Jeep Booby Traps Help
#151
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
In article <3F4BC473.39F0EEF6@***.net>,
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> Please don't crosspost, as only inconsiderate ******** do.
You are correct. My bad. What's your solution?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> Please don't crosspost, as only inconsiderate ******** do.
You are correct. My bad. What's your solution?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#152
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
Write separate posts, and maybe invite them to subscribe to this
group and add to the off topic, but don't crosspost as it is a violation
of our charter:
ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...rs.jeep+******
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeepers wrote:
>
> You are correct. My bad. What's your solution?
group and add to the off topic, but don't crosspost as it is a violation
of our charter:
ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...rs.jeep+******
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeepers wrote:
>
> You are correct. My bad. What's your solution?
#153
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
Write separate posts, and maybe invite them to subscribe to this
group and add to the off topic, but don't crosspost as it is a violation
of our charter:
ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...rs.jeep+******
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeepers wrote:
>
> You are correct. My bad. What's your solution?
group and add to the off topic, but don't crosspost as it is a violation
of our charter:
ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...rs.jeep+******
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeepers wrote:
>
> You are correct. My bad. What's your solution?
#154
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:59:31 GMT, the following appeared in
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by twaldron
<twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net>:
>Which state allows using deadly force when life isn't endangered???
I assume you mean by civilians. I can't provide a list, but
Texas for sure, and I know I've seen others mentioned. Tried
Google?
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:27:38 GMT, the following appeared in
>> rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by kevin
>> <kevin@el.net>:
>>
>> Check your state laws, but I believe you'll find that *no*
>> state allows unattended booby traps. And using lethal force
>> when life isn't endangered is also usually a no-no, although
>> this varies by state.
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by twaldron
<twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net>:
>Which state allows using deadly force when life isn't endangered???
I assume you mean by civilians. I can't provide a list, but
Texas for sure, and I know I've seen others mentioned. Tried
Google?
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:27:38 GMT, the following appeared in
>> rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by kevin
>> <kevin@el.net>:
>>
>> Check your state laws, but I believe you'll find that *no*
>> state allows unattended booby traps. And using lethal force
>> when life isn't endangered is also usually a no-no, although
>> this varies by state.
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
#155
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:59:31 GMT, the following appeared in
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by twaldron
<twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net>:
>Which state allows using deadly force when life isn't endangered???
I assume you mean by civilians. I can't provide a list, but
Texas for sure, and I know I've seen others mentioned. Tried
Google?
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:27:38 GMT, the following appeared in
>> rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by kevin
>> <kevin@el.net>:
>>
>> Check your state laws, but I believe you'll find that *no*
>> state allows unattended booby traps. And using lethal force
>> when life isn't endangered is also usually a no-no, although
>> this varies by state.
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by twaldron
<twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net>:
>Which state allows using deadly force when life isn't endangered???
I assume you mean by civilians. I can't provide a list, but
Texas for sure, and I know I've seen others mentioned. Tried
Google?
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:27:38 GMT, the following appeared in
>> rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by kevin
>> <kevin@el.net>:
>>
>> Check your state laws, but I believe you'll find that *no*
>> state allows unattended booby traps. And using lethal force
>> when life isn't endangered is also usually a no-no, although
>> this varies by state.
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
#156
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:35:09 GMT, the following appeared in
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by twaldron
<twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net>:
I may be missing something, but if you'll check below you'll
notice that "night" is only mentioned for 2 specific crimes;
arson, burglary, robbery and aggravated robbery don't seem
to carry that restriction.
>I'm not a lawyer, but I think you'd be hard pressed to find a case where
>someone was shot and killed, not threatening bodily harm and committing
>a theft, for instance, during the daytime and the shooter wasn't charged.
>
>I do know that there is much more leniency in regard to deadly force for
>the victim, if the crime is committed at night.
>
>Jeepers wrote:
>
>> Chapter 9 of the Texas Penal code. Look it up for yourself.
