Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
A car or minivan the size of an SUV would be called an SUV...
"Dave C." <spammersdie@slowlyandpainfully.com> wrote in message
news:bNgmb.890$RQ1.297@newsread3.news.pas.earthlin k.net...
> > >Name one that is a good value for the money. (I don't really expect a
> reply
> > >here) -Dave
> > >
> > >
> > Most are less expensive than an SUV with comparable seating or cargo
> space.
>
> OK . . . show me one CAR or MINIVAN that has comparable seating and cargo
> space for less money than the typical SUV? Oh, and AWD or 4X4, with good
> towing capacity. -Dave
>
>
"Dave C." <spammersdie@slowlyandpainfully.com> wrote in message
news:bNgmb.890$RQ1.297@newsread3.news.pas.earthlin k.net...
> > >Name one that is a good value for the money. (I don't really expect a
> reply
> > >here) -Dave
> > >
> > >
> > Most are less expensive than an SUV with comparable seating or cargo
> space.
>
> OK . . . show me one CAR or MINIVAN that has comparable seating and cargo
> space for less money than the typical SUV? Oh, and AWD or 4X4, with good
> towing capacity. -Dave
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
A car or minivan the size of an SUV would be called an SUV...
"Dave C." <spammersdie@slowlyandpainfully.com> wrote in message
news:bNgmb.890$RQ1.297@newsread3.news.pas.earthlin k.net...
> > >Name one that is a good value for the money. (I don't really expect a
> reply
> > >here) -Dave
> > >
> > >
> > Most are less expensive than an SUV with comparable seating or cargo
> space.
>
> OK . . . show me one CAR or MINIVAN that has comparable seating and cargo
> space for less money than the typical SUV? Oh, and AWD or 4X4, with good
> towing capacity. -Dave
>
>
"Dave C." <spammersdie@slowlyandpainfully.com> wrote in message
news:bNgmb.890$RQ1.297@newsread3.news.pas.earthlin k.net...
> > >Name one that is a good value for the money. (I don't really expect a
> reply
> > >here) -Dave
> > >
> > >
> > Most are less expensive than an SUV with comparable seating or cargo
> space.
>
> OK . . . show me one CAR or MINIVAN that has comparable seating and cargo
> space for less money than the typical SUV? Oh, and AWD or 4X4, with good
> towing capacity. -Dave
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
A car or minivan the size of an SUV would be called an SUV...
"Dave C." <spammersdie@slowlyandpainfully.com> wrote in message
news:bNgmb.890$RQ1.297@newsread3.news.pas.earthlin k.net...
> > >Name one that is a good value for the money. (I don't really expect a
> reply
> > >here) -Dave
> > >
> > >
> > Most are less expensive than an SUV with comparable seating or cargo
> space.
>
> OK . . . show me one CAR or MINIVAN that has comparable seating and cargo
> space for less money than the typical SUV? Oh, and AWD or 4X4, with good
> towing capacity. -Dave
>
>
"Dave C." <spammersdie@slowlyandpainfully.com> wrote in message
news:bNgmb.890$RQ1.297@newsread3.news.pas.earthlin k.net...
> > >Name one that is a good value for the money. (I don't really expect a
> reply
> > >here) -Dave
> > >
> > >
> > Most are less expensive than an SUV with comparable seating or cargo
> space.
>
> OK . . . show me one CAR or MINIVAN that has comparable seating and cargo
> space for less money than the typical SUV? Oh, and AWD or 4X4, with good
> towing capacity. -Dave
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Dave C." <spammersdie@slowlyandpainfully.com> wrote in message
news:NNjmb.1019$RQ1.437@newsread3.news.pas.earthli nk.net...
> > Mitsubishi Delecia Spacegear 4x4 minvan with turbo Diesel engine
> >
> > rhys
>
> Great! As soon as it's sold on this continent, count me in. -Dave
>
>
That is a preoblem, too many strident Unions ensuring their members continue
to be employed making substandard over priced re-hashes of '50s mistakes.
GM has some of the finest cars/trucks/pickups in the world, but can't be
persuaded to import them to the US.
Besides which I think the Spacegear is available in LHD in some countries.
you could possibly import a few for personal use under grey import rules.
rhys
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Dave C." <spammersdie@slowlyandpainfully.com> wrote in message
news:NNjmb.1019$RQ1.437@newsread3.news.pas.earthli nk.net...
> > Mitsubishi Delecia Spacegear 4x4 minvan with turbo Diesel engine
> >
> > rhys
>
> Great! As soon as it's sold on this continent, count me in. -Dave
>
>
That is a preoblem, too many strident Unions ensuring their members continue
to be employed making substandard over priced re-hashes of '50s mistakes.
GM has some of the finest cars/trucks/pickups in the world, but can't be
persuaded to import them to the US.
