auto lockers
#171
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: auto lockers
Matt and Jeff, give up on Bill as I did a long time ago. He is so
hopelessly outdated that he has to base his Detroit Locker experience on
his fifty-year old drag racing days from when he was a teenager. He
knows so little about today's technology that he thought an Ox-Locker
was vacuum-actuated and didn't realize it became a spool when engaged.
Bill hasn't offroaded in so many years that he's irrelevant on anything
to do with lockers and offroading. Then when Bill gets educated here
enough to realize that the Ox locker was actually engaged and operating
as a spool which he claimed would have prevented the problem, he can't
own up to being wrong.
Same old -------- Bill is known for.
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> (a) Ox isn't vacuum lock, it's mechanically actuated via cable. (b) Let me
> clarify, are you talking about the rear axle, or front? Because the orginal
> post in the thread was regarding front axles, not rear, and you told him to
> "use a spool."
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4273D879.DD095873@***.net...
>
>> My "assumption" as you want to call it, is based on my teenage
>>years driving dragsters, where a Detroit Locker could cause a full sized
>>stock factor experimental to lunch straight up into the air do a
>>pirouette and come down headed back to the pits. In slow-motion that's
>>was exactly what Jennifer's locker did, that's how we know it was a
>>Detroit, and not a OX vacuum lock, one wheel had to have released in
>>order for it to turn around to go back down the hill:
>>http://www.xws.com/jbjeep/jenroll-shortversion.mpg
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>>>She was probably so confused by your tangents she didn't want to go down
>>>that road.
>>>
>>>OK, so we've established that she didn't have a front Detroit locker, but
>>>rather it was an OX. And you've established *she* never told you her
>>>Detroit
>>>released causing her to go over; you merely *assumed* she had detroit.
>>>Since
>>>an OX locker is essentially a spool when locked, and it was locked
>>>according
>>>to the video, what's your theory now why she rolled? Did she buy gas in
>>>Mexico? Did she have over 15,000 miles on her spark plugs?
>
>
>
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
hopelessly outdated that he has to base his Detroit Locker experience on
his fifty-year old drag racing days from when he was a teenager. He
knows so little about today's technology that he thought an Ox-Locker
was vacuum-actuated and didn't realize it became a spool when engaged.
Bill hasn't offroaded in so many years that he's irrelevant on anything
to do with lockers and offroading. Then when Bill gets educated here
enough to realize that the Ox locker was actually engaged and operating
as a spool which he claimed would have prevented the problem, he can't
own up to being wrong.
Same old -------- Bill is known for.
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> (a) Ox isn't vacuum lock, it's mechanically actuated via cable. (b) Let me
> clarify, are you talking about the rear axle, or front? Because the orginal
> post in the thread was regarding front axles, not rear, and you told him to
> "use a spool."
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4273D879.DD095873@***.net...
>
>> My "assumption" as you want to call it, is based on my teenage
>>years driving dragsters, where a Detroit Locker could cause a full sized
>>stock factor experimental to lunch straight up into the air do a
>>pirouette and come down headed back to the pits. In slow-motion that's
>>was exactly what Jennifer's locker did, that's how we know it was a
>>Detroit, and not a OX vacuum lock, one wheel had to have released in
>>order for it to turn around to go back down the hill:
>>http://www.xws.com/jbjeep/jenroll-shortversion.mpg
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>>>She was probably so confused by your tangents she didn't want to go down
>>>that road.
>>>
>>>OK, so we've established that she didn't have a front Detroit locker, but
>>>rather it was an OX. And you've established *she* never told you her
>>>Detroit
>>>released causing her to go over; you merely *assumed* she had detroit.
>>>Since
>>>an OX locker is essentially a spool when locked, and it was locked
>>>according
>>>to the video, what's your theory now why she rolled? Did she buy gas in
>>>Mexico? Did she have over 15,000 miles on her spark plugs?
