Superwinch = junk
#201
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Superwinch <> junk
Dork! ;-P
<jk, jenn... :-)>
"jbjeep" <jbjeep@saw.net> wrote in message
news:7eeilv4eo2bev0fbr4k8klbmaks40hmnoq@4ax.com...
> Geek!
>
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 21:32:15 -0400, "TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote:
>
> >>Fortran IV, Pascal, Cobol, BASIC... Old stuff... :)
> >>
> >>"Big Daddy" <DontBother@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >>news:3f59171d$0$52134$a0465688@nnrp.fuse.net.. .
> >>> You can tell you must be a BASIC and not a C, C++, or Java programmer
or
> >>the
> >>> syntax would be Superwinch != junk.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
<jk, jenn... :-)>
"jbjeep" <jbjeep@saw.net> wrote in message
news:7eeilv4eo2bev0fbr4k8klbmaks40hmnoq@4ax.com...
> Geek!
>
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 21:32:15 -0400, "TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote:
>
> >>Fortran IV, Pascal, Cobol, BASIC... Old stuff... :)
> >>
> >>"Big Daddy" <DontBother@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >>news:3f59171d$0$52134$a0465688@nnrp.fuse.net.. .
> >>> You can tell you must be a BASIC and not a C, C++, or Java programmer
or
> >>the
> >>> syntax would be Superwinch != junk.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
#202
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Superwinch <> junk
Why would you compare a Cherokee that was modified enought to carry 44s with
a stock TJ that has a locker as the only option?
You said you would rather have a 2WD Cherokee with 44s than a TJ with
lockers and stock tires. The differences in these two options is like the
difference in a fine steak and a Costco hot dog. The hot dog from Costco is
the best dog you will find anywhere, but it is still a far cry from any
steak. And, why on earth would anybody dream of putting 44s on a 2WD
Cherokee?
Wait, you're the guy that bitched about the weak-*** winch that is arguably
half the size it needs to be? I am beginning to notice a pattern ...
While you are poking around on PavementSucks, take a look at the pages for
CRWLR.
"Joshua Nelson" <spam_box@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:b102b6e4.0309051317.1a0676ff@posting.google.c om...
> >
> > I don't think you can stuff 44s under a Cherokee, but that is another
topic.
>
> You can put any tire size on any vehicle if you try hard enough.
>
> http://www.pavementsucks.com/gallery...p?ride_id=1375
a stock TJ that has a locker as the only option?
You said you would rather have a 2WD Cherokee with 44s than a TJ with
lockers and stock tires. The differences in these two options is like the
difference in a fine steak and a Costco hot dog. The hot dog from Costco is
the best dog you will find anywhere, but it is still a far cry from any
steak. And, why on earth would anybody dream of putting 44s on a 2WD
Cherokee?
Wait, you're the guy that bitched about the weak-*** winch that is arguably
half the size it needs to be? I am beginning to notice a pattern ...
While you are poking around on PavementSucks, take a look at the pages for
CRWLR.
"Joshua Nelson" <spam_box@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:b102b6e4.0309051317.1a0676ff@posting.google.c om...
> >
> > I don't think you can stuff 44s under a Cherokee, but that is another
topic.
>
> You can put any tire size on any vehicle if you try hard enough.
>
> http://www.pavementsucks.com/gallery...p?ride_id=1375
#203
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Superwinch <> junk
Why would you compare a Cherokee that was modified enought to carry 44s with
a stock TJ that has a locker as the only option?
You said you would rather have a 2WD Cherokee with 44s than a TJ with
lockers and stock tires. The differences in these two options is like the
difference in a fine steak and a Costco hot dog. The hot dog from Costco is
the best dog you will find anywhere, but it is still a far cry from any
steak. And, why on earth would anybody dream of putting 44s on a 2WD
Cherokee?
Wait, you're the guy that bitched about the weak-*** winch that is arguably
half the size it needs to be? I am beginning to notice a pattern ...
While you are poking around on PavementSucks, take a look at the pages for
CRWLR.
