134a Refrigerant
#4381
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
You are like that Mother blaming her son's death on President Bush,
you don't have a clue! What a loser!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> But do you *understand* it, Bill? BTW,
> thanks for Iraq.
> __
> Steve
you don't have a clue! What a loser!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> But do you *understand* it, Bill? BTW,
> thanks for Iraq.
> __
> Steve
#4382
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
What a loser!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Better yet! No words at all... and
> no lying!
> __
> Steve
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Better yet! No words at all... and
> no lying!
> __
> Steve
#4383
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
What a loser!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Better yet! No words at all... and
> no lying!
> __
> Steve
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Better yet! No words at all... and
> no lying!
> __
> Steve
#4384
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
What a loser!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Better yet! No words at all... and
> no lying!
> __
> Steve
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Better yet! No words at all... and
> no lying!
> __
> Steve
#4385
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
What a loser!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Better yet! No words at all... and
> no lying!
> __
> Steve
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Better yet! No words at all... and
> no lying!
> __
> Steve
#4386
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11g1j4ltme2go64@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:yh1Me.2481$Hn3.1971@newssvr23.news.prodigy.ne t...
> >>> "What is that, High Mobility Coupling?"
> >
> >>Liar.
> >
> > Lack of any response noted. ***** busted.
>
> those were YOUR words, liar.
But you had to lie again, and say:
<>
ALL you said was:
"> What is that, High Mobility Coupling?"
</>
Patently a lie, since I showed the original
post:
<>
What is that, High Mobility Coupling? Like a big double-thick
steel-braided hose? We had two of those on the radiotelescope
dish (they always come in pairs in your line of business!).
Do you mean the coupling is in a pinch, or that you're in
a pinch to replace it?
</>
You lie, like a dog.
> > Things are starting to look bad for you
>
>more -------- smoke
and lies, as well. Down the tubes, Nate.
> > And of course, I posted this way back
> > on July 5:
>
> irrelevant.
Not irrelevant when it shows you *LYING*.
You *LIED*. You're a proven *LIAR*.
> >> > A piece of pipe... you have my answer.
> >>
> >> lol and its WRONG! :-)
> >
> > We no longer believe a damn thing
> > you write
>
> lol....youre speaking for yourself
Yeah, and that's plenty, let me assure
you. And I speak the truth, and know
of which I speak... in contrast to you.
> > when
> > you referred to the three-port device?
>
> i never referenced this as having anything to do with our discussion,
liar.
> i simply mentioned they existed and that you couldnt handle discussing
them.
Another lie! You said the two valves were
for regulating the flow and the bypass!
What a numbskull!
> >> lol so now youre recommendation changes yet AGAIN! :-) first you say
> >> two
> >> valves and a pipe to regulate pressures
> >
> > Never said it
>
> liar. your implication was clear.
Nope... you can't connect two valves
and a pipe, and end up with a Y
arrangement... it's physically impossible.
Maybe you're not lying here... just incredibly
dense.
> >> hey ------- dumbass, you still have to regulate bypass to maintain
> > condensor
> >> pressure.
> >
> > We no longer believe a thing you write.
>
> and youre still pitifully wrong.
Doesn't matter... you have no credibility.
I wouldn't let you work on my toenail clippers.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..
#4387
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11g1j4ltme2go64@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:yh1Me.2481$Hn3.1971@newssvr23.news.prodigy.ne t...
> >>> "What is that, High Mobility Coupling?"
> >
> >>Liar.
> >
> > Lack of any response noted. ***** busted.
>
> those were YOUR words, liar.
But you had to lie again, and say:
<>
ALL you said was:
"> What is that, High Mobility Coupling?"
</>
Patently a lie, since I showed the original
post:
<>
What is that, High Mobility Coupling? Like a big double-thick
steel-braided hose? We had two of those on the radiotelescope
dish (they always come in pairs in your line of business!).