>
>
>
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
#172
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: auto lockers
Matt and Jeff, give up on Bill as I did a long time ago. He is so
hopelessly outdated that he has to base his Detroit Locker experience on
his fifty-year old drag racing days from when he was a teenager. He
knows so little about today's technology that he thought an Ox-Locker
was vacuum-actuated and didn't realize it became a spool when engaged.
Bill hasn't offroaded in so many years that he's irrelevant on anything
to do with lockers and offroading. Then when Bill gets educated here
enough to realize that the Ox locker was actually engaged and operating
as a spool which he claimed would have prevented the problem, he can't
own up to being wrong.
Same old -------- Bill is known for.
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> (a) Ox isn't vacuum lock, it's mechanically actuated via cable. (b) Let me
> clarify, are you talking about the rear axle, or front? Because the orginal
> post in the thread was regarding front axles, not rear, and you told him to
> "use a spool."
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4273D879.DD095873@***.net...
>
>> My "assumption" as you want to call it, is based on my teenage
>>years driving dragsters, where a Detroit Locker could cause a full sized
>>stock factor experimental to lunch straight up into the air do a
>>pirouette and come down headed back to the pits. In slow-motion that's
>>was exactly what Jennifer's locker did, that's how we know it was a
>>Detroit, and not a OX vacuum lock, one wheel had to have released in
>>order for it to turn around to go back down the hill:
>>http://www.xws.com/jbjeep/jenroll-shortversion.mpg
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>>>She was probably so confused by your tangents she didn't want to go down
>>>that road.
>>>
>>>OK, so we've established that she didn't have a front Detroit locker, but
>>>rather it was an OX. And you've established *she* never told you her
>>>Detroit
>>>released causing her to go over; you merely *assumed* she had detroit.
>>>Since
>>>an OX locker is essentially a spool when locked, and it was locked
>>>according
>>>to the video, what's your theory now why she rolled? Did she buy gas in
>>>Mexico? Did she have over 15,000 miles on her spark plugs?
>
>
>
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
hopelessly outdated that he has to base his Detroit Locker experience on
his fifty-year old drag racing days from when he was a teenager. He
knows so little about today's technology that he thought an Ox-Locker
was vacuum-actuated and didn't realize it became a spool when engaged.
Bill hasn't offroaded in so many years that he's irrelevant on anything
to do with lockers and offroading. Then when Bill gets educated here
enough to realize that the Ox locker was actually engaged and operating
as a spool which he claimed would have prevented the problem, he can't
own up to being wrong.
Same old -------- Bill is known for.
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> (a) Ox isn't vacuum lock, it's mechanically actuated via cable. (b) Let me
> clarify, are you talking about the rear axle, or front? Because the orginal
> post in the thread was regarding front axles, not rear, and you told him to
> "use a spool."
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4273D879.DD095873@***.net...
>
>> My "assumption" as you want to call it, is based on my teenage
>>years driving dragsters, where a Detroit Locker could cause a full sized
>>stock factor experimental to lunch straight up into the air do a
>>pirouette and come down headed back to the pits. In slow-motion that's
>>was exactly what Jennifer's locker did, that's how we know it was a
>>Detroit, and not a OX vacuum lock, one wheel had to have released in
>>order for it to turn around to go back down the hill:
>>http://www.xws.com/jbjeep/jenroll-shortversion.mpg
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>>>She was probably so confused by your tangents she didn't want to go down
>>>that road.
>>>
>>>OK, so we've established that she didn't have a front Detroit locker, but
>>>rather it was an OX. And you've established *she* never told you her
>>>Detroit
>>>released causing her to go over; you merely *assumed* she had detroit.
>>>Since
>>>an OX locker is essentially a spool when locked, and it was locked
>>>according
>>>to the video, what's your theory now why she rolled? Did she buy gas in
>>>Mexico? Did she have over 15,000 miles on her spark plugs?
