Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

Eat beans, American needs gas.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

DougW wrote:
>
> ...the more you toot the better you feel.

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

Eat beans, American needs gas.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

DougW wrote:
>
> ...the more you toot the better you feel.

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

Eat beans, American needs gas.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

DougW wrote:
>
> ...the more you toot the better you feel.

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:21:25 GMT, "neojeep" <NOSPAMpeter@tellep.com>
wrote:

>Only if Apples were the musical fruit.
>
Like beans?

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:21:25 GMT, "neojeep" <NOSPAMpeter@tellep.com>
wrote:

>Only if Apples were the musical fruit.
>
Like beans?

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:21:25 GMT, "neojeep" <NOSPAMpeter@tellep.com>
wrote:

>Only if Apples were the musical fruit.
>
Like beans?

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3FE23261.38DE35DB@sympatico.ca...
> There are no Wrangler Jeeps in Canada.
>
> I think GM nailed them because a pickup is named Wrangler.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>

Wrangler Sahara has been Wrangler Renegade since 2000 in New Zealand
because of an issue with Nissan. This was the explanation given to me by
the Jeep dealer when I asked him why I couldn't find any late model
Wrangler Sahara.

TW

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3FE23261.38DE35DB@sympatico.ca...
> There are no Wrangler Jeeps in Canada.
>
> I think GM nailed them because a pickup is named Wrangler.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>

Wrangler Sahara has been Wrangler Renegade since 2000 in New Zealand
because of an issue with Nissan. This was the explanation given to me by
the Jeep dealer when I asked him why I couldn't find any late model
Wrangler Sahara.

TW

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3FE23261.38DE35DB@sympatico.ca...
> There are no Wrangler Jeeps in Canada.
>
> I think GM nailed them because a pickup is named Wrangler.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>

Wrangler Sahara has been Wrangler Renegade since 2000 in New Zealand
because of an issue with Nissan. This was the explanation given to me by
the Jeep dealer when I asked him why I couldn't find any late model
Wrangler Sahara.

TW

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Jason Williams wrote:

> The word Jeeples once was used back in the 70's for a line of
> children's toys. They were little people characters. If it was used
> once before and the trademark expired, what was the big deal. Let's
> use that name.

Ah, well, there's an angle for you to pursue; The prior, unopposed use of
the name.


> I fully agree with with idea of protecting ones rights and once I
> contact the trademark department at DC, I'll see what my options are.

I wouldn't do that were I you. I'm thinking that your first call should
be to a trademark attorney. Have him evaluate your case and decide where
to go from there. The best that you can hope for by contacting DC
directly is for them to send you more "Go Back Now! Abandon All Hope!"
letters, or a demand for 25% of the list price of the items you sell.


> Do they want to work with me? I originally thought this would be
> treated like a club type of thing. Maybe trying to trademark the name
> is what took it too far. Hey, live and learn. Life is too short to
> not have some sort of trials and tribulations.

Naw, they would have found you eventually anyway, and demanded back
royalties, so it is better that this happened now. BTW, it isn't about
you or right and wrong or profit or even image, it is about a very narrow
business point of view concerned only about not allowing their
"intellectual property" to be diluted in any way or to fall into the
public domain. You probably would have gotten a similar notice had you
been a big fan of things made with a hook-and-loop fastening system and
had called your product "Velcroids".