Remember Katrina?

On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:19:39 -0500, "Matt Macchiarolo"
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:

>Then the project should be federalized. (flame suit on)
>
>"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
>news:dsnpf7$a9k$1@reader2.panix.com...
>> We're drifting rapidly off-topic, but...
>>
>> If the Navy's motivation was from stock owners demanding increased profits
>> then submersible boat plants wouldn't enjoy the safety record that they
>> do.
>>
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>> Would be a good use for all the military bases that are slated to
>>> close...put up nuclear power plants. GWB mentioned that a while back, but
>>> I haven't heard much about it since. Yes, Bill, I agree with something W
>>> said. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
>>>
>>> And we should assign the management of the plants to the Navy, since they
>>> have so much experience with nuclear power.
>>>
>>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>> news:43EE7F78.44C01486@***.net...
>>>
>>>> We must use nuclear energy. Even a wind mill cost a million dollars
>>>>worth of energy to make. Maybe asking the our Indians to use their
>>>>sovereign nations, to build around these liberal wackos, will solve our
>>>>problem. All we have to do is drop our use of petroleum by about ten
>>>>percent and gasoline will become a useless by-product again.
>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>
>>>>Lee Ayrton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Or that it is pure government pork. It takes the energy of 2/3s of a
>>>>>gallon of gasoline to produce a gallon of pump-ready ethanol. A gallon
>>>>>of ethanol holds 2/3s the energy of gasoline, so BTU-wise it is a wash.
>>>>> I'm all for workable alternative energy sources, but in this case we
>>>>>might just as well burn gasoline and pay farmers not to plant surplus
>>>>>corn.
>>>
>>>



-- msosborn at msosborn dot com

 

Yep, everything was f*cked up until the military took over operations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Honore

<Matt Osborn> wrote in message
news:g4bvu1hc662gfr9fpcq2h1613pm4ddrckt@4ax.com...
> Remember Katrina?
>
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:19:39 -0500, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>>Then the project should be federalized. (flame suit on)
>>
>>"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
>>news:dsnpf7$a9k$1@reader2.panix.com...
>>> We're drifting rapidly off-topic, but...
>>>
>>> If the Navy's motivation was from stock owners demanding increased
>>> profits
>>> then submersible boat plants wouldn't enjoy the safety record that they
>>> do.
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>> Would be a good use for all the military bases that are slated to
>>>> close...put up nuclear power plants. GWB mentioned that a while back,
>>>> but
>>>> I haven't heard much about it since. Yes, Bill, I agree with something
>>>> W
>>>> said. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
>>>>
>>>> And we should assign the management of the plants to the Navy, since
>>>> they
>>>> have so much experience with nuclear power.
>>>>
>>>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:43EE7F78.44C01486@***.net...
>>>>
>>>>> We must use nuclear energy. Even a wind mill cost a million dollars
>>>>>worth of energy to make. Maybe asking the our Indians to use their
>>>>>sovereign nations, to build around these liberal wackos, will solve our
>>>>>problem. All we have to do is drop our use of petroleum by about ten
>>>>>percent and gasoline will become a useless by-product again.
>>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>Lee Ayrton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Or that it is pure government pork. It takes the energy of 2/3s of a
>>>>>>gallon of gasoline to produce a gallon of pump-ready ethanol. A
>>>>>>gallon
>>>>>>of ethanol holds 2/3s the energy of gasoline, so BTU-wise it is a
>>>>>>wash.
>>>>>> I'm all for workable alternative energy sources, but in this case we
>>>>>>might just as well burn gasoline and pay farmers not to plant surplus
>>>>>>corn.
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
> -- msosborn at msosborn dot com

 

Yep, everything was f*cked up until the military took over operations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Honore

<Matt Osborn> wrote in message
news:g4bvu1hc662gfr9fpcq2h1613pm4ddrckt@4ax.com...
> Remember Katrina?
>
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:19:39 -0500, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>>Then the project should be federalized. (flame suit on)
>>
>>"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
>>news:dsnpf7$a9k$1@reader2.panix.com...
>>> We're drifting rapidly off-topic, but...
>>>
>>> If the Navy's motivation was from stock owners demanding increased
>>> profits
>>> then submersible boat plants wouldn't enjoy the safety record that they
>>> do.
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>> Would be a good use for all the military bases that are slated to
>>>> close...put up nuclear power plants. GWB mentioned that a while back,
>>>> but
>>>> I haven't heard much about it since. Yes, Bill, I agree with something
>>>> W
>>>> said. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
>>>>
>>>> And we should assign the management of the plants to the Navy, since
>>>> they
>>>> have so much experience with nuclear power.
>>>>
>>>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:43EE7F78.44C01486@***.net...
>>>>
>>>>> We must use nuclear energy. Even a wind mill cost a million dollars
>>>>>worth of energy to make. Maybe asking the our Indians to use their
>>>>>sovereign nations, to build around these liberal wackos, will solve our
>>>>>problem. All we have to do is drop our use of petroleum by about ten
>>>>>percent and gasoline will become a useless by-product again.
>>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>Lee Ayrton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Or that it is pure government pork. It takes the energy of 2/3s of a
>>>>>>gallon of gasoline to produce a gallon of pump-ready ethanol. A
>>>>>>gallon
>>>>>>of ethanol holds 2/3s the energy of gasoline, so BTU-wise it is a
>>>>>>wash.
>>>>>> I'm all for workable alternative energy sources, but in this case we
>>>>>>might just as well burn gasoline and pay farmers not to plant surplus
>>>>>>corn.
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
> -- msosborn at msosborn dot com

 

Yep, everything was f*cked up until the military took over operations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Honore