>
>
>
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
#173
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: auto lockers
Matt and Jeff, give up on Bill as I did a long time ago. He is so
hopelessly outdated that he has to base his Detroit Locker experience on
his fifty-year old drag racing days from when he was a teenager. He
knows so little about today's technology that he thought an Ox-Locker
was vacuum-actuated and didn't realize it became a spool when engaged.
Bill hasn't offroaded in so many years that he's irrelevant on anything
to do with lockers and offroading. Then when Bill gets educated here
enough to realize that the Ox locker was actually engaged and operating
as a spool which he claimed would have prevented the problem, he can't
own up to being wrong.
Same old -------- Bill is known for.
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> (a) Ox isn't vacuum lock, it's mechanically actuated via cable. (b) Let me
> clarify, are you talking about the rear axle, or front? Because the orginal
> post in the thread was regarding front axles, not rear, and you told him to
> "use a spool."
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4273D879.DD095873@***.net...
>
>> My "assumption" as you want to call it, is based on my teenage
>>years driving dragsters, where a Detroit Locker could cause a full sized
>>stock factor experimental to lunch straight up into the air do a
>>pirouette and come down headed back to the pits. In slow-motion that's
>>was exactly what Jennifer's locker did, that's how we know it was a
>>Detroit, and not a OX vacuum lock, one wheel had to have released in
>>order for it to turn around to go back down the hill:
>>http://www.xws.com/jbjeep/jenroll-shortversion.mpg
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>>>She was probably so confused by your tangents she didn't want to go down
>>>that road.
>>>
>>>OK, so we've established that she didn't have a front Detroit locker, but
>>>rather it was an OX. And you've established *she* never told you her
>>>Detroit
>>>released causing her to go over; you merely *assumed* she had detroit.
>>>Since
>>>an OX locker is essentially a spool when locked, and it was locked
>>>according
>>>to the video, what's your theory now why she rolled? Did she buy gas in
>>>Mexico? Did she have over 15,000 miles on her spark plugs?
>
>
>
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
hopelessly outdated that he has to base his Detroit Locker experience on
his fifty-year old drag racing days from when he was a teenager. He
knows so little about today's technology that he thought an Ox-Locker
was vacuum-actuated and didn't realize it became a spool when engaged.
Bill hasn't offroaded in so many years that he's irrelevant on anything
to do with lockers and offroading. Then when Bill gets educated here
enough to realize that the Ox locker was actually engaged and operating
as a spool which he claimed would have prevented the problem, he can't
own up to being wrong.
Same old -------- Bill is known for.
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> (a) Ox isn't vacuum lock, it's mechanically actuated via cable. (b) Let me
> clarify, are you talking about the rear axle, or front? Because the orginal
> post in the thread was regarding front axles, not rear, and you told him to
> "use a spool."
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4273D879.DD095873@***.net...
>
>> My "assumption" as you want to call it, is based on my teenage
>>years driving dragsters, where a Detroit Locker could cause a full sized
>>stock factor experimental to lunch straight up into the air do a
>>pirouette and come down headed back to the pits. In slow-motion that's
>>was exactly what Jennifer's locker did, that's how we know it was a
>>Detroit, and not a OX vacuum lock, one wheel had to have released in
>>order for it to turn around to go back down the hill:
>>http://www.xws.com/jbjeep/jenroll-shortversion.mpg
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>>>She was probably so confused by your tangents she didn't want to go down
>>>that road.
>>>
>>>OK, so we've established that she didn't have a front Detroit locker, but
>>>rather it was an OX. And you've established *she* never told you her
>>>Detroit
>>>released causing her to go over; you merely *assumed* she had detroit.
>>>Since
>>>an OX locker is essentially a spool when locked, and it was locked
>>>according
>>>to the video, what's your theory now why she rolled? Did she buy gas in
>>>Mexico? Did she have over 15,000 miles on her spark plugs?
