"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4m7$nk9$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <uAcnb.8112$FI2.2516@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bnjfa3$b81$9@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <5q2nb.4730$X22.88@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.ne t>,
> >> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >news:bngqj4$8h4$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >>
> >> >> Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some
science.<CLICK>Try
> >> >learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try
> >learning
> >> >some science.<CLICK>...........
> >> >
> >> >Will somebody please kick the jukebox, somebody's playing that broken
> >Parker
> >> >record on there again. ;-D
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Would someone please tell the 6th-grade drop-outs here to stop arguing
> >science
> >> with scientists? As Pogo said, I refuse to engage in a battle of wits
> >with an
> >> unarmed opponent.
> >
> >Better a 6th grade drop out than an elitist know-it-all that blindly
follows
> >anything that comes out of the DNC, CR, or any UN based org. who replies
to
> >any differing opinion with "Learn some science.", "idiot", "****", "right
> >winger", etc.......
> >You sound like a broken record after a while Lloyd. Try having an open
mind
> >it might be a new experiance for you.
> >
> >
> Does that mean embracing creationism? That evil spirits cause disease?
That
> the earth is 6000 years old?
>
> Open minds are fine until the data is in. Then it's foolish.
Gee Lloyd trying to be condescending here as usual. I didn't say anything
about creationism, evil spirits, or the earth being 6000 years old.
An open mind means looking at all the data instead of ignoring some data
while giving more weight to other data.
You know along the lines of discounting a period of higher solar activity
while everything from cow farts to cold snaps are directly linked to global
warming.
You should also think twice about slamming people for siting what you call
"right-wing" sources when you tend to use sources that have the opposite
bias or use scare tactics to get more funding. Its called being
hypocritical.

 

"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4m7$nk9$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <uAcnb.8112$FI2.2516@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bnjfa3$b81$9@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <5q2nb.4730$X22.88@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.ne t>,
> >> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >news:bngqj4$8h4$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >>
> >> >> Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some
science.<CLICK>Try
> >> >learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try
> >learning
> >> >some science.<CLICK>...........
> >> >
> >> >Will somebody please kick the jukebox, somebody's playing that broken
> >Parker
> >> >record on there again. ;-D
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Would someone please tell the 6th-grade drop-outs here to stop arguing
> >science
> >> with scientists? As Pogo said, I refuse to engage in a battle of wits
> >with an
> >> unarmed opponent.
> >
> >Better a 6th grade drop out than an elitist know-it-all that blindly
follows
> >anything that comes out of the DNC, CR, or any UN based org. who replies
to
> >any differing opinion with "Learn some science.", "idiot", "****", "right
> >winger", etc.......
> >You sound like a broken record after a while Lloyd. Try having an open
mind
> >it might be a new experiance for you.
> >
> >
> Does that mean embracing creationism? That evil spirits cause disease?
That
> the earth is 6000 years old?
>
> Open minds are fine until the data is in. Then it's foolish.
Gee Lloyd trying to be condescending here as usual. I didn't say anything
about creationism, evil spirits, or the earth being 6000 years old.
An open mind means looking at all the data instead of ignoring some data
while giving more weight to other data.
You know along the lines of discounting a period of higher solar activity
while everything from cow farts to cold snaps are directly linked to global
warming.
You should also think twice about slamming people for siting what you call
"right-wing" sources when you tend to use sources that have the opposite
bias or use scare tactics to get more funding. Its called being
hypocritical.

 

"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4m7$nk9$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <uAcnb.8112$FI2.2516@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bnjfa3$b81$9@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <5q2nb.4730$X22.88@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.ne t>,
> >> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >news:bngqj4$8h4$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >>
> >> >> Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some
science.<CLICK>Try
> >> >learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try
> >learning
> >> >some science.<CLICK>...........
> >> >
> >> >Will somebody please kick the jukebox, somebody's playing that broken
> >Parker
> >> >record on there again. ;-D
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Would someone please tell the 6th-grade drop-outs here to stop arguing
> >science
> >> with scientists? As Pogo said, I refuse to engage in a battle of wits
> >with an
> >> unarmed opponent.
> >
> >Better a 6th grade drop out than an elitist know-it-all that blindly
follows
> >anything that comes out of the DNC, CR, or any UN based org. who replies
to
> >any differing opinion with "Learn some science.", "idiot", "****", "right
> >winger", etc.......
> >You sound like a broken record after a while Lloyd. Try having an open
mind
> >it might be a new experiance for you.
> >
> >
> Does that mean embracing creationism? That evil spirits cause disease?
That
> the earth is 6000 years old?
>
> Open minds are fine until the data is in. Then it's foolish.
Gee Lloyd trying to be condescending here as usual. I didn't say anything
about creationism, evil spirits, or the earth being 6000 years old.
An open mind means looking at all the data instead of ignoring some data
while giving more weight to other data.
You know along the lines of discounting a period of higher solar activity
while everything from cow farts to cold snaps are directly linked to global
warming.
You should also think twice about slamming people for siting what you call
"right-wing" sources when you tend to use sources that have the opposite
bias or use scare tactics to get more funding. Its called being
hypocritical.

