a CRYO CLASS! i asked you for an
HVAC/R course that included cryo. ive already stated long ago that cryo was
its own specialized segment therefore its a given that it would have its own
classes. your claim is that its "refrigeration" which is why i want to see
it as part of an hvac/r standard curriculum. YOU LOSE, liar.
>> that does not make me qualified to work on it. as i said above, i never
>> said ---- about _knowledge_, my statement was about qualifications.
>
> Spin! More spin!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot respond to your statement that kicked my ***,
nate"
> Are you qualified to work on
> cryogenic refrigeration?
no, and i never claimed to be. im a refrigeration tech, not cryo.
>> because cryo isnt refrigeration.
>
> Then why did you deign to discuss it?
because it was irrelevant to our discussion. just another red herring in a
pitiful attempt at spinning the topic away from your own ignorance.
"two valves and a pipe" BUWAHAHA! :-)
> I'm afraid you'll have to point the 'continues'
> part out to us... nobody else here sees this.
lol LIAR. you just cant stop referencing my man parts. lol.
> Your command of TLA's is almost as amazing
> as your ignorance of your limitations... we can
> all see you hiding behind them, like they were
> the be-all and end-all of your schooling.
TRANSLATION --> "i dont even know the basic terminology nate" LOL
> Once again, if you'll relate what you think
> PMB means, I'll relate how I already know
> something about it.
TRANSLATION --> "please give me something i can google so i can pretend to
know something" :-)
> Time is no object... I spec'ed a usable
> substitute. In no way was I supposed
> to spec the *best* substitute... only
> a usable one.
LIAR! you gave me nothing but WRONG answers! you havent in any way given
me any reasonable solution. when you own it, ill give you the proper
answer.
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...04362e0709ebbd
and youre just as wrong back then! :-) you canNOT just bypass it.
>> and it doesnt matter, so long as it is in the system there is required
>> regulation so choke on that for a bit. :-)
>
> The TEV or Klixon will handle that... or didn't
> you realize this?
you utter FOOL! the expansion valve has NOTHING to do with regulating
pressure into the condensor.
>> LIAR! you said "two valves and a pipe" BUWHAHA! :-)
>
> How does this substitute for a three-port
> device? I was subbing for a two-port one!
NO. you were ------- up across the board. :-)
> Two-port device! Simple head pressure control
> application... no bypass.
youre WRONG -------. you have to regulate both ways.....or come up with
another PAINFULLY simple way of making the pressure regulate itself.....
BUWAHAHA! just own it boy, and ill give it to you. :-)
> Turns out that I was right on... and you were
> 'out in the cold, stuck on the roof'.
lol you fool, i was down in less than 10 minutes where your solution would
have meant spoiled product because it wouldnt work.
> I kicked your *** with it.
HA! tell me boy, when does 134a become restricted? and when is its patent
dated to expire?
>> i want to see ANYTHING from you that qualifies you to work on cryo or
>> refrigeration.
>
> I'm wiping the floor with you now, doesn't
> that qualify?
TRANSLATION --> "i can produce no proof because im LYING nate"
> You're the idiot cranking valves on
> the roof!
LIAR! that was YOUR recommendation! it was your failed solution that you
now sit and try to lie your way out of. :-)
>> LIAR! you can buy all you want throughout central america to include
>> mexico.
>
> I said 'civilized', moron...
ah, so mexico isnt a civilized nation? you fool. mexico doesnt play your
liberal games.
> My bad... manufacturing phaseout is due
> by January 2010. Sorry for the mistake.
just one of an endless list of your ---- ups.
> So all systems don't have the valve? Does
> an icemaker have the valve?
TRANSLATION --> "more smoke and mirrors"
ice machines are irrelevant as they have no need for either.
> no certification is required to work on
> cryogenic refrigeration systems that use
> non-harmful gasses. Satisfied? I am...
so if you know something about it, give me the settings on the FCC (CC =
cycle control, now google it and try to figure it out).
>> lol LIAR. you were never a chief site tech over anything cryo. you cant
>> even tell me what the PMB is, much less the adjustment proceedure.
>
> Well, you got the '***' part of 'assertion' right
TRANSLATION --> "youre right nate, i cannot answer the question"
> This is the second time you've attempted to hide
> behind a three-letter acronym... this makes you
> a jerk.
lol this just means im kicking your *** with your own ignorance. if you
knew anything about what you speak you would already know what they mean.
> Working pressures:
> <>
> The helium is
> sprayed in at 200psi, then pumped out by
> the fiber pistons at 65psi...
BZZT! NOT what im looking for!
> How can a person lie
you sure do manage.
> Read the polls, and suck them up. The lamest of
> lame duck presidencies is going down the tubes
> spectacularly, and the history books will have a
> field day with it. This one will stink for generations,
> count on it. And you're one of the ones we can
> thank for it!
lol.....polls my ***. you lost boy! :-)
> I confuse R22 and R12
no ----. you confuse many things because youre a liar with no real
experience.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
#4332
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:kyzKe.510$8c.446@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com.. .