>
>
>
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
#174
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: auto lockers
If the tires can slip on the ground, the locker will never unlock. That is
what makes it a locker. Remember, a locker causes stress to build in the
differential because the tires can not slip easily on the pavement, this
stress must be released before other parts might break. If the tires are on
dirt, the stress never builds up because the tires slip easily. You seem to
be forgetting that the locker only unlocks when the tires don't slip on the
dirt.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42758A71.71201667@***.net...
> LOL Your Detroit Locker can tell when you're are on dirt? Please
> tell me where are the detectors?
> The Detroit Locker is designed to unlock whenever one wheel is
> being turned faster, that's basic 101 differential technology, of course
> if you want yours not to unlock then use a spool like I do.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > A locker NEVER unlocks on dirt. That is why we use them.
what makes it a locker. Remember, a locker causes stress to build in the
differential because the tires can not slip easily on the pavement, this
stress must be released before other parts might break. If the tires are on
dirt, the stress never builds up because the tires slip easily. You seem to
be forgetting that the locker only unlocks when the tires don't slip on the
dirt.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42758A71.71201667@***.net...
> LOL Your Detroit Locker can tell when you're are on dirt? Please
> tell me where are the detectors?
> The Detroit Locker is designed to unlock whenever one wheel is
> being turned faster, that's basic 101 differential technology, of course
> if you want yours not to unlock then use a spool like I do.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > A locker NEVER unlocks on dirt. That is why we use them.
#175
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: auto lockers
If the tires can slip on the ground, the locker will never unlock. That is
what makes it a locker. Remember, a locker causes stress to build in the
differential because the tires can not slip easily on the pavement, this
stress must be released before other parts might break. If the tires are on
dirt, the stress never builds up because the tires slip easily. You seem to
be forgetting that the locker only unlocks when the tires don't slip on the
dirt.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42758A71.71201667@***.net...
> LOL Your Detroit Locker can tell when you're are on dirt? Please
> tell me where are the detectors?
> The Detroit Locker is designed to unlock whenever one wheel is
> being turned faster, that's basic 101 differential technology, of course
> if you want yours not to unlock then use a spool like I do.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > A locker NEVER unlocks on dirt. That is why we use them.
what makes it a locker. Remember, a locker causes stress to build in the
differential because the tires can not slip easily on the pavement, this
stress must be released before other parts might break. If the tires are on
dirt, the stress never builds up because the tires slip easily. You seem to
be forgetting that the locker only unlocks when the tires don't slip on the
dirt.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42758A71.71201667@***.net...
> LOL Your Detroit Locker can tell when you're are on dirt? Please
> tell me where are the detectors?
> The Detroit Locker is designed to unlock whenever one wheel is
> being turned faster, that's basic 101 differential technology, of course
> if you want yours not to unlock then use a spool like I do.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > A locker NEVER unlocks on dirt. That is why we use them.
#176
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: auto lockers
If the tires can slip on the ground, the locker will never unlock. That is
what makes it a locker. Remember, a locker causes stress to build in the
differential because the tires can not slip easily on the pavement, this
stress must be released before other parts might break. If the tires are on
dirt, the stress never builds up because the tires slip easily. You seem to
be forgetting that the locker only unlocks when the tires don't slip on the
dirt.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42758A71.71201667@***.net...
> LOL Your Detroit Locker can tell when you're are on dirt? Please
> tell me where are the detectors?
> The Detroit Locker is designed to unlock whenever one wheel is
> being turned faster, that's basic 101 differential technology, of course
> if you want yours not to unlock then use a spool like I do.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > A locker NEVER unlocks on dirt. That is why we use them.
what makes it a locker. Remember, a locker causes stress to build in the
differential because the tires can not slip easily on the pavement, this
stress must be released before other parts might break. If the tires are on
dirt, the stress never builds up because the tires slip easily. You seem to
be forgetting that the locker only unlocks when the tires don't slip on the
dirt.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42758A71.71201667@***.net...
