Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

Knowing what you obviously already knew, how could you have expected
anything else from D-C?

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

Knowing what you obviously already knew, how could you have expected
anything else from D-C?

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

Knowing what you obviously already knew, how could you have expected
anything else from D-C?

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

"Jason Williams" <Jason90715@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c0500d7c.0312161554.2982a297@posting.google.c om...
> "We are trademark counsel for DaimlerChrysler Corporation

jason,
ouch. 3 to 1 we see "jeeples" used by daimler in the near future. sorry to
hear about your run in....sorry to see them yet again biting the hand that
feeds them. if youd care to compare notes, contact me at
http://tinyurl.com/amfi

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com



As you are
> no
> doubt aware, DaimlerChrysler Corporation is the owner of the JEEP
> trademark. In addition to using JEEP to identify vehicles,
> DaimlerChrysler
> uses JEEP trademark in connection with other products including, but
> not
> limited to, clothing, baby carriages, and toys. By virtue of
> DaimlerChrysler's long use of JEEP and extensive advertising, JEEP has
> become a well known, if not famous, trademark entitled to a broad
> scope of
> protection or exclusivity of use.
>
> It has come to DaimlerChrysler's attention that your application for
> the
> mark JEEPLES for clothing was published in the November 25, 2003 issue
> of
> the Trademark Official Gazette. On December 8, 2003, we filed a
> request
> for an extension of time to file a Notice of Opposition.
>
> In our opinion, your JEEPLES trademark is confusingly similar to the
> JEEP
> trademark and likely to cause confusion. Accordingly, DaimlerChrysler
> respectfully requests that you expressly abandon that application and
> cease
> any plans to use the mark. If you do not expressly abandon the
> application, DaimlerChrysler will have no choice but file a Notice of
> Opposition. Moreover, if you begin to use the mark on clothing,
> DaimlerChrysler will not hesitate to assert its legal and equitable
> rights.
>
> We hope that this issue may be resolved on an amicable basis. If you,
> or
> your legal counsel, have any questions, please do not hesitate to
> contact
> me."
>
> At least I'm not out too much money.
> I didn't think we would worry them too much as we are promoting Jeeps
> in a positive style. You know, responsible off roading.
> Oh well.
> Jason

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

"Jason Williams" <Jason90715@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c0500d7c.0312161554.2982a297@posting.google.c om...
> "We are trademark counsel for DaimlerChrysler Corporation

jason,
ouch. 3 to 1 we see "jeeples" used by daimler in the near future. sorry to
hear about your run in....sorry to see them yet again biting the hand that
feeds them. if youd care to compare notes, contact me at
http://tinyurl.com/amfi

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com



As you are
> no
> doubt aware, DaimlerChrysler Corporation is the owner of the JEEP
> trademark. In addition to using JEEP to identify vehicles,
> DaimlerChrysler
> uses JEEP trademark in connection with other products including, but
> not
> limited to, clothing, baby carriages, and toys. By virtue of
> DaimlerChrysler's long use of JEEP and extensive advertising, JEEP has
> become a well known, if not famous, trademark entitled to a broad
> scope of
> protection or exclusivity of use.
>
> It has come to DaimlerChrysler's attention that your application for
> the
> mark JEEPLES for clothing was published in the November 25, 2003 issue
> of
> the Trademark Official Gazette. On December 8, 2003, we filed a
> request
> for an extension of time to file a Notice of Opposition.
>
> In our opinion, your JEEPLES trademark is confusingly similar to the
> JEEP
> trademark and likely to cause confusion. Accordingly, DaimlerChrysler
> respectfully requests that you expressly abandon that application and
> cease
> any plans to use the mark. If you do not expressly abandon the
> application, DaimlerChrysler will have no choice but file a Notice of
> Opposition. Moreover, if you begin to use the mark on clothing,
> DaimlerChrysler will not hesitate to assert its legal and equitable
> rights.
>
> We hope that this issue may be resolved on an amicable basis. If you,
> or
> your legal counsel, have any questions, please do not hesitate to
> contact
> me."
>
> At least I'm not out too much money.
> I didn't think we would worry them too much as we are promoting Jeeps
> in a positive style. You know, responsible off roading.
> Oh well.
> Jason

