question on jeep dealer refusing service.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I don't believe I read through this whole post & didn't
learn crap about negotiating a deal with a sleaze ball
car sales man I just hate walking into a dealers, I think
I'd rather have a root canal without Novocain but
at least I sure feel a bunch better about top posting.
L8r - Jersey
learn crap about negotiating a deal with a sleaze ball
car sales man I just hate walking into a dealers, I think
I'd rather have a root canal without Novocain but
at least I sure feel a bunch better about top posting.
L8r - Jersey
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hear, hear! My point exactly. Unfortunately, the newsserver for my
home account blows, so I use Google for all my NG access instead. Plus
I like being able to get on and access the NG from google from any
computer. Not to mention it does a nice job of including all related
posts (albeit sometimes even posts from 2+ years ago) with like
subjects, and builds a nice tree of which response applies to which
message. Without this, I would have to make sure to log-on regularly
with a NG reader to make sure I have those old posts archived. And I
still would have to hit Google for the older thread prior to my
joining this group.
So, when someone bottom-posts on a LONG email thread, I have to hit
the stupid "Read the rest of this message..." link, which is a PITA.
Lucky for me most here either <SNIP> out the extraneous junk, or
top-post.
/Bob
Steve <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message news:<lkdhc.24156$Np3.891660@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>...
> I wasn't broke until I blew my paper route stash (and more) on a TI99/4A
> in 1982. I used to be a bottom-post **** when I started dabbling on
> Usenet in the late 80s (rn!), but I now prefer reading top posts. Having
> to click the *Read the rest of this message...* link to see a bottom
> post when Googling an archived thread gets tedious.
>
> Linux rules.
>
> Steve
>
> Lee Ayrton wrote:
> > I was too broke for the Timex and never got around to Commies or CoCos.
home account blows, so I use Google for all my NG access instead. Plus
I like being able to get on and access the NG from google from any
computer. Not to mention it does a nice job of including all related
posts (albeit sometimes even posts from 2+ years ago) with like
subjects, and builds a nice tree of which response applies to which
message. Without this, I would have to make sure to log-on regularly
with a NG reader to make sure I have those old posts archived. And I
still would have to hit Google for the older thread prior to my
joining this group.
So, when someone bottom-posts on a LONG email thread, I have to hit
the stupid "Read the rest of this message..." link, which is a PITA.
Lucky for me most here either <SNIP> out the extraneous junk, or
top-post.
/Bob
Steve <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message news:<lkdhc.24156$Np3.891660@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>...
> I wasn't broke until I blew my paper route stash (and more) on a TI99/4A
> in 1982. I used to be a bottom-post **** when I started dabbling on
> Usenet in the late 80s (rn!), but I now prefer reading top posts. Having
> to click the *Read the rest of this message...* link to see a bottom
> post when Googling an archived thread gets tedious.
>
> Linux rules.
>
> Steve
>
> Lee Ayrton wrote:
> > I was too broke for the Timex and never got around to Commies or CoCos.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hear, hear! My point exactly. Unfortunately, the newsserver for my
home account blows, so I use Google for all my NG access instead. Plus
I like being able to get on and access the NG from google from any
computer. Not to mention it does a nice job of including all related
posts (albeit sometimes even posts from 2+ years ago) with like
subjects, and builds a nice tree of which response applies to which
message. Without this, I would have to make sure to log-on regularly
with a NG reader to make sure I have those old posts archived. And I
still would have to hit Google for the older thread prior to my
joining this group.
So, when someone bottom-posts on a LONG email thread, I have to hit
the stupid "Read the rest of this message..." link, which is a PITA.
Lucky for me most here either <SNIP> out the extraneous junk, or
top-post.
/Bob
Steve <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message news:<lkdhc.24156$Np3.891660@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>...
> I wasn't broke until I blew my paper route stash (and more) on a TI99/4A
> in 1982. I used to be a bottom-post **** when I started dabbling on
> Usenet in the late 80s (rn!), but I now prefer reading top posts. Having
> to click the *Read the rest of this message...* link to see a bottom
> post when Googling an archived thread gets tedious.
>
> Linux rules.
>
> Steve
>
> Lee Ayrton wrote:
> > I was too broke for the Timex and never got around to Commies or CoCos.
home account blows, so I use Google for all my NG access instead. Plus
I like being able to get on and access the NG from google from any
computer. Not to mention it does a nice job of including all related
posts (albeit sometimes even posts from 2+ years ago) with like
subjects, and builds a nice tree of which response applies to which
message. Without this, I would have to make sure to log-on regularly
with a NG reader to make sure I have those old posts archived. And I
still would have to hit Google for the older thread prior to my
joining this group.