> LOL Your Detroit Locker can tell when you're are on dirt? Please
> tell me where are the detectors?
> The Detroit Locker is designed to unlock whenever one wheel is
> being turned faster, that's basic 101 differential technology, of course
> if you want yours not to unlock then use a spool like I do.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > A locker NEVER unlocks on dirt. That is why we use them.
#177
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: auto lockers
If the tires can slip on the ground, the locker will never unlock. That is
what makes it a locker. Remember, a locker causes stress to build in the
differential because the tires can not slip easily on the pavement, this
stress must be released before other parts might break. If the tires are on
dirt, the stress never builds up because the tires slip easily. You seem to
be forgetting that the locker only unlocks when the tires don't slip on the
dirt.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42758A71.71201667@***.net...
> LOL Your Detroit Locker can tell when you're are on dirt? Please
> tell me where are the detectors?
> The Detroit Locker is designed to unlock whenever one wheel is
> being turned faster, that's basic 101 differential technology, of course
> if you want yours not to unlock then use a spool like I do.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > A locker NEVER unlocks on dirt. That is why we use them.
what makes it a locker. Remember, a locker causes stress to build in the
differential because the tires can not slip easily on the pavement, this
stress must be released before other parts might break. If the tires are on
dirt, the stress never builds up because the tires slip easily. You seem to
be forgetting that the locker only unlocks when the tires don't slip on the
dirt.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42758A71.71201667@***.net...
> LOL Your Detroit Locker can tell when you're are on dirt? Please
> tell me where are the detectors?
> The Detroit Locker is designed to unlock whenever one wheel is
> being turned faster, that's basic 101 differential technology, of course
> if you want yours not to unlock then use a spool like I do.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > A locker NEVER unlocks on dirt. That is why we use them.
#178
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: auto lockers
Jennifer is using an Detroit Locker. Are you going to tell me it
doesn't release as per it's tests: http://www.tractech.com/TechTips.htm
Jerry, you're so... full of sh*t it's unbelievable, and the very reason
I read this group, is to correct your misinformation.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Matt and Jeff, give up on Bill as I did a long time ago. He is so
> hopelessly outdated that he has to base his Detroit Locker experience on
> his fifty-year old drag racing days from when he was a teenager. He
> knows so little about today's technology that he thought an Ox-Locker
> was vacuum-actuated and didn't realize it became a spool when engaged.
> Bill hasn't offroaded in so many years that he's irrelevant on anything
> to do with lockers and offroading. Then when Bill gets educated here
> enough to realize that the Ox locker was actually engaged and operating
> as a spool which he claimed would have prevented the problem, he can't
> own up to being wrong.
>
> Same old -------- Bill is known for.
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> > (a) Ox isn't vacuum lock, it's mechanically actuated via cable. (b) Let me
> > clarify, are you talking about the rear axle, or front? Because the orginal
> > post in the thread was regarding front axles, not rear, and you told him to
> > "use a spool."
> >
> > "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:4273D879.DD095873@***.net...
> >
> >> My "assumption" as you want to call it, is based on my teenage
> >>years driving dragsters, where a Detroit Locker could cause a full sized
> >>stock factor experimental to lunch straight up into the air do a
> >>pirouette and come down headed back to the pits. In slow-motion that's
> >>was exactly what Jennifer's locker did, that's how we know it was a
> >>Detroit, and not a OX vacuum lock, one wheel had to have released in
> >>order for it to turn around to go back down the hill:
> >>http://www.xws.com/jbjeep/jenroll-shortversion.mpg
> >> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>
> >>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >>>She was probably so confused by your tangents she didn't want to go down
> >>>that road.
> >>>
> >>>OK, so we've established that she didn't have a front Detroit locker, but
> >>>rather it was an OX. And you've established *she* never told you her
> >>>Detroit
> >>>released causing her to go over; you merely *assumed* she had detroit.