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

"Jason Williams" <Jason90715@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c0500d7c.0312161554.2982a297@posting.google.c om...
> "We are trademark counsel for DaimlerChrysler Corporation

jason,
ouch. 3 to 1 we see "jeeples" used by daimler in the near future. sorry to
hear about your run in....sorry to see them yet again biting the hand that
feeds them. if youd care to compare notes, contact me at
http://tinyurl.com/amfi

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com



As you are
> no
> doubt aware, DaimlerChrysler Corporation is the owner of the JEEP
> trademark. In addition to using JEEP to identify vehicles,
> DaimlerChrysler
> uses JEEP trademark in connection with other products including, but
> not
> limited to, clothing, baby carriages, and toys. By virtue of
> DaimlerChrysler's long use of JEEP and extensive advertising, JEEP has
> become a well known, if not famous, trademark entitled to a broad
> scope of
> protection or exclusivity of use.
>
> It has come to DaimlerChrysler's attention that your application for
> the
> mark JEEPLES for clothing was published in the November 25, 2003 issue
> of
> the Trademark Official Gazette. On December 8, 2003, we filed a
> request
> for an extension of time to file a Notice of Opposition.
>
> In our opinion, your JEEPLES trademark is confusingly similar to the
> JEEP
> trademark and likely to cause confusion. Accordingly, DaimlerChrysler
> respectfully requests that you expressly abandon that application and
> cease
> any plans to use the mark. If you do not expressly abandon the
> application, DaimlerChrysler will have no choice but file a Notice of
> Opposition. Moreover, if you begin to use the mark on clothing,
> DaimlerChrysler will not hesitate to assert its legal and equitable
> rights.
>
> We hope that this issue may be resolved on an amicable basis. If you,
> or
> your legal counsel, have any questions, please do not hesitate to
> contact
> me."
>
> At least I'm not out too much money.
> I didn't think we would worry them too much as we are promoting Jeeps
> in a positive style. You know, responsible off roading.
> Oh well.
> Jason

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

Do any of you understand intellectual property rights and copyright law?

Tirya
--
TDC Inca Jeeper
A dirty Jeep is a happy Jeep.
"travis" <travist34removethis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uh8vtv8mjql1l82mi8arual4fkqcf1rkid@4ax.com...
> All of this stuff reminds me of the VWOA crap going on where VW is
> having their lawyers contact people who are doing as little as just
> displaying a VW logo on their non-profit website and telling them to
> remove it. Sounds like someone needs to clean house at VWOA and Jeep
> in the PR departments. Ridiculous.
>
>
> On 16 Dec 2003 15:54:25 -0800, Jason90715@yahoo.com (Jason Williams)
> shared the following:
>
> >Nathan,
> >I have followed your past dealings with DC and I can now feel your
> >pain. My wife has always refered to me and my Jeep'n buddies as 'Jeep
> >Creeps'. What other group of people will waive at total strangers
> >just because of what they drive? She always, still does, when I
> >return or initiate a 'Jeep Wave'. she then started calling us
> >Jeeples. Well, she decided to start a business called Jeeples. With
> >a slogan of "A different kind of people". She applied for a trademark
> >of Jeeples. We just recieve this today.
> >
> >"We are trademark counsel for DaimlerChrysler Corporation. As you are
> >no
> >doubt aware, DaimlerChrysler Corporation is the owner of the JEEP
> >trademark. In addition to using JEEP to identify vehicles,
> >DaimlerChrysler
> >uses JEEP trademark in connection with other products including, but
> >not
> >limited to, clothing, baby carriages, and toys. By virtue of
> >DaimlerChrysler's long use of JEEP and extensive advertising, JEEP has
> >become a well known, if not famous, trademark entitled to a broad
> >scope of
> >protection or exclusivity of use.
> >
> >It has come to DaimlerChrysler's attention that your application for
> >the
> >mark JEEPLES for clothing was published in the November 25, 2003 issue
> >of
> >the Trademark Official Gazette. On December 8, 2003, we filed a
> >request
> >for an extension of time to file a Notice of Opposition.
> >
> >In our opinion, your JEEPLES trademark is confusingly similar to the
> >JEEP
> >trademark and likely to cause confusion. Accordingly, DaimlerChrysler
> >respectfully requests that you expressly abandon that application and
> >cease
> >any plans to use the mark. If you do not expressly abandon the
> >application, DaimlerChrysler will have no choice but file a Notice of
> >Opposition. Moreover, if you begin to use the mark on clothing,
> >DaimlerChrysler will not hesitate to assert its legal and equitable
> >rights.
> >
> >We hope that this issue may be resolved on an amicable basis. If you,
> >or
> >your legal counsel, have any questions, please do not hesitate to
> >contact
> >me."
> >
> >At least I'm not out too much money.
> >I didn't think we would worry them too much as we are promoting Jeeps
> >in a positive style. You know, responsible off roading.
> >Oh well.
> >Jason
>
>
> --
> Travis
> http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
> Do unto others. Then split.
> Happy trails!!!
> :wq!

