Jeep Booby Traps Help
#221
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
If you're not a native american, then you have a good chance of being of
brit descent (which means you have a good chance of being a bit french or
german), and if you are a native american then you are almost certainly
mexican (or canadian) !!
btw, wasn't it the Mason Dixon line ?
Dave Milne, Scotland
'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
news:moomesa-FAB10D.21362926082003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
: In article <SGU2b.4803$IJ6.473689@twister.socal.rr.com>,
: "Richard Harris" <SHARRIS11@san.rr.com> wrote:
:
: > "Russ B" <gofast@REMOVE_THIStexoma.net> wrote in message
: > news:bigohu0gtj@enews3.newsguy.com...
: > > No sweat Jeepers...We're on the same team. These idiots just can't
belive
: > we
: > > still have rights in TX can they?
: > > RB
: >
: > Russ,
: > Understood about the team thing and that the law in Texas probably
prevents
: > crime, but that "Yankee" crap should have died a long time before you
were
: > born, and using IDIOTs to refer to fellow jeepers because we live
somewhere
: > other than Texas,is a perfect way to **** off your "fellow jeepers"!
And
: > you Russ B, unless you are a native American, which by your writing I
: > highly doubt, are at least a descendant of FOREIGNERS. This country as
we
: > know it was built on foreigners both legal and (unfortunately) illegal.
: > Think before you write! I'm not happy about illegal immigration either,
but
: > don't knock those who are here legally...Like ME!!!!!!
: >
: > PS: I just have a Special Operations Command Sticker on my Bumper to
deter
: > would-be thieves. I could park in Bario Logan or East LA with that and
not
: > have any problems....So far so Good.
: >
: >
:
: A yankee is anyone north of the Mason-Nixon line.
:
: Texas was it's own country, I decend from Texas, the Nation.
:
: You can't help it if you are not from Texas :^) we won't hold it
: against you.
:
:
: -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
: http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
: -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
brit descent (which means you have a good chance of being a bit french or
german), and if you are a native american then you are almost certainly
mexican (or canadian) !!
btw, wasn't it the Mason Dixon line ?
Dave Milne, Scotland
'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
news:moomesa-FAB10D.21362926082003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
: In article <SGU2b.4803$IJ6.473689@twister.socal.rr.com>,
: "Richard Harris" <SHARRIS11@san.rr.com> wrote:
:
: > "Russ B" <gofast@REMOVE_THIStexoma.net> wrote in message
: > news:bigohu0gtj@enews3.newsguy.com...
: > > No sweat Jeepers...We're on the same team. These idiots just can't
belive
: > we
: > > still have rights in TX can they?
: > > RB
: >
: > Russ,
: > Understood about the team thing and that the law in Texas probably
prevents
: > crime, but that "Yankee" crap should have died a long time before you
were
: > born, and using IDIOTs to refer to fellow jeepers because we live
somewhere
: > other than Texas,is a perfect way to **** off your "fellow jeepers"!
And
: > you Russ B, unless you are a native American, which by your writing I
: > highly doubt, are at least a descendant of FOREIGNERS. This country as
we
: > know it was built on foreigners both legal and (unfortunately) illegal.
: > Think before you write! I'm not happy about illegal immigration either,
but
: > don't knock those who are here legally...Like ME!!!!!!
: >
: > PS: I just have a Special Operations Command Sticker on my Bumper to
deter
: > would-be thieves. I could park in Bario Logan or East LA with that and
not
: > have any problems....So far so Good.
: >
: >
:
: A yankee is anyone north of the Mason-Nixon line.
:
: Texas was it's own country, I decend from Texas, the Nation.
:
: You can't help it if you are not from Texas :^) we won't hold it
: against you.
:
:
: -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
: http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
: -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#222
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
I think the laws in Canada are a bit different. My jeep has been broken
into once, my house once, and my old truck once (all in the past year).