"Joshua Nelson" <spam_box@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:b102b6e4.0309051317.1a0676ff@posting.google.c om...
> >
> > I don't think you can stuff 44s under a Cherokee, but that is another
topic.
>
> You can put any tire size on any vehicle if you try hard enough.
>
> http://www.pavementsucks.com/gallery...p?ride_id=1375
a stock TJ that has a locker as the only option?
You said you would rather have a 2WD Cherokee with 44s than a TJ with
lockers and stock tires. The differences in these two options is like the
difference in a fine steak and a Costco hot dog. The hot dog from Costco is
the best dog you will find anywhere, but it is still a far cry from any
steak. And, why on earth would anybody dream of putting 44s on a 2WD
Cherokee?
Wait, you're the guy that bitched about the weak-*** winch that is arguably
half the size it needs to be? I am beginning to notice a pattern ...
While you are poking around on PavementSucks, take a look at the pages for
CRWLR.
"Joshua Nelson" <spam_box@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:b102b6e4.0309051317.1a0676ff@posting.google.c om...
> >
> > I don't think you can stuff 44s under a Cherokee, but that is another
topic.
>
> You can put any tire size on any vehicle if you try hard enough.
>
> http://www.pavementsucks.com/gallery...p?ride_id=1375
#204
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Superwinch <> junk
"Joshua Nelson" <spam_box@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:b102b6e4.0309051317.1a0676ff@posting.google.c om...
> >
> > I don't think you can stuff 44s under a Cherokee, but that is another
topic.
>
> You can put any tire size on any vehicle if you try hard enough.
>
> http://www.pavementsucks.com/gallery...p?ride_id=1375
My bad, try this PavementSucks ... (It used to be www.pvmtsux.com, but it
will redirect you)
http://www2.real-jeeps.com/
#205
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Superwinch <> junk
"Joshua Nelson" <spam_box@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:b102b6e4.0309051317.1a0676ff@posting.google.c om...
> >
> > I don't think you can stuff 44s under a Cherokee, but that is another
topic.
>
> You can put any tire size on any vehicle if you try hard enough.
>
> http://www.pavementsucks.com/gallery...p?ride_id=1375
My bad, try this PavementSucks ... (It used to be www.pvmtsux.com, but it
will redirect you)
http://www2.real-jeeps.com/
#206
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Superwinch = junk
One hard slap works better than many small slaps...
"Cal Wheeler" <cal@whee.ler> wrote in message
news:bjh8a3$qta$1@pita.alt.net...
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> >>And do pay attention to
> >>the drop in winch abbilty with every wrap of line, ( jeep 101)
> >
> >
> >
> > Ok. I will accept what you are telling me since you all seem to be so
> > certain. However I do not understand why this would be the case. It
> > would actually seem logical to expect the opposite. Think of a ten
> > speed bicycle. The bike is hardest to pedal when the chain is on the
> > smallest diameter gears. I would think it would be the same with a
> > winch. On the outer layers of cable you have a bit more diameter.
>
> My forehead hurts from slapping it so many times after reading your posts.
>
"Cal Wheeler" <cal@whee.ler> wrote in message
news:bjh8a3$qta$1@pita.alt.net...
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> >>And do pay attention to
> >>the drop in winch abbilty with every wrap of line, ( jeep 101)
> >
> >
> >
> > Ok. I will accept what you are telling me since you all seem to be so
> > certain. However I do not understand why this would be the case. It
> > would actually seem logical to expect the opposite. Think of a ten
> > speed bicycle. The bike is hardest to pedal when the chain is on the
> > smallest diameter gears. I would think it would be the same with a
> > winch. On the outer layers of cable you have a bit more diameter.
>
> My forehead hurts from slapping it so many times after reading your posts.
>
#207
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Superwinch = junk
One hard slap works better than many small slaps...
"Cal Wheeler" <cal@whee.ler> wrote in message
news:bjh8a3$qta$1@pita.alt.net...