So, when someone bottom-posts on a LONG email thread, I have to hit
the stupid "Read the rest of this message..." link, which is a PITA.
Lucky for me most here either <SNIP> out the extraneous junk, or
top-post.
/Bob
Steve <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message news:<lkdhc.24156$Np3.891660@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>...
> I wasn't broke until I blew my paper route stash (and more) on a TI99/4A
> in 1982. I used to be a bottom-post **** when I started dabbling on
> Usenet in the late 80s (rn!), but I now prefer reading top posts. Having
> to click the *Read the rest of this message...* link to see a bottom
> post when Googling an archived thread gets tedious.
>
> Linux rules.
>
> Steve
>
> Lee Ayrton wrote:
> > I was too broke for the Timex and never got around to Commies or CoCos.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hear, hear! My point exactly. Unfortunately, the newsserver for my
home account blows, so I use Google for all my NG access instead. Plus
I like being able to get on and access the NG from google from any
computer. Not to mention it does a nice job of including all related
posts (albeit sometimes even posts from 2+ years ago) with like
subjects, and builds a nice tree of which response applies to which
message. Without this, I would have to make sure to log-on regularly
with a NG reader to make sure I have those old posts archived. And I
still would have to hit Google for the older thread prior to my
joining this group.
So, when someone bottom-posts on a LONG email thread, I have to hit
the stupid "Read the rest of this message..." link, which is a PITA.
Lucky for me most here either <SNIP> out the extraneous junk, or
top-post.
/Bob
Steve <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message news:<lkdhc.24156$Np3.891660@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>...
> I wasn't broke until I blew my paper route stash (and more) on a TI99/4A
> in 1982. I used to be a bottom-post **** when I started dabbling on
> Usenet in the late 80s (rn!), but I now prefer reading top posts. Having
> to click the *Read the rest of this message...* link to see a bottom
> post when Googling an archived thread gets tedious.
>
> Linux rules.
>
> Steve
>
> Lee Ayrton wrote:
> > I was too broke for the Timex and never got around to Commies or CoCos.
home account blows, so I use Google for all my NG access instead. Plus
I like being able to get on and access the NG from google from any
computer. Not to mention it does a nice job of including all related
posts (albeit sometimes even posts from 2+ years ago) with like
subjects, and builds a nice tree of which response applies to which
message. Without this, I would have to make sure to log-on regularly
with a NG reader to make sure I have those old posts archived. And I
still would have to hit Google for the older thread prior to my
joining this group.
So, when someone bottom-posts on a LONG email thread, I have to hit
the stupid "Read the rest of this message..." link, which is a PITA.
Lucky for me most here either <SNIP> out the extraneous junk, or
top-post.
/Bob
Steve <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message news:<lkdhc.24156$Np3.891660@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>...
> I wasn't broke until I blew my paper route stash (and more) on a TI99/4A
> in 1982. I used to be a bottom-post **** when I started dabbling on
> Usenet in the late 80s (rn!), but I now prefer reading top posts. Having
> to click the *Read the rest of this message...* link to see a bottom
> post when Googling an archived thread gets tedious.
>
> Linux rules.
>
> Steve
>
> Lee Ayrton wrote:
> > I was too broke for the Timex and never got around to Commies or CoCos.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hear, hear! My point exactly. Unfortunately, the newsserver for my
home account blows, so I use Google for all my NG access instead. Plus
I like being able to get on and access the NG from google from any
computer. Not to mention it does a nice job of including all related
posts (albeit sometimes even posts from 2+ years ago) with like
subjects, and builds a nice tree of which response applies to which
message. Without this, I would have to make sure to log-on regularly
with a NG reader to make sure I have those old posts archived. And I
still would have to hit Google for the older thread prior to my
joining this group.
So, when someone bottom-posts on a LONG email thread, I have to hit
the stupid "Read the rest of this message..." link, which is a PITA.
Lucky for me most here either <SNIP> out the extraneous junk, or
top-post.
/Bob
Steve <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message news:<lkdhc.24156$Np3.891660@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>...
> I wasn't broke until I blew my paper route stash (and more) on a TI99/4A
> in 1982. I used to be a bottom-post **** when I started dabbling on
> Usenet in the late 80s (rn!), but I now prefer reading top posts. Having
> to click the *Read the rest of this message...* link to see a bottom
> post when Googling an archived thread gets tedious.
>
> Linux rules.
