Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

I like it better...

"Bob" <magicclaw@mac.com> wrote in message
news:47b769ae.0312171142.48a388fa@posting.google.c om...
> How about "Jeoples"?
>
> They'd have a much harder time asserting an infringement claim when
> the spelling is different, and just a PART of the word sounds like
> their name...
> (Admittedly it's not as cool as Jeeples, though)
>
>
>
> Jason90715@yahoo.com (Jason Williams) wrote in message
news:<c0500d7c.0312161554.2982a297@posting.google. com>...
> > Nathan,
> > I have followed your past dealings with DC and I can now feel your
> > pain. My wife has always refered to me and my Jeep'n buddies as 'Jeep
> > Creeps'. What other group of people will waive at total strangers
> > just because of what they drive? She always, still does, when I
> > return or initiate a 'Jeep Wave'. she then started calling us
> > Jeeples. Well, she decided to start a business called Jeeples. With
> > a slogan of "A different kind of people". She applied for a trademark
> > of Jeeples. We just recieve this today.
> >
> > "We are trademark counsel for DaimlerChrysler Corporation. As you are
> > no
> > doubt aware, DaimlerChrysler Corporation is the owner of the JEEP
> > trademark. In addition to using JEEP to identify vehicles,
> > DaimlerChrysler
> > uses JEEP trademark in connection with other products including, but
> > not
> > limited to, clothing, baby carriages, and toys. By virtue of
> > DaimlerChrysler's long use of JEEP and extensive advertising, JEEP has
> > become a well known, if not famous, trademark entitled to a broad
> > scope of
> > protection or exclusivity of use.
> >
> > It has come to DaimlerChrysler's attention that your application for
> > the
> > mark JEEPLES for clothing was published in the November 25, 2003 issue
> > of
> > the Trademark Official Gazette. On December 8, 2003, we filed a
> > request
> > for an extension of time to file a Notice of Opposition.
> >
> > In our opinion, your JEEPLES trademark is confusingly similar to the
> > JEEP
> > trademark and likely to cause confusion. Accordingly, DaimlerChrysler
> > respectfully requests that you expressly abandon that application and
> > cease
> > any plans to use the mark. If you do not expressly abandon the
> > application, DaimlerChrysler will have no choice but file a Notice of
> > Opposition. Moreover, if you begin to use the mark on clothing,
> > DaimlerChrysler will not hesitate to assert its legal and equitable
> > rights.
> >
> > We hope that this issue may be resolved on an amicable basis. If you,
> > or
> > your legal counsel, have any questions, please do not hesitate to
> > contact
> > me."
> >
> > At least I'm not out too much money.
> > I didn't think we would worry them too much as we are promoting Jeeps
> > in a positive style. You know, responsible off roading.
> > Oh well.
> > Jason

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

I like it better...

"Bob" <magicclaw@mac.com> wrote in message
news:47b769ae.0312171142.48a388fa@posting.google.c om...
> How about "Jeoples"?
>
> They'd have a much harder time asserting an infringement claim when
> the spelling is different, and just a PART of the word sounds like
> their name...
> (Admittedly it's not as cool as Jeeples, though)
>
>
>
> Jason90715@yahoo.com (Jason Williams) wrote in message
news:<c0500d7c.0312161554.2982a297@posting.google. com>...
> > Nathan,
> > I have followed your past dealings with DC and I can now feel your
> > pain. My wife has always refered to me and my Jeep'n buddies as 'Jeep
> > Creeps'. What other group of people will waive at total strangers
> > just because of what they drive? She always, still does, when I
> > return or initiate a 'Jeep Wave'. she then started calling us
> > Jeeples. Well, she decided to start a business called Jeeples. With
> > a slogan of "A different kind of people". She applied for a trademark
> > of Jeeples. We just recieve this today.
> >
> > "We are trademark counsel for DaimlerChrysler Corporation. As you are
> > no
> > doubt aware, DaimlerChrysler Corporation is the owner of the JEEP
> > trademark. In addition to using JEEP to identify vehicles,
> > DaimlerChrysler
> > uses JEEP trademark in connection with other products including, but
> > not
> > limited to, clothing, baby carriages, and toys. By virtue of
> > DaimlerChrysler's long use of JEEP and extensive advertising, JEEP has
> > become a well known, if not famous, trademark entitled to a broad
> > scope of
> > protection or exclusivity of use.
> >
> > It has come to DaimlerChrysler's attention that your application for
> > the
> > mark JEEPLES for clothing was published in the November 25, 2003 issue
> > of
> > the Trademark Official Gazette. On December 8, 2003, we filed a
> > request
> > for an extension of time to file a Notice of Opposition.
> >
> > In our opinion, your JEEPLES trademark is confusingly similar to the
> > JEEP
> > trademark and likely to cause confusion. Accordingly, DaimlerChrysler
> > respectfully requests that you expressly abandon that application and
> > cease
> > any plans to use the mark. If you do not expressly abandon the
> > application, DaimlerChrysler will have no choice but file a Notice of
> > Opposition. Moreover, if you begin to use the mark on clothing,
> > DaimlerChrysler will not hesitate to assert its legal and equitable
> > rights.
> >
> > We hope that this issue may be resolved on an amicable basis. If you,
> > or
> > your legal counsel, have any questions, please do not hesitate to
> > contact
> > me."
> >
> > At least I'm not out too much money.
> > I didn't think we would worry them too much as we are promoting Jeeps
> > in a positive style. You know, responsible off roading.
> > Oh well.
> > Jason