Heck, I'd should put that sticker on my windshield *grin*
Andy
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F4C2CBC.CA8BBDC5@***.net...
> I can tell you my home hasn't been burgled again after I put this
> warning up at my front door and side windows:
> http://www.----------.com/warning.jpg And I really mean it too as
> probably anyone that's had their home broken into and robbed.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Russ B wrote:
> >
> > twaldron,
> >
> > There is a very special, very small word in § 9.42 (2)A that splatters
your
> > BS...read the statute carefully please, and hopefully it will explain to
you
> > how I, or any other Texan who can lawfully own or possess a firearm, can
> > justifiably use deadly force without a personal threat. The word "OR" at
the
> > end of paragraph (A) does NOT mean that the conditions of paragraph (B),
the
> > one you cite as requiring threat of bodily harm to justify use of deadly
> > force, must be met. "OR" does not mean the same thing as "AND".The word
"OR"
> > means that EITHER condition is a justification for the use of deadly
force.
> > If I use deadly force to prevent the specific crimes listed in paragraph
> > (A), my life does not have to be endangered. Look at how it's written,
that
> > one little word was result of hours, maybe weeks, perhaps ever years of
> > debate in Austin.
> >
> > § 9.42. Deadly Force to Protect Property
> >
> > <snip article (1)>
> >
> > (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is
> > immediately necessary:
> >
> > (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
robbery,
> > aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief
during
> > the nighttime; or
> >
> > I'm pretty sure you will counter with the "during the day" stipulation
that
> > you have added since you said,"Which state allows using deadly force
when
> > life isn't endangered???" and several of us replied with Texas. So far,
> > none of us has said you can use deadly force in Texas during the
daylight
> > hours to stop a thief. Perhaps you added the daylight hours stipulation
> > after you realized that you were wrong...maybe you read the law, but
missed
> > that little two-letter word the first time through. I don't know. I do
know
> > that you originally posted ONLY the words,"Which state allows using
deadly
> > force when life isn't endangered???" and several have answered and
provided
> > copies of statute to back it up. I also provided a link to the Texas
Penal
> > Code (in my reply to your "BS:Next" post) if you don't believe it's an
> > exact, current copy. I, and others, have given you an answer to your
> > original question. You can't backpedal, sir, your posts are all here,
and
> > you originally didn't say anything about daylight as a condition. I'm
pretty
> > much done debating this issue. Now...Want to debate whether or not a
Texan
> > can use lethal force when life isn't endangered during the DAYLIGHT???
> >
> > So,again...BS yourself!
into once, my house once, and my old truck once (all in the past year).
Heck, I'd should put that sticker on my windshield *grin*
Andy
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F4C2CBC.CA8BBDC5@***.net...
> I can tell you my home hasn't been burgled again after I put this
> warning up at my front door and side windows:
> http://www.----------.com/warning.jpg And I really mean it too as
> probably anyone that's had their home broken into and robbed.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Russ B wrote:
> >
> > twaldron,
> >
> > There is a very special, very small word in § 9.42 (2)A that splatters
your
> > BS...read the statute carefully please, and hopefully it will explain to
you
> > how I, or any other Texan who can lawfully own or possess a firearm, can
> > justifiably use deadly force without a personal threat. The word "OR" at
the
> > end of paragraph (A) does NOT mean that the conditions of paragraph (B),
the
> > one you cite as requiring threat of bodily harm to justify use of deadly
> > force, must be met. "OR" does not mean the same thing as "AND".The word
"OR"
> > means that EITHER condition is a justification for the use of deadly
force.
> > If I use deadly force to prevent the specific crimes listed in paragraph
> > (A), my life does not have to be endangered. Look at how it's written,
that
> > one little word was result of hours, maybe weeks, perhaps ever years of
> > debate in Austin.
