Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <vpjp9lk0t8lf87@corp.supernews.com>, Douglas A. Shrader wrote:
>> What journals do YOU read Lloyd?
> I've asked you this before Lloyd, and you've never answered. You claim to be
> a hotshot scientist, what peer reviewed scientific journals do you read?
I can say one thing, when I did a search a few years back for the hell
of it, nothing had ever been published in a Journal that was written
by Parker.
While I didn't get author credit, at least one of the projects I worked
on got into a journal. And I do have a patent, a design one, but a patent
none the less. What about you parker? You've got decades of head start
on me......
>> What journals do YOU read Lloyd?
> I've asked you this before Lloyd, and you've never answered. You claim to be
> a hotshot scientist, what peer reviewed scientific journals do you read?
I can say one thing, when I did a search a few years back for the hell
of it, nothing had ever been published in a Journal that was written
by Parker.
While I didn't get author credit, at least one of the projects I worked
on got into a journal. And I do have a patent, a design one, but a patent
none the less. What about you parker? You've got decades of head start
on me......
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <vpjp9lk0t8lf87@corp.supernews.com>, Douglas A. Shrader wrote:
>> What journals do YOU read Lloyd?
> I've asked you this before Lloyd, and you've never answered. You claim to be
> a hotshot scientist, what peer reviewed scientific journals do you read?
I can say one thing, when I did a search a few years back for the hell
of it, nothing had ever been published in a Journal that was written
by Parker.
While I didn't get author credit, at least one of the projects I worked
on got into a journal. And I do have a patent, a design one, but a patent
none the less. What about you parker? You've got decades of head start
on me......
>> What journals do YOU read Lloyd?
> I've asked you this before Lloyd, and you've never answered. You claim to be
> a hotshot scientist, what peer reviewed scientific journals do you read?
I can say one thing, when I did a search a few years back for the hell
of it, nothing had ever been published in a Journal that was written
by Parker.
While I didn't get author credit, at least one of the projects I worked
on got into a journal. And I do have a patent, a design one, but a patent
none the less. What about you parker? You've got decades of head start
on me......
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <vpjp9lk0t8lf87@corp.supernews.com>, Douglas A. Shrader wrote:
>> What journals do YOU read Lloyd?
> I've asked you this before Lloyd, and you've never answered. You claim to be
> a hotshot scientist, what peer reviewed scientific journals do you read?
I can say one thing, when I did a search a few years back for the hell
of it, nothing had ever been published in a Journal that was written
by Parker.
While I didn't get author credit, at least one of the projects I worked
on got into a journal. And I do have a patent, a design one, but a patent
none the less. What about you parker? You've got decades of head start
on me......
>> What journals do YOU read Lloyd?
> I've asked you this before Lloyd, and you've never answered. You claim to be
> a hotshot scientist, what peer reviewed scientific journals do you read?
I can say one thing, when I did a search a few years back for the hell
of it, nothing had ever been published in a Journal that was written
by Parker.
While I didn't get author credit, at least one of the projects I worked
on got into a journal. And I do have a patent, a design one, but a patent
none the less. What about you parker? You've got decades of head start
on me......
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Aardwolf" <se1aard1@itis.com> wrote in message
news:3F9A053E.1A572CA2@itis.com...
>
>
> rnf2 wrote:
>
> > Besides which I think the Spacegear is available in LHD in some
countries.
> > you could possibly import a few for personal use under grey import
rules.
>
> Unfortunately there are no more grey import rules. You can import a
vehicle as
> is for testing, but have to export or destroy it after two years. You can
bring
> in a vehicle as is, if you can persuade the DOT that it is of "unique
technical
> or historical interest" but can only drive it 2500 miles a year and can't
resell
> it. Or you can import any vehicle as is that is over 25 years old with no
> restrictions.
>
> --Aardwolf.
>
Stupid.
should be able to import anything that is not currently imported by a
manufacturor.
rhys
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Aardwolf" <se1aard1@itis.com> wrote in message
news:3F9A053E.1A572CA2@itis.com...
>
>
> rnf2 wrote:
>
> > Besides which I think the Spacegear is available in LHD in some
countries.
> > you could possibly import a few for personal use under grey import
rules.
>
> Unfortunately there are no more grey import rules. You can import a
vehicle as
> is for testing, but have to export or destroy it after two years. You can
bring
> in a vehicle as is, if you can persuade the DOT that it is of "unique
technical
> or historical interest" but can only drive it 2500 miles a year and can't
resell
> it. Or you can import any vehicle as is that is over 25 years old with no
> restrictions.