> >>>Since
> >>>an OX locker is essentially a spool when locked, and it was locked
> >>>according
> >>>to the video, what's your theory now why she rolled? Did she buy gas in
> >>>Mexico? Did she have over 15,000 miles on her spark plugs?
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
doesn't release as per it's tests: http://www.tractech.com/TechTips.htm
Jerry, you're so... full of sh*t it's unbelievable, and the very reason
I read this group, is to correct your misinformation.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Matt and Jeff, give up on Bill as I did a long time ago. He is so
> hopelessly outdated that he has to base his Detroit Locker experience on
> his fifty-year old drag racing days from when he was a teenager. He
> knows so little about today's technology that he thought an Ox-Locker
> was vacuum-actuated and didn't realize it became a spool when engaged.
> Bill hasn't offroaded in so many years that he's irrelevant on anything
> to do with lockers and offroading. Then when Bill gets educated here
> enough to realize that the Ox locker was actually engaged and operating
> as a spool which he claimed would have prevented the problem, he can't
> own up to being wrong.
>
> Same old -------- Bill is known for.
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> > (a) Ox isn't vacuum lock, it's mechanically actuated via cable. (b) Let me
> > clarify, are you talking about the rear axle, or front? Because the orginal
> > post in the thread was regarding front axles, not rear, and you told him to
> > "use a spool."
> >
> > "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:4273D879.DD095873@***.net...
> >
> >> My "assumption" as you want to call it, is based on my teenage
> >>years driving dragsters, where a Detroit Locker could cause a full sized
> >>stock factor experimental to lunch straight up into the air do a
> >>pirouette and come down headed back to the pits. In slow-motion that's
> >>was exactly what Jennifer's locker did, that's how we know it was a
> >>Detroit, and not a OX vacuum lock, one wheel had to have released in
> >>order for it to turn around to go back down the hill:
> >>http://www.xws.com/jbjeep/jenroll-shortversion.mpg
> >> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>
> >>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >>>She was probably so confused by your tangents she didn't want to go down
> >>>that road.
> >>>
> >>>OK, so we've established that she didn't have a front Detroit locker, but
> >>>rather it was an OX. And you've established *she* never told you her
> >>>Detroit
> >>>released causing her to go over; you merely *assumed* she had detroit.
> >>>Since
> >>>an OX locker is essentially a spool when locked, and it was locked
> >>>according
> >>>to the video, what's your theory now why she rolled? Did she buy gas in
> >>>Mexico? Did she have over 15,000 miles on her spark plugs?
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
#179
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: auto lockers
Jennifer is using an Detroit Locker. Are you going to tell me it
doesn't release as per it's tests: http://www.tractech.com/TechTips.htm
Jerry, you're so... full of sh*t it's unbelievable, and the very reason
I read this group, is to correct your misinformation.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Matt and Jeff, give up on Bill as I did a long time ago. He is so
> hopelessly outdated that he has to base his Detroit Locker experience on
> his fifty-year old drag racing days from when he was a teenager. He
> knows so little about today's technology that he thought an Ox-Locker
> was vacuum-actuated and didn't realize it became a spool when engaged.
> Bill hasn't offroaded in so many years that he's irrelevant on anything
> to do with lockers and offroading. Then when Bill gets educated here
> enough to realize that the Ox locker was actually engaged and operating
> as a spool which he claimed would have prevented the problem, he can't
> own up to being wrong.
>
> Same old -------- Bill is known for.
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> > (a) Ox isn't vacuum lock, it's mechanically actuated via cable. (b) Let me
> > clarify, are you talking about the rear axle, or front? Because the orginal
> > post in the thread was regarding front axles, not rear, and you told him to
> > "use a spool."
> >
> > "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:4273D879.DD095873@***.net...