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

I like it better...

"Bob" <magicclaw@mac.com> wrote in message
news:47b769ae.0312171142.48a388fa@posting.google.c om...
> How about "Jeoples"?
>
> They'd have a much harder time asserting an infringement claim when
> the spelling is different, and just a PART of the word sounds like
> their name...
> (Admittedly it's not as cool as Jeeples, though)
>
>
>
> Jason90715@yahoo.com (Jason Williams) wrote in message
news:<c0500d7c.0312161554.2982a297@posting.google. com>...
> > Nathan,
> > I have followed your past dealings with DC and I can now feel your
> > pain. My wife has always refered to me and my Jeep'n buddies as 'Jeep
> > Creeps'. What other group of people will waive at total strangers
> > just because of what they drive? She always, still does, when I
> > return or initiate a 'Jeep Wave'. she then started calling us
> > Jeeples. Well, she decided to start a business called Jeeples. With
> > a slogan of "A different kind of people". She applied for a trademark
> > of Jeeples. We just recieve this today.
> >
> > "We are trademark counsel for DaimlerChrysler Corporation. As you are
> > no
> > doubt aware, DaimlerChrysler Corporation is the owner of the JEEP
> > trademark. In addition to using JEEP to identify vehicles,
> > DaimlerChrysler
> > uses JEEP trademark in connection with other products including, but
> > not
> > limited to, clothing, baby carriages, and toys. By virtue of
> > DaimlerChrysler's long use of JEEP and extensive advertising, JEEP has
> > become a well known, if not famous, trademark entitled to a broad
> > scope of
> > protection or exclusivity of use.
> >
> > It has come to DaimlerChrysler's attention that your application for
> > the
> > mark JEEPLES for clothing was published in the November 25, 2003 issue
> > of
> > the Trademark Official Gazette. On December 8, 2003, we filed a
> > request
> > for an extension of time to file a Notice of Opposition.
> >
> > In our opinion, your JEEPLES trademark is confusingly similar to the
> > JEEP
> > trademark and likely to cause confusion. Accordingly, DaimlerChrysler
> > respectfully requests that you expressly abandon that application and
> > cease
> > any plans to use the mark. If you do not expressly abandon the
> > application, DaimlerChrysler will have no choice but file a Notice of
> > Opposition. Moreover, if you begin to use the mark on clothing,
> > DaimlerChrysler will not hesitate to assert its legal and equitable
> > rights.
> >
> > We hope that this issue may be resolved on an amicable basis. If you,
> > or
> > your legal counsel, have any questions, please do not hesitate to
> > contact
> > me."
> >
> > At least I'm not out too much money.
> > I didn't think we would worry them too much as we are promoting Jeeps
> > in a positive style. You know, responsible off roading.
> > Oh well.
> > Jason

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:54:25 -0800, Jason Williams wrote:

> Nathan,
> I have followed your past dealings with DC and I can now feel your
> pain. My wife has always refered to me and my Jeep'n buddies as 'Jeep
> Creeps'. What other group of people will waive at total strangers
> just because of what they drive? She always, still does, when I
> return or initiate a 'Jeep Wave'. she then started calling us
> Jeeples. Well, she decided to start a business called Jeeples. With
> a slogan of "A different kind of people". She applied for a trademark
> of Jeeples. We just recieve this today.
>
> "We are trademark counsel for DaimlerChrysler Corporation. As you are
> no
> doubt aware, DaimlerChrysler Corporation is the owner of the JEEP
> trademark. In addition to using JEEP to identify vehicles,
> DaimlerChrysler
> uses JEEP trademark in connection with other products including, but
> not
> limited to, clothing, baby carriages, and toys. By virtue of
> DaimlerChrysler's long use of JEEP and extensive advertising, JEEP has
> become a well known, if not famous, trademark entitled to a broad
> scope of
> protection or exclusivity of use.
>
> It has come to DaimlerChrysler's attention that your application for
> the
> mark JEEPLES for clothing was published in the November 25, 2003 issue
> of
> the Trademark Official Gazette. On December 8, 2003, we filed a
> request
> for an extension of time to file a Notice of Opposition.
>
> In our opinion, your JEEPLES trademark is confusingly similar to the
> JEEP
> trademark and likely to cause confusion. Accordingly, DaimlerChrysler
> respectfully requests that you expressly abandon that application and
> cease
> any plans to use the mark. If you do not expressly abandon the
> application, DaimlerChrysler will have no choice but file a Notice of
> Opposition. Moreover, if you begin to use the mark on clothing,
> DaimlerChrysler will not hesitate to assert its legal and equitable
> rights.
>
> We hope that this issue may be resolved on an amicable basis. If you,
> or
> your legal counsel, have any questions, please do not hesitate to
> contact
> me."
>
> At least I'm not out too much money.
> I didn't think we would worry them too much as we are promoting Jeeps
> in a positive style. You know, responsible off roading.
> Oh well.
> Jason

DC *must* protect the 'JEEP' trademark. how would anyone in this group like
to see a sidekick, rav-4 or even a miata (lol) with JEEP on it somewhere.
That could happen if they don't protect the trademark.

--
Keith
98 TJ
86 Mustang GT

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:54:25 -0800, Jason Williams wrote:

> Nathan,
> I have followed your past dealings with DC and I can now feel your
> pain. My wife has always refered to me and my Jeep'n buddies as 'Jeep
> Creeps'. What other group of people will waive at total strangers
> just because of what they drive? She always, still does, when I
> return or initiate a 'Jeep Wave'. she then started calling us
> Jeeples. Well, she decided to start a business called Jeeples. With
> a slogan of "A different kind of people". She applied for a trademark
> of Jeeples. We just recieve this today.
>
> "We are trademark counsel for DaimlerChrysler Corporation. As you are
> no
> doubt aware, DaimlerChrysler Corporation is the owner of the JEEP
> trademark. In addition to using JEEP to identify vehicles,
> DaimlerChrysler
> uses JEEP trademark in connection with other products including, but
> not
> limited to, clothing, baby carriages, and toys. By virtue of
> DaimlerChrysler's long use of JEEP and extensive advertising, JEEP has
> become a well known, if not famous, trademark entitled to a broad
> scope of
> protection or exclusivity of use.
>
> It has come to DaimlerChrysler's attention that your application for
> the
> mark JEEPLES for clothing was published in the November 25, 2003 issue
> of
> the Trademark Official Gazette. On December 8, 2003, we filed a
> request
> for an extension of time to file a Notice of Opposition.
>
> In our opinion, your JEEPLES trademark is confusingly similar to the
> JEEP
> trademark and likely to cause confusion. Accordingly, DaimlerChrysler
> respectfully requests that you expressly abandon that application and
> cease
> any plans to use the mark. If you do not expressly abandon the
> application, DaimlerChrysler will have no choice but file a Notice of
> Opposition. Moreover, if you begin to use the mark on clothing,
> DaimlerChrysler will not hesitate to assert its legal and equitable
> rights.
>
> We hope that this issue may be resolved on an amicable basis. If you,
> or
> your legal counsel, have any questions, please do not hesitate to
> contact
> me."
>
> At least I'm not out too much money.
> I didn't think we would worry them too much as we are promoting Jeeps
> in a positive style. You know, responsible off roading.
> Oh well.
> Jason

DC *must* protect the 'JEEP' trademark. how would anyone in this group like
to see a sidekick, rav-4 or even a miata (lol) with JEEP on it somewhere.
That could happen if they don't protect the trademark.

