>
> The US is approximately 3.5 million square miles with a population of
> approximately 75 million people which works out to about 78 people per


I guess that would be 275 million.

 

Inside San Diego County we must have written permission from the
land owner, or our Sheriffs will write us for trespass.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Earle Horton wrote:
>
> Lon,
>
> I am not a lawyer, but there is a difference between civil trespass and
> criminal trespass. There are statutory guidelines and case law particular
> to every jurisdiction, but in most cases the difference involves
> "prosecutorial discretion", i.e. whether the police want to get involved or
> not. If the complainant is perceived as a nut job by the local authorities,
> there is no personal injury, and property damage is minimal, then it this
> most likely going to be a civil matter.
>
> This does not mean that the property owner has no rights, but it does mean
> that it will be up to him, at his expense, to enforce them. In the remote
> case that C. E. White is on the level, then the best advice to him is to
> contact a lawyer, who will tell him how to protect his property in a legal
> and effective manner. Maybe the local law enforcement can provide this
> advice, but it is not really their job.
>
> Earle

 

Inside San Diego County we must have written permission from the
land owner, or our Sheriffs will write us for trespass.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Earle Horton wrote:
>
> Lon,
>
> I am not a lawyer, but there is a difference between civil trespass and
> criminal trespass. There are statutory guidelines and case law particular
> to every jurisdiction, but in most cases the difference involves
> "prosecutorial discretion", i.e. whether the police want to get involved or
> not. If the complainant is perceived as a nut job by the local authorities,
> there is no personal injury, and property damage is minimal, then it this
> most likely going to be a civil matter.
>
> This does not mean that the property owner has no rights, but it does mean
> that it will be up to him, at his expense, to enforce them. In the remote
> case that C. E. White is on the level, then the best advice to him is to
> contact a lawyer, who will tell him how to protect his property in a legal
> and effective manner. Maybe the local law enforcement can provide this
> advice, but it is not really their job.
>
> Earle

 

Inside San Diego County we must have written permission from the
land owner, or our Sheriffs will write us for trespass.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Earle Horton wrote:
>
> Lon,
>
> I am not a lawyer, but there is a difference between civil trespass and
> criminal trespass. There are statutory guidelines and case law particular
> to every jurisdiction, but in most cases the difference involves
> "prosecutorial discretion", i.e. whether the police want to get involved or
> not. If the complainant is perceived as a nut job by the local authorities,
> there is no personal injury, and property damage is minimal, then it this
> most likely going to be a civil matter.
>
> This does not mean that the property owner has no rights, but it does mean
> that it will be up to him, at his expense, to enforce them. In the remote
> case that C. E. White is on the level, then the best advice to him is to
> contact a lawyer, who will tell him how to protect his property in a legal
> and effective manner. Maybe the local law enforcement can provide this
> advice, but it is not really their job.
>
> Earle

 

Hi Bill,
I thought the leftover moneys were always used up by our Government
without any plan for the principal to be invested to make interest,
typically doubling every seven years.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

billy ray wrote:
>
> Social Security wasn't always a Ponzi scheme. A president from what party
> was responsible?
>
> Bonus points for why he spent the cash..

 

Hi Bill,
I thought the leftover moneys were always used up by our Government
without any plan for the principal to be invested to make interest,
typically doubling every seven years.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

billy ray wrote:
>
> Social Security wasn't always a Ponzi scheme. A president from what party
> was responsible?
>
> Bonus points for why he spent the cash..

 

Hi Bill,
I thought the leftover moneys were always used up by our Government
without any plan for the principal to be invested to make interest,
typically doubling every seven years.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

billy ray wrote:
>
> Social Security wasn't always a Ponzi scheme. A president from what party
> was responsible?
>
> Bonus points for why he spent the cash..

 

What you're not showing proper respect for his invention of our
internet??????
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

billy ray wrote:
>
> Jeff that is a terrible thing to say about Mr. Gore's loss in the 2000
> election.
>
> He was a nutcase long before then. In his 1992 literary masterpiece "Earth
> in the Balance: Forging a New Common Purpose" he says he would rather see
> women to die a horrible painful death than to cut down a tree.
>
> I assume that is why the tree huggers support him...

 

What you're not showing proper respect for his invention of our
internet??????
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

billy ray wrote:
>
> Jeff that is a terrible thing to say about Mr. Gore's loss in the 2000
> election.
>
> He was a nutcase long before then. In his 1992 literary masterpiece "Earth
> in the Balance: Forging a New Common Purpose" he says he would rather see
> women to die a horrible painful death than to cut down a tree.
>
> I assume that is why the tree huggers support him...

 

What you're not showing proper respect for his invention of our
internet??????
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

billy ray wrote:
>
> Jeff that is a terrible thing to say about Mr. Gore's loss in the 2000
> election.
>
> He was a nutcase long before then. In his 1992 literary masterpiece "Earth
> in the Balance: Forging a New Common Purpose" he says he would rather see
> women to die a horrible painful death than to cut down a tree.
>
> I assume that is why the tree huggers support him...