>> cryo is its own specialized segment. cryo is not considered
> refrigeration.
>
> Another howler
and it doesnt change ----, liar. cryo is not refrigeration.
>> i have from the beginning.
>
> Not in the post where you made the boast!
TRANSLATION --> "i leave ---- out when i need to in order to try to make my
LIES stick, nate"
no ----.
> I've already spec'ed 'em... go back and read,
LIAR! you havent even told me what they are yet. just give me the settings
on the FCC stevie. ill give you a hint, the CC stands for "cycle control"
lol. you cant because you know NOTHING of cryo. :-)
> And just what gives you the right to speak with
> authority on atmospheric science?
thats just it stool, ive never attempted to speak with authority. ive
stated from the BEGINNING that its all belief and speculation. only LIARS
like you try to claim it as fact.
>> it is as it relates to refrigeration, which is the topic of our
> discussion.
>
> Physics, Nate
TRANSLATION --> "ill throw out smoke and mirrors because i have no response"
> How about this one?
> http://www.pe.gatech.edu/conted/serv...?COURSE_ID=543
>
> loser...
you STUPID and ignorant fool, that is a CRYO CLASS! i asked you for an
HVAC/R course that included cryo. ive already stated long ago that cryo was
its own specialized segment therefore its a given that it would have its own
classes. your claim is that its "refrigeration" which is why i want to see
it as part of an hvac/r standard curriculum. YOU LOSE, liar.
>> that does not make me qualified to work on it. as i said above, i never
>> said ---- about _knowledge_, my statement was about qualifications.
>
> Spin! More spin!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot respond to your statement that kicked my ***,
nate"
> Are you qualified to work on
> cryogenic refrigeration?
no, and i never claimed to be. im a refrigeration tech, not cryo.
>> because cryo isnt refrigeration.
>
> Then why did you deign to discuss it?
because it was irrelevant to our discussion. just another red herring in a
pitiful attempt at spinning the topic away from your own ignorance.
"two valves and a pipe" BUWAHAHA! :-)
> I'm afraid you'll have to point the 'continues'
> part out to us... nobody else here sees this.
lol LIAR. you just cant stop referencing my man parts. lol.
> Your command of TLA's is almost as amazing
> as your ignorance of your limitations... we can
> all see you hiding behind them, like they were
> the be-all and end-all of your schooling.
TRANSLATION --> "i dont even know the basic terminology nate" LOL
> Once again, if you'll relate what you think
> PMB means, I'll relate how I already know
> something about it.
TRANSLATION --> "please give me something i can google so i can pretend to
know something" :-)
> Time is no object... I spec'ed a usable
> substitute. In no way was I supposed
> to spec the *best* substitute... only
> a usable one.
LIAR! you gave me nothing but WRONG answers! you havent in any way given
me any reasonable solution. when you own it, ill give you the proper
answer.
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...04362e0709ebbd
and youre just as wrong back then! :-) you canNOT just bypass it.
>> and it doesnt matter, so long as it is in the system there is required
>> regulation so choke on that for a bit. :-)
>
> The TEV or Klixon will handle that... or didn't
> you realize this?
you utter FOOL! the expansion valve has NOTHING to do with regulating
pressure into the condensor.
>> LIAR! you said "two valves and a pipe" BUWHAHA! :-)
>
> How does this substitute for a three-port
> device? I was subbing for a two-port one!
NO. you were ------- up across the board. :-)
> Two-port device! Simple head pressure control
> application... no bypass.
youre WRONG -------. you have to regulate both ways.....or come up with
another PAINFULLY simple way of making the pressure regulate itself.....
BUWAHAHA! just own it boy, and ill give it to you. :-)
> Turns out that I was right on... and you were
> 'out in the cold, stuck on the roof'.
lol you fool, i was down in less than 10 minutes where your solution would
have meant spoiled product because it wouldnt work.
> I kicked your *** with it.
HA! tell me boy, when does 134a become restricted? and when is its patent
dated to expire?
>> i want to see ANYTHING from you that qualifies you to work on cryo or
>> refrigeration.
>
> I'm wiping the floor with you now, doesn't
> that qualify?
TRANSLATION --> "i can produce no proof because im LYING nate"
> You're the idiot cranking valves on
> the roof!
LIAR! that was YOUR recommendation! it was your failed solution that you
now sit and try to lie your way out of. :-)
>> LIAR! you can buy all you want throughout central america to include
>> mexico.
>
> I said 'civilized', moron...
ah, so mexico isnt a civilized nation? you fool. mexico doesnt play your
liberal games.
> My bad... manufacturing phaseout is due
> by January 2010. Sorry for the mistake.
just one of an endless list of your ---- ups.
> So all systems don't have the valve? Does
> an icemaker have the valve?
TRANSLATION --> "more smoke and mirrors"
ice machines are irrelevant as they have no need for either.
> no certification is required to work on
> cryogenic refrigeration systems that use
> non-harmful gasses. Satisfied? I am...
so if you know something about it, give me the settings on the FCC (CC =
cycle control, now google it and try to figure it out).