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> >>And do pay attention to
> >>the drop in winch abbilty with every wrap of line, ( jeep 101)
> >
> >
> >
> > Ok. I will accept what you are telling me since you all seem to be so
> > certain. However I do not understand why this would be the case. It
> > would actually seem logical to expect the opposite. Think of a ten
> > speed bicycle. The bike is hardest to pedal when the chain is on the
> > smallest diameter gears. I would think it would be the same with a
> > winch. On the outer layers of cable you have a bit more diameter.
>
> My forehead hurts from slapping it so many times after reading your posts.
>
"Cal Wheeler" <cal@whee.ler> wrote in message
news:bjh8a3$qta$1@pita.alt.net...
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> >>And do pay attention to
> >>the drop in winch abbilty with every wrap of line, ( jeep 101)
> >
> >
> >
> > Ok. I will accept what you are telling me since you all seem to be so
> > certain. However I do not understand why this would be the case. It
> > would actually seem logical to expect the opposite. Think of a ten
> > speed bicycle. The bike is hardest to pedal when the chain is on the
> > smallest diameter gears. I would think it would be the same with a
> > winch. On the outer layers of cable you have a bit more diameter.
>
> My forehead hurts from slapping it so many times after reading your posts.
>
#208
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Superwinch <> junk
I realize this was an outlandish comparison. It was hypothetical, for
discussion purposes only. My point was that in certain situations,
lift is more important than traction. I suppose I could have used the
hypothetical example of a TJ with 31 inch tires and no LDS vs. 30 inch
tires with LSD, but I wanted to make my hypothetical more clear cut.
Sheesh.
> Why would you compare a Cherokee that was modified enought to carry 44s with
> a stock TJ that has a locker as the only option?
>
> You said you would rather have a 2WD Cherokee with 44s than a TJ with
> lockers and stock tires. The differences in these two options is like the
> difference in a fine steak and a Costco hot dog. The hot dog from Costco is
> the best dog you will find anywhere, but it is still a far cry from any
> steak. And, why on earth would anybody dream of putting 44s on a 2WD
> Cherokee?
>
> Wait, you're the guy that bitched about the weak-*** winch that is arguably
> half the size it needs to be? I am beginning to notice a pattern ...
>
> While you are poking around on PavementSucks, take a look at the pages for
> CRWLR.
>
>
discussion purposes only. My point was that in certain situations,
lift is more important than traction. I suppose I could have used the
hypothetical example of a TJ with 31 inch tires and no LDS vs. 30 inch
tires with LSD, but I wanted to make my hypothetical more clear cut.
Sheesh.
> Why would you compare a Cherokee that was modified enought to carry 44s with
> a stock TJ that has a locker as the only option?
>
> You said you would rather have a 2WD Cherokee with 44s than a TJ with
> lockers and stock tires. The differences in these two options is like the
> difference in a fine steak and a Costco hot dog. The hot dog from Costco is
> the best dog you will find anywhere, but it is still a far cry from any
> steak. And, why on earth would anybody dream of putting 44s on a 2WD
> Cherokee?
>
> Wait, you're the guy that bitched about the weak-*** winch that is arguably
> half the size it needs to be? I am beginning to notice a pattern ...
>
> While you are poking around on PavementSucks, take a look at the pages for
> CRWLR.
>
>
#209
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Superwinch <> junk
I realize this was an outlandish comparison. It was hypothetical, for
discussion purposes only. My point was that in certain situations,
lift is more important than traction. I suppose I could have used the
hypothetical example of a TJ with 31 inch tires and no LDS vs. 30 inch
tires with LSD, but I wanted to make my hypothetical more clear cut.
Sheesh.
> Why would you compare a Cherokee that was modified enought to carry 44s with
> a stock TJ that has a locker as the only option?
>
> You said you would rather have a 2WD Cherokee with 44s than a TJ with
> lockers and stock tires. The differences in these two options is like the
> difference in a fine steak and a Costco hot dog. The hot dog from Costco is
> the best dog you will find anywhere, but it is still a far cry from any
> steak. And, why on earth would anybody dream of putting 44s on a 2WD
> Cherokee?
>
> Wait, you're the guy that bitched about the weak-*** winch that is arguably
> half the size it needs to be? I am beginning to notice a pattern ...
