Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent discussion
> about science.
Explain to me the methods being used to measure the average global
temperature that are both precise enough and consistent enough to
separate a 0.4 degree C temperature rise out of the normal background
variation over the past 1000 years. Explain to me any computer model
that can predict 1 degree C average global temperature rises with any
certainty when they can't even predict tomorrow's temperatures with 3
degrees on a consistent basis.
I assume you don't know any scientist who adjust their data to fit their
preconceived notions.
Weren't those cold fusion guys "scientist"? Heck I think they were even
honest scientist.
Do you honestly think the Earth's environment has ever been static and
unchanging? Can you say with any certainty that global warming is worse
than the environmental changes that would occur in its absence?
Literally billions of tons of carbon have been effectively removed from
the atmosphere over the last few billion years. At some point, might me
have too little CO2?
History is full of widely accepted theories that turned out to be wrong.
Why are you so sure that Global Warming isn't one of these?
I assume you believe that all scientist and government agency are
completely honest and that they would never jump on a popular bandwagon
as means of securing funding to support their careers/agencies? It has
been my experience that people who say things are OK tend not to secure
funding and soon need to find something else to do.
Even if you are 100% right about global warming, might not the fixes be
worse than doing nothing?
Ed
None of us is as dumb as all of us
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:16:28 -0500, "The Ancient One"
<onlytheone@thetopknows.com>
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bnm54u$nk9$13@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <vprkhgchpgi642@corp.supernews.com>,
>> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bnjeoi$b81$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <vpof02qkahoq17@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >> Sure, got to make sure. But the UN couldn't find them, and 150,000
>US
>> >> >troops
>> >> >> haven't found them.
>> >> >
>> >> >Bingo, The UN couldn't find them, although it is well documented that
>> >they
>> >> >existed.
>> >>
>> >> Not in 2003.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >That is why they were still looking, that is why we are still
>> >> >looking. We haven't found Saddam yet either, but we know he exists as
>> >well.
>> >> >Or do you think that is also a lie?
>> >>
>> >> Is he as big as the WMD?
>> >
>> >You do realize Saddam had twelve years in which to hide them. Where is
>Jimmy
>> >Hoffa?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> We claimed direct evidence and knowledge that WMD were there in 2003.
>
>No, we asked for proof of where they were and if they had been destroyed, as
>per the UN Mandate. Saddam refused to provide said proof. You really are
>dumb aren't you.
Not as dumb as you, who can't remember back as far as 8 months ago.
>
<onlytheone@thetopknows.com>
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bnm54u$nk9$13@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <vprkhgchpgi642@corp.supernews.com>,
>> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bnjeoi$b81$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <vpof02qkahoq17@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >> Sure, got to make sure. But the UN couldn't find them, and 150,000
>US
>> >> >troops
>> >> >> haven't found them.
>> >> >
>> >> >Bingo, The UN couldn't find them, although it is well documented that
>> >they
>> >> >existed.
>> >>
>> >> Not in 2003.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >That is why they were still looking, that is why we are still
>> >> >looking. We haven't found Saddam yet either, but we know he exists as
>> >well.
>> >> >Or do you think that is also a lie?
>> >>
>> >> Is he as big as the WMD?
>> >
>> >You do realize Saddam had twelve years in which to hide them. Where is
>Jimmy
>> >Hoffa?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> We claimed direct evidence and knowledge that WMD were there in 2003.
>
>No, we asked for proof of where they were and if they had been destroyed, as
>per the UN Mandate. Saddam refused to provide said proof. You really are
>dumb aren't you.
Not as dumb as you, who can't remember back as far as 8 months ago.
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:16:28 -0500, "The Ancient One"
<onlytheone@thetopknows.com>
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bnm54u$nk9$13@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <vprkhgchpgi642@corp.supernews.com>,
>> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bnjeoi$b81$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <vpof02qkahoq17@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >> Sure, got to make sure. But the UN couldn't find them, and 150,000
>US
>> >> >troops
>> >> >> haven't found them.
>> >> >
>> >> >Bingo, The UN couldn't find them, although it is well documented that
>> >they
>> >> >existed.
>> >>
>> >> Not in 2003.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >That is why they were still looking, that is why we are still
>> >> >looking. We haven't found Saddam yet either, but we know he exists as
>> >well.
>> >> >Or do you think that is also a lie?
>> >>
>> >> Is he as big as the WMD?
>> >
>> >You do realize Saddam had twelve years in which to hide them. Where is
>Jimmy
>> >Hoffa?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> We claimed direct evidence and knowledge that WMD were there in 2003.
