Any Alignment specialist?
#141
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any Alignment specialist?
Yes, I should have hired someone to manage it, like my friends with
multiple stations, but I was just burnt out, and just wanted to drive a
truck, for a million miles, at ten cents and hour.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Cherokee-LTD wrote:
>
> I bet you've been kicking yourself ever since.
>
> Nobody has to buy or sell me, I give of my time (and opinions) freely.
>
> -Brian
multiple stations, but I was just burnt out, and just wanted to drive a
truck, for a million miles, at ten cents and hour.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Cherokee-LTD wrote:
>
> I bet you've been kicking yourself ever since.
>
> Nobody has to buy or sell me, I give of my time (and opinions) freely.
>
> -Brian
#142
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any Alignment specialist?
With a little experience in auto repair, we learn many time there
will be at least two things that go wrong at the same time, such as a
weak battery may over work the alternator or regulator, or cook the
wiring.
"I stand corrected":
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_e....net&lr=&hl=en
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Cherokee-LTD wrote:
>
> I w i l l t y p e s l o w l y f o r y o u.
> W e a r e d i s c u s s i n g b a l l j o i n t s,
> n o t w h e e l b e a r i n g s.
>
> Most people are inclined to admit when they're mistaken rather than
> displaying further ignorance. Although your links are often helpful, I
> don't read many posts saying "hey Bill, you were right". Even more extinct
> are posts from you admitting when you were wrong.
>
> I resisted chiming in on this portion of the thread (you and Steve G) until
> now... but... Steve makes a very good point and it is worth re-posting:
>
> "The problem here is that there are people that may be new to this group
> that come here without the benefit of hearing how many times you're
> diagnosis have been shown to be full of ---- and they actually put stock in
> what you've posted. Then they go out and buy a new battery and find that
> didn't solve their overcharging problem because their regulater wasn't
> grounded properly or replace a perfectly good balljoint and still find they
> can't get enough camber because their axles bent."
>
> I realize at this point Bill is no longer reading and off to find some link
> pertaining to God knows what. I also realize that the content of this post
> is strictly for amusement since he doesn't have it in him to admit when he's
> wrong. Having said that, I am always willing to give the benefit of the
> doubt... maybe his "tapered roller bearing ball joints" theory have
> something to do with his Jeep's 0-70mph "within 3 seconds" claim.
> http://tinyurl.com/2taf7
>
> -Brian
will be at least two things that go wrong at the same time, such as a
weak battery may over work the alternator or regulator, or cook the
wiring.
"I stand corrected":
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_e....net&lr=&hl=en
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Cherokee-LTD wrote:
>
> I w i l l t y p e s l o w l y f o r y o u.
> W e a r e d i s c u s s i n g b a l l j o i n t s,
> n o t w h e e l b e a r i n g s.
>
> Most people are inclined to admit when they're mistaken rather than
> displaying further ignorance. Although your links are often helpful, I
> don't read many posts saying "hey Bill, you were right". Even more extinct
> are posts from you admitting when you were wrong.
>
> I resisted chiming in on this portion of the thread (you and Steve G) until
> now... but... Steve makes a very good point and it is worth re-posting:
>
> "The problem here is that there are people that may be new to this group
> that come here without the benefit of hearing how many times you're
> diagnosis have been shown to be full of ---- and they actually put stock in
> what you've posted. Then they go out and buy a new battery and find that
> didn't solve their overcharging problem because their regulater wasn't
> grounded properly or replace a perfectly good balljoint and still find they
> can't get enough camber because their axles bent."
>
> I realize at this point Bill is no longer reading and off to find some link
> pertaining to God knows what. I also realize that the content of this post
> is strictly for amusement since he doesn't have it in him to admit when he's
> wrong. Having said that, I am always willing to give the benefit of the
> doubt... maybe his "tapered roller bearing ball joints" theory have
> something to do with his Jeep's 0-70mph "within 3 seconds" claim.
> http://tinyurl.com/2taf7
>
> -Brian
#143
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any Alignment specialist?