>
> While you are poking around on PavementSucks, take a look at the pages for
> CRWLR.
>
>
discussion purposes only. My point was that in certain situations,
lift is more important than traction. I suppose I could have used the
hypothetical example of a TJ with 31 inch tires and no LDS vs. 30 inch
tires with LSD, but I wanted to make my hypothetical more clear cut.
Sheesh.
> Why would you compare a Cherokee that was modified enought to carry 44s with
> a stock TJ that has a locker as the only option?
>
> You said you would rather have a 2WD Cherokee with 44s than a TJ with
> lockers and stock tires. The differences in these two options is like the
> difference in a fine steak and a Costco hot dog. The hot dog from Costco is
> the best dog you will find anywhere, but it is still a far cry from any
> steak. And, why on earth would anybody dream of putting 44s on a 2WD
> Cherokee?
>
> Wait, you're the guy that bitched about the weak-*** winch that is arguably
> half the size it needs to be? I am beginning to notice a pattern ...
>
> While you are poking around on PavementSucks, take a look at the pages for
> CRWLR.
>
>
#210
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Superwinch <> junk
Here you go, Joshua!
http://aaadog.com/jeep/wow01b.jpg
http://aaadog.com/jeep/wow02b.jpg
http://aaadog.com/jeep/wow03b.jpg
http://aaadog.com/jeep/wow04b.jpg
"Joshua Nelson" <spam_box@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:b102b6e4.0309090620.2c3a3b34@posting.google.c om...
> I realize this was an outlandish comparison. It was hypothetical, for
> discussion purposes only. My point was that in certain situations,
> lift is more important than traction. I suppose I could have used the
> hypothetical example of a TJ with 31 inch tires and no LDS vs. 30 inch
> tires with LSD, but I wanted to make my hypothetical more clear cut.
>
> Sheesh.
>
> > Why would you compare a Cherokee that was modified enought to carry 44s
with
> > a stock TJ that has a locker as the only option?
> >
> > You said you would rather have a 2WD Cherokee with 44s than a TJ with
> > lockers and stock tires. The differences in these two options is like
the
> > difference in a fine steak and a Costco hot dog. The hot dog from Costco
is
> > the best dog you will find anywhere, but it is still a far cry from any
> > steak. And, why on earth would anybody dream of putting 44s on a 2WD
> > Cherokee?
> >
> > Wait, you're the guy that bitched about the weak-*** winch that is
arguably
> > half the size it needs to be? I am beginning to notice a pattern ...
> >
> > While you are poking around on PavementSucks, take a look at the pages
for
> > CRWLR.
> >
> >
http://aaadog.com/jeep/wow01b.jpg
http://aaadog.com/jeep/wow02b.jpg
http://aaadog.com/jeep/wow03b.jpg
http://aaadog.com/jeep/wow04b.jpg
"Joshua Nelson" <spam_box@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:b102b6e4.0309090620.2c3a3b34@posting.google.c om...
> I realize this was an outlandish comparison. It was hypothetical, for
> discussion purposes only. My point was that in certain situations,
> lift is more important than traction. I suppose I could have used the
> hypothetical example of a TJ with 31 inch tires and no LDS vs. 30 inch
> tires with LSD, but I wanted to make my hypothetical more clear cut.
>
> Sheesh.
>
> > Why would you compare a Cherokee that was modified enought to carry 44s
with
> > a stock TJ that has a locker as the only option?
> >
> > You said you would rather have a 2WD Cherokee with 44s than a TJ with
> > lockers and stock tires. The differences in these two options is like
the
> > difference in a fine steak and a Costco hot dog. The hot dog from Costco
is
> > the best dog you will find anywhere, but it is still a far cry from any
> > steak. And, why on earth would anybody dream of putting 44s on a 2WD
> > Cherokee?
> >
> > Wait, you're the guy that bitched about the weak-*** winch that is
arguably
> > half the size it needs to be? I am beginning to notice a pattern ...
> >
> > While you are poking around on PavementSucks, take a look at the pages
for
> > CRWLR.
> >
> >