"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm464$nk9$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bnjhqm0m1g@enews2.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >I'm still waiting for these CO2 zealots to 1) prove their theories,
>
> Are you saying the National Academy of Sciences, NASA, EPA, NOAA, etc.,
have
> jumped onto something that's not proven? Isn't it more likely you either
have
> not read the science or refuse to believe it?
>
>
> > 2)
> >assuming they are correct, propose a single workable solution besides
> >getting mom to sell her SUV. The entire theory is a full of holes as
their
> >proponents heads.
>
> The only solution is to cut greenhouse gas emissions. That means driving
> less, driving more fuel-efficient vehicles, using coal less, using more
> renewable energy sources, planting more trees, not clear-cutting
forests...
>

More greenhouse gases have been put into the atmosphere from So. Calif.
fires in 3 days than will ever be put into the air by SUV's.

 

Aardwolf <se1aard1@itis.com> wrote in message news:<3F972F7A.B287F2D0@itis.com>...
> Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> > "Aardwolf" <se1aard1@itis.com> wrote in message

(snip)

>> probably with a few
> > hardy souls running off natural gas.

A small note: At least in the US, Honda is introducing the Civic GX,
which is powered by natural gas.

(snip)

 

Aardwolf <se1aard1@itis.com> wrote in message news:<3F972F7A.B287F2D0@itis.com>...
> Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> > "Aardwolf" <se1aard1@itis.com> wrote in message

(snip)

>> probably with a few
> > hardy souls running off natural gas.

A small note: At least in the US, Honda is introducing the Civic GX,
which is powered by natural gas.

(snip)

 

Aardwolf <se1aard1@itis.com> wrote in message news:<3F972F7A.B287F2D0@itis.com>...
> Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> > "Aardwolf" <se1aard1@itis.com> wrote in message

(snip)

>> probably with a few
> > hardy souls running off natural gas.

A small note: At least in the US, Honda is introducing the Civic GX,
which is powered by natural gas.

(snip)

 

"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bnm69q$12d4h3$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> "A senile incontinent old fool named Lloyd Parker"
<lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu>
> wrote in message news:bnm57i$ord$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> ---snippy---
> > Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent
> > discussion about science. But to claim, as some have here, that
> > evolution is not a fact is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't
> > factual.
> >
> Evolution is not a fact Lloyd. It is a theory. It happens to be a good
> theory which explains much of the observed data, but it is still a theory.
> If you were a real scientist you would know this.
>
> Earle
>
You don't have to be a scientist to know that evolution is a FACT. It
occurs. period.
The theory is Dawin's, and Darwin only tried to explain WHY evolution
OCCURS.
Even if Darwin's explanation is totally off, it doesn't change the FACT that
evolution is occuring everyday, all the time, right in front of you.
Look it up.
How else would dog breeders be able to make dogs with different traits. Are
you saying genes don't get passed down to offspring? Are you saying that the
strong do not survive? Because the strong surviving and passing down genes
to their offspring IS EVOLUTION.
Just because we can't prove how something happens, doesn't change the FACT
that it happens.

 

"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bnm69q$12d4h3$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> "A senile incontinent old fool named Lloyd Parker"
<lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu>
> wrote in message news:bnm57i$ord$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> ---snippy---
> > Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent
> > discussion about science. But to claim, as some have here, that
> > evolution is not a fact is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't
> > factual.
> >
> Evolution is not a fact Lloyd. It is a theory. It happens to be a good
> theory which explains much of the observed data, but it is still a theory.
> If you were a real scientist you would know this.
>
> Earle
>
You don't have to be a scientist to know that evolution is a FACT. It
occurs. period.
The theory is Dawin's, and Darwin only tried to explain WHY evolution
OCCURS.
Even if Darwin's explanation is totally off, it doesn't change the FACT that
evolution is occuring everyday, all the time, right in front of you.
Look it up.
How else would dog breeders be able to make dogs with different traits. Are
you saying genes don't get passed down to offspring? Are you saying that the
strong do not survive? Because the strong surviving and passing down genes
to their offspring IS EVOLUTION.
Just because we can't prove how something happens, doesn't change the FACT
that it happens.