With a little experience in auto repair, we learn many time there
will be at least two things that go wrong at the same time, such as a
weak battery may over work the alternator or regulator, or cook the
wiring.
"I stand corrected":
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_e....net&lr=&hl=en
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Cherokee-LTD wrote:
>
> I w i l l t y p e s l o w l y f o r y o u.
> W e a r e d i s c u s s i n g b a l l j o i n t s,
> n o t w h e e l b e a r i n g s.
>
> Most people are inclined to admit when they're mistaken rather than
> displaying further ignorance. Although your links are often helpful, I
> don't read many posts saying "hey Bill, you were right". Even more extinct
> are posts from you admitting when you were wrong.
>
> I resisted chiming in on this portion of the thread (you and Steve G) until
> now... but... Steve makes a very good point and it is worth re-posting:
>
> "The problem here is that there are people that may be new to this group
> that come here without the benefit of hearing how many times you're
> diagnosis have been shown to be full of ---- and they actually put stock in
> what you've posted. Then they go out and buy a new battery and find that
> didn't solve their overcharging problem because their regulater wasn't
> grounded properly or replace a perfectly good balljoint and still find they
> can't get enough camber because their axles bent."
>
> I realize at this point Bill is no longer reading and off to find some link
> pertaining to God knows what. I also realize that the content of this post
> is strictly for amusement since he doesn't have it in him to admit when he's
> wrong. Having said that, I am always willing to give the benefit of the
> doubt... maybe his "tapered roller bearing ball joints" theory have
> something to do with his Jeep's 0-70mph "within 3 seconds" claim.
> http://tinyurl.com/2taf7
>
> -Brian
will be at least two things that go wrong at the same time, such as a
weak battery may over work the alternator or regulator, or cook the
wiring.
"I stand corrected":
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_e....net&lr=&hl=en
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Cherokee-LTD wrote:
>
> I w i l l t y p e s l o w l y f o r y o u.
> W e a r e d i s c u s s i n g b a l l j o i n t s,
> n o t w h e e l b e a r i n g s.
>
> Most people are inclined to admit when they're mistaken rather than
> displaying further ignorance. Although your links are often helpful, I
> don't read many posts saying "hey Bill, you were right". Even more extinct
> are posts from you admitting when you were wrong.
>
> I resisted chiming in on this portion of the thread (you and Steve G) until
> now... but... Steve makes a very good point and it is worth re-posting:
>
> "The problem here is that there are people that may be new to this group
> that come here without the benefit of hearing how many times you're
> diagnosis have been shown to be full of ---- and they actually put stock in
> what you've posted. Then they go out and buy a new battery and find that
> didn't solve their overcharging problem because their regulater wasn't
> grounded properly or replace a perfectly good balljoint and still find they
> can't get enough camber because their axles bent."
>
> I realize at this point Bill is no longer reading and off to find some link
> pertaining to God knows what. I also realize that the content of this post
> is strictly for amusement since he doesn't have it in him to admit when he's
> wrong. Having said that, I am always willing to give the benefit of the
> doubt... maybe his "tapered roller bearing ball joints" theory have
> something to do with his Jeep's 0-70mph "within 3 seconds" claim.
> http://tinyurl.com/2taf7
>
> -Brian
#144
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any Alignment specialist?
With a little experience in auto repair, we learn many time there
will be at least two things that go wrong at the same time, such as a
weak battery may over work the alternator or regulator, or cook the
wiring.
"I stand corrected":
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_e....net&lr=&hl=en
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Cherokee-LTD wrote:
>
> I w i l l t y p e s l o w l y f o r y o u.
> W e a r e d i s c u s s i n g b a l l j o i n t s,
> n o t w h e e l b e a r i n g s.
>
> Most people are inclined to admit when they're mistaken rather than
> displaying further ignorance. Although your links are often helpful, I
> don't read many posts saying "hey Bill, you were right". Even more extinct
> are posts from you admitting when you were wrong.
