True. Skill and intelligence certainly compliment each other...

Skill: "You're very bright."

Intelligence: "Thanks, you do nice work."


"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F5DF738.6057FEC7@***.net...
> Hi Jim,
> Yes, but we're usually a little more successful if our team's
> quarterback is also intelligent.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> TJim wrote:
> >
> > Just because "skill does not imply intelligence" it doesn't mean that
"lack
> > of skill implies intelligence". Nor does it mean that "skill implies
lack
> > of intelligence". Unless specifically stated otherwise, the ASSumption
is
> > that there is *no* implied correlation between "skill" and
"intelligence".

 

ok..........are we equating skill with "eye - motor coordination"
It would, then, seem that skill is required to shift, steer, etc &
intelligence is required to prevent the multitude of potential traffic
fatalities (driver sitting @ intersection & pulling out in front of you
because he doesn't want to be behind a "slow" truck).

--
Carlo F. Serusa, Jr. RPh
carlo.jr@comcast.net
'98 Sahara TJ - '89 YJ - '79 Scout II
O|||||||O
'92 Explorer '65 Mustang


"TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:PrecnTx6CZ9nZsCiXTWJhw@comcast.com...
> True. Skill and intelligence certainly compliment each other...
>
> Skill: "You're very bright."
>
> Intelligence: "Thanks, you do nice work."
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:3F5DF738.6057FEC7@***.net...
> > Hi Jim,
> > Yes, but we're usually a little more successful if our team's
> > quarterback is also intelligent.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > TJim wrote:
> > >
> > > Just because "skill does not imply intelligence" it doesn't mean that
> "lack
> > > of skill implies intelligence". Nor does it mean that "skill implies
> lack
> > > of intelligence". Unless specifically stated otherwise, the
ASSumption
> is
> > > that there is *no* implied correlation between "skill" and
> "intelligence".
>
>

 

ok..........are we equating skill with "eye - motor coordination"
It would, then, seem that skill is required to shift, steer, etc &
intelligence is required to prevent the multitude of potential traffic
fatalities (driver sitting @ intersection & pulling out in front of you
because he doesn't want to be behind a "slow" truck).

--
Carlo F. Serusa, Jr. RPh
carlo.jr@comcast.net
'98 Sahara TJ - '89 YJ - '79 Scout II
O|||||||O
'92 Explorer '65 Mustang


"TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:PrecnTx6CZ9nZsCiXTWJhw@comcast.com...
> True. Skill and intelligence certainly compliment each other...
>
> Skill: "You're very bright."
>
> Intelligence: "Thanks, you do nice work."
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:3F5DF738.6057FEC7@***.net...
> > Hi Jim,
> > Yes, but we're usually a little more successful if our team's
> > quarterback is also intelligent.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > TJim wrote:
> > >
> > > Just because "skill does not imply intelligence" it doesn't mean that
> "lack
> > > of skill implies intelligence". Nor does it mean that "skill implies
> lack
> > > of intelligence". Unless specifically stated otherwise, the
ASSumption
> is
> > > that there is *no* implied correlation between "skill" and
> "intelligence".
>
>

 

On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 05:07:18 GMT in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******,
"Carlo Jr." <carlo.jr@comcast.net> wrote:

>I say that pulling up to 80,000lbs of anything through crowded residential
>areas, over freeways, over mountain roads, & roads like those of the Feather
>River Canyon (all in one day - & sharing these roads with really
>unintelligent drivers) does require skills that many average or even above
>average individuals do not posses.

In addition I am sure they know how to pour the right color of gas
down the right hole at the station. That doesn't mean they know how
it is blended or what else goes on back at the refinery.

 

On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 05:07:18 GMT in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******,
"Carlo Jr." <carlo.jr@comcast.net> wrote:

>I say that pulling up to 80,000lbs of anything through crowded residential
>areas, over freeways, over mountain roads, & roads like those of the Feather
>River Canyon (all in one day - & sharing these roads with really
>unintelligent drivers) does require skills that many average or even above
>average individuals do not posses.

In addition I am sure they know how to pour the right color of gas
down the right hole at the station. That doesn't mean they know how
it is blended or what else goes on back at the refinery.

 

ARCO uses an alcohol mix for Kalifornia.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

David Harmon wrote:
>
> Here in so. Cal. I can run any brand of 87 octane in my stock '84
> CJ7 258 as long as it is not ARCO. ARCO gas knocks like hell.
> Otherwise the only time it knocks is occasionally pulling up the
> San Fernando pass southbound I-405 full throttle 5th gear in hot
> weather.
>
> The funny thing is, ARCO mid-grade 89 octane is the same price as
> everybody else's 87 octane. I still won't buy it.

 

ARCO uses an alcohol mix for Kalifornia.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

David Harmon wrote:
>
> Here in so. Cal. I can run any brand of 87 octane in my stock '84
> CJ7 258 as long as it is not ARCO. ARCO gas knocks like hell.
> Otherwise the only time it knocks is occasionally pulling up the
> San Fernando pass southbound I-405 full throttle 5th gear in hot
> weather.
>
> The funny thing is, ARCO mid-grade 89 octane is the same price as
> everybody else's 87 octane. I still won't buy it.

 

Yes, but they are following instructions to a T, in mixing these
additives upon loading or they will be replaced. Kind of like you may
replace your spouse if they do not follow the cake mix instructions.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

David Harmon wrote:
>
> In addition I am sure they know how to pour the right color of gas
> down the right hole at the station. That doesn't mean they know how
> it is blended or what else goes on back at the refinery.

 

Yes, but they are following instructions to a T, in mixing these
additives upon loading or they will be replaced. Kind of like you may
replace your spouse if they do not follow the cake mix instructions.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

David Harmon wrote:
>
> In addition I am sure they know how to pour the right color of gas
> down the right hole at the station. That doesn't mean they know how
> it is blended or what else goes on back at the refinery.

 

ah........but do they - or should they care, as long as it gets in the right
hole?

--
Carlo F. Serusa, Jr. RPh
carlo.jr@comcast.net
'98 Sahara TJ - '89 YJ - '79 Scout II
O|||||||O
'92 Explorer '65 Mustang


"David Harmon" <source@netcom.com> wrote in message
news:3f66e824.6106378@news.west.earthlink.net...
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 05:07:18 GMT in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******,
> "Carlo Jr." <carlo.jr@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >I say that pulling up to 80,000lbs of anything through crowded
residential
> >areas, over freeways, over mountain roads, & roads like those of the
Feather
> >River Canyon (all in one day - & sharing these roads with really
> >unintelligent drivers) does require skills that many average or even
above
> >average individuals do not posses.
>
> In addition I am sure they know how to pour the right color of gas
> down the right hole at the station. That doesn't mean they know how
> it is blended or what else goes on back at the refinery.
>