Do you mean the coupling is in a pinch, or that you're in
a pinch to replace it?
</>
You lie, like a dog.
> > Things are starting to look bad for you
>
>more -------- smoke
and lies, as well. Down the tubes, Nate.
> > And of course, I posted this way back
> > on July 5:
>
> irrelevant.
Not irrelevant when it shows you *LYING*.
You *LIED*. You're a proven *LIAR*.
> >> > A piece of pipe... you have my answer.
> >>
> >> lol and its WRONG! :-)
> >
> > We no longer believe a damn thing
> > you write
>
> lol....youre speaking for yourself
Yeah, and that's plenty, let me assure
you. And I speak the truth, and know
of which I speak... in contrast to you.
> > when
> > you referred to the three-port device?
>
> i never referenced this as having anything to do with our discussion,
liar.
> i simply mentioned they existed and that you couldnt handle discussing
them.
Another lie! You said the two valves were
for regulating the flow and the bypass!
What a numbskull!
> >> lol so now youre recommendation changes yet AGAIN! :-) first you say
> >> two
> >> valves and a pipe to regulate pressures
> >
> > Never said it
>
> liar. your implication was clear.
Nope... you can't connect two valves
and a pipe, and end up with a Y
arrangement... it's physically impossible.
Maybe you're not lying here... just incredibly
dense.
> >> hey ------- dumbass, you still have to regulate bypass to maintain
> > condensor
> >> pressure.
> >
> > We no longer believe a thing you write.
>
> and youre still pitifully wrong.
Doesn't matter... you have no credibility.
I wouldn't let you work on my toenail clippers.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..
#4388
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11g1j4ltme2go64@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:yh1Me.2481$Hn3.1971@newssvr23.news.prodigy.ne t...
> >>> "What is that, High Mobility Coupling?"
> >
> >>Liar.
> >
> > Lack of any response noted. ***** busted.
>
> those were YOUR words, liar.
But you had to lie again, and say:
<>
ALL you said was:
"> What is that, High Mobility Coupling?"
</>
Patently a lie, since I showed the original
post:
<>
What is that, High Mobility Coupling? Like a big double-thick
steel-braided hose? We had two of those on the radiotelescope
dish (they always come in pairs in your line of business!).
Do you mean the coupling is in a pinch, or that you're in
a pinch to replace it?
</>
You lie, like a dog.
> > Things are starting to look bad for you
>
>more -------- smoke
and lies, as well. Down the tubes, Nate.
> > And of course, I posted this way back
> > on July 5:
>
> irrelevant.
Not irrelevant when it shows you *LYING*.
You *LIED*. You're a proven *LIAR*.
> >> > A piece of pipe... you have my answer.
> >>
> >> lol and its WRONG! :-)
> >
> > We no longer believe a damn thing
> > you write
>
> lol....youre speaking for yourself
Yeah, and that's plenty, let me assure
you. And I speak the truth, and know
of which I speak... in contrast to you.
> > when
> > you referred to the three-port device?
>
> i never referenced this as having anything to do with our discussion,
liar.
> i simply mentioned they existed and that you couldnt handle discussing
them.
Another lie! You said the two valves were
for regulating the flow and the bypass!
What a numbskull!
> >> lol so now youre recommendation changes yet AGAIN! :-) first you say
> >> two
> >> valves and a pipe to regulate pressures
> >
> > Never said it
>
> liar. your implication was clear.
Nope... you can't connect two valves
and a pipe, and end up with a Y
arrangement... it's physically impossible.
Maybe you're not lying here... just incredibly
dense.
> >> hey ------- dumbass, you still have to regulate bypass to maintain
> > condensor
> >> pressure.
> >
> > We no longer believe a thing you write.
>
> and youre still pitifully wrong.
Doesn't matter... you have no credibility.
I wouldn't let you work on my toenail clippers.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..
#4389
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11g1j4ltme2go64@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:yh1Me.2481$Hn3.1971@newssvr23.news.prodigy.ne t...