>>
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when you believe that deadly force
>> is immediately necessary to prevent the imminent commission of arson,
>> burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the night or
>> criminal mischief during the night.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when you believe that deadly force
>> is immediately necessary to prevent a person fleeing after committing
>> burglary, robbery, or aggravated robbery.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when you believe that deadly force
>> is immediately necessary to prevent a person from fleeing with the
>> property after committing theft during the night and you also believe
>> that the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other
>> means.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when use of force other than force
>> would expose you to death or serious bodily injury.
>>
>> Use of Deadly Force in Defense of a Third Person's Property
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified in defense of a third person's
>> property if you believe that the owner of the property requested the
>> protection, you have a legal duty to protect the property or you are
>> protecting the property of your spouse, parent or child under your
>> supervision.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is NOT justified in defense of a third person's
>> property if you would not be justified in using deadly force to protect
>> your own property under the same circumstances.
>>
>>
>> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
>> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by twaldron
<twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net>:
I may be missing something, but if you'll check below you'll
notice that "night" is only mentioned for 2 specific crimes;
arson, burglary, robbery and aggravated robbery don't seem
to carry that restriction.
>I'm not a lawyer, but I think you'd be hard pressed to find a case where
>someone was shot and killed, not threatening bodily harm and committing
>a theft, for instance, during the daytime and the shooter wasn't charged.
>
>I do know that there is much more leniency in regard to deadly force for
>the victim, if the crime is committed at night.
>
>Jeepers wrote:
>
>> Chapter 9 of the Texas Penal code. Look it up for yourself.
>>
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when you believe that deadly force
>> is immediately necessary to prevent the imminent commission of arson,
>> burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the night or
>> criminal mischief during the night.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when you believe that deadly force
>> is immediately necessary to prevent a person fleeing after committing
>> burglary, robbery, or aggravated robbery.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when you believe that deadly force
>> is immediately necessary to prevent a person from fleeing with the
>> property after committing theft during the night and you also believe
>> that the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other
>> means.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when use of force other than force
>> would expose you to death or serious bodily injury.
>>
>> Use of Deadly Force in Defense of a Third Person's Property
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified in defense of a third person's
>> property if you believe that the owner of the property requested the
>> protection, you have a legal duty to protect the property or you are
>> protecting the property of your spouse, parent or child under your
>> supervision.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is NOT justified in defense of a third person's
>> property if you would not be justified in using deadly force to protect
>> your own property under the same circumstances.
>>
>>
>> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
>> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
#157
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:35:09 GMT, the following appeared in
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by twaldron
<twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net>:
I may be missing something, but if you'll check below you'll
notice that "night" is only mentioned for 2 specific crimes;
arson, burglary, robbery and aggravated robbery don't seem
to carry that restriction.
>I'm not a lawyer, but I think you'd be hard pressed to find a case where
>someone was shot and killed, not threatening bodily harm and committing
>a theft, for instance, during the daytime and the shooter wasn't charged.
>
>I do know that there is much more leniency in regard to deadly force for
>the victim, if the crime is committed at night.
>
>Jeepers wrote:
>
>> Chapter 9 of the Texas Penal code. Look it up for yourself.
>>
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when you believe that deadly force
>> is immediately necessary to prevent the imminent commission of arson,
>> burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the night or
>> criminal mischief during the night.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when you believe that deadly force
>> is immediately necessary to prevent a person fleeing after committing
>> burglary, robbery, or aggravated robbery.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when you believe that deadly force
>> is immediately necessary to prevent a person from fleeing with the
>> property after committing theft during the night and you also believe
>> that the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other
>> means.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when use of force other than force
>> would expose you to death or serious bodily injury.
>>
>> Use of Deadly Force in Defense of a Third Person's Property
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified in defense of a third person's
>> property if you believe that the owner of the property requested the
>> protection, you have a legal duty to protect the property or you are
>> protecting the property of your spouse, parent or child under your
>> supervision.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is NOT justified in defense of a third person's
>> property if you would not be justified in using deadly force to protect
>> your own property under the same circumstances.