> >
> > § 9.42. Deadly Force to Protect Property
> >
> > <snip article (1)>
> >
> > (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is
> > immediately necessary:
> >
> > (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
robbery,
> > aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief
during
> > the nighttime; or
> >
> > I'm pretty sure you will counter with the "during the day" stipulation
that
> > you have added since you said,"Which state allows using deadly force
when
> > life isn't endangered???" and several of us replied with Texas. So far,
> > none of us has said you can use deadly force in Texas during the
daylight
> > hours to stop a thief. Perhaps you added the daylight hours stipulation
> > after you realized that you were wrong...maybe you read the law, but
missed
> > that little two-letter word the first time through. I don't know. I do
know
> > that you originally posted ONLY the words,"Which state allows using
deadly
> > force when life isn't endangered???" and several have answered and
provided
> > copies of statute to back it up. I also provided a link to the Texas
Penal
> > Code (in my reply to your "BS:Next" post) if you don't believe it's an
> > exact, current copy. I, and others, have given you an answer to your
> > original question. You can't backpedal, sir, your posts are all here,
and
> > you originally didn't say anything about daylight as a condition. I'm
pretty
> > much done debating this issue. Now...Want to debate whether or not a
Texan
> > can use lethal force when life isn't endangered during the DAYLIGHT???
> >
> > So,again...BS yourself!
#223
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
I think the laws in Canada are a bit different. My jeep has been broken
into once, my house once, and my old truck once (all in the past year).
Heck, I'd should put that sticker on my windshield *grin*
Andy
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F4C2CBC.CA8BBDC5@***.net...
> I can tell you my home hasn't been burgled again after I put this
> warning up at my front door and side windows:
> http://www.----------.com/warning.jpg And I really mean it too as
> probably anyone that's had their home broken into and robbed.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Russ B wrote:
> >
> > twaldron,
> >
> > There is a very special, very small word in § 9.42 (2)A that splatters
your
> > BS...read the statute carefully please, and hopefully it will explain to
you
> > how I, or any other Texan who can lawfully own or possess a firearm, can
> > justifiably use deadly force without a personal threat. The word "OR" at
the
> > end of paragraph (A) does NOT mean that the conditions of paragraph (B),
the
> > one you cite as requiring threat of bodily harm to justify use of deadly
> > force, must be met. "OR" does not mean the same thing as "AND".The word
"OR"
> > means that EITHER condition is a justification for the use of deadly
force.
> > If I use deadly force to prevent the specific crimes listed in paragraph
> > (A), my life does not have to be endangered. Look at how it's written,
that
> > one little word was result of hours, maybe weeks, perhaps ever years of
> > debate in Austin.
> >
> > § 9.42. Deadly Force to Protect Property
> >
> > <snip article (1)>
> >
> > (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is
> > immediately necessary:
> >
> > (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
robbery,
> > aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief
during
> > the nighttime; or
> >
> > I'm pretty sure you will counter with the "during the day" stipulation
that
> > you have added since you said,"Which state allows using deadly force
when
> > life isn't endangered???" and several of us replied with Texas. So far,
> > none of us has said you can use deadly force in Texas during the
daylight
> > hours to stop a thief. Perhaps you added the daylight hours stipulation
> > after you realized that you were wrong...maybe you read the law, but
missed
> > that little two-letter word the first time through. I don't know. I do
know
> > that you originally posted ONLY the words,"Which state allows using
deadly
> > force when life isn't endangered???" and several have answered and
provided
> > copies of statute to back it up. I also provided a link to the Texas
Penal
> > Code (in my reply to your "BS:Next" post) if you don't believe it's an
> > exact, current copy. I, and others, have given you an answer to your
> > original question. You can't backpedal, sir, your posts are all here,
and
> > you originally didn't say anything about daylight as a condition. I'm
pretty
> > much done debating this issue. Now...Want to debate whether or not a
Texan
> > can use lethal force when life isn't endangered during the DAYLIGHT???
> >
> > So,again...BS yourself!
into once, my house once, and my old truck once (all in the past year).