>> lol LIAR. you were never a chief site tech over anything cryo. you cant
>> even tell me what the PMB is, much less the adjustment proceedure.
>
> Well, you got the '***' part of 'assertion' right
TRANSLATION --> "youre right nate, i cannot answer the question"
> This is the second time you've attempted to hide
> behind a three-letter acronym... this makes you
> a jerk.
lol this just means im kicking your *** with your own ignorance. if you
knew anything about what you speak you would already know what they mean.
> Working pressures:
> <>
> The helium is
> sprayed in at 200psi, then pumped out by
> the fiber pistons at 65psi...
BZZT! NOT what im looking for!
> How can a person lie
you sure do manage.
> Read the polls, and suck them up. The lamest of
> lame duck presidencies is going down the tubes
> spectacularly, and the history books will have a
> field day with it. This one will stink for generations,
> count on it. And you're one of the ones we can
> thank for it!
lol.....polls my ***. you lost boy! :-)
> I confuse R22 and R12
no ----. you confuse many things because youre a liar with no real
experience.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:kyzKe.510$8c.446@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com.. .
>> cryo is its own specialized segment. cryo is not considered
> refrigeration.
>
> Another howler
and it doesnt change ----, liar. cryo is not refrigeration.
>> i have from the beginning.
>
> Not in the post where you made the boast!
TRANSLATION --> "i leave ---- out when i need to in order to try to make my
LIES stick, nate"
no ----.
> I've already spec'ed 'em... go back and read,
LIAR! you havent even told me what they are yet. just give me the settings
on the FCC stevie. ill give you a hint, the CC stands for "cycle control"
lol. you cant because you know NOTHING of cryo. :-)
> And just what gives you the right to speak with
> authority on atmospheric science?
thats just it stool, ive never attempted to speak with authority. ive
stated from the BEGINNING that its all belief and speculation. only LIARS
like you try to claim it as fact.
>> it is as it relates to refrigeration, which is the topic of our
> discussion.
>
> Physics, Nate
TRANSLATION --> "ill throw out smoke and mirrors because i have no response"
> How about this one?
> http://www.pe.gatech.edu/conted/serv...?COURSE_ID=543
>
> loser...
you STUPID and ignorant fool, that is a CRYO CLASS! i asked you for an
HVAC/R course that included cryo. ive already stated long ago that cryo was
its own specialized segment therefore its a given that it would have its own
classes. your claim is that its "refrigeration" which is why i want to see
it as part of an hvac/r standard curriculum. YOU LOSE, liar.
>> that does not make me qualified to work on it. as i said above, i never
>> said ---- about _knowledge_, my statement was about qualifications.
>
> Spin! More spin!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot respond to your statement that kicked my ***,
nate"
> Are you qualified to work on
> cryogenic refrigeration?
no, and i never claimed to be. im a refrigeration tech, not cryo.
>> because cryo isnt refrigeration.
>
> Then why did you deign to discuss it?
because it was irrelevant to our discussion. just another red herring in a
pitiful attempt at spinning the topic away from your own ignorance.
"two valves and a pipe" BUWAHAHA! :-)
> I'm afraid you'll have to point the 'continues'
> part out to us... nobody else here sees this.
lol LIAR. you just cant stop referencing my man parts. lol.
> Your command of TLA's is almost as amazing
> as your ignorance of your limitations... we can
> all see you hiding behind them, like they were
> the be-all and end-all of your schooling.
TRANSLATION --> "i dont even know the basic terminology nate" LOL
> Once again, if you'll relate what you think
> PMB means, I'll relate how I already know
> something about it.
TRANSLATION --> "please give me something i can google so i can pretend to
know something" :-)
> Time is no object... I spec'ed a usable
> substitute. In no way was I supposed
> to spec the *best* substitute... only
> a usable one.
LIAR! you gave me nothing but WRONG answers! you havent in any way given
me any reasonable solution. when you own it, ill give you the proper
answer.
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...04362e0709ebbd
and youre just as wrong back then! :-) you canNOT just bypass it.
>> and it doesnt matter, so long as it is in the system there is required
>> regulation so choke on that for a bit. :-)
>
> The TEV or Klixon will handle that... or didn't
> you realize this?
you utter FOOL! the expansion valve has NOTHING to do with regulating
pressure into the condensor.
>> LIAR! you said "two valves and a pipe" BUWHAHA! :-)
>
> How does this substitute for a three-port
> device? I was subbing for a two-port one!
NO. you were ------- up across the board. :-)
> Two-port device! Simple head pressure control
> application... no bypass.
youre WRONG -------. you have to regulate both ways.....or come up with
another PAINFULLY simple way of making the pressure regulate itself.....
BUWAHAHA! just own it boy, and ill give it to you. :-)
> Turns out that I was right on... and you were
> 'out in the cold, stuck on the roof'.
lol you fool, i was down in less than 10 minutes where your solution would
have meant spoiled product because it wouldnt work.
> I kicked your *** with it.