>>
>>
>> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
>> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by twaldron
<twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net>:
I may be missing something, but if you'll check below you'll
notice that "night" is only mentioned for 2 specific crimes;
arson, burglary, robbery and aggravated robbery don't seem
to carry that restriction.
>I'm not a lawyer, but I think you'd be hard pressed to find a case where
>someone was shot and killed, not threatening bodily harm and committing
>a theft, for instance, during the daytime and the shooter wasn't charged.
>
>I do know that there is much more leniency in regard to deadly force for
>the victim, if the crime is committed at night.
>
>Jeepers wrote:
>
>> Chapter 9 of the Texas Penal code. Look it up for yourself.
>>
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when you believe that deadly force
>> is immediately necessary to prevent the imminent commission of arson,
>> burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the night or
>> criminal mischief during the night.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when you believe that deadly force
>> is immediately necessary to prevent a person fleeing after committing
>> burglary, robbery, or aggravated robbery.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when you believe that deadly force
>> is immediately necessary to prevent a person from fleeing with the
>> property after committing theft during the night and you also believe
>> that the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other
>> means.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified when use of force other than force
>> would expose you to death or serious bodily injury.
>>
>> Use of Deadly Force in Defense of a Third Person's Property
>>
>> The use of deadly force is justified in defense of a third person's
>> property if you believe that the owner of the property requested the
>> protection, you have a legal duty to protect the property or you are
>> protecting the property of your spouse, parent or child under your
>> supervision.
>>
>> The use of deadly force is NOT justified in defense of a third person's
>> property if you would not be justified in using deadly force to protect
>> your own property under the same circumstances.
>>
>>
>> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
>> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>> -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
#158
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 06:25:25 GMT, the following appeared in
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "bulletsnbrains"
<strang@chorus.net>:
>
>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@buzz.off> wrote in message
>news:kptkkvcunntme7508r4n1541gobna11an0@4ax.com.. .
>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:27:38 GMT, the following appeared in
>> rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by kevin
>> <kevin@el.net>:
>>
>> Check your state laws, but I believe you'll find that *no*
>> state allows unattended booby traps. And using lethal force
>> when life isn't endangered is also usually a no-no, although
>> this varies by state.
>
>Buy some foot/leg traps for medium sized animals like fox and coyote! They
>only have to be check every 24 hours per trapping regulations. :-)
>
>When one of those pesky "animals" gets it paw caught, not only will the dog
>hear'em but so will you, and about half the neighborhood .<G>
Nice idea (and I ran a trapline for muskrats for a couple
years when I was around ten or so), but I think you might
have a *wee* bit of trouble convincing the cops that
muskrats were living in your driveway... ;-)
Seriously, though, trapping regs are usually *very* specific
about locations, types and so on. Now a real honest-to-God
bear trap... ;-)
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "bulletsnbrains"
<strang@chorus.net>:
>
>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@buzz.off> wrote in message
>news:kptkkvcunntme7508r4n1541gobna11an0@4ax.com.. .
>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:27:38 GMT, the following appeared in
>> rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by kevin
>> <kevin@el.net>:
>>
>> Check your state laws, but I believe you'll find that *no*
>> state allows unattended booby traps. And using lethal force
>> when life isn't endangered is also usually a no-no, although
>> this varies by state.
>
>Buy some foot/leg traps for medium sized animals like fox and coyote! They
>only have to be check every 24 hours per trapping regulations. :-)
>
>When one of those pesky "animals" gets it paw caught, not only will the dog
>hear'em but so will you, and about half the neighborhood .<G>
Nice idea (and I ran a trapline for muskrats for a couple
years when I was around ten or so), but I think you might
have a *wee* bit of trouble convincing the cops that
muskrats were living in your driveway... ;-)
Seriously, though, trapping regs are usually *very* specific
about locations, types and so on. Now a real honest-to-God
bear trap... ;-)
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
#159
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 06:25:25 GMT, the following appeared in
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "bulletsnbrains"
<strang@chorus.net>:
>
>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@buzz.off> wrote in message
>news:kptkkvcunntme7508r4n1541gobna11an0@4ax.com.. .