Heck, I'd should put that sticker on my windshield *grin*
Andy
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F4C2CBC.CA8BBDC5@***.net...
> I can tell you my home hasn't been burgled again after I put this
> warning up at my front door and side windows:
> http://www.----------.com/warning.jpg And I really mean it too as
> probably anyone that's had their home broken into and robbed.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Russ B wrote:
> >
> > twaldron,
> >
> > There is a very special, very small word in § 9.42 (2)A that splatters
your
> > BS...read the statute carefully please, and hopefully it will explain to
you
> > how I, or any other Texan who can lawfully own or possess a firearm, can
> > justifiably use deadly force without a personal threat. The word "OR" at
the
> > end of paragraph (A) does NOT mean that the conditions of paragraph (B),
the
> > one you cite as requiring threat of bodily harm to justify use of deadly
> > force, must be met. "OR" does not mean the same thing as "AND".The word
"OR"
> > means that EITHER condition is a justification for the use of deadly
force.
> > If I use deadly force to prevent the specific crimes listed in paragraph
> > (A), my life does not have to be endangered. Look at how it's written,
that
> > one little word was result of hours, maybe weeks, perhaps ever years of
> > debate in Austin.
> >
> > § 9.42. Deadly Force to Protect Property
> >
> > <snip article (1)>
> >
> > (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is
> > immediately necessary:
> >
> > (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
robbery,
> > aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief
during
> > the nighttime; or
> >
> > I'm pretty sure you will counter with the "during the day" stipulation
that
> > you have added since you said,"Which state allows using deadly force
when
> > life isn't endangered???" and several of us replied with Texas. So far,
> > none of us has said you can use deadly force in Texas during the
daylight
> > hours to stop a thief. Perhaps you added the daylight hours stipulation
> > after you realized that you were wrong...maybe you read the law, but
missed
> > that little two-letter word the first time through. I don't know. I do
know
> > that you originally posted ONLY the words,"Which state allows using
deadly
> > force when life isn't endangered???" and several have answered and
provided
> > copies of statute to back it up. I also provided a link to the Texas
Penal
> > Code (in my reply to your "BS:Next" post) if you don't believe it's an
> > exact, current copy. I, and others, have given you an answer to your
> > original question. You can't backpedal, sir, your posts are all here,
and
> > you originally didn't say anything about daylight as a condition. I'm
pretty
> > much done debating this issue. Now...Want to debate whether or not a
Texan
> > can use lethal force when life isn't endangered during the DAYLIGHT???
> >
> > So,again...BS yourself!
#224
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep *****...more fun that a barrel of Yankees...
In article <bihaq801n98@enews4.newsguy.com>,
"Russ B" <gofast@REMOVE_THIStexoma.net> wrote:
> The ones from North of the M-D Line
Mason-Nixon line.
Mason Texas. Nixon Texas.
Yankees north of there. :^)
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
"Russ B" <gofast@REMOVE_THIStexoma.net> wrote:
> The ones from North of the M-D Line
Mason-Nixon line.
Mason Texas. Nixon Texas.
Yankees north of there. :^)
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#225
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep *****...more fun that a barrel of Yankees...
In article <bihaq801n98@enews4.newsguy.com>,
"Russ B" <gofast@REMOVE_THIStexoma.net> wrote:
> The ones from North of the M-D Line
Mason-Nixon line.
Mason Texas. Nixon Texas.
Yankees north of there. :^)
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
"Russ B" <gofast@REMOVE_THIStexoma.net> wrote:
> The ones from North of the M-D Line
Mason-Nixon line.
Mason Texas. Nixon Texas.
Yankees north of there. :^)
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#226
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
In article <8RX2b.5344$Pj6.51832947@news-text.cableinet.net>,
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote:
> btw, wasn't it the Mason Dixon line ?
No. The Mason, Texas-Nixon, Texas line. I'm south of that.