Besides which I think the Spacegear is available in LHD in some countries.
you could possibly import a few for personal use under grey import rules.
rhys
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Dave C." <spammersdie@slowlyandpainfully.com> wrote in message
news:NNjmb.1019$RQ1.437@newsread3.news.pas.earthli nk.net...
> > Mitsubishi Delecia Spacegear 4x4 minvan with turbo Diesel engine
> >
> > rhys
>
> Great! As soon as it's sold on this continent, count me in. -Dave
>
>
That is a preoblem, too many strident Unions ensuring their members continue
to be employed making substandard over priced re-hashes of '50s mistakes.
GM has some of the finest cars/trucks/pickups in the world, but can't be
persuaded to import them to the US.
Besides which I think the Spacegear is available in LHD in some countries.
you could possibly import a few for personal use under grey import rules.
rhys
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Brent P wrote:
> In article <3F99A319.703@computer.org>, Matthew S. Whiting wrote:
>
>
>>I agree. Saying we don't know for sure is accurate. Saying evolution
>>is based on fact and creation is not based on fact, is simply not
>>accurate. The only honest answer is that we don't know the complete
>>answer and likely never will. Lloyd, and others who claim to be
>>scientists, are incorrect at best, and disingenuous at worst, when they
>>claim that evolution is fact based.
>
>
> Evolution is based in facts, evidence. It's an explanation based upon
> the evidence, the facts. It still could be incorrect, but it is based
> in fact.
Sorry, but I believe that facts are things that are correct, not incorrect.
>>I believe creation is the best available explanation. They believe
>>evolution is the best available explanation. However, you can't say
>>either is based on fact or provides a complete explanation.
>
>
> What if the means of creation is evolution? Throws the monkey into
> the wrench now doesn't it :)
>
>
And what if the means of evolution was intelligent design through
creation? :-)
Matt
> In article <3F99A319.703@computer.org>, Matthew S. Whiting wrote:
>
>
>>I agree. Saying we don't know for sure is accurate. Saying evolution
>>is based on fact and creation is not based on fact, is simply not
>>accurate. The only honest answer is that we don't know the complete
>>answer and likely never will. Lloyd, and others who claim to be
>>scientists, are incorrect at best, and disingenuous at worst, when they
>>claim that evolution is fact based.
>
>
> Evolution is based in facts, evidence. It's an explanation based upon
> the evidence, the facts. It still could be incorrect, but it is based
> in fact.
Sorry, but I believe that facts are things that are correct, not incorrect.
>>I believe creation is the best available explanation. They believe
>>evolution is the best available explanation. However, you can't say
>>either is based on fact or provides a complete explanation.
>
>
> What if the means of creation is evolution? Throws the monkey into
> the wrench now doesn't it :)
>
>
And what if the means of evolution was intelligent design through
creation? :-)
Matt
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Brent P wrote:
> In article <3F99A319.703@computer.org>, Matthew S. Whiting wrote:
>
>
>>I agree. Saying we don't know for sure is accurate. Saying evolution
>>is based on fact and creation is not based on fact, is simply not
>>accurate. The only honest answer is that we don't know the complete
>>answer and likely never will. Lloyd, and others who claim to be
>>scientists, are incorrect at best, and disingenuous at worst, when they
>>claim that evolution is fact based.
>
>
> Evolution is based in facts, evidence. It's an explanation based upon
> the evidence, the facts. It still could be incorrect, but it is based
> in fact.
Sorry, but I believe that facts are things that are correct, not incorrect.
>>I believe creation is the best available explanation. They believe
>>evolution is the best available explanation. However, you can't say
>>either is based on fact or provides a complete explanation.
>
>
> What if the means of creation is evolution? Throws the monkey into
> the wrench now doesn't it :)
>
>
And what if the means of evolution was intelligent design through
creation? :-)
Matt
> In article <3F99A319.703@computer.org>, Matthew S. Whiting wrote:
>
>
>>I agree. Saying we don't know for sure is accurate. Saying evolution
>>is based on fact and creation is not based on fact, is simply not
>>accurate. The only honest answer is that we don't know the complete
>>answer and likely never will. Lloyd, and others who claim to be
>>scientists, are incorrect at best, and disingenuous at worst, when they
>>claim that evolution is fact based.
>
>
> Evolution is based in facts, evidence. It's an explanation based upon
> the evidence, the facts. It still could be incorrect, but it is based
> in fact.
Sorry, but I believe that facts are things that are correct, not incorrect.
>>I believe creation is the best available explanation. They believe
>>evolution is the best available explanation. However, you can't say
>>either is based on fact or provides a complete explanation.
>
>
> What if the means of creation is evolution? Throws the monkey into
> the wrench now doesn't it :)
>
>
And what if the means of evolution was intelligent design through
creation? :-)
Matt