 

"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm464$nk9$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bnjhqm0m1g@enews2.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >I'm still waiting for these CO2 zealots to 1) prove their theories,
>
> Are you saying the National Academy of Sciences, NASA, EPA, NOAA, etc.,
have
> jumped onto something that's not proven? Isn't it more likely you either
have
> not read the science or refuse to believe it?
>
>
> > 2)
> >assuming they are correct, propose a single workable solution besides
> >getting mom to sell her SUV. The entire theory is a full of holes as
their
> >proponents heads.
>
> The only solution is to cut greenhouse gas emissions. That means driving
> less, driving more fuel-efficient vehicles, using coal less, using more
> renewable energy sources, planting more trees, not clear-cutting
forests...
>

So when are you gonna trade that gas guzzling overpriced German taxi cab
Benzo in for a Prius or an Insight? I bet your computer uses a good bit of
electricity too.

 

"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm464$nk9$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bnjhqm0m1g@enews2.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >I'm still waiting for these CO2 zealots to 1) prove their theories,
>
> Are you saying the National Academy of Sciences, NASA, EPA, NOAA, etc.,
have
> jumped onto something that's not proven? Isn't it more likely you either
have
> not read the science or refuse to believe it?
>
>
> > 2)
> >assuming they are correct, propose a single workable solution besides
> >getting mom to sell her SUV. The entire theory is a full of holes as
their
> >proponents heads.
>
> The only solution is to cut greenhouse gas emissions. That means driving
> less, driving more fuel-efficient vehicles, using coal less, using more
> renewable energy sources, planting more trees, not clear-cutting
forests...
>

So when are you gonna trade that gas guzzling overpriced German taxi cab
Benzo in for a Prius or an Insight? I bet your computer uses a good bit of
electricity too.

 

"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm464$nk9$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bnjhqm0m1g@enews2.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >I'm still waiting for these CO2 zealots to 1) prove their theories,
>
> Are you saying the National Academy of Sciences, NASA, EPA, NOAA, etc.,
have
> jumped onto something that's not proven? Isn't it more likely you either
have
> not read the science or refuse to believe it?
>
>
> > 2)
> >assuming they are correct, propose a single workable solution besides
> >getting mom to sell her SUV. The entire theory is a full of holes as
their
> >proponents heads.
>
> The only solution is to cut greenhouse gas emissions. That means driving
> less, driving more fuel-efficient vehicles, using coal less, using more
> renewable energy sources, planting more trees, not clear-cutting
forests...
>

So when are you gonna trade that gas guzzling overpriced German taxi cab
Benzo in for a Prius or an Insight? I bet your computer uses a good bit of
electricity too.

 

"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vpters43g2722a@corp.supernews.com...
>
---snippy---
> Perhaps if you had both intelligence and an open mind we could have
> an intelligent conversation. However you are to stupid to realize how
> ignorant you are. A PHd does not make you intelligent LP, nor is one
> required to have an informed discussion about any topic you care to
> name. I would bet hard money my IQ is far greater than yours, care
> to post yours?
>
Please, let's not descend to the level of posting IQ scores on the Internet.
That would be really crass.

Earle
http://earleh.tripod.com/w2.html

 

"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vpters43g2722a@corp.supernews.com...
>
---snippy---
> Perhaps if you had both intelligence and an open mind we could have
> an intelligent conversation. However you are to stupid to realize how
> ignorant you are. A PHd does not make you intelligent LP, nor is one
> required to have an informed discussion about any topic you care to
> name. I would bet hard money my IQ is far greater than yours, care
> to post yours?
>
Please, let's not descend to the level of posting IQ scores on the Internet.
That would be really crass.

Earle
http://earleh.tripod.com/w2.html

 

"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vpters43g2722a@corp.supernews.com...
>
---snippy---
> Perhaps if you had both intelligence and an open mind we could have
> an intelligent conversation. However you are to stupid to realize how
> ignorant you are. A PHd does not make you intelligent LP, nor is one
> required to have an informed discussion about any topic you care to
> name. I would bet hard money my IQ is far greater than yours, care
> to post yours?
>
Please, let's not descend to the level of posting IQ scores on the Internet.
That would be really crass.

Earle
http://earleh.tripod.com/w2.html

 

"A fool named chris mullin" <mullin_chris_j@northgrum.com> wrote in message
news:bnmd7s$csi$1@gateway.northgrum.com...
>
> "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
> news:bnm69q$12d4h3$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > "A senile incontinent old fool named Lloyd Parker"
> <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu>
> > wrote in message news:bnm57i$ord$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > ---snippy---
> > > Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent
> > > discussion about science. But to claim, as some have here, that
> > > evolution is not a fact is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't
> > > factual.
> > >
> > Evolution is not a fact Lloyd. It is a theory. It happens to be a good
> > theory which explains much of the observed data, but it is still a
> > theory. If you were a real scientist you would know this.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> You don't have to be a scientist to know that evolution is a FACT. It
> occurs. period.
> The theory is Dawin's, and Darwin only tried to explain WHY evolution
> OCCURS.
> Even if Darwin's explanation is totally off, it doesn't change the FACT
> that
> evolution is occuring everyday, all the time, right in front of you.
> Look it up.
> How else would dog breeders be able to make dogs with different traits.
> Are
> you saying genes don't get passed down to offspring? Are you saying that
> the
> strong do not survive? Because the strong surviving and passing down genes
> to their offspring IS EVOLUTION.
> Just because we can't prove how something happens, doesn't change the FACT
> that it happens.
>
We have no way of knowing that it is indeed the strong that survive. What
we observe in nature is change. How we explain it is evolution. Evolution
is therefore a theory to explain change, not a fact. Putting something in
all caps does not make it more true. I am sure that even Lloyd knows this.

Earle