HA! tell me boy, when does 134a become restricted? and when is its patent
dated to expire?
>> i want to see ANYTHING from you that qualifies you to work on cryo or
>> refrigeration.
>
> I'm wiping the floor with you now, doesn't
> that qualify?
TRANSLATION --> "i can produce no proof because im LYING nate"
> You're the idiot cranking valves on
> the roof!
LIAR! that was YOUR recommendation! it was your failed solution that you
now sit and try to lie your way out of. :-)
>> LIAR! you can buy all you want throughout central america to include
>> mexico.
>
> I said 'civilized', moron...
ah, so mexico isnt a civilized nation? you fool. mexico doesnt play your
liberal games.
> My bad... manufacturing phaseout is due
> by January 2010. Sorry for the mistake.
just one of an endless list of your ---- ups.
> So all systems don't have the valve? Does
> an icemaker have the valve?
TRANSLATION --> "more smoke and mirrors"
ice machines are irrelevant as they have no need for either.
> no certification is required to work on
> cryogenic refrigeration systems that use
> non-harmful gasses. Satisfied? I am...
so if you know something about it, give me the settings on the FCC (CC =
cycle control, now google it and try to figure it out).
>> lol LIAR. you were never a chief site tech over anything cryo. you cant
>> even tell me what the PMB is, much less the adjustment proceedure.
>
> Well, you got the '***' part of 'assertion' right
TRANSLATION --> "youre right nate, i cannot answer the question"
> This is the second time you've attempted to hide
> behind a three-letter acronym... this makes you
> a jerk.
lol this just means im kicking your *** with your own ignorance. if you
knew anything about what you speak you would already know what they mean.
> Working pressures:
> <>
> The helium is
> sprayed in at 200psi, then pumped out by
> the fiber pistons at 65psi...
BZZT! NOT what im looking for!
> How can a person lie
you sure do manage.
> Read the polls, and suck them up. The lamest of
> lame duck presidencies is going down the tubes
> spectacularly, and the history books will have a
> field day with it. This one will stink for generations,
> count on it. And you're one of the ones we can
> thank for it!
lol.....polls my ***. you lost boy! :-)
> I confuse R22 and R12
no ----. you confuse many things because youre a liar with no real
experience.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
#4333
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:kyzKe.510$8c.446@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com.. .
>> cryo is its own specialized segment. cryo is not considered
> refrigeration.
>
> Another howler
and it doesnt change ----, liar. cryo is not refrigeration.
>> i have from the beginning.
>
> Not in the post where you made the boast!
TRANSLATION --> "i leave ---- out when i need to in order to try to make my
LIES stick, nate"
no ----.
> I've already spec'ed 'em... go back and read,
LIAR! you havent even told me what they are yet. just give me the settings
on the FCC stevie. ill give you a hint, the CC stands for "cycle control"
lol. you cant because you know NOTHING of cryo. :-)
> And just what gives you the right to speak with
> authority on atmospheric science?
thats just it stool, ive never attempted to speak with authority. ive
stated from the BEGINNING that its all belief and speculation. only LIARS
like you try to claim it as fact.
>> it is as it relates to refrigeration, which is the topic of our
> discussion.
>
> Physics, Nate
TRANSLATION --> "ill throw out smoke and mirrors because i have no response"
> How about this one?
> http://www.pe.gatech.edu/conted/serv...?COURSE_ID=543
>
> loser...
you STUPID and ignorant fool, that is a CRYO CLASS! i asked you for an
HVAC/R course that included cryo. ive already stated long ago that cryo was
its own specialized segment therefore its a given that it would have its own
classes. your claim is that its "refrigeration" which is why i want to see
it as part of an hvac/r standard curriculum. YOU LOSE, liar.
>> that does not make me qualified to work on it. as i said above, i never
>> said ---- about _knowledge_, my statement was about qualifications.
>
> Spin! More spin!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot respond to your statement that kicked my ***,
nate"
> Are you qualified to work on
> cryogenic refrigeration?
no, and i never claimed to be. im a refrigeration tech, not cryo.
>> because cryo isnt refrigeration.
>
> Then why did you deign to discuss it?
because it was irrelevant to our discussion. just another red herring in a
pitiful attempt at spinning the topic away from your own ignorance.
"two valves and a pipe" BUWAHAHA! :-)
> I'm afraid you'll have to point the 'continues'
> part out to us... nobody else here sees this.
lol LIAR. you just cant stop referencing my man parts. lol.
> Your command of TLA's is almost as amazing
> as your ignorance of your limitations... we can
> all see you hiding behind them, like they were
> the be-all and end-all of your schooling.
TRANSLATION --> "i dont even know the basic terminology nate" LOL
> Once again, if you'll relate what you think
> PMB means, I'll relate how I already know
> something about it.
TRANSLATION --> "please give me something i can google so i can pretend to
know something" :-)
> Time is no object... I spec'ed a usable
> substitute. In no way was I supposed
> to spec the *best* substitute... only
> a usable one.