>
> I resisted chiming in on this portion of the thread (you and Steve G) until
> now... but... Steve makes a very good point and it is worth re-posting:
>
> "The problem here is that there are people that may be new to this group
> that come here without the benefit of hearing how many times you're
> diagnosis have been shown to be full of ---- and they actually put stock in
> what you've posted. Then they go out and buy a new battery and find that
> didn't solve their overcharging problem because their regulater wasn't
> grounded properly or replace a perfectly good balljoint and still find they
> can't get enough camber because their axles bent."
>
> I realize at this point Bill is no longer reading and off to find some link
> pertaining to God knows what. I also realize that the content of this post
> is strictly for amusement since he doesn't have it in him to admit when he's
> wrong. Having said that, I am always willing to give the benefit of the
> doubt... maybe his "tapered roller bearing ball joints" theory have
> something to do with his Jeep's 0-70mph "within 3 seconds" claim.
> http://tinyurl.com/2taf7
>
> -Brian
will be at least two things that go wrong at the same time, such as a
weak battery may over work the alternator or regulator, or cook the
wiring.
"I stand corrected":
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_e....net&lr=&hl=en
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Cherokee-LTD wrote:
>
> I w i l l t y p e s l o w l y f o r y o u.
> W e a r e d i s c u s s i n g b a l l j o i n t s,
> n o t w h e e l b e a r i n g s.
>
> Most people are inclined to admit when they're mistaken rather than
> displaying further ignorance. Although your links are often helpful, I
> don't read many posts saying "hey Bill, you were right". Even more extinct
> are posts from you admitting when you were wrong.
>
> I resisted chiming in on this portion of the thread (you and Steve G) until
> now... but... Steve makes a very good point and it is worth re-posting:
>
> "The problem here is that there are people that may be new to this group
> that come here without the benefit of hearing how many times you're
> diagnosis have been shown to be full of ---- and they actually put stock in
> what you've posted. Then they go out and buy a new battery and find that
> didn't solve their overcharging problem because their regulater wasn't
> grounded properly or replace a perfectly good balljoint and still find they
> can't get enough camber because their axles bent."
>
> I realize at this point Bill is no longer reading and off to find some link
> pertaining to God knows what. I also realize that the content of this post
> is strictly for amusement since he doesn't have it in him to admit when he's
> wrong. Having said that, I am always willing to give the benefit of the
> doubt... maybe his "tapered roller bearing ball joints" theory have
> something to do with his Jeep's 0-70mph "within 3 seconds" claim.
> http://tinyurl.com/2taf7
>
> -Brian
#145
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any Alignment specialist?
With a little experience in auto repair, we learn many time there
will be at least two things that go wrong at the same time, such as a
weak battery may over work the alternator or regulator, or cook the
wiring.
"I stand corrected":
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_e....net&lr=&hl=en
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Cherokee-LTD wrote:
>
> I w i l l t y p e s l o w l y f o r y o u.
> W e a r e d i s c u s s i n g b a l l j o i n t s,
> n o t w h e e l b e a r i n g s.
>
> Most people are inclined to admit when they're mistaken rather than
> displaying further ignorance. Although your links are often helpful, I
> don't read many posts saying "hey Bill, you were right". Even more extinct
> are posts from you admitting when you were wrong.
>
> I resisted chiming in on this portion of the thread (you and Steve G) until
> now... but... Steve makes a very good point and it is worth re-posting:
>
> "The problem here is that there are people that may be new to this group
> that come here without the benefit of hearing how many times you're
> diagnosis have been shown to be full of ---- and they actually put stock in
> what you've posted. Then they go out and buy a new battery and find that
> didn't solve their overcharging problem because their regulater wasn't
> grounded properly or replace a perfectly good balljoint and still find they
> can't get enough camber because their axles bent."
>
> I realize at this point Bill is no longer reading and off to find some link
> pertaining to God knows what. I also realize that the content of this post
> is strictly for amusement since he doesn't have it in him to admit when he's
> wrong. Having said that, I am always willing to give the benefit of the
> doubt... maybe his "tapered roller bearing ball joints" theory have
> something to do with his Jeep's 0-70mph "within 3 seconds" claim.
> http://tinyurl.com/2taf7
>
> -Brian
will be at least two things that go wrong at the same time, such as a
weak battery may over work the alternator or regulator, or cook the
wiring.