>
>No, we asked for proof of where they were and if they had been destroyed, as
>per the UN Mandate. Saddam refused to provide said proof. You really are
>dumb aren't you.
Not as dumb as you, who can't remember back as far as 8 months ago.
>
<onlytheone@thetopknows.com>
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bnm54u$nk9$13@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <vprkhgchpgi642@corp.supernews.com>,
>> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bnjeoi$b81$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <vpof02qkahoq17@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >> Sure, got to make sure. But the UN couldn't find them, and 150,000
>US
>> >> >troops
>> >> >> haven't found them.
>> >> >
>> >> >Bingo, The UN couldn't find them, although it is well documented that
>> >they
>> >> >existed.
>> >>
>> >> Not in 2003.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >That is why they were still looking, that is why we are still
>> >> >looking. We haven't found Saddam yet either, but we know he exists as
>> >well.
>> >> >Or do you think that is also a lie?
>> >>
>> >> Is he as big as the WMD?
>> >
>> >You do realize Saddam had twelve years in which to hide them. Where is
>Jimmy
>> >Hoffa?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> We claimed direct evidence and knowledge that WMD were there in 2003.
>
>No, we asked for proof of where they were and if they had been destroyed, as
>per the UN Mandate. Saddam refused to provide said proof. You really are
>dumb aren't you.
Not as dumb as you, who can't remember back as far as 8 months ago.
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:16:28 -0500, "The Ancient One"
<onlytheone@thetopknows.com>
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bnm54u$nk9$13@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <vprkhgchpgi642@corp.supernews.com>,
>> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bnjeoi$b81$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <vpof02qkahoq17@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >> Sure, got to make sure. But the UN couldn't find them, and 150,000
>US
>> >> >troops
>> >> >> haven't found them.
>> >> >
>> >> >Bingo, The UN couldn't find them, although it is well documented that
>> >they
>> >> >existed.
>> >>
>> >> Not in 2003.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >That is why they were still looking, that is why we are still
>> >> >looking. We haven't found Saddam yet either, but we know he exists as
>> >well.
>> >> >Or do you think that is also a lie?
>> >>
>> >> Is he as big as the WMD?
>> >
>> >You do realize Saddam had twelve years in which to hide them. Where is
>Jimmy
>> >Hoffa?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> We claimed direct evidence and knowledge that WMD were there in 2003.
>
>No, we asked for proof of where they were and if they had been destroyed, as
>per the UN Mandate. Saddam refused to provide said proof. You really are
>dumb aren't you.
Not as dumb as you, who can't remember back as far as 8 months ago.
>
<onlytheone@thetopknows.com>
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bnm54u$nk9$13@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <vprkhgchpgi642@corp.supernews.com>,
>> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bnjeoi$b81$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <vpof02qkahoq17@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >> Sure, got to make sure. But the UN couldn't find them, and 150,000
>US
>> >> >troops
>> >> >> haven't found them.
>> >> >
>> >> >Bingo, The UN couldn't find them, although it is well documented that
>> >they
>> >> >existed.
>> >>
>> >> Not in 2003.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >That is why they were still looking, that is why we are still
>> >> >looking. We haven't found Saddam yet either, but we know he exists as
>> >well.
>> >> >Or do you think that is also a lie?
>> >>
>> >> Is he as big as the WMD?
>> >
>> >You do realize Saddam had twelve years in which to hide them. Where is
>Jimmy
>> >Hoffa?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> We claimed direct evidence and knowledge that WMD were there in 2003.
>
>No, we asked for proof of where they were and if they had been destroyed, as
>per the UN Mandate. Saddam refused to provide said proof. You really are
>dumb aren't you.
Not as dumb as you, who can't remember back as far as 8 months ago.
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
They can't AUCL(?) would scream about discrimination against hispanics or
lovers of mexican foods. and Taco Bell would lobby congress...
rhys
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bnne9s02pll@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Shhh....!!!!! Don't say anything about this in California or they'll put a
> "fart tax" on garlic, salsa & refried beans!
>
> "rnf2" <rnf2@NOSPAMwaikato.ac.nz> wrote in message
> news:3f9f08a0@news.iconz.co.nz...
> >
> > "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote
> >
> > > You know along the lines of discounting a period of higher solar
> activity
> > > while everything from cow farts to cold snaps are directly linked to
> > global
> > > warming.
> > >
> >
> > You been reading about the NZ fart tax?
> >
> > rhys
> >
> >
>
>
lovers of mexican foods. and Taco Bell would lobby congress...
rhys
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bnne9s02pll@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Shhh....!!!!! Don't say anything about this in California or they'll put a
> "fart tax" on garlic, salsa & refried beans!