>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:27:38 GMT, the following appeared in
>> rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by kevin
>> <kevin@el.net>:
>>
>> Check your state laws, but I believe you'll find that *no*
>> state allows unattended booby traps. And using lethal force
>> when life isn't endangered is also usually a no-no, although
>> this varies by state.
>
>Buy some foot/leg traps for medium sized animals like fox and coyote! They
>only have to be check every 24 hours per trapping regulations. :-)
>
>When one of those pesky "animals" gets it paw caught, not only will the dog
>hear'em but so will you, and about half the neighborhood .<G>
Nice idea (and I ran a trapline for muskrats for a couple
years when I was around ten or so), but I think you might
have a *wee* bit of trouble convincing the cops that
muskrats were living in your driveway... ;-)
Seriously, though, trapping regs are usually *very* specific
about locations, types and so on. Now a real honest-to-God
bear trap... ;-)
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "bulletsnbrains"
<strang@chorus.net>:
>
>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@buzz.off> wrote in message
>news:kptkkvcunntme7508r4n1541gobna11an0@4ax.com.. .
>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:27:38 GMT, the following appeared in
>> rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by kevin
>> <kevin@el.net>:
>>
>> Check your state laws, but I believe you'll find that *no*
>> state allows unattended booby traps. And using lethal force
>> when life isn't endangered is also usually a no-no, although
>> this varies by state.
>
>Buy some foot/leg traps for medium sized animals like fox and coyote! They
>only have to be check every 24 hours per trapping regulations. :-)
>
>When one of those pesky "animals" gets it paw caught, not only will the dog
>hear'em but so will you, and about half the neighborhood .<G>
Nice idea (and I ran a trapline for muskrats for a couple
years when I was around ten or so), but I think you might
have a *wee* bit of trouble convincing the cops that
muskrats were living in your driveway... ;-)
Seriously, though, trapping regs are usually *very* specific
about locations, types and so on. Now a real honest-to-God
bear trap... ;-)
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
#160
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep Booby Traps Help
Sorry, no rebel flag on back...two small, discreet U.S. flags right under
the Jeep emblems...our country was founded on the premise that every man had
the right to defend himself and his property. Here in Texas, that right is
still respected to a certain extent. Some of the worst tyranny and most
inhuman regimes have begun by disarming the populace. I'm not some
gun-freak-wacko...but I am armed, I know I have the right to use lethal
force protect my family, myself, and my property. I don't have much money,
and I work hard for what I own, so I'm not letting ANYONE take something
without a fight.
RB
"twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
news:YJI2b.62$1h2.19@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com...
> How's that Rebel Flag look on the back of a Jeep anyway? :)
>
> Russ B wrote:
>
> > If more of us Texans would shoot these ********, the crime rate would go
> > down. Too many people these days have ZERO respect for other people's
> > property. Sure the DA MIGHT try to charge you, but in most cases you'll
> > walk if you use lethal force to prevent a crime of this type...My main
> > concern is that all the yankees, criminals, and foreigners will get our
laws
> > changed.
> >
> > RB
>
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
> 03 TJ Rubicon
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
>
the Jeep emblems...our country was founded on the premise that every man had
the right to defend himself and his property. Here in Texas, that right is
still respected to a certain extent. Some of the worst tyranny and most
inhuman regimes have begun by disarming the populace. I'm not some
gun-freak-wacko...but I am armed, I know I have the right to use lethal
force protect my family, myself, and my property. I don't have much money,
and I work hard for what I own, so I'm not letting ANYONE take something
without a fight.
RB
"twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
news:YJI2b.62$1h2.19@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com...
> How's that Rebel Flag look on the back of a Jeep anyway? :)
>
> Russ B wrote:
>
> > If more of us Texans would shoot these ********, the crime rate would go
> > down. Too many people these days have ZERO respect for other people's
> > property. Sure the DA MIGHT try to charge you, but in most cases you'll
> > walk if you use lethal force to prevent a crime of this type...My main
> > concern is that all the yankees, criminals, and foreigners will get our
laws
> > changed.
> >
> > RB
>
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
> 03 TJ Rubicon
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
>