Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <vprm88jd5h658b@corp.supernews.com>,
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:mDknb.34757$9E1.133399@attbi_s52...
>> In article <vprkoqb5aif957@corp.supernews.com>, Douglas A. Shrader wrote:
>>
>> > This thread is to long, I'm leaving it, but I must say it has been a
>> > pleasure reading your posts. What group are you posting from?
>>
>> Thanks. Nate, aardwolf, and I post from rec.autos.driving.
>>
>> If you think this is a long thread, you should google for the one
>> years ago where we (regulars of r.a.d) tried to teach lloyd how
>> braking antilock braking systems worked and how they varied from car to
>> car. :)
>>
>>
>
>LOL, I can imagine, I've tried to hold an intelligent discussion with Lloyd
>before, I discovered it can't be done. ;-)
Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent discussion
about science. But to claim, as some have here, that evolution is not a fact
is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't factual.
>
>
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:mDknb.34757$9E1.133399@attbi_s52...
>> In article <vprkoqb5aif957@corp.supernews.com>, Douglas A. Shrader wrote:
>>
>> > This thread is to long, I'm leaving it, but I must say it has been a
>> > pleasure reading your posts. What group are you posting from?
>>
>> Thanks. Nate, aardwolf, and I post from rec.autos.driving.
>>
>> If you think this is a long thread, you should google for the one
>> years ago where we (regulars of r.a.d) tried to teach lloyd how
>> braking antilock braking systems worked and how they varied from car to
>> car. :)
>>
>>
>
>LOL, I can imagine, I've tried to hold an intelligent discussion with Lloyd
>before, I discovered it can't be done. ;-)
Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent discussion
about science. But to claim, as some have here, that evolution is not a fact
is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't factual.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <vprm88jd5h658b@corp.supernews.com>,
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:mDknb.34757$9E1.133399@attbi_s52...
>> In article <vprkoqb5aif957@corp.supernews.com>, Douglas A. Shrader wrote:
>>
>> > This thread is to long, I'm leaving it, but I must say it has been a
>> > pleasure reading your posts. What group are you posting from?
>>
>> Thanks. Nate, aardwolf, and I post from rec.autos.driving.
>>
>> If you think this is a long thread, you should google for the one
>> years ago where we (regulars of r.a.d) tried to teach lloyd how
>> braking antilock braking systems worked and how they varied from car to
>> car. :)
>>
>>
>
>LOL, I can imagine, I've tried to hold an intelligent discussion with Lloyd
>before, I discovered it can't be done. ;-)
Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent discussion
about science. But to claim, as some have here, that evolution is not a fact
is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't factual.
>
>
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:mDknb.34757$9E1.133399@attbi_s52...
>> In article <vprkoqb5aif957@corp.supernews.com>, Douglas A. Shrader wrote:
>>
>> > This thread is to long, I'm leaving it, but I must say it has been a
>> > pleasure reading your posts. What group are you posting from?
>>
>> Thanks. Nate, aardwolf, and I post from rec.autos.driving.
>>
>> If you think this is a long thread, you should google for the one
>> years ago where we (regulars of r.a.d) tried to teach lloyd how
>> braking antilock braking systems worked and how they varied from car to
>> car. :)
>>
>>
>
>LOL, I can imagine, I've tried to hold an intelligent discussion with Lloyd
>before, I discovered it can't be done. ;-)
Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent discussion
about science. But to claim, as some have here, that evolution is not a fact
is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't factual.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <vprm88jd5h658b@corp.supernews.com>,
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:mDknb.34757$9E1.133399@attbi_s52...
>> In article <vprkoqb5aif957@corp.supernews.com>, Douglas A. Shrader wrote:
>>
>> > This thread is to long, I'm leaving it, but I must say it has been a
>> > pleasure reading your posts. What group are you posting from?
>>
>> Thanks. Nate, aardwolf, and I post from rec.autos.driving.
>>
>> If you think this is a long thread, you should google for the one
>> years ago where we (regulars of r.a.d) tried to teach lloyd how
>> braking antilock braking systems worked and how they varied from car to
>> car. :)
>>
>>
>
>LOL, I can imagine, I've tried to hold an intelligent discussion with Lloyd
>before, I discovered it can't be done. ;-)
Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent discussion
about science. But to claim, as some have here, that evolution is not a fact
is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't factual.