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

Do any of you understand intellectual property rights and copyright law?

Tirya
--
TDC Inca Jeeper
A dirty Jeep is a happy Jeep.
"travis" <travist34removethis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uh8vtv8mjql1l82mi8arual4fkqcf1rkid@4ax.com...
> All of this stuff reminds me of the VWOA crap going on where VW is
> having their lawyers contact people who are doing as little as just
> displaying a VW logo on their non-profit website and telling them to
> remove it. Sounds like someone needs to clean house at VWOA and Jeep
> in the PR departments. Ridiculous.
>
>
> On 16 Dec 2003 15:54:25 -0800, Jason90715@yahoo.com (Jason Williams)
> shared the following:
>
> >Nathan,
> >I have followed your past dealings with DC and I can now feel your
> >pain. My wife has always refered to me and my Jeep'n buddies as 'Jeep
> >Creeps'. What other group of people will waive at total strangers
> >just because of what they drive? She always, still does, when I
> >return or initiate a 'Jeep Wave'. she then started calling us
> >Jeeples. Well, she decided to start a business called Jeeples. With
> >a slogan of "A different kind of people". She applied for a trademark
> >of Jeeples. We just recieve this today.
> >
> >"We are trademark counsel for DaimlerChrysler Corporation. As you are
> >no
> >doubt aware, DaimlerChrysler Corporation is the owner of the JEEP
> >trademark. In addition to using JEEP to identify vehicles,
> >DaimlerChrysler
> >uses JEEP trademark in connection with other products including, but
> >not
> >limited to, clothing, baby carriages, and toys. By virtue of
> >DaimlerChrysler's long use of JEEP and extensive advertising, JEEP has
> >become a well known, if not famous, trademark entitled to a broad
> >scope of
> >protection or exclusivity of use.
> >
> >It has come to DaimlerChrysler's attention that your application for
> >the
> >mark JEEPLES for clothing was published in the November 25, 2003 issue
> >of
> >the Trademark Official Gazette. On December 8, 2003, we filed a
> >request
> >for an extension of time to file a Notice of Opposition.
> >
> >In our opinion, your JEEPLES trademark is confusingly similar to the
> >JEEP
> >trademark and likely to cause confusion. Accordingly, DaimlerChrysler
> >respectfully requests that you expressly abandon that application and
> >cease
> >any plans to use the mark. If you do not expressly abandon the
> >application, DaimlerChrysler will have no choice but file a Notice of
> >Opposition. Moreover, if you begin to use the mark on clothing,
> >DaimlerChrysler will not hesitate to assert its legal and equitable
> >rights.
> >
> >We hope that this issue may be resolved on an amicable basis. If you,
> >or
> >your legal counsel, have any questions, please do not hesitate to
> >contact
> >me."
> >
> >At least I'm not out too much money.
> >I didn't think we would worry them too much as we are promoting Jeeps
> >in a positive style. You know, responsible off roading.
> >Oh well.
> >Jason
>
>
> --
> Travis
> http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
> Do unto others. Then split.
> Happy trails!!!
> :wq!

