Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote in message news:<bo6rhb0rvn@enews3.newsguy.com>...
> > Just like I said - when you have nothing to say, you right-wingers resort
> to name-calling. <
>
> Why is it you leftist ******** always think anyone who disagreees with you
> is a "right-winger"? No wonder no one takes you seriously any longer.
Since you spout the GOP party line, you are a right-winger. Q.E.D.
But thanks for proving my point.
--
Jonesy
> > Just like I said - when you have nothing to say, you right-wingers resort
> to name-calling. <
>
> Why is it you leftist ******** always think anyone who disagreees with you
> is a "right-winger"? No wonder no one takes you seriously any longer.
Since you spout the GOP party line, you are a right-winger. Q.E.D.
But thanks for proving my point.
--
Jonesy
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote in message news:<bo6rhb0rvn@enews3.newsguy.com>...
> > Just like I said - when you have nothing to say, you right-wingers resort
> to name-calling. <
>
> Why is it you leftist ******** always think anyone who disagreees with you
> is a "right-winger"? No wonder no one takes you seriously any longer.
Since you spout the GOP party line, you are a right-winger. Q.E.D.
But thanks for proving my point.
--
Jonesy
> > Just like I said - when you have nothing to say, you right-wingers resort
> to name-calling. <
>
> Why is it you leftist ******** always think anyone who disagreees with you
> is a "right-winger"? No wonder no one takes you seriously any longer.
Since you spout the GOP party line, you are a right-winger. Q.E.D.
But thanks for proving my point.
--
Jonesy
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >Oh - you mean like in California where they are protecting the
> >environment by not allowing the forests to be maintained properly
>
> Nature maintains forests very nicely, as she has done for a very long time.
Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening (or native Americans
before Columbus). Nature would be perfectly happy to let all of Southern
California burn once in a while. This would effectively remove all the dead
trees and brush.
Ed
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >Oh - you mean like in California where they are protecting the
> >environment by not allowing the forests to be maintained properly
>
> Nature maintains forests very nicely, as she has done for a very long time.
Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening (or native Americans
before Columbus). Nature would be perfectly happy to let all of Southern
California burn once in a while. This would effectively remove all the dead
trees and brush.
Ed
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >Oh - you mean like in California where they are protecting the
> >environment by not allowing the forests to be maintained properly
>
> Nature maintains forests very nicely, as she has done for a very long time.
Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening (or native Americans
before Columbus). Nature would be perfectly happy to let all of Southern
California burn once in a while. This would effectively remove all the dead
trees and brush.
Ed
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
have burned off long before humans showed up.
"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3FA7EEC9.DC749BF4@mindspring.com...
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> > >Oh - you mean like in California where they are protecting the
> > >environment by not allowing the forests to be maintained properly
> >
> > Nature maintains forests very nicely, as she has done for a very long
time.
>
> Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening (or native Americans
> before Columbus). Nature would be perfectly happy to let all of Southern
> California burn once in a while. This would effectively remove all the
dead
> trees and brush.
>
> Ed
>
if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
have burned off long before humans showed up.
"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3FA7EEC9.DC749BF4@mindspring.com...
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> > >Oh - you mean like in California where they are protecting the
> > >environment by not allowing the forests to be maintained properly
> >
> > Nature maintains forests very nicely, as she has done for a very long
time.
>
> Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening (or native Americans
> before Columbus). Nature would be perfectly happy to let all of Southern
> California burn once in a while. This would effectively remove all the
dead
> trees and brush.
>
> Ed
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
have burned off long before humans showed up.
"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3FA7EEC9.DC749BF4@mindspring.com...
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> > >Oh - you mean like in California where they are protecting the
> > >environment by not allowing the forests to be maintained properly
> >
> > Nature maintains forests very nicely, as she has done for a very long
time.
>
> Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening (or native Americans
> before Columbus). Nature would be perfectly happy to let all of Southern
> California burn once in a while. This would effectively remove all the
dead
> trees and brush.
>
> Ed
>
if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
have burned off long before humans showed up.
"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3FA7EEC9.DC749BF4@mindspring.com...
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> > >Oh - you mean like in California where they are protecting the
> > >environment by not allowing the forests to be maintained properly
> >
> > Nature maintains forests very nicely, as she has done for a very long
time.
>
> Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening (or native Americans
> before Columbus). Nature would be perfectly happy to let all of Southern
> California burn once in a while. This would effectively remove all the
dead
> trees and brush.
>
> Ed
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
have burned off long before humans showed up.
"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3FA7EEC9.DC749BF4@mindspring.com...
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> > >Oh - you mean like in California where they are protecting the
> > >environment by not allowing the forests to be maintained properly
> >
> > Nature maintains forests very nicely, as she has done for a very long
time.
>
> Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening (or native Americans
> before Columbus). Nature would be perfectly happy to let all of Southern
> California burn once in a while. This would effectively remove all the
dead
> trees and brush.
>
> Ed
>
if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
have burned off long before humans showed up.
"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3FA7EEC9.DC749BF4@mindspring.com...
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> > >Oh - you mean like in California where they are protecting the
> > >environment by not allowing the forests to be maintained properly
> >
> > Nature maintains forests very nicely, as she has done for a very long
time.
>
> Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening (or native Americans
> before Columbus). Nature would be perfectly happy to let all of Southern
> California burn once in a while. This would effectively remove all the
dead
> trees and brush.
>
> Ed
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bo8k7j$3lv$8@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> Nature maintains forests very nicely, as she has done for a very long time.
Wrong on two counts.
1) Nature often uses cataclysm, like big fires.
2) Big fires are encouraged when the critters (humans) aren't allowed
to consume the deadwood and are going about puting out alot of the fires.
>
> Nature maintains forests very nicely, as she has done for a very long time.
Wrong on two counts.
1) Nature often uses cataclysm, like big fires.
2) Big fires are encouraged when the critters (humans) aren't allowed
to consume the deadwood and are going about puting out alot of the fires.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bo8k7j$3lv$8@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> Nature maintains forests very nicely, as she has done for a very long time.
Wrong on two counts.
1) Nature often uses cataclysm, like big fires.
2) Big fires are encouraged when the critters (humans) aren't allowed
to consume the deadwood and are going about puting out alot of the fires.
>
> Nature maintains forests very nicely, as she has done for a very long time.
Wrong on two counts.
1) Nature often uses cataclysm, like big fires.
2) Big fires are encouraged when the critters (humans) aren't allowed
to consume the deadwood and are going about puting out alot of the fires.