--
Keith
98 TJ
86 Mustang GT

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:54:25 -0800, Jason Williams wrote:

> Nathan,
> I have followed your past dealings with DC and I can now feel your
> pain. My wife has always refered to me and my Jeep'n buddies as 'Jeep
> Creeps'. What other group of people will waive at total strangers
> just because of what they drive? She always, still does, when I
> return or initiate a 'Jeep Wave'. she then started calling us
> Jeeples. Well, she decided to start a business called Jeeples. With
> a slogan of "A different kind of people". She applied for a trademark
> of Jeeples. We just recieve this today.
>
> "We are trademark counsel for DaimlerChrysler Corporation. As you are
> no
> doubt aware, DaimlerChrysler Corporation is the owner of the JEEP
> trademark. In addition to using JEEP to identify vehicles,
> DaimlerChrysler
> uses JEEP trademark in connection with other products including, but
> not
> limited to, clothing, baby carriages, and toys. By virtue of
> DaimlerChrysler's long use of JEEP and extensive advertising, JEEP has
> become a well known, if not famous, trademark entitled to a broad
> scope of
> protection or exclusivity of use.
>
> It has come to DaimlerChrysler's attention that your application for
> the
> mark JEEPLES for clothing was published in the November 25, 2003 issue
> of
> the Trademark Official Gazette. On December 8, 2003, we filed a
> request
> for an extension of time to file a Notice of Opposition.
>
> In our opinion, your JEEPLES trademark is confusingly similar to the
> JEEP
> trademark and likely to cause confusion. Accordingly, DaimlerChrysler
> respectfully requests that you expressly abandon that application and
> cease
> any plans to use the mark. If you do not expressly abandon the
> application, DaimlerChrysler will have no choice but file a Notice of
> Opposition. Moreover, if you begin to use the mark on clothing,
> DaimlerChrysler will not hesitate to assert its legal and equitable
> rights.
>
> We hope that this issue may be resolved on an amicable basis. If you,
> or
> your legal counsel, have any questions, please do not hesitate to
> contact
> me."
>
> At least I'm not out too much money.
> I didn't think we would worry them too much as we are promoting Jeeps
> in a positive style. You know, responsible off roading.
> Oh well.
> Jason

DC *must* protect the 'JEEP' trademark. how would anyone in this group like
to see a sidekick, rav-4 or even a miata (lol) with JEEP on it somewhere.
That could happen if they don't protect the trademark.

--
Keith
98 TJ
86 Mustang GT

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

Find let them have their trademark, "Jeep". Jeepeople, should
belong first whom trademark it.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Keith wrote:
>
> DC *must* protect the 'JEEP' trademark. how would anyone in this group like
> to see a sidekick, rav-4 or even a miata (lol) with JEEP on it somewhere.
> That could happen if they don't protect the trademark.
>
> --
> Keith
> 98 TJ
> 86 Mustang GT

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

Find let them have their trademark, "Jeep". Jeepeople, should
belong first whom trademark it.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Keith wrote:
>
> DC *must* protect the 'JEEP' trademark. how would anyone in this group like
> to see a sidekick, rav-4 or even a miata (lol) with JEEP on it somewhere.
> That could happen if they don't protect the trademark.
>
> --
> Keith
> 98 TJ
> 86 Mustang GT

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

Find let them have their trademark, "Jeep". Jeepeople, should
belong first whom trademark it.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Keith wrote:
>
> DC *must* protect the 'JEEP' trademark. how would anyone in this group like
> to see a sidekick, rav-4 or even a miata (lol) with JEEP on it somewhere.
> That could happen if they don't protect the trademark.
>
> --
> Keith
> 98 TJ
> 86 Mustang GT

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 19:22:49 -0800, L.W.Hughe wrote:

> Find let them have their trademark, "Jeep". Jeepeople, should
> belong first whom trademark it.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Keith wrote:
>>
>> DC *must* protect the 'JEEP' trademark. how would anyone in this group
>> like to see a sidekick, rav-4 or even a miata (lol) with JEEP on it
>> somewhere. That could happen if they don't protect the trademark.
>>
>> --
>> Keith
>> 98 TJ
>> 86 Mustang GT

They must protect all variations of the Jeep trademark. Look at the
Windows (as in Microsoft) vs. Lindows (as in Linux) lawsuit and it will
explain much of what trademark law is about.

--
Keith
98 TJ
86 Mustang GT