> >
> >> My "assumption" as you want to call it, is based on my teenage
> >>years driving dragsters, where a Detroit Locker could cause a full sized
> >>stock factor experimental to lunch straight up into the air do a
> >>pirouette and come down headed back to the pits. In slow-motion that's
> >>was exactly what Jennifer's locker did, that's how we know it was a
> >>Detroit, and not a OX vacuum lock, one wheel had to have released in
> >>order for it to turn around to go back down the hill:
> >>http://www.xws.com/jbjeep/jenroll-shortversion.mpg
> >> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>
> >>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >>>She was probably so confused by your tangents she didn't want to go down
> >>>that road.
> >>>
> >>>OK, so we've established that she didn't have a front Detroit locker, but
> >>>rather it was an OX. And you've established *she* never told you her
> >>>Detroit
> >>>released causing her to go over; you merely *assumed* she had detroit.
> >>>Since
> >>>an OX locker is essentially a spool when locked, and it was locked
> >>>according
> >>>to the video, what's your theory now why she rolled? Did she buy gas in
> >>>Mexico? Did she have over 15,000 miles on her spark plugs?
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
doesn't release as per it's tests: http://www.tractech.com/TechTips.htm
Jerry, you're so... full of sh*t it's unbelievable, and the very reason
I read this group, is to correct your misinformation.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Matt and Jeff, give up on Bill as I did a long time ago. He is so
> hopelessly outdated that he has to base his Detroit Locker experience on
> his fifty-year old drag racing days from when he was a teenager. He
> knows so little about today's technology that he thought an Ox-Locker
> was vacuum-actuated and didn't realize it became a spool when engaged.
> Bill hasn't offroaded in so many years that he's irrelevant on anything
> to do with lockers and offroading. Then when Bill gets educated here
> enough to realize that the Ox locker was actually engaged and operating
> as a spool which he claimed would have prevented the problem, he can't
> own up to being wrong.
>
> Same old -------- Bill is known for.
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> > (a) Ox isn't vacuum lock, it's mechanically actuated via cable. (b) Let me
> > clarify, are you talking about the rear axle, or front? Because the orginal
> > post in the thread was regarding front axles, not rear, and you told him to
> > "use a spool."
> >
> > "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:4273D879.DD095873@***.net...
> >
> >> My "assumption" as you want to call it, is based on my teenage
> >>years driving dragsters, where a Detroit Locker could cause a full sized
> >>stock factor experimental to lunch straight up into the air do a
> >>pirouette and come down headed back to the pits. In slow-motion that's
> >>was exactly what Jennifer's locker did, that's how we know it was a
> >>Detroit, and not a OX vacuum lock, one wheel had to have released in
> >>order for it to turn around to go back down the hill:
> >>http://www.xws.com/jbjeep/jenroll-shortversion.mpg
> >> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>
> >>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >>>She was probably so confused by your tangents she didn't want to go down
> >>>that road.
> >>>
> >>>OK, so we've established that she didn't have a front Detroit locker, but
> >>>rather it was an OX. And you've established *she* never told you her
> >>>Detroit
> >>>released causing her to go over; you merely *assumed* she had detroit.
> >>>Since
> >>>an OX locker is essentially a spool when locked, and it was locked
> >>>according
> >>>to the video, what's your theory now why she rolled? Did she buy gas in
> >>>Mexico? Did she have over 15,000 miles on her spark plugs?
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
#180
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: auto lockers
Jennifer is using an Detroit Locker. Are you going to tell me it
doesn't release as per it's tests: http://www.tractech.com/TechTips.htm
Jerry, you're so... full of sh*t it's unbelievable, and the very reason
I read this group, is to correct your misinformation.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Matt and Jeff, give up on Bill as I did a long time ago. He is so
> hopelessly outdated that he has to base his Detroit Locker experience on
> his fifty-year old drag racing days from when he was a teenager. He
> knows so little about today's technology that he thought an Ox-Locker
> was vacuum-actuated and didn't realize it became a spool when engaged.