>
>
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:mDknb.34757$9E1.133399@attbi_s52...
>> In article <vprkoqb5aif957@corp.supernews.com>, Douglas A. Shrader wrote:
>>
>> > This thread is to long, I'm leaving it, but I must say it has been a
>> > pleasure reading your posts. What group are you posting from?
>>
>> Thanks. Nate, aardwolf, and I post from rec.autos.driving.
>>
>> If you think this is a long thread, you should google for the one
>> years ago where we (regulars of r.a.d) tried to teach lloyd how
>> braking antilock braking systems worked and how they varied from car to
>> car. :)
>>
>>
>
>LOL, I can imagine, I've tried to hold an intelligent discussion with Lloyd
>before, I discovered it can't be done. ;-)
Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent discussion
about science. But to claim, as some have here, that evolution is not a fact
is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't factual.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"A senile incontinent old fool named Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu>
wrote in message news:bnm57i$ord$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
---snippy---
> Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent
> discussion about science. But to claim, as some have here, that
> evolution is not a fact is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't
> factual.
>
Evolution is not a fact Lloyd. It is a theory. It happens to be a good
theory which explains much of the observed data, but it is still a theory.
If you were a real scientist you would know this.
Earle
wrote in message news:bnm57i$ord$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
---snippy---
> Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent
> discussion about science. But to claim, as some have here, that
> evolution is not a fact is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't
> factual.
>
Evolution is not a fact Lloyd. It is a theory. It happens to be a good
theory which explains much of the observed data, but it is still a theory.
If you were a real scientist you would know this.
Earle
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"A senile incontinent old fool named Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu>
wrote in message news:bnm57i$ord$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
---snippy---
> Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent
> discussion about science. But to claim, as some have here, that
> evolution is not a fact is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't
> factual.
>
Evolution is not a fact Lloyd. It is a theory. It happens to be a good
theory which explains much of the observed data, but it is still a theory.
If you were a real scientist you would know this.
Earle
wrote in message news:bnm57i$ord$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
---snippy---
> Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent
> discussion about science. But to claim, as some have here, that
> evolution is not a fact is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't
> factual.
>
Evolution is not a fact Lloyd. It is a theory. It happens to be a good
theory which explains much of the observed data, but it is still a theory.
If you were a real scientist you would know this.
Earle
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"A senile incontinent old fool named Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu>
wrote in message news:bnm57i$ord$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
---snippy---
> Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent
> discussion about science. But to claim, as some have here, that
> evolution is not a fact is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't
> factual.
>
Evolution is not a fact Lloyd. It is a theory. It happens to be a good
theory which explains much of the observed data, but it is still a theory.
If you were a real scientist you would know this.
Earle
wrote in message news:bnm57i$ord$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
---snippy---
> Perhaps if you knew some science, we could have an intelligent
> discussion about science. But to claim, as some have here, that
> evolution is not a fact is as UNintelligent as claiming atoms aren't
> factual.
>
Evolution is not a fact Lloyd. It is a theory. It happens to be a good
theory which explains much of the observed data, but it is still a theory.
If you were a real scientist you would know this.
Earle
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm54u$nk9$13@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vprkhgchpgi642@corp.supernews.com>,
> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bnjeoi$b81$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <vpof02qkahoq17@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >
> >> >> Sure, got to make sure. But the UN couldn't find them, and 150,000
US
> >> >troops
> >> >> haven't found them.
> >> >
> >> >Bingo, The UN couldn't find them, although it is well documented that
> >they
> >> >existed.
> >>
> >> Not in 2003.
> >>
> >>
> >> >That is why they were still looking, that is why we are still
> >> >looking. We haven't found Saddam yet either, but we know he exists as
> >well.
> >> >Or do you think that is also a lie?
> >>
> >> Is he as big as the WMD?
> >
> >You do realize Saddam had twelve years in which to hide them. Where is
Jimmy
> >Hoffa?