> >>> "What is that, High Mobility Coupling?"
> >
> >>Liar.
> >
> > Lack of any response noted. ***** busted.
>
> those were YOUR words, liar.
But you had to lie again, and say:
<>
ALL you said was:
"> What is that, High Mobility Coupling?"
</>
Patently a lie, since I showed the original
post:
<>
What is that, High Mobility Coupling? Like a big double-thick
steel-braided hose? We had two of those on the radiotelescope
dish (they always come in pairs in your line of business!).
Do you mean the coupling is in a pinch, or that you're in
a pinch to replace it?
</>
You lie, like a dog.
> > Things are starting to look bad for you
>
>more -------- smoke
and lies, as well. Down the tubes, Nate.
> > And of course, I posted this way back
> > on July 5:
>
> irrelevant.
Not irrelevant when it shows you *LYING*.
You *LIED*. You're a proven *LIAR*.
> >> > A piece of pipe... you have my answer.
> >>
> >> lol and its WRONG! :-)
> >
> > We no longer believe a damn thing
> > you write
>
> lol....youre speaking for yourself
Yeah, and that's plenty, let me assure
you. And I speak the truth, and know
of which I speak... in contrast to you.
> > when
> > you referred to the three-port device?
>
> i never referenced this as having anything to do with our discussion,
liar.
> i simply mentioned they existed and that you couldnt handle discussing
them.
Another lie! You said the two valves were
for regulating the flow and the bypass!
What a numbskull!
> >> lol so now youre recommendation changes yet AGAIN! :-) first you say
> >> two
> >> valves and a pipe to regulate pressures
> >
> > Never said it
>
> liar. your implication was clear.
Nope... you can't connect two valves
and a pipe, and end up with a Y
arrangement... it's physically impossible.
Maybe you're not lying here... just incredibly
dense.
> >> hey ------- dumbass, you still have to regulate bypass to maintain
> > condensor
> >> pressure.
> >
> > We no longer believe a thing you write.
>
> and youre still pitifully wrong.
Doesn't matter... you have no credibility.
I wouldn't let you work on my toenail clippers.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..
#4390
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:_YbMe.2977$Hn3.865@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net ...
> Cryogenic refrigeration is not
> refrigeration!
no ----. its what ive been telling you. doesnt matter, you know jack ----
about either. :-)
> They still won't save you
they werent intended to save me. they were intended to choke you and they
did just that. :-)
>> im not qualified to speak with authority
>
> OK, now we're starting to get somewhere!
...and neither are you.
> But it does not give you qualifications in
> atmospheric science
ditto.
>> it is NOT what i asked you for!
>
> I don't give a damn what you asked for...
TRANSLATION --> "youre right, nate"
>> no. i discussed it to show the extent of your foolishness.
>
> Hook, line, and swivel!
exactly. it was quite successful as you jumped right on and tried to LIE
your way through.
>> lol your example is totally foolish!
>
> Trust... we no longer trust you.
TRANSLATION --> "youre right, nate."
>> lol no. it shows your _lack_ of knowledge. i gave you the FCC, and
> clearly
>> stated that the CC stood for "cycle controller". cryo uses no type of
> cycle
>> controller, _at all_. the process is completely different.
>
> As you can see, I didn't bite for your trick
> question.
LIAR! you couldnt find anything on it so you just never answered me. :-)
if you knew anything about cryo refrigeration you would have known
immediately that it uses no type of cycle controller. you lied about your
qualifications, and i exposed you. :-)
> So? Is cryo now refrigeration?
no. its cryogenic refrigeration. totally different process and principle,
totally different science.
>> > You complete IDIOT! The expansion valve
>> > controls the condensor pressure by *releasing*
>> > pressure at the *outlet*.
>>
>> you ------- fool. the expansion valve regulates EVAPORATOR pressure.
>
> And nothing happens *behind* it? Dumbass.