LIAR! you gave me nothing but WRONG answers! you havent in any way given
me any reasonable solution. when you own it, ill give you the proper
answer.
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...04362e0709ebbd
and youre just as wrong back then! :-) you canNOT just bypass it.
>> and it doesnt matter, so long as it is in the system there is required
>> regulation so choke on that for a bit. :-)
>
> The TEV or Klixon will handle that... or didn't
> you realize this?
you utter FOOL! the expansion valve has NOTHING to do with regulating
pressure into the condensor.
>> LIAR! you said "two valves and a pipe" BUWHAHA! :-)
>
> How does this substitute for a three-port
> device? I was subbing for a two-port one!
NO. you were ------- up across the board. :-)
> Two-port device! Simple head pressure control
> application... no bypass.
youre WRONG -------. you have to regulate both ways.....or come up with
another PAINFULLY simple way of making the pressure regulate itself.....
BUWAHAHA! just own it boy, and ill give it to you. :-)
> Turns out that I was right on... and you were
> 'out in the cold, stuck on the roof'.
lol you fool, i was down in less than 10 minutes where your solution would
have meant spoiled product because it wouldnt work.
> I kicked your *** with it.
HA! tell me boy, when does 134a become restricted? and when is its patent
dated to expire?
>> i want to see ANYTHING from you that qualifies you to work on cryo or
>> refrigeration.
>
> I'm wiping the floor with you now, doesn't
> that qualify?
TRANSLATION --> "i can produce no proof because im LYING nate"
> You're the idiot cranking valves on
> the roof!
LIAR! that was YOUR recommendation! it was your failed solution that you
now sit and try to lie your way out of. :-)
>> LIAR! you can buy all you want throughout central america to include
>> mexico.
>
> I said 'civilized', moron...
ah, so mexico isnt a civilized nation? you fool. mexico doesnt play your
liberal games.
> My bad... manufacturing phaseout is due
> by January 2010. Sorry for the mistake.
just one of an endless list of your ---- ups.
> So all systems don't have the valve? Does
> an icemaker have the valve?
TRANSLATION --> "more smoke and mirrors"
ice machines are irrelevant as they have no need for either.
> no certification is required to work on
> cryogenic refrigeration systems that use
> non-harmful gasses. Satisfied? I am...
so if you know something about it, give me the settings on the FCC (CC =
cycle control, now google it and try to figure it out).
>> lol LIAR. you were never a chief site tech over anything cryo. you cant
>> even tell me what the PMB is, much less the adjustment proceedure.
>
> Well, you got the '***' part of 'assertion' right
TRANSLATION --> "youre right nate, i cannot answer the question"
> This is the second time you've attempted to hide
> behind a three-letter acronym... this makes you
> a jerk.
lol this just means im kicking your *** with your own ignorance. if you
knew anything about what you speak you would already know what they mean.
> Working pressures:
> <>
> The helium is
> sprayed in at 200psi, then pumped out by
> the fiber pistons at 65psi...
BZZT! NOT what im looking for!
> How can a person lie
you sure do manage.
> Read the polls, and suck them up. The lamest of
> lame duck presidencies is going down the tubes
> spectacularly, and the history books will have a
> field day with it. This one will stink for generations,
> count on it. And you're one of the ones we can
> thank for it!
lol.....polls my ***. you lost boy! :-)
> I confuse R22 and R12
no ----. you confuse many things because youre a liar with no real
experience.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:kyzKe.510$8c.446@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com.. .
>> cryo is its own specialized segment. cryo is not considered
> refrigeration.
>
> Another howler
and it doesnt change ----, liar. cryo is not refrigeration.
>> i have from the beginning.
>
> Not in the post where you made the boast!
TRANSLATION --> "i leave ---- out when i need to in order to try to make my
LIES stick, nate"
no ----.
> I've already spec'ed 'em... go back and read,
LIAR! you havent even told me what they are yet. just give me the settings
on the FCC stevie. ill give you a hint, the CC stands for "cycle control"
lol. you cant because you know NOTHING of cryo. :-)
> And just what gives you the right to speak with
> authority on atmospheric science?
thats just it stool, ive never attempted to speak with authority. ive
stated from the BEGINNING that its all belief and speculation. only LIARS
like you try to claim it as fact.
>> it is as it relates to refrigeration, which is the topic of our
> discussion.
>
> Physics, Nate
TRANSLATION --> "ill throw out smoke and mirrors because i have no response"
> How about this one?
> http://www.pe.gatech.edu/conted/serv...?COURSE_ID=543
>
> loser...
you STUPID and ignorant fool, that is a CRYO CLASS! i asked you for an
HVAC/R course that included cryo. ive already stated long ago that cryo was
its own specialized segment therefore its a given that it would have its own
classes. your claim is that its "refrigeration" which is why i want to see
it as part of an hvac/r standard curriculum. YOU LOSE, liar.
>> that does not make me qualified to work on it. as i said above, i never
>> said ---- about _knowledge_, my statement was about qualifications.