Driving my 4x4 into Mexico this weekend into the mountains to go
spelunking. Now that will be SOUTH.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote:
> btw, wasn't it the Mason Dixon line ?
No. The Mason, Texas-Nixon, Texas line. I'm south of that.
Driving my 4x4 into Mexico this weekend into the mountains to go
spelunking. Now that will be SOUTH.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#227
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
In article <8RX2b.5344$Pj6.51832947@news-text.cableinet.net>,
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote:
> btw, wasn't it the Mason Dixon line ?
No. The Mason, Texas-Nixon, Texas line. I'm south of that.
Driving my 4x4 into Mexico this weekend into the mountains to go
spelunking. Now that will be SOUTH.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote:
> btw, wasn't it the Mason Dixon line ?
No. The Mason, Texas-Nixon, Texas line. I'm south of that.
Driving my 4x4 into Mexico this weekend into the mountains to go
spelunking. Now that will be SOUTH.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#228
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
I really never wanted to debate anything. I just wanted a definitive
answer, but law isn't always black and white and there is much room for
interpretation. I just haven't seen anything, statute or not, that would
make me feel comfortable pulling the trigger. Not that I would ever feel
comfortable in that situation, but you know what I mean.
Funny you mention Pearl, because I've always put Lone Star and Pearl in
the same sentence.
Russ B wrote:
> Twaldron, I have it already...I'm not wrong about the ORIGINAL question you
> asked:"Which state allows using deadly force when life isn't endangered???"
> There is a tremendous amount of case law to back it up, as well as the
> statute I posted. This thread is long, and very convoluted already and is
> pretty much off-topic anyway.
>
> If you REALLY want to debate the daytime use of deadly force when your life
> isn't endangered...go to tx.guns and debate it there. I might even be able
> to make a pretty good argument that one can....
>
> BTW: I don't drink Lone Star...tastes like too much like Pearl these days.
>
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:S8W2b.248$1h2.208@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
>>YES!! Now yer gittin' it! In my understanding, nightime adds additional
>>risk to the victim because he's even less sure of the criminal's intent.
>>You've got to figure he's up to no good at night and potentially lethal.
>>I consider that an endangerment above and beyond whatever the crime is.
>>I don't know if that is the reasoning behind the law, I just surmise
>>that it is part of it.
>>
>>My orig. question was regarding an incident where the guy was up to no
>>good, but not posing a threat. Someone posted that it's just peachy in
>>Texas to shoot the ****. When the cops come, you get a smack on the back
>>and a handshake. THAT'S what I said BS to.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Now...Want to debate whether or not a Texan
>>>can use lethal force when life isn't endangered during the DAYLIGHT???
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>________________________________________________ ___________
>>tw
>>03 TJ Rubicon
>>01 XJ Sport
>>
>>There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
>>-- Dave Barry
>>
>>http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
>>(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
>>________________________________________________ ___________
>>
>
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
answer, but law isn't always black and white and there is much room for
interpretation. I just haven't seen anything, statute or not, that would
make me feel comfortable pulling the trigger. Not that I would ever feel
comfortable in that situation, but you know what I mean.
Funny you mention Pearl, because I've always put Lone Star and Pearl in
the same sentence.
Russ B wrote:
> Twaldron, I have it already...I'm not wrong about the ORIGINAL question you
> asked:"Which state allows using deadly force when life isn't endangered???"
> There is a tremendous amount of case law to back it up, as well as the
> statute I posted. This thread is long, and very convoluted already and is
> pretty much off-topic anyway.
>
> If you REALLY want to debate the daytime use of deadly force when your life
> isn't endangered...go to tx.guns and debate it there. I might even be able
> to make a pretty good argument that one can....
>
> BTW: I don't drink Lone Star...tastes like too much like Pearl these days.
>
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:S8W2b.248$1h2.208@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
>>YES!! Now yer gittin' it! In my understanding, nightime adds additional
>>risk to the victim because he's even less sure of the criminal's intent.