>
> --Aardwolf.
>
Stupid.
should be able to import anything that is not currently imported by a
manufacturor.
rhys
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Aardwolf" <se1aard1@itis.com> wrote in message
news:3F9A053E.1A572CA2@itis.com...
>
>
> rnf2 wrote:
>
> > Besides which I think the Spacegear is available in LHD in some
countries.
> > you could possibly import a few for personal use under grey import
rules.
>
> Unfortunately there are no more grey import rules. You can import a
vehicle as
> is for testing, but have to export or destroy it after two years. You can
bring
> in a vehicle as is, if you can persuade the DOT that it is of "unique
technical
> or historical interest" but can only drive it 2500 miles a year and can't
resell
> it. Or you can import any vehicle as is that is over 25 years old with no
> restrictions.
>
> --Aardwolf.
>
Stupid.
should be able to import anything that is not currently imported by a
manufacturor.
rhys
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <1bad7qqap6.fsf@cs.nmsu.edu>, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>> Brent P wrote:
>> > What if the means of creation is evolution? Throws the monkey into
>> > the wrench now doesn't it :)
> "Throws the monkey into the wrench?" Never mind, I know what you
> meant.
It's a purposeful warpage of the old saying 'throws a monkey wrench
into the works'. A former co-worker came up with that, I've used it since
because I think it's much funnier ;)
>> Brent P wrote:
>> > What if the means of creation is evolution? Throws the monkey into
>> > the wrench now doesn't it :)
> "Throws the monkey into the wrench?" Never mind, I know what you
> meant.
It's a purposeful warpage of the old saying 'throws a monkey wrench
into the works'. A former co-worker came up with that, I've used it since
because I think it's much funnier ;)
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <1bad7qqap6.fsf@cs.nmsu.edu>, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>> Brent P wrote:
>> > What if the means of creation is evolution? Throws the monkey into
>> > the wrench now doesn't it :)
> "Throws the monkey into the wrench?" Never mind, I know what you
> meant.
It's a purposeful warpage of the old saying 'throws a monkey wrench
into the works'. A former co-worker came up with that, I've used it since
because I think it's much funnier ;)
>> Brent P wrote:
>> > What if the means of creation is evolution? Throws the monkey into
>> > the wrench now doesn't it :)
> "Throws the monkey into the wrench?" Never mind, I know what you
> meant.
It's a purposeful warpage of the old saying 'throws a monkey wrench
into the works'. A former co-worker came up with that, I've used it since
because I think it's much funnier ;)
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <1bad7qqap6.fsf@cs.nmsu.edu>, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>> Brent P wrote:
>> > What if the means of creation is evolution? Throws the monkey into
>> > the wrench now doesn't it :)
> "Throws the monkey into the wrench?" Never mind, I know what you
> meant.
It's a purposeful warpage of the old saying 'throws a monkey wrench
into the works'. A former co-worker came up with that, I've used it since
because I think it's much funnier ;)
>> Brent P wrote:
>> > What if the means of creation is evolution? Throws the monkey into
>> > the wrench now doesn't it :)
> "Throws the monkey into the wrench?" Never mind, I know what you
> meant.
It's a purposeful warpage of the old saying 'throws a monkey wrench
into the works'. A former co-worker came up with that, I've used it since
because I think it's much funnier ;)
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8Inmb.9553$mZ5.58279@attbi_s54...
> In article <vpjp9lk0t8lf87@corp.supernews.com>, Douglas A. Shrader wrote:
>
> >> What journals do YOU read Lloyd?
>
> > I've asked you this before Lloyd, and you've never answered. You claim
to be
> > a hotshot scientist, what peer reviewed scientific journals do you read?
>
> I can say one thing, when I did a search a few years back for the hell
> of it, nothing had ever been published in a Journal that was written
> by Parker.
>
> While I didn't get author credit, at least one of the projects I worked
> on got into a journal. And I do have a patent, a design one, but a patent
> none the less. What about you parker? You've got decades of head start
> on me......
>
>
I didn't get credit, but I got in a book written by a lecturer here at Uni,
we were having a debate and one of my remarks in refuting the opposing
arguement made the lecturer go all thoughtful and she asked after class if
she could quote me in the textbook on the subject she was writing.
rhys