"I stand corrected":
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_e....net&lr=&hl=en
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Cherokee-LTD wrote:
>
> I w i l l t y p e s l o w l y f o r y o u.
> W e a r e d i s c u s s i n g b a l l j o i n t s,
> n o t w h e e l b e a r i n g s.
>
> Most people are inclined to admit when they're mistaken rather than
> displaying further ignorance. Although your links are often helpful, I
> don't read many posts saying "hey Bill, you were right". Even more extinct
> are posts from you admitting when you were wrong.
>
> I resisted chiming in on this portion of the thread (you and Steve G) until
> now... but... Steve makes a very good point and it is worth re-posting:
>
> "The problem here is that there are people that may be new to this group
> that come here without the benefit of hearing how many times you're
> diagnosis have been shown to be full of ---- and they actually put stock in
> what you've posted. Then they go out and buy a new battery and find that
> didn't solve their overcharging problem because their regulater wasn't
> grounded properly or replace a perfectly good balljoint and still find they
> can't get enough camber because their axles bent."
>
> I realize at this point Bill is no longer reading and off to find some link
> pertaining to God knows what. I also realize that the content of this post
> is strictly for amusement since he doesn't have it in him to admit when he's
> wrong. Having said that, I am always willing to give the benefit of the
> doubt... maybe his "tapered roller bearing ball joints" theory have
> something to do with his Jeep's 0-70mph "within 3 seconds" claim.
> http://tinyurl.com/2taf7
>
> -Brian
#146
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any Alignment specialist?
Yes, I threw in the ball Joint trolling for you. So I may add the
World War Two design is still used in one ton trucks and in all heavy
equipment. Have you ever heard of a Dana 25 breaking those bearings or
the contain axle universal joint? Like your light duty Dana 30.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Besides his diagram offered as "proof" is from a 50-year old manual,
> probably for a CJ3A. Those I believe are kingpin bearings, not ball joints
> like every modern vehicle has had since 1970, and theres nothing there to
> suggest they are tapered roller bearings.
>
> Every 12 months or so Bill goes off into a severe tangent. I know, I was the
> subject of such a couple years ago. Just sigh and walk away.
World War Two design is still used in one ton trucks and in all heavy
equipment. Have you ever heard of a Dana 25 breaking those bearings or
the contain axle universal joint? Like your light duty Dana 30.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Besides his diagram offered as "proof" is from a 50-year old manual,
> probably for a CJ3A. Those I believe are kingpin bearings, not ball joints
> like every modern vehicle has had since 1970, and theres nothing there to
> suggest they are tapered roller bearings.
>
> Every 12 months or so Bill goes off into a severe tangent. I know, I was the
> subject of such a couple years ago. Just sigh and walk away.
#147
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any Alignment specialist?
Yes, I threw in the ball Joint trolling for you. So I may add the
World War Two design is still used in one ton trucks and in all heavy
equipment. Have you ever heard of a Dana 25 breaking those bearings or
the contain axle universal joint? Like your light duty Dana 30.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Besides his diagram offered as "proof" is from a 50-year old manual,
> probably for a CJ3A. Those I believe are kingpin bearings, not ball joints
> like every modern vehicle has had since 1970, and theres nothing there to
> suggest they are tapered roller bearings.
>
> Every 12 months or so Bill goes off into a severe tangent. I know, I was the
> subject of such a couple years ago. Just sigh and walk away.
World War Two design is still used in one ton trucks and in all heavy
equipment. Have you ever heard of a Dana 25 breaking those bearings or
the contain axle universal joint? Like your light duty Dana 30.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Besides his diagram offered as "proof" is from a 50-year old manual,
> probably for a CJ3A. Those I believe are kingpin bearings, not ball joints
> like every modern vehicle has had since 1970, and theres nothing there to
> suggest they are tapered roller bearings.
>
> Every 12 months or so Bill goes off into a severe tangent. I know, I was the
> subject of such a couple years ago. Just sigh and walk away.
#148
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any Alignment specialist?