>
> Steve
>
> Lee Ayrton wrote:
> > I was too broke for the Timex and never got around to Commies or CoCos.
home account blows, so I use Google for all my NG access instead. Plus
I like being able to get on and access the NG from google from any
computer. Not to mention it does a nice job of including all related
posts (albeit sometimes even posts from 2+ years ago) with like
subjects, and builds a nice tree of which response applies to which
message. Without this, I would have to make sure to log-on regularly
with a NG reader to make sure I have those old posts archived. And I
still would have to hit Google for the older thread prior to my
joining this group.
So, when someone bottom-posts on a LONG email thread, I have to hit
the stupid "Read the rest of this message..." link, which is a PITA.
Lucky for me most here either <SNIP> out the extraneous junk, or
top-post.
/Bob
Steve <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message news:<lkdhc.24156$Np3.891660@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>...
> I wasn't broke until I blew my paper route stash (and more) on a TI99/4A
> in 1982. I used to be a bottom-post **** when I started dabbling on
> Usenet in the late 80s (rn!), but I now prefer reading top posts. Having
> to click the *Read the rest of this message...* link to see a bottom
> post when Googling an archived thread gets tedious.
>
> Linux rules.
>
> Steve
>
> Lee Ayrton wrote:
> > I was too broke for the Timex and never got around to Commies or CoCos.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Great analogy.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jersey wrote:
>
> I don't believe I read through this whole post & didn't
> learn crap about negotiating a deal with a sleaze ball
> car sales man I just hate walking into a dealers, I think
> I'd rather have a root canal without Novocain but
> at least I sure feel a bunch better about top posting.
>
> L8r - Jersey
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jersey wrote:
>
> I don't believe I read through this whole post & didn't
> learn crap about negotiating a deal with a sleaze ball
> car sales man I just hate walking into a dealers, I think
> I'd rather have a root canal without Novocain but
> at least I sure feel a bunch better about top posting.
>
> L8r - Jersey
Guest
Posts: n/a
Great analogy.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jersey wrote:
>
> I don't believe I read through this whole post & didn't
> learn crap about negotiating a deal with a sleaze ball
> car sales man I just hate walking into a dealers, I think
> I'd rather have a root canal without Novocain but
> at least I sure feel a bunch better about top posting.
>
> L8r - Jersey
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jersey wrote:
>
> I don't believe I read through this whole post & didn't
> learn crap about negotiating a deal with a sleaze ball
> car sales man I just hate walking into a dealers, I think
> I'd rather have a root canal without Novocain but
> at least I sure feel a bunch better about top posting.
>
> L8r - Jersey
Guest
Posts: n/a
Great analogy.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jersey wrote:
>
> I don't believe I read through this whole post & didn't
> learn crap about negotiating a deal with a sleaze ball
> car sales man I just hate walking into a dealers, I think
> I'd rather have a root canal without Novocain but
> at least I sure feel a bunch better about top posting.
>
> L8r - Jersey
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jersey wrote:
>
> I don't believe I read through this whole post & didn't
> learn crap about negotiating a deal with a sleaze ball
> car sales man I just hate walking into a dealers, I think
> I'd rather have a root canal without Novocain but
> at least I sure feel a bunch better about top posting.
>
> L8r - Jersey
Guest
Posts: n/a
Great analogy.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jersey wrote:
>
> I don't believe I read through this whole post & didn't
> learn crap about negotiating a deal with a sleaze ball
> car sales man I just hate walking into a dealers, I think
> I'd rather have a root canal without Novocain but
> at least I sure feel a bunch better about top posting.
>
> L8r - Jersey
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jersey wrote:
>
> I don't believe I read through this whole post & didn't
> learn crap about negotiating a deal with a sleaze ball
> car sales man I just hate walking into a dealers, I think
> I'd rather have a root canal without Novocain but
> at least I sure feel a bunch better about top posting.
>
> L8r - Jersey
Guest
Posts: n/a
Jersey wrote:
> I don't believe I read through this whole post & didn't
> learn crap about negotiating a deal with a sleaze ball
> car sales man I just hate walking into a dealers, I think
> I'd rather have a root canal without Novocain but
> at least I sure feel a bunch better about top posting.
>
> L8r - Jersey
>
>
>
There is one jeep dealer in Ga. who does not play the price game One
price thats it. Most new car dealers make their money from year end
volume rebates, not off of the retail sales. The more they sell the
higher their year end kick back .
> I don't believe I read through this whole post & didn't
> learn crap about negotiating a deal with a sleaze ball
> car sales man I just hate walking into a dealers, I think
> I'd rather have a root canal without Novocain but
> at least I sure feel a bunch better about top posting.
>
> L8r - Jersey
>
>
>
There is one jeep dealer in Ga. who does not play the price game One
price thats it. Most new car dealers make their money from year end
volume rebates, not off of the retail sales. The more they sell the
higher their year end kick back .