>>You've got to figure he's up to no good at night and potentially lethal.
>>I consider that an endangerment above and beyond whatever the crime is.
>>I don't know if that is the reasoning behind the law, I just surmise
>>that it is part of it.
>>
>>My orig. question was regarding an incident where the guy was up to no
>>good, but not posing a threat. Someone posted that it's just peachy in
>>Texas to shoot the ****. When the cops come, you get a smack on the back
>>and a handshake. THAT'S what I said BS to.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Now...Want to debate whether or not a Texan
>>>can use lethal force when life isn't endangered during the DAYLIGHT???
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>________________________________________________ ___________
>>tw
>>03 TJ Rubicon
>>01 XJ Sport
>>
>>There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
>>-- Dave Barry
>>
>>http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
>>(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
>>________________________________________________ ___________
>>
>
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
#229
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
I really never wanted to debate anything. I just wanted a definitive
answer, but law isn't always black and white and there is much room for
interpretation. I just haven't seen anything, statute or not, that would
make me feel comfortable pulling the trigger. Not that I would ever feel
comfortable in that situation, but you know what I mean.
Funny you mention Pearl, because I've always put Lone Star and Pearl in
the same sentence.
Russ B wrote:
> Twaldron, I have it already...I'm not wrong about the ORIGINAL question you
> asked:"Which state allows using deadly force when life isn't endangered???"
> There is a tremendous amount of case law to back it up, as well as the
> statute I posted. This thread is long, and very convoluted already and is
> pretty much off-topic anyway.
>
> If you REALLY want to debate the daytime use of deadly force when your life
> isn't endangered...go to tx.guns and debate it there. I might even be able
> to make a pretty good argument that one can....
>
> BTW: I don't drink Lone Star...tastes like too much like Pearl these days.
>
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:S8W2b.248$1h2.208@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
>>YES!! Now yer gittin' it! In my understanding, nightime adds additional
>>risk to the victim because he's even less sure of the criminal's intent.
>>You've got to figure he's up to no good at night and potentially lethal.
>>I consider that an endangerment above and beyond whatever the crime is.
>>I don't know if that is the reasoning behind the law, I just surmise
>>that it is part of it.
>>
>>My orig. question was regarding an incident where the guy was up to no
>>good, but not posing a threat. Someone posted that it's just peachy in
>>Texas to shoot the ****. When the cops come, you get a smack on the back
>>and a handshake. THAT'S what I said BS to.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Now...Want to debate whether or not a Texan
>>>can use lethal force when life isn't endangered during the DAYLIGHT???
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>________________________________________________ ___________
>>tw
>>03 TJ Rubicon
>>01 XJ Sport
>>
>>There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
>>-- Dave Barry
>>
>>http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
>>(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
>>________________________________________________ ___________
>>
>
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
answer, but law isn't always black and white and there is much room for
interpretation. I just haven't seen anything, statute or not, that would
make me feel comfortable pulling the trigger. Not that I would ever feel
comfortable in that situation, but you know what I mean.
Funny you mention Pearl, because I've always put Lone Star and Pearl in
the same sentence.
Russ B wrote:
> Twaldron, I have it already...I'm not wrong about the ORIGINAL question you
> asked:"Which state allows using deadly force when life isn't endangered???"
> There is a tremendous amount of case law to back it up, as well as the
> statute I posted. This thread is long, and very convoluted already and is
> pretty much off-topic anyway.
>
> If you REALLY want to debate the daytime use of deadly force when your life
> isn't endangered...go to tx.guns and debate it there. I might even be able
> to make a pretty good argument that one can....
>
> BTW: I don't drink Lone Star...tastes like too much like Pearl these days.
>
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:S8W2b.248$1h2.208@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com. ..
>
>>YES!! Now yer gittin' it! In my understanding, nightime adds additional
>>risk to the victim because he's even less sure of the criminal's intent.