Yes, I threw in the ball Joint trolling for you. So I may add the
World War Two design is still used in one ton trucks and in all heavy
equipment. Have you ever heard of a Dana 25 breaking those bearings or
the contain axle universal joint? Like your light duty Dana 30.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Besides his diagram offered as "proof" is from a 50-year old manual,
> probably for a CJ3A. Those I believe are kingpin bearings, not ball joints
> like every modern vehicle has had since 1970, and theres nothing there to
> suggest they are tapered roller bearings.
>
> Every 12 months or so Bill goes off into a severe tangent. I know, I was the
> subject of such a couple years ago. Just sigh and walk away.
World War Two design is still used in one ton trucks and in all heavy
equipment. Have you ever heard of a Dana 25 breaking those bearings or
the contain axle universal joint? Like your light duty Dana 30.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Besides his diagram offered as "proof" is from a 50-year old manual,
> probably for a CJ3A. Those I believe are kingpin bearings, not ball joints
> like every modern vehicle has had since 1970, and theres nothing there to
> suggest they are tapered roller bearings.
>
> Every 12 months or so Bill goes off into a severe tangent. I know, I was the
> subject of such a couple years ago. Just sigh and walk away.
#149
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any Alignment specialist?
Yes, I threw in the ball Joint trolling for you. So I may add the
World War Two design is still used in one ton trucks and in all heavy
equipment. Have you ever heard of a Dana 25 breaking those bearings or
the contain axle universal joint? Like your light duty Dana 30.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Besides his diagram offered as "proof" is from a 50-year old manual,
> probably for a CJ3A. Those I believe are kingpin bearings, not ball joints
> like every modern vehicle has had since 1970, and theres nothing there to
> suggest they are tapered roller bearings.
>
> Every 12 months or so Bill goes off into a severe tangent. I know, I was the
> subject of such a couple years ago. Just sigh and walk away.
World War Two design is still used in one ton trucks and in all heavy
equipment. Have you ever heard of a Dana 25 breaking those bearings or
the contain axle universal joint? Like your light duty Dana 30.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Besides his diagram offered as "proof" is from a 50-year old manual,
> probably for a CJ3A. Those I believe are kingpin bearings, not ball joints
> like every modern vehicle has had since 1970, and theres nothing there to
> suggest they are tapered roller bearings.
>
> Every 12 months or so Bill goes off into a severe tangent. I know, I was the
> subject of such a couple years ago. Just sigh and walk away.
#150
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any Alignment specialist?
Theres a lovely picture of a hub in the Jeep Bible of I think a Dana
25...hub ripped right from the knuckle.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40F01509.AC41C0FE@***.net...
> Yes, I threw in the ball Joint trolling for you. So I may add the
> World War Two design is still used in one ton trucks and in all heavy
> equipment. Have you ever heard of a Dana 25 breaking those bearings or
> the contain axle universal joint? Like your light duty Dana 30.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Besides his diagram offered as "proof" is from a 50-year old manual,
> > probably for a CJ3A. Those I believe are kingpin bearings, not ball
joints
> > like every modern vehicle has had since 1970, and theres nothing there
to
> > suggest they are tapered roller bearings.
> >
> > Every 12 months or so Bill goes off into a severe tangent. I know, I was
the
> > subject of such a couple years ago. Just sigh and walk away.
25...hub ripped right from the knuckle.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40F01509.AC41C0FE@***.net...
> Yes, I threw in the ball Joint trolling for you. So I may add the
> World War Two design is still used in one ton trucks and in all heavy
> equipment. Have you ever heard of a Dana 25 breaking those bearings or
> the contain axle universal joint? Like your light duty Dana 30.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Besides his diagram offered as "proof" is from a 50-year old manual,
> > probably for a CJ3A. Those I believe are kingpin bearings, not ball
joints
> > like every modern vehicle has had since 1970, and theres nothing there
to
> > suggest they are tapered roller bearings.
> >
> > Every 12 months or so Bill goes off into a severe tangent. I know, I was
the
> > subject of such a couple years ago. Just sigh and walk away.