NO. the condensor pressure is regulated only by the pressure of the
compressor discharge. you were WRONG and the diagram i linked you to
clearly shows it. the expansion valve has NOTHING to do with regulating
condensor pressure. ive also quoted your STUPID statement above where you
try to explain that the expansion valve regulates condensor pressure.
BUWAHAHA!!!!! :-)
>> and besides, even in high ambient you have to regulate the bypass or the
>> refrigerant will distribute equally causing low condensor pressures.
>
> No bypass.
you fool, thats what the HMC does. you had better learn at least a little
bit about what you speak of.
>> > You didn't say Uncle.
>>
>> TRANSLATION --> "i have no response"
>
> You still didn't say Uncle!
and you still have no response. why? because youre WRONG and i busted you.
your lies will carry you no farther. tell us again how an expansion valve
regulates condensor pressure. BUWAHAHA!!!!! :-)
> I said:
> Doesn't there have to be a valve in the system?
>
> You said:
> there is already a full valve system in place to do just that.
>
> You imply that all refrigerant systems have
> this valve.
you need to specify which valves you reference. there are all types of
valves and all but sealed systems have them. what valve are you asking
about fool?
> So is there an FCC in cryo, or not?
lol.....yeah, you know cryo. <rolling eyes> BUWAHAHA! :-)
> 1.) I didn't ask about 'in a pinch'.
LIAR! you asked about it only after your lies and -------- were exposed.
it was a red herring, a desperate and pitiful attempt at save face on your
part and i exposed you, liar.
> 2.) Cryo system has FCC..
WRONG. i threw it at you to watch you choke, and then pointed it out that
it had none to expose your -------- and you sunk like a rock. :-)
> 3.) Challenge has -30 ambient spec..
my challenge to you clearly stated -30, liar. :-)
> 4.) He told me first about optionality of HPC.
liar. i told you what it was and you choked on it. :-)
> 5.) Claimed I used valves for regulation..
LIAR. you did. it was only after i pointed out how foolish your "tow
valves and a pipe" are that you changed your story.
> 6.) Claimed 2 valves and piece of pipe could
> sub for three-port device...
LIAR. that was yours. i just think its so pitiful that its funny. lol
..
> 7.) Claimed 3-port device simplest HPC implementation...
LIAR! show me boy.
> 8.) Claimed all refrigerant systems have retention valving...
LIAR. show me where i stated such. i said all refrigeration systems with
HPC's (we were discussion them at the time) had the valves they need to pump
themselves down into their own recievers. you liar.
> 9.) Claimed certification necessary to work on
> cryo systems...
show me otherwise, liar.
> 10.) Claimed I never had a job servicing cryo systems...
lol...you didnt. :-)
> 11.) Claimed cryo not refrigeration..
its not.
> 12.) Claimed helium supply and return not
> 'working pressures'... lie.
TRANSLATION --> "i dont know enough about cryo to have a clue about what
youre asking for, nate" :-)
> What can tomorrow only
> bring, but more lies?
only if you responde with more lies, liar.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:_YbMe.2977$Hn3.865@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net ...
> Cryogenic refrigeration is not
> refrigeration!
no ----. its what ive been telling you. doesnt matter, you know jack ----
about either. :-)
> They still won't save you
they werent intended to save me. they were intended to choke you and they
did just that. :-)
>> im not qualified to speak with authority
>
> OK, now we're starting to get somewhere!
...and neither are you.
> But it does not give you qualifications in
> atmospheric science
ditto.
>> it is NOT what i asked you for!
>
> I don't give a damn what you asked for...
TRANSLATION --> "youre right, nate"
>> no. i discussed it to show the extent of your foolishness.
>
> Hook, line, and swivel!
exactly. it was quite successful as you jumped right on and tried to LIE
your way through.
>> lol your example is totally foolish!
>
> Trust... we no longer trust you.
TRANSLATION --> "youre right, nate."