> >
> >
> >
> We claimed direct evidence and knowledge that WMD were there in 2003.
No, we asked for proof of where they were and if they had been destroyed, as
per the UN Mandate. Saddam refused to provide said proof. You really are
dumb aren't you.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm54u$nk9$13@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vprkhgchpgi642@corp.supernews.com>,
> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bnjeoi$b81$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <vpof02qkahoq17@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >
> >> >> Sure, got to make sure. But the UN couldn't find them, and 150,000
US
> >> >troops
> >> >> haven't found them.
> >> >
> >> >Bingo, The UN couldn't find them, although it is well documented that
> >they
> >> >existed.
> >>
> >> Not in 2003.
> >>
> >>
> >> >That is why they were still looking, that is why we are still
> >> >looking. We haven't found Saddam yet either, but we know he exists as
> >well.
> >> >Or do you think that is also a lie?
> >>
> >> Is he as big as the WMD?
> >
> >You do realize Saddam had twelve years in which to hide them. Where is
Jimmy
> >Hoffa?
> >
> >
> >
> We claimed direct evidence and knowledge that WMD were there in 2003.
No, we asked for proof of where they were and if they had been destroyed, as
per the UN Mandate. Saddam refused to provide said proof. You really are
dumb aren't you.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm54u$nk9$13@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vprkhgchpgi642@corp.supernews.com>,
> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bnjeoi$b81$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <vpof02qkahoq17@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >
> >> >> Sure, got to make sure. But the UN couldn't find them, and 150,000
US
> >> >troops
> >> >> haven't found them.
> >> >
> >> >Bingo, The UN couldn't find them, although it is well documented that
> >they
> >> >existed.
> >>
> >> Not in 2003.
> >>
> >>
> >> >That is why they were still looking, that is why we are still
> >> >looking. We haven't found Saddam yet either, but we know he exists as
> >well.
> >> >Or do you think that is also a lie?
> >>
> >> Is he as big as the WMD?
> >
> >You do realize Saddam had twelve years in which to hide them. Where is
Jimmy
> >Hoffa?
> >
> >
> >
> We claimed direct evidence and knowledge that WMD were there in 2003.
No, we asked for proof of where they were and if they had been destroyed, as
per the UN Mandate. Saddam refused to provide said proof. You really are
dumb aren't you.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4u8$nk9$9@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vpr958bc1cor0a@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:pmhnb.42839$Fm2.17324@attbi_s04...
> >> In article <vpr85smbfn0e8f@corp.supernews.com>, The Ancient One wrote:
> >> >
> >> > "Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:K3hnb.43148$Tr4.88475@attbi_s03...
> >> >> In article <vpr6s32q4afc2d@corp.supernews.com>, The Ancient One
wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >> > news:bnjesk$b81$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >> >> In article <vpog8qgknohjbc@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> >> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >> >> >news:bngqj4$8h4$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >> >> >a bunch of meaningless BS.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >I see you still won't tell us what peer reviewed journals you
read
> >> > Lloyd,
> >> >> >> >nor where you have been published.
> >> >> >> >You're no scientist, your a wannabe. Shutup and stop pretending
to
> >be
> >> >> >> >something you will never be, you are embarrrassing the real
> >scientist
> >> >> > with
> >> >> >> >your shameful behavior.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Tell us your scientific credentials, oh cowardly one. Your
degree,
> >> > your
> >> >> > field
> >> >> >> of work. I won't hold my breath though.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I asked you first, oh lying one.
> >> >>
> >> >> More than you wanted to know about Dr. Parker:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.oxford.emory.edu/Director...cfm?UserID=130
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Error Occurred While Processing Request
> >> >
> >> > Didn't work :-(
> >>
> >> Just shove his name into a google search, grab the link to emory...
It's
> >the
> >> first one.
> >>
> >
> >Got it, thanks.
> >He must have used a lot of crib sheets in collage, he sure didn't learn
> >much.
> >
> >
> Still waiting for what science field your Ph.D. is in....
Still waiting to hear what peer reviewed journals you read, and what and
where you have been published in peer reviewed journals. Until you answer my
question I have no reason to answer yours.