>
> "rnf2" <rnf2@NOSPAMwaikato.ac.nz> wrote in message
> news:3f9f08a0@news.iconz.co.nz...
> >
> > "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote
> >
> > > You know along the lines of discounting a period of higher solar
> activity
> > > while everything from cow farts to cold snaps are directly linked to
> > global
> > > warming.
> > >
> >
> > You been reading about the NZ fart tax?
> >
> > rhys
> >
> >
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
They can't AUCL(?) would scream about discrimination against hispanics or
lovers of mexican foods. and Taco Bell would lobby congress...
rhys
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bnne9s02pll@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Shhh....!!!!! Don't say anything about this in California or they'll put a
> "fart tax" on garlic, salsa & refried beans!
>
> "rnf2" <rnf2@NOSPAMwaikato.ac.nz> wrote in message
> news:3f9f08a0@news.iconz.co.nz...
> >
> > "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote
> >
> > > You know along the lines of discounting a period of higher solar
> activity
> > > while everything from cow farts to cold snaps are directly linked to
> > global
> > > warming.
> > >
> >
> > You been reading about the NZ fart tax?
> >
> > rhys
> >
> >
>
>
lovers of mexican foods. and Taco Bell would lobby congress...
rhys
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bnne9s02pll@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Shhh....!!!!! Don't say anything about this in California or they'll put a
> "fart tax" on garlic, salsa & refried beans!
>
> "rnf2" <rnf2@NOSPAMwaikato.ac.nz> wrote in message
> news:3f9f08a0@news.iconz.co.nz...
> >
> > "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote
> >
> > > You know along the lines of discounting a period of higher solar
> activity
> > > while everything from cow farts to cold snaps are directly linked to
> > global
> > > warming.
> > >
> >
> > You been reading about the NZ fart tax?
> >
> > rhys
> >
> >
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
They can't AUCL(?) would scream about discrimination against hispanics or
lovers of mexican foods. and Taco Bell would lobby congress...
rhys
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bnne9s02pll@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Shhh....!!!!! Don't say anything about this in California or they'll put a
> "fart tax" on garlic, salsa & refried beans!
>
> "rnf2" <rnf2@NOSPAMwaikato.ac.nz> wrote in message
> news:3f9f08a0@news.iconz.co.nz...
> >
> > "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote
> >
> > > You know along the lines of discounting a period of higher solar
> activity
> > > while everything from cow farts to cold snaps are directly linked to
> > global
> > > warming.
> > >
> >
> > You been reading about the NZ fart tax?
> >
> > rhys
> >
> >
>
>
lovers of mexican foods. and Taco Bell would lobby congress...
rhys
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bnne9s02pll@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Shhh....!!!!! Don't say anything about this in California or they'll put a
> "fart tax" on garlic, salsa & refried beans!
>
> "rnf2" <rnf2@NOSPAMwaikato.ac.nz> wrote in message
> news:3f9f08a0@news.iconz.co.nz...
> >
> > "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote
> >
> > > You know along the lines of discounting a period of higher solar
> activity
> > > while everything from cow farts to cold snaps are directly linked to
> > global
> > > warming.
> > >
> >
> > You been reading about the NZ fart tax?
> >
> > rhys
> >
> >
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"rnf2" <rnf2@NOSPAMwaikato.ac.nz> wrote in message
news:3f9f08a0@news.iconz.co.nz...
>
> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote
>
> > You know along the lines of discounting a period of higher solar
activity
> > while everything from cow farts to cold snaps are directly linked to
> global
> > warming.
> >
>
> You been reading about the NZ fart tax?
>
> rhys
>
>
Yep, little while back though.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"rnf2" <rnf2@NOSPAMwaikato.ac.nz> wrote in message
news:3f9f08a0@news.iconz.co.nz...
>
> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote
>
> > You know along the lines of discounting a period of higher solar
activity
> > while everything from cow farts to cold snaps are directly linked to
> global
> > warming.
> >
>
> You been reading about the NZ fart tax?
>
> rhys
>
>
Yep, little while back though.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"rnf2" <rnf2@NOSPAMwaikato.ac.nz> wrote in message
news:3f9f08a0@news.iconz.co.nz...
>
> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote
>
> > You know along the lines of discounting a period of higher solar
activity
> > while everything from cow farts to cold snaps are directly linked to
> global
> > warming.
> >
>
> You been reading about the NZ fart tax?
>
> rhys
>
>
Yep, little while back though.