>> lol no. it shows your _lack_ of knowledge. i gave you the FCC, and
> clearly
>> stated that the CC stood for "cycle controller". cryo uses no type of
> cycle
>> controller, _at all_. the process is completely different.
>
> As you can see, I didn't bite for your trick
> question.
LIAR! you couldnt find anything on it so you just never answered me. :-)
if you knew anything about cryo refrigeration you would have known
immediately that it uses no type of cycle controller. you lied about your
qualifications, and i exposed you. :-)
> So? Is cryo now refrigeration?
no. its cryogenic refrigeration. totally different process and principle,
totally different science.
>> > You complete IDIOT! The expansion valve
>> > controls the condensor pressure by *releasing*
>> > pressure at the *outlet*.
>>
>> you ------- fool. the expansion valve regulates EVAPORATOR pressure.
>
> And nothing happens *behind* it? Dumbass.
NO. the condensor pressure is regulated only by the pressure of the
compressor discharge. you were WRONG and the diagram i linked you to
clearly shows it. the expansion valve has NOTHING to do with regulating
condensor pressure. ive also quoted your STUPID statement above where you
try to explain that the expansion valve regulates condensor pressure.
BUWAHAHA!!!!! :-)
>> and besides, even in high ambient you have to regulate the bypass or the
>> refrigerant will distribute equally causing low condensor pressures.
>
> No bypass.
you fool, thats what the HMC does. you had better learn at least a little
bit about what you speak of.
>> > You didn't say Uncle.
>>
>> TRANSLATION --> "i have no response"
>
> You still didn't say Uncle!
and you still have no response. why? because youre WRONG and i busted you.
your lies will carry you no farther. tell us again how an expansion valve
regulates condensor pressure. BUWAHAHA!!!!! :-)
> I said:
> Doesn't there have to be a valve in the system?
>
> You said:
> there is already a full valve system in place to do just that.
>
> You imply that all refrigerant systems have
> this valve.
you need to specify which valves you reference. there are all types of
valves and all but sealed systems have them. what valve are you asking
about fool?
> So is there an FCC in cryo, or not?
lol.....yeah, you know cryo. <rolling eyes> BUWAHAHA! :-)
> 1.) I didn't ask about 'in a pinch'.
LIAR! you asked about it only after your lies and -------- were exposed.
it was a red herring, a desperate and pitiful attempt at save face on your
part and i exposed you, liar.
> 2.) Cryo system has FCC..
WRONG. i threw it at you to watch you choke, and then pointed it out that
it had none to expose your -------- and you sunk like a rock. :-)
> 3.) Challenge has -30 ambient spec..
my challenge to you clearly stated -30, liar. :-)
> 4.) He told me first about optionality of HPC.
liar. i told you what it was and you choked on it. :-)
> 5.) Claimed I used valves for regulation..
LIAR. you did. it was only after i pointed out how foolish your "tow
valves and a pipe" are that you changed your story.
> 6.) Claimed 2 valves and piece of pipe could
> sub for three-port device...
LIAR. that was yours. i just think its so pitiful that its funny. lol
..
> 7.) Claimed 3-port device simplest HPC implementation...
LIAR! show me boy.
> 8.) Claimed all refrigerant systems have retention valving...
LIAR. show me where i stated such. i said all refrigeration systems with
HPC's (we were discussion them at the time) had the valves they need to pump
themselves down into their own recievers. you liar.
> 9.) Claimed certification necessary to work on
> cryo systems...
show me otherwise, liar.
> 10.) Claimed I never had a job servicing cryo systems...
lol...you didnt. :-)
> 11.) Claimed cryo not refrigeration..
its not.
> 12.) Claimed helium supply and return not
> 'working pressures'... lie.
TRANSLATION --> "i dont know enough about cryo to have a clue about what
youre asking for, nate" :-)
> What can tomorrow only
> bring, but more lies?
only if you responde with more lies, liar.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com