Pink Kate
#961
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:444cd4db$0$14944$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> I don't have time to live with the wolves
then stop pretending to know something about them.
> I read a book
BUWAHAHAH!!!!!!!!! thanks for making my point! :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:444cd4db$0$14944$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> I don't have time to live with the wolves
then stop pretending to know something about them.
> I read a book
BUWAHAHAH!!!!!!!!! thanks for making my point! :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#962
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:444cd4db$0$14944$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> I don't have time to live with the wolves
then stop pretending to know something about them.
> I read a book
BUWAHAHAH!!!!!!!!! thanks for making my point! :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:444cd4db$0$14944$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> I don't have time to live with the wolves
then stop pretending to know something about them.
> I read a book
BUWAHAHAH!!!!!!!!! thanks for making my point! :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#963
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
You got that right Earle. He is even so dumb or 'gullible' to think all
'your' US 9-11 terrorists came from Canada. He forgets about the
Florida flight schools, Good ol' Saudi Arabia that runs all your
shipping ports, etc... No wonder the local yokels have him hoodwinked.
Mike
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You really are stupid.
>
> Earle
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:xkR2g.32$pk2.1581@news.uswest.net...
> > "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:444b90b6$0$24427$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > > Pictures are subject to interpretation.
> >
> > bury your head in the sand earle. thats the irony of true
> > ignorance......you have no idea of your own.
> >
> >
> > > I recommend that you ask a
> > > reputable wildlife biologist, who has studied wolves
> >
> > you should hav read the links i provided where some of those same people
> > have spoken. i wont bother linking you again since you dismiss and make
> > excuses for any evidence which contradicts your beliefs.
> >
> >
> > > The people who OKed the wolf program in the States. Wildlife
> biologists,
> > > all of them. Just because they have degrees in the subject
> >
> > doesnt mean ----. any liberal can spend time in a classroom and think he
> > knows everything about anything. spend time living with them.
> >
> >
> > > You're a lot like my registered nurse friend, although apparently more
> > > stable. Screaming at me, in my own yard
> >
> > pick better friends. ;-)
> >
> >
> > > I see you didn't jump all over
> > > Bill when he called illegal immigrants criminals
> >
> > CLUE time earle......illegal immagrants ARE criminals! theyre violating
> the
> > written law that you cling to when it suits you, and you dismiss it when
> it
> > doesnt.
> >
> >
> > > and all they are looking
> > > for, is work that we don't want.
> >
> > --------! if that was all they wanted they wouldnt be bleeding our social
> > programs DRY!
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nathan W. Collier
> > http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> > http://7SlotGrille.com
> > http://InlineDiesel.com
> > http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> > http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
> >
> >
'your' US 9-11 terrorists came from Canada. He forgets about the
Florida flight schools, Good ol' Saudi Arabia that runs all your
shipping ports, etc... No wonder the local yokels have him hoodwinked.
Mike
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You really are stupid.
>
> Earle
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:xkR2g.32$pk2.1581@news.uswest.net...
> > "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:444b90b6$0$24427$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > > Pictures are subject to interpretation.
> >
> > bury your head in the sand earle. thats the irony of true
> > ignorance......you have no idea of your own.
> >
> >
> > > I recommend that you ask a
> > > reputable wildlife biologist, who has studied wolves
> >
> > you should hav read the links i provided where some of those same people
> > have spoken. i wont bother linking you again since you dismiss and make
> > excuses for any evidence which contradicts your beliefs.
> >
> >
> > > The people who OKed the wolf program in the States. Wildlife
> biologists,
> > > all of them. Just because they have degrees in the subject
> >
> > doesnt mean ----. any liberal can spend time in a classroom and think he
> > knows everything about anything. spend time living with them.
> >
> >
> > > You're a lot like my registered nurse friend, although apparently more
> > > stable. Screaming at me, in my own yard
> >
> > pick better friends. ;-)
> >
> >
> > > I see you didn't jump all over
> > > Bill when he called illegal immigrants criminals
> >
> > CLUE time earle......illegal immagrants ARE criminals! theyre violating
> the
> > written law that you cling to when it suits you, and you dismiss it when
> it
> > doesnt.
> >
> >
> > > and all they are looking
> > > for, is work that we don't want.
> >
> > --------! if that was all they wanted they wouldnt be bleeding our social
> > programs DRY!
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nathan W. Collier
> > http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> > http://7SlotGrille.com
> > http://InlineDiesel.com
> > http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> > http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
> >
> >
#964
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
You got that right Earle. He is even so dumb or 'gullible' to think all
'your' US 9-11 terrorists came from Canada. He forgets about the
Florida flight schools, Good ol' Saudi Arabia that runs all your
shipping ports, etc... No wonder the local yokels have him hoodwinked.
Mike
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You really are stupid.
>
> Earle
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:xkR2g.32$pk2.1581@news.uswest.net...