> Bill hasn't offroaded in so many years that he's irrelevant on anything
> to do with lockers and offroading. Then when Bill gets educated here
> enough to realize that the Ox locker was actually engaged and operating
> as a spool which he claimed would have prevented the problem, he can't
> own up to being wrong.
>
> Same old -------- Bill is known for.
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> > (a) Ox isn't vacuum lock, it's mechanically actuated via cable. (b) Let me
> > clarify, are you talking about the rear axle, or front? Because the orginal
> > post in the thread was regarding front axles, not rear, and you told him to
> > "use a spool."
> >
> > "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:4273D879.DD095873@***.net...
> >
> >> My "assumption" as you want to call it, is based on my teenage
> >>years driving dragsters, where a Detroit Locker could cause a full sized
> >>stock factor experimental to lunch straight up into the air do a
> >>pirouette and come down headed back to the pits. In slow-motion that's
> >>was exactly what Jennifer's locker did, that's how we know it was a
> >>Detroit, and not a OX vacuum lock, one wheel had to have released in
> >>order for it to turn around to go back down the hill:
> >>http://www.xws.com/jbjeep/jenroll-shortversion.mpg
> >> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>
> >>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >>>She was probably so confused by your tangents she didn't want to go down
> >>>that road.
> >>>
> >>>OK, so we've established that she didn't have a front Detroit locker, but
> >>>rather it was an OX. And you've established *she* never told you her
> >>>Detroit
> >>>released causing her to go over; you merely *assumed* she had detroit.
> >>>Since
> >>>an OX locker is essentially a spool when locked, and it was locked
> >>>according
> >>>to the video, what's your theory now why she rolled? Did she buy gas in
> >>>Mexico? Did she have over 15,000 miles on her spark plugs?
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
doesn't release as per it's tests: http://www.tractech.com/TechTips.htm
Jerry, you're so... full of sh*t it's unbelievable, and the very reason
I read this group, is to correct your misinformation.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Matt and Jeff, give up on Bill as I did a long time ago. He is so
> hopelessly outdated that he has to base his Detroit Locker experience on
> his fifty-year old drag racing days from when he was a teenager. He
> knows so little about today's technology that he thought an Ox-Locker
> was vacuum-actuated and didn't realize it became a spool when engaged.
> Bill hasn't offroaded in so many years that he's irrelevant on anything
> to do with lockers and offroading. Then when Bill gets educated here
> enough to realize that the Ox locker was actually engaged and operating
> as a spool which he claimed would have prevented the problem, he can't
> own up to being wrong.
>
> Same old -------- Bill is known for.
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> > (a) Ox isn't vacuum lock, it's mechanically actuated via cable. (b) Let me
> > clarify, are you talking about the rear axle, or front? Because the orginal
> > post in the thread was regarding front axles, not rear, and you told him to
> > "use a spool."
> >
> > "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:4273D879.DD095873@***.net...
> >
> >> My "assumption" as you want to call it, is based on my teenage
> >>years driving dragsters, where a Detroit Locker could cause a full sized
> >>stock factor experimental to lunch straight up into the air do a
> >>pirouette and come down headed back to the pits. In slow-motion that's
> >>was exactly what Jennifer's locker did, that's how we know it was a
> >>Detroit, and not a OX vacuum lock, one wheel had to have released in
> >>order for it to turn around to go back down the hill:
> >>http://www.xws.com/jbjeep/jenroll-shortversion.mpg
> >> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>
> >>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >>>She was probably so confused by your tangents she didn't want to go down
> >>>that road.
> >>>
> >>>OK, so we've established that she didn't have a front Detroit locker, but
> >>>rather it was an OX. And you've established *she* never told you her
> >>>Detroit
> >>>released causing her to go over; you merely *assumed* she had detroit.
> >>>Since
> >>>an OX locker is essentially a spool when locked, and it was locked
> >>>according
> >>>to the video, what's your theory now why she rolled? Did she buy gas in
> >>>Mexico? Did she have over 15,000 miles on her spark plugs?
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/