<Matt Osborn> wrote in message
news:g4bvu1hc662gfr9fpcq2h1613pm4ddrckt@4ax.com...
> Remember Katrina?
>
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:19:39 -0500, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>>Then the project should be federalized. (flame suit on)
>>
>>"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
>>news:dsnpf7$a9k$1@reader2.panix.com...
>>> We're drifting rapidly off-topic, but...
>>>
>>> If the Navy's motivation was from stock owners demanding increased
>>> profits
>>> then submersible boat plants wouldn't enjoy the safety record that they
>>> do.
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>> Would be a good use for all the military bases that are slated to
>>>> close...put up nuclear power plants. GWB mentioned that a while back,
>>>> but
>>>> I haven't heard much about it since. Yes, Bill, I agree with something
>>>> W
>>>> said. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
>>>>
>>>> And we should assign the management of the plants to the Navy, since
>>>> they
>>>> have so much experience with nuclear power.
>>>>
>>>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:43EE7F78.44C01486@***.net...
>>>>
>>>>> We must use nuclear energy. Even a wind mill cost a million dollars
>>>>>worth of energy to make. Maybe asking the our Indians to use their
>>>>>sovereign nations, to build around these liberal wackos, will solve our
>>>>>problem. All we have to do is drop our use of petroleum by about ten
>>>>>percent and gasoline will become a useless by-product again.
>>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>Lee Ayrton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Or that it is pure government pork. It takes the energy of 2/3s of a
>>>>>>gallon of gasoline to produce a gallon of pump-ready ethanol. A
>>>>>>gallon
>>>>>>of ethanol holds 2/3s the energy of gasoline, so BTU-wise it is a
>>>>>>wash.
>>>>>> I'm all for workable alternative energy sources, but in this case we
>>>>>>might just as well burn gasoline and pay farmers not to plant surplus
>>>>>>corn.
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
> -- msosborn at msosborn dot com

 

Yep, everything was f*cked up until the military took over operations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Honore

<Matt Osborn> wrote in message
news:g4bvu1hc662gfr9fpcq2h1613pm4ddrckt@4ax.com...
> Remember Katrina?
>
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:19:39 -0500, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>>Then the project should be federalized. (flame suit on)
>>
>>"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
>>news:dsnpf7$a9k$1@reader2.panix.com...
>>> We're drifting rapidly off-topic, but...
>>>
>>> If the Navy's motivation was from stock owners demanding increased
>>> profits
>>> then submersible boat plants wouldn't enjoy the safety record that they
>>> do.
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>> Would be a good use for all the military bases that are slated to
>>>> close...put up nuclear power plants. GWB mentioned that a while back,
>>>> but
>>>> I haven't heard much about it since. Yes, Bill, I agree with something
>>>> W
>>>> said. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
>>>>
>>>> And we should assign the management of the plants to the Navy, since
>>>> they
>>>> have so much experience with nuclear power.
>>>>
>>>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:43EE7F78.44C01486@***.net...
>>>>
>>>>> We must use nuclear energy. Even a wind mill cost a million dollars
>>>>>worth of energy to make. Maybe asking the our Indians to use their
>>>>>sovereign nations, to build around these liberal wackos, will solve our
>>>>>problem. All we have to do is drop our use of petroleum by about ten
>>>>>percent and gasoline will become a useless by-product again.
>>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>Lee Ayrton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Or that it is pure government pork. It takes the energy of 2/3s of a
>>>>>>gallon of gasoline to produce a gallon of pump-ready ethanol. A
>>>>>>gallon
>>>>>>of ethanol holds 2/3s the energy of gasoline, so BTU-wise it is a
>>>>>>wash.
>>>>>> I'm all for workable alternative energy sources, but in this case we
>>>>>>might just as well burn gasoline and pay farmers not to plant surplus
>>>>>>corn.
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
> -- msosborn at msosborn dot com

 

I for an amendment to our constitution to have our military take
over the boarder patrol's duty. As the Mexican Federally and their fifty
caliber machine guns are being used on our Minute Men now.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Then the project should be federalized. (flame suit on)

 

I for an amendment to our constitution to have our military take
over the boarder patrol's duty. As the Mexican Federally and their fifty
caliber machine guns are being used on our Minute Men now.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Then the project should be federalized. (flame suit on)

 

I for an amendment to our constitution to have our military take
over the boarder patrol's duty. As the Mexican Federally and their fifty
caliber machine guns are being used on our Minute Men now.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Then the project should be federalized. (flame suit on)

 

I for an amendment to our constitution to have our military take
over the boarder patrol's duty. As the Mexican Federally and their fifty
caliber machine guns are being used on our Minute Men now.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Then the project should be federalized. (flame suit on)

 

Part of the huge problem is that WI gas taxes are WAY too high. For the
longest time, the gas tax would AUTOMATICALLY increase every April 1st.
(What a cruel joke our state government plays on us) The gas tax rose by
81% - from 16.5 cents to 29.9 cents per gallon - over the last 20 years,
giving Wisconsin one of the highest gas taxes in the nation. Maybe rather
than having such high gas taxes, the vehicle registrations should go up? Or
at lease slap a few toll booths so all the "FIBs" and "FISHTABs" pay a
little to drive thru the state to make it to their "weekend homes" up nort
or in da UP.

Just my unenlightend opinion


"Chris Lamb" <clamb1@new.rr.com> wrote in message
news:43ed6a97.456917@news-server.new.rr.com...
> Have 2000 GC V-8 and wondering if anyone is running ethanol in theirs.
> Price here in WI is 45 cents a gallon cheaper than 87 Octane.