>
> Spin! More spin!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot respond to your statement that kicked my ***,
nate"
> Are you qualified to work on
> cryogenic refrigeration?
no, and i never claimed to be. im a refrigeration tech, not cryo.
>> because cryo isnt refrigeration.
>
> Then why did you deign to discuss it?
because it was irrelevant to our discussion. just another red herring in a
pitiful attempt at spinning the topic away from your own ignorance.
"two valves and a pipe" BUWAHAHA! :-)
> I'm afraid you'll have to point the 'continues'
> part out to us... nobody else here sees this.
lol LIAR. you just cant stop referencing my man parts. lol.
> Your command of TLA's is almost as amazing
> as your ignorance of your limitations... we can
> all see you hiding behind them, like they were
> the be-all and end-all of your schooling.
TRANSLATION --> "i dont even know the basic terminology nate" LOL
> Once again, if you'll relate what you think
> PMB means, I'll relate how I already know
> something about it.
TRANSLATION --> "please give me something i can google so i can pretend to
know something" :-)
> Time is no object... I spec'ed a usable
> substitute. In no way was I supposed
> to spec the *best* substitute... only
> a usable one.
LIAR! you gave me nothing but WRONG answers! you havent in any way given
me any reasonable solution. when you own it, ill give you the proper
answer.
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...04362e0709ebbd
and youre just as wrong back then! :-) you canNOT just bypass it.
>> and it doesnt matter, so long as it is in the system there is required
>> regulation so choke on that for a bit. :-)
>
> The TEV or Klixon will handle that... or didn't
> you realize this?
you utter FOOL! the expansion valve has NOTHING to do with regulating
pressure into the condensor.
>> LIAR! you said "two valves and a pipe" BUWHAHA! :-)
>
> How does this substitute for a three-port
> device? I was subbing for a two-port one!
NO. you were ------- up across the board. :-)
> Two-port device! Simple head pressure control
> application... no bypass.
youre WRONG -------. you have to regulate both ways.....or come up with
another PAINFULLY simple way of making the pressure regulate itself.....
BUWAHAHA! just own it boy, and ill give it to you. :-)
> Turns out that I was right on... and you were
> 'out in the cold, stuck on the roof'.
lol you fool, i was down in less than 10 minutes where your solution would
have meant spoiled product because it wouldnt work.
> I kicked your *** with it.
HA! tell me boy, when does 134a become restricted? and when is its patent
dated to expire?
>> i want to see ANYTHING from you that qualifies you to work on cryo or
>> refrigeration.
>
> I'm wiping the floor with you now, doesn't
> that qualify?
TRANSLATION --> "i can produce no proof because im LYING nate"
> You're the idiot cranking valves on
> the roof!
LIAR! that was YOUR recommendation! it was your failed solution that you
now sit and try to lie your way out of. :-)
>> LIAR! you can buy all you want throughout central america to include
>> mexico.
>
> I said 'civilized', moron...
ah, so mexico isnt a civilized nation? you fool. mexico doesnt play your
liberal games.
> My bad... manufacturing phaseout is due
> by January 2010. Sorry for the mistake.
just one of an endless list of your ---- ups.
> So all systems don't have the valve? Does
> an icemaker have the valve?
TRANSLATION --> "more smoke and mirrors"
ice machines are irrelevant as they have no need for either.
> no certification is required to work on
> cryogenic refrigeration systems that use
> non-harmful gasses. Satisfied? I am...
so if you know something about it, give me the settings on the FCC (CC =
cycle control, now google it and try to figure it out).
>> lol LIAR. you were never a chief site tech over anything cryo. you cant
>> even tell me what the PMB is, much less the adjustment proceedure.
>
> Well, you got the '***' part of 'assertion' right
TRANSLATION --> "youre right nate, i cannot answer the question"
> This is the second time you've attempted to hide
> behind a three-letter acronym... this makes you
> a jerk.
lol this just means im kicking your *** with your own ignorance. if you
knew anything about what you speak you would already know what they mean.
> Working pressures:
> <>
> The helium is
> sprayed in at 200psi, then pumped out by
> the fiber pistons at 65psi...
BZZT! NOT what im looking for!
> How can a person lie
you sure do manage.
> Read the polls, and suck them up. The lamest of
> lame duck presidencies is going down the tubes
> spectacularly, and the history books will have a
> field day with it. This one will stink for generations,
> count on it. And you're one of the ones we can
> thank for it!
lol.....polls my ***. you lost boy! :-)
> I confuse R22 and R12
no ----. you confuse many things because youre a liar with no real
experience.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
#4334
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42FACE56.1222A9F@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:42FA74C8.8767BAD0@***.net...
> > > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You didn't try to tell us what an arcsin does...
> > > > we notice these things around here.
> >
> > Absence of arcsin explanation *again* noted...
> > jeez, Bill, at least Google it and paste something!
> >
> > > > The whole point of this exercise was to see if
> > > > you had an elementary grasp of math... it's
> > > > painfully obvious that you don't. Please
> > > > refrain from making claims about it in the
> > > > future.