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

Do any of you understand intellectual property rights and copyright law?

Tirya
--
TDC Inca Jeeper
A dirty Jeep is a happy Jeep.
"travis" <travist34removethis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uh8vtv8mjql1l82mi8arual4fkqcf1rkid@4ax.com...
> All of this stuff reminds me of the VWOA crap going on where VW is
> having their lawyers contact people who are doing as little as just
> displaying a VW logo on their non-profit website and telling them to
> remove it. Sounds like someone needs to clean house at VWOA and Jeep
> in the PR departments. Ridiculous.
>
>
> On 16 Dec 2003 15:54:25 -0800, Jason90715@yahoo.com (Jason Williams)
> shared the following:
>
> >Nathan,
> >I have followed your past dealings with DC and I can now feel your
> >pain. My wife has always refered to me and my Jeep'n buddies as 'Jeep
> >Creeps'. What other group of people will waive at total strangers
> >just because of what they drive? She always, still does, when I
> >return or initiate a 'Jeep Wave'. she then started calling us
> >Jeeples. Well, she decided to start a business called Jeeples. With
> >a slogan of "A different kind of people". She applied for a trademark
> >of Jeeples. We just recieve this today.
> >
> >"We are trademark counsel for DaimlerChrysler Corporation. As you are
> >no
> >doubt aware, DaimlerChrysler Corporation is the owner of the JEEP
> >trademark. In addition to using JEEP to identify vehicles,
> >DaimlerChrysler
> >uses JEEP trademark in connection with other products including, but
> >not
> >limited to, clothing, baby carriages, and toys. By virtue of
> >DaimlerChrysler's long use of JEEP and extensive advertising, JEEP has
> >become a well known, if not famous, trademark entitled to a broad
> >scope of
> >protection or exclusivity of use.
> >
> >It has come to DaimlerChrysler's attention that your application for
> >the
> >mark JEEPLES for clothing was published in the November 25, 2003 issue
> >of
> >the Trademark Official Gazette. On December 8, 2003, we filed a
> >request
> >for an extension of time to file a Notice of Opposition.
> >
> >In our opinion, your JEEPLES trademark is confusingly similar to the
> >JEEP
> >trademark and likely to cause confusion. Accordingly, DaimlerChrysler
> >respectfully requests that you expressly abandon that application and
> >cease
> >any plans to use the mark. If you do not expressly abandon the
> >application, DaimlerChrysler will have no choice but file a Notice of
> >Opposition. Moreover, if you begin to use the mark on clothing,
> >DaimlerChrysler will not hesitate to assert its legal and equitable
> >rights.
> >
> >We hope that this issue may be resolved on an amicable basis. If you,
> >or
> >your legal counsel, have any questions, please do not hesitate to
> >contact
> >me."
> >
> >At least I'm not out too much money.
> >I didn't think we would worry them too much as we are promoting Jeeps
> >in a positive style. You know, responsible off roading.
> >Oh well.
> >Jason
>
>
> --
> Travis
> http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
> Do unto others. Then split.
> Happy trails!!!
> :wq!

Re: Hello Nathan Collier
 

"Tirya" <Tirya@spamfree.addy> wrote in message
news:fgPDb.564005$HS4.4275726@attbi_s01...
> Do any of you understand intellectual property rights and copyright law?

intellectual property is a new frontier thats only beginning to be explored.
there is very little existing case law on it because people like me fold and
settle rather than risk everything fighting a corporate giant.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com