Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Matthew S. Whiting wrote:
> Bill Putney wrote:
>
>>
>> Kevin wrote:
>>
>>>>> Move to Atlanta, you'll see lots of both doing that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Amen, Atlanta is full of these hoodlums.
>>
>>
>>
>> Or as someone submitted to the Atlanta Tourism Board a few years ago
>> when they ran a contest for a good toursim slogan: "Atlanta: An island
>> of culture floating in a sea of rednecks." Needless to say - that was
>> not selected as the winning slogan. 8^)
>
>
> Because the culture part wasn't true! :-)
>
>
> Matt
>
Atlanta is done. It is a slimy as any large city in the country.Most of
the producers have fled to the burbs, leaving the poor and gangs.
> Bill Putney wrote:
>
>>
>> Kevin wrote:
>>
>>>>> Move to Atlanta, you'll see lots of both doing that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Amen, Atlanta is full of these hoodlums.
>>
>>
>>
>> Or as someone submitted to the Atlanta Tourism Board a few years ago
>> when they ran a contest for a good toursim slogan: "Atlanta: An island
>> of culture floating in a sea of rednecks." Needless to say - that was
>> not selected as the winning slogan. 8^)
>
>
> Because the culture part wasn't true! :-)
>
>
> Matt
>
Atlanta is done. It is a slimy as any large city in the country.Most of
the producers have fled to the burbs, leaving the poor and gangs.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> I seem to remember a C/D road test of a full-size Chevy pickup that got below
> 10 mpg, as did the CR test of the Excursion.
CR's overall mileage for the Excursion was 10 mpg. The 150 mile trip mileage was
12. This was a V-10 Gas model. The diesel would do much better.
Ed
Guest
Posts: n/a
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> I seem to remember a C/D road test of a full-size Chevy pickup that got below
> 10 mpg, as did the CR test of the Excursion.
CR's overall mileage for the Excursion was 10 mpg. The 150 mile trip mileage was
12. This was a V-10 Gas model. The diesel would do much better.
Ed
Guest
Posts: n/a
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> I seem to remember a C/D road test of a full-size Chevy pickup that got below
> 10 mpg, as did the CR test of the Excursion.
CR's overall mileage for the Excursion was 10 mpg. The 150 mile trip mileage was
12. This was a V-10 Gas model. The diesel would do much better.
Ed
Guest
Posts: n/a
Marc wrote:
> The full sized trucks and SUVs that are three-quarter ton or smaller all
> have city mileage from 10-15 and highway mileage from 15-19. The one-tons
> (trucks only, I know of now SUVs with that title) and some of the "heavy
> duty" 3/4 ton ones are of sufficient GVWR that they do not get listed with
> the EPA as passenger vehicles and are worse for mileage, but they aren't as
> easy to look up for all of them in one place.
The heavy duty Suburban, Excursion, and H2 fall into the heavy duty category and
don't ahve mileage listings.
Ed
Guest
Posts: n/a
Marc wrote:
> The full sized trucks and SUVs that are three-quarter ton or smaller all
> have city mileage from 10-15 and highway mileage from 15-19. The one-tons
> (trucks only, I know of now SUVs with that title) and some of the "heavy
> duty" 3/4 ton ones are of sufficient GVWR that they do not get listed with
> the EPA as passenger vehicles and are worse for mileage, but they aren't as
> easy to look up for all of them in one place.
The heavy duty Suburban, Excursion, and H2 fall into the heavy duty category and
don't ahve mileage listings.
Ed
Guest
Posts: n/a
Marc wrote:
> The full sized trucks and SUVs that are three-quarter ton or smaller all
> have city mileage from 10-15 and highway mileage from 15-19. The one-tons
> (trucks only, I know of now SUVs with that title) and some of the "heavy
> duty" 3/4 ton ones are of sufficient GVWR that they do not get listed with
> the EPA as passenger vehicles and are worse for mileage, but they aren't as
> easy to look up for all of them in one place.
The heavy duty Suburban, Excursion, and H2 fall into the heavy duty category and
don't ahve mileage listings.
Ed
Guest
Posts: n/a
Nate Nagel wrote:
>
> An SUV performing the same unsafe maneuver is far more hazardous to
> surrounding traffic. Surely even you can see that?
No, I can't see it. This is the sort of drivel the anti-SUV crowd routinely repeats.
Continulaly repeating an opinion does not make it a fact. PROVE IT!
Ed
Guest
Posts: n/a
Nate Nagel wrote:
>
> An SUV performing the same unsafe maneuver is far more hazardous to
> surrounding traffic. Surely even you can see that?
No, I can't see it. This is the sort of drivel the anti-SUV crowd routinely repeats.
Continulaly repeating an opinion does not make it a fact. PROVE IT!
Ed
Guest
Posts: n/a
Nate Nagel wrote:
>
> An SUV performing the same unsafe maneuver is far more hazardous to
> surrounding traffic. Surely even you can see that?
No, I can't see it. This is the sort of drivel the anti-SUV crowd routinely repeats.
Continulaly repeating an opinion does not make it a fact. PROVE IT!
Ed