> >
> > > This is the equation you have me to compute the volume of a
> > > cylinder shape fuel storage tank with a stick: "(pi*(r^2)*L)/2" which
> > > everyone would know would only work if the stick stuck half it's
length.
> > > And you tell me my math is elementary?????? <ROTFLMAO>
> >
> > No, Bill... the conditions were to *explain* the
> > derivation of the equation, not to post an equation
> > garnered from Google. You couldn't do this, and
> > every time you opened your mouth you proved
> > beyond a shadow of a doubt that if you ever had
> > any math courses, the knowlege had left you.
> > The equation you quote is for the half-full case,
> > my first hint to you. Go back and read, if you can.
> > __
> > Steve
> > "i recognize my limitations and
> > immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
> > .
> "Absence of arcsin explanation *again* noted..." That's because I
> switched to an easier formula that uses cosine, of course as I guessed
> you're just too stupid to comprehend.
That doesn't mean that you can't give us a
simple explanation of what an arcsin does,
does it? Unless, of course, you don't have
a clue... such a simple function! Put in a
sin, get out an angle...
> What is it you do for money? It's got to be some government make
> job, hand out. One that's Bullsh*t like the rest of bleeding hear
> liberal that suck the Real tax payers dry.
Keep it up! Hearts and minds tumble when
you speak your trash. Ossification of the
cranium... leads to neo-conism. You're a
con-head!
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
#4335
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42FACE56.1222A9F@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:42FA74C8.8767BAD0@***.net...
> > > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You didn't try to tell us what an arcsin does...
> > > > we notice these things around here.
> >
> > Absence of arcsin explanation *again* noted...
> > jeez, Bill, at least Google it and paste something!
> >
> > > > The whole point of this exercise was to see if
> > > > you had an elementary grasp of math... it's
> > > > painfully obvious that you don't. Please
> > > > refrain from making claims about it in the
> > > > future.
> >
> > > This is the equation you have me to compute the volume of a
> > > cylinder shape fuel storage tank with a stick: "(pi*(r^2)*L)/2" which
> > > everyone would know would only work if the stick stuck half it's
length.
> > > And you tell me my math is elementary?????? <ROTFLMAO>
> >
> > No, Bill... the conditions were to *explain* the
> > derivation of the equation, not to post an equation
> > garnered from Google. You couldn't do this, and
> > every time you opened your mouth you proved
> > beyond a shadow of a doubt that if you ever had
> > any math courses, the knowlege had left you.
> > The equation you quote is for the half-full case,
> > my first hint to you. Go back and read, if you can.
> > __
> > Steve
> > "i recognize my limitations and
> > immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
> > .
> "Absence of arcsin explanation *again* noted..." That's because I
> switched to an easier formula that uses cosine, of course as I guessed
> you're just too stupid to comprehend.
That doesn't mean that you can't give us a
simple explanation of what an arcsin does,
does it? Unless, of course, you don't have
a clue... such a simple function! Put in a
sin, get out an angle...
> What is it you do for money? It's got to be some government make
> job, hand out. One that's Bullsh*t like the rest of bleeding hear
> liberal that suck the Real tax payers dry.
Keep it up! Hearts and minds tumble when
you speak your trash. Ossification of the
cranium... leads to neo-conism. You're a
con-head!
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
#4336
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42FACE56.1222A9F@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:42FA74C8.8767BAD0@***.net...
> > > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You didn't try to tell us what an arcsin does...
> > > > we notice these things around here.
> >
> > Absence of arcsin explanation *again* noted...
> > jeez, Bill, at least Google it and paste something!
> >
> > > > The whole point of this exercise was to see if
> > > > you had an elementary grasp of math... it's
> > > > painfully obvious that you don't. Please
> > > > refrain from making claims about it in the
> > > > future.
> >
> > > This is the equation you have me to compute the volume of a
> > > cylinder shape fuel storage tank with a stick: "(pi*(r^2)*L)/2" which
> > > everyone would know would only work if the stick stuck half it's
length.
> > > And you tell me my math is elementary?????? <ROTFLMAO>
> >
> > No, Bill... the conditions were to *explain* the
> > derivation of the equation, not to post an equation
> > garnered from Google. You couldn't do this, and
> > every time you opened your mouth you proved
> > beyond a shadow of a doubt that if you ever had
> > any math courses, the knowlege had left you.
> > The equation you quote is for the half-full case,
> > my first hint to you. Go back and read, if you can.
> > __
> > Steve
> > "i recognize my limitations and
> > immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
> > .
> "Absence of arcsin explanation *again* noted..." That's because I
> switched to an easier formula that uses cosine, of course as I guessed
> you're just too stupid to comprehend.
That doesn't mean that you can't give us a
simple explanation of what an arcsin does,
does it? Unless, of course, you don't have
a clue... such a simple function! Put in a
sin, get out an angle...
> What is it you do for money? It's got to be some government make
> job, hand out. One that's Bullsh*t like the rest of bleeding hear
> liberal that suck the Real tax payers dry.