 

"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bnm69q$12d4h3$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> "A senile incontinent old fool named Lloyd Parker"
<lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu>
> wrote in message news:bnm57i$ord$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> ---snippy---
> > Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent
> > discussion about science. But to claim, as some have here, that
> > evolution is not a fact is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't
> > factual.
> >
> Evolution is not a fact Lloyd. It is a theory. It happens to be a good
> theory which explains much of the observed data, but it is still a theory.
> If you were a real scientist you would know this.
>
> Earle
>
You don't have to be a scientist to know that evolution is a FACT. It
occurs. period.
The theory is Dawin's, and Darwin only tried to explain WHY evolution
OCCURS.
Even if Darwin's explanation is totally off, it doesn't change the FACT that
evolution is occuring everyday, all the time, right in front of you.
Look it up.
How else would dog breeders be able to make dogs with different traits. Are
you saying genes don't get passed down to offspring? Are you saying that the
strong do not survive? Because the strong surviving and passing down genes
to their offspring IS EVOLUTION.
Just because we can't prove how something happens, doesn't change the FACT
that it happens.

 

"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4ta$nk9$8@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vpr8iqtkru4q64@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:77hnb.33968$9E1.125612@attbi_s52...
> >> In article <vpr7cutepp2qe4@corp.supernews.com>, The Ancient One wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hell Lloyd it was even on CNN last night, the story about the ice in
the
> >> > Arctic melting, which, as they put it, is caused by warmer
temperatures,
> >> > possible because of Global warming, although (their words) The CAUSE
of
> >the
> >> > Global warming is still UNKNOWN.
> >> > For someone claiming to be a scientist you sure don't know much
science.
> >> > Better learn some before you post here claiming to be one you lying
> >wannabe.
> >>
> >> He will now chastise you for getting information from CNN instead of
> >scientific
> >> journals.
> >>
> >> However, keep in mind that Parker believes Road and Track and Consumer
> >Reports
> >> over SAE papers and articles.... go figure.
> >
> >I figure him for a clueless, closed-minded imbecile, so far he hasn't
proven
> >me wrong. ;-)
> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> Coward too afraid to use his name? Boo-hoo.

I use my name LP, and I agree with him.

 

"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4ta$nk9$8@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vpr8iqtkru4q64@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:77hnb.33968$9E1.125612@attbi_s52...
> >> In article <vpr7cutepp2qe4@corp.supernews.com>, The Ancient One wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hell Lloyd it was even on CNN last night, the story about the ice in
the
> >> > Arctic melting, which, as they put it, is caused by warmer
temperatures,
> >> > possible because of Global warming, although (their words) The CAUSE
of
> >the
> >> > Global warming is still UNKNOWN.
> >> > For someone claiming to be a scientist you sure don't know much
science.
> >> > Better learn some before you post here claiming to be one you lying
> >wannabe.
> >>
> >> He will now chastise you for getting information from CNN instead of
> >scientific
> >> journals.
> >>
> >> However, keep in mind that Parker believes Road and Track and Consumer
> >Reports
> >> over SAE papers and articles.... go figure.
> >
> >I figure him for a clueless, closed-minded imbecile, so far he hasn't
proven
> >me wrong. ;-)
> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> Coward too afraid to use his name? Boo-hoo.

I use my name LP, and I agree with him.

 

"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4ta$nk9$8@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vpr8iqtkru4q64@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:77hnb.33968$9E1.125612@attbi_s52...
> >> In article <vpr7cutepp2qe4@corp.supernews.com>, The Ancient One wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hell Lloyd it was even on CNN last night, the story about the ice in
the
> >> > Arctic melting, which, as they put it, is caused by warmer
temperatures,
> >> > possible because of Global warming, although (their words) The CAUSE
of
> >the
> >> > Global warming is still UNKNOWN.
> >> > For someone claiming to be a scientist you sure don't know much
science.
> >> > Better learn some before you post here claiming to be one you lying
> >wannabe.
> >>
> >> He will now chastise you for getting information from CNN instead of
> >scientific
> >> journals.
> >>
> >> However, keep in mind that Parker believes Road and Track and Consumer
> >Reports
> >> over SAE papers and articles.... go figure.
> >
> >I figure him for a clueless, closed-minded imbecile, so far he hasn't
proven
> >me wrong. ;-)
> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> Coward too afraid to use his name? Boo-hoo.

I use my name LP, and I agree with him.