>>You've got to figure he's up to no good at night and potentially lethal.
>>I consider that an endangerment above and beyond whatever the crime is.
>>I don't know if that is the reasoning behind the law, I just surmise
>>that it is part of it.
>>
>>My orig. question was regarding an incident where the guy was up to no
>>good, but not posing a threat. Someone posted that it's just peachy in
>>Texas to shoot the ****. When the cops come, you get a smack on the back
>>and a handshake. THAT'S what I said BS to.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Now...Want to debate whether or not a Texan
>>>can use lethal force when life isn't endangered during the DAYLIGHT???
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>________________________________________________ ___________
>>tw
>>03 TJ Rubicon
>>01 XJ Sport
>>
>>There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
>>-- Dave Barry
>>
>>http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
>>(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
>>________________________________________________ ___________
>>
>
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
#230
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
Don't scare them away. Take their picture, alert yourself, call 911 and
have them arrested.
"kevin" <kevin@el.net> wrote in message
news:nOU2b.270665$Ho3.35522@sccrnsc03...
> twaldron wrote:
> > We live in the same state.
> >
> > Russ B wrote:
> >
> >> No sweat Jeepers...We're on the same team. These idiots just can't
> >> belive we
> >> still have rights in TX can they?
> >> RB
> >> "Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
> >> news:moomesa-F3354A.06525826082003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
> >>
> >>> In article <bieijr010kl@enews3.newsguy.com>,
> >>> "Russ B" <gofast@REMOVE_THIStexoma.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> BS yourself! Here is a snippet straight off of the Texas Penal Code,
> >>>> available for your perusal at
> >>>> http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statu...tml#pe010.9.32
> >>>>
> >>>> SUBCHAPTER D. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Ignore my reply. I doofused the wrong poster. Doh!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> >>> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> >>> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> It the thugs try again they will have to work harder. I installed 6
> passive infrared pairs of flood lights that trip an inside alarm, 3
> cameras, ( 2 are on the jeep) and a real time securtiy vcr. I have 2
> more infrared cameras on the way. I am also setting up a permieter alarm
> with a trip wire , and pull trap switch in a square 20 feet around the
> jeep and cars. The trip wire will be set 18 inches high using mono
> fishing line. When someone hits the wire it pulls the plastic insulator
> out of the pull trap switch completing the circuit and setting off a
> siern. Then we get to see how bad they really are.
>
have them arrested.
"kevin" <kevin@el.net> wrote in message
news:nOU2b.270665$Ho3.35522@sccrnsc03...
> twaldron wrote:
> > We live in the same state.
> >
> > Russ B wrote:
> >
> >> No sweat Jeepers...We're on the same team. These idiots just can't
> >> belive we
> >> still have rights in TX can they?
> >> RB
> >> "Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message
> >> news:moomesa-F3354A.06525826082003@corp.newsfeeds.com...
> >>
> >>> In article <bieijr010kl@enews3.newsguy.com>,
> >>> "Russ B" <gofast@REMOVE_THIStexoma.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> BS yourself! Here is a snippet straight off of the Texas Penal Code,
> >>>> available for your perusal at
> >>>> http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statu...tml#pe010.9.32
> >>>>
> >>>> SUBCHAPTER D. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Ignore my reply. I doofused the wrong poster. Doh!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> >>> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> >>> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> It the thugs try again they will have to work harder. I installed 6
> passive infrared pairs of flood lights that trip an inside alarm, 3
> cameras, ( 2 are on the jeep) and a real time securtiy vcr. I have 2
> more infrared cameras on the way. I am also setting up a permieter alarm
> with a trip wire , and pull trap switch in a square 20 feet around the
> jeep and cars. The trip wire will be set 18 inches high using mono
> fishing line. When someone hits the wire it pulls the plastic insulator
> out of the pull trap switch completing the circuit and setting off a
> siern. Then we get to see how bad they really are.
>