Keep it up! Hearts and minds tumble when
you speak your trash. Ossification of the
cranium... leads to neo-conism. You're a
con-head!
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
#4337
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42FACE56.1222A9F@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:42FA74C8.8767BAD0@***.net...
> > > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You didn't try to tell us what an arcsin does...
> > > > we notice these things around here.
> >
> > Absence of arcsin explanation *again* noted...
> > jeez, Bill, at least Google it and paste something!
> >
> > > > The whole point of this exercise was to see if
> > > > you had an elementary grasp of math... it's
> > > > painfully obvious that you don't. Please
> > > > refrain from making claims about it in the
> > > > future.
> >
> > > This is the equation you have me to compute the volume of a
> > > cylinder shape fuel storage tank with a stick: "(pi*(r^2)*L)/2" which
> > > everyone would know would only work if the stick stuck half it's
length.
> > > And you tell me my math is elementary?????? <ROTFLMAO>
> >
> > No, Bill... the conditions were to *explain* the
> > derivation of the equation, not to post an equation
> > garnered from Google. You couldn't do this, and
> > every time you opened your mouth you proved
> > beyond a shadow of a doubt that if you ever had
> > any math courses, the knowlege had left you.
> > The equation you quote is for the half-full case,
> > my first hint to you. Go back and read, if you can.
> > __
> > Steve
> > "i recognize my limitations and
> > immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
> > .
> "Absence of arcsin explanation *again* noted..." That's because I
> switched to an easier formula that uses cosine, of course as I guessed
> you're just too stupid to comprehend.
That doesn't mean that you can't give us a
simple explanation of what an arcsin does,
does it? Unless, of course, you don't have
a clue... such a simple function! Put in a
sin, get out an angle...
> What is it you do for money? It's got to be some government make
> job, hand out. One that's Bullsh*t like the rest of bleeding hear
> liberal that suck the Real tax payers dry.
Keep it up! Hearts and minds tumble when
you speak your trash. Ossification of the
cranium... leads to neo-conism. You're a
con-head!
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
#4338
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
inverse sine
ArcSin[z] = (-I) Log[I z + Sqrt[1 - z^2]]
Now go back to sucking off the government, you free loading loser.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> That doesn't mean that you can't give us a
> simple explanation of what an arcsin does,
> does it? Unless, of course, you don't have
> a clue... such a simple function! Put in a
> sin, get out an angle...
>
> Keep it up! Hearts and minds tumble when
> you speak your trash. Ossification of the
> cranium... leads to neo-conism. You're a
> con-head!
> __
> Steve
ArcSin[z] = (-I) Log[I z + Sqrt[1 - z^2]]
Now go back to sucking off the government, you free loading loser.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> That doesn't mean that you can't give us a
> simple explanation of what an arcsin does,
> does it? Unless, of course, you don't have
> a clue... such a simple function! Put in a
> sin, get out an angle...
>
> Keep it up! Hearts and minds tumble when
> you speak your trash. Ossification of the
> cranium... leads to neo-conism. You're a
> con-head!
> __
> Steve
#4339
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
inverse sine
ArcSin[z] = (-I) Log[I z + Sqrt[1 - z^2]]
Now go back to sucking off the government, you free loading loser.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> That doesn't mean that you can't give us a
> simple explanation of what an arcsin does,
> does it? Unless, of course, you don't have
> a clue... such a simple function! Put in a
> sin, get out an angle...
>
> Keep it up! Hearts and minds tumble when
> you speak your trash. Ossification of the
> cranium... leads to neo-conism. You're a
> con-head!
> __
> Steve
ArcSin[z] = (-I) Log[I z + Sqrt[1 - z^2]]
Now go back to sucking off the government, you free loading loser.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> That doesn't mean that you can't give us a
> simple explanation of what an arcsin does,
> does it? Unless, of course, you don't have
> a clue... such a simple function! Put in a
> sin, get out an angle...
>
> Keep it up! Hearts and minds tumble when
> you speak your trash. Ossification of the
> cranium... leads to neo-conism. You're a
> con-head!
> __
> Steve
#4340
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
inverse sine
ArcSin[z] = (-I) Log[I z + Sqrt[1 - z^2]]
Now go back to sucking off the government, you free loading loser.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> That doesn't mean that you can't give us a
> simple explanation of what an arcsin does,
> does it? Unless, of course, you don't have
> a clue... such a simple function! Put in a
> sin, get out an angle...
>
> Keep it up! Hearts and minds tumble when
> you speak your trash. Ossification of the
> cranium... leads to neo-conism. You're a
> con-head!
> __
> Steve
ArcSin[z] = (-I) Log[I z + Sqrt[1 - z^2]]
Now go back to sucking off the government, you free loading loser.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> That doesn't mean that you can't give us a
> simple explanation of what an arcsin does,
> does it? Unless, of course, you don't have
> a clue... such a simple function! Put in a
> sin, get out an angle...
>
> Keep it up! Hearts and minds tumble when
> you speak your trash. Ossification of the
> cranium... leads to neo-conism. You're a
> con-head!
> __
> Steve