> > "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:444b90b6$0$24427$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > > Pictures are subject to interpretation.
> >
> > bury your head in the sand earle. thats the irony of true
> > ignorance......you have no idea of your own.
> >
> >
> > > I recommend that you ask a
> > > reputable wildlife biologist, who has studied wolves
> >
> > you should hav read the links i provided where some of those same people
> > have spoken. i wont bother linking you again since you dismiss and make
> > excuses for any evidence which contradicts your beliefs.
> >
> >
> > > The people who OKed the wolf program in the States. Wildlife
> biologists,
> > > all of them. Just because they have degrees in the subject
> >
> > doesnt mean ----. any liberal can spend time in a classroom and think he
> > knows everything about anything. spend time living with them.
> >
> >
> > > You're a lot like my registered nurse friend, although apparently more
> > > stable. Screaming at me, in my own yard
> >
> > pick better friends. ;-)
> >
> >
> > > I see you didn't jump all over
> > > Bill when he called illegal immigrants criminals
> >
> > CLUE time earle......illegal immagrants ARE criminals! theyre violating
> the
> > written law that you cling to when it suits you, and you dismiss it when
> it
> > doesnt.
> >
> >
> > > and all they are looking
> > > for, is work that we don't want.
> >
> > --------! if that was all they wanted they wouldnt be bleeding our social
> > programs DRY!
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nathan W. Collier
> > http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> > http://7SlotGrille.com
> > http://InlineDiesel.com
> > http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> > http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
> >
> >
'your' US 9-11 terrorists came from Canada. He forgets about the
Florida flight schools, Good ol' Saudi Arabia that runs all your
shipping ports, etc... No wonder the local yokels have him hoodwinked.
Mike
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You really are stupid.
>
> Earle
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:xkR2g.32$pk2.1581@news.uswest.net...
> > "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:444b90b6$0$24427$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > > Pictures are subject to interpretation.
> >
> > bury your head in the sand earle. thats the irony of true
> > ignorance......you have no idea of your own.
> >
> >
> > > I recommend that you ask a
> > > reputable wildlife biologist, who has studied wolves
> >
> > you should hav read the links i provided where some of those same people
> > have spoken. i wont bother linking you again since you dismiss and make
> > excuses for any evidence which contradicts your beliefs.
> >
> >
> > > The people who OKed the wolf program in the States. Wildlife
> biologists,
> > > all of them. Just because they have degrees in the subject
> >
> > doesnt mean ----. any liberal can spend time in a classroom and think he
> > knows everything about anything. spend time living with them.
> >
> >
> > > You're a lot like my registered nurse friend, although apparently more
> > > stable. Screaming at me, in my own yard
> >
> > pick better friends. ;-)
> >
> >
> > > I see you didn't jump all over
> > > Bill when he called illegal immigrants criminals
> >
> > CLUE time earle......illegal immagrants ARE criminals! theyre violating
> the
> > written law that you cling to when it suits you, and you dismiss it when
> it
> > doesnt.
> >
> >
> > > and all they are looking
> > > for, is work that we don't want.
> >
> > --------! if that was all they wanted they wouldnt be bleeding our social
> > programs DRY!
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nathan W. Collier
> > http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> > http://7SlotGrille.com
> > http://InlineDiesel.com
> > http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> > http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
> >
> >
#965
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
You got that right Earle. He is even so dumb or 'gullible' to think all
'your' US 9-11 terrorists came from Canada. He forgets about the
Florida flight schools, Good ol' Saudi Arabia that runs all your
shipping ports, etc... No wonder the local yokels have him hoodwinked.
Mike
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You really are stupid.
>
> Earle
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:xkR2g.32$pk2.1581@news.uswest.net...
> > "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:444b90b6$0$24427$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > > Pictures are subject to interpretation.
> >
> > bury your head in the sand earle. thats the irony of true
> > ignorance......you have no idea of your own.
> >
> >
> > > I recommend that you ask a
> > > reputable wildlife biologist, who has studied wolves
> >
> > you should hav read the links i provided where some of those same people
> > have spoken. i wont bother linking you again since you dismiss and make
> > excuses for any evidence which contradicts your beliefs.
> >
> >
> > > The people who OKed the wolf program in the States. Wildlife
> biologists,
> > > all of them. Just because they have degrees in the subject
> >
> > doesnt mean ----. any liberal can spend time in a classroom and think he
> > knows everything about anything. spend time living with them.
> >
> >
> > > You're a lot like my registered nurse friend, although apparently more
> > > stable. Screaming at me, in my own yard
> >
> > pick better friends. ;-)
> >
> >
> > > I see you didn't jump all over
> > > Bill when he called illegal immigrants criminals
> >
> > CLUE time earle......illegal immagrants ARE criminals! theyre violating
> the
> > written law that you cling to when it suits you, and you dismiss it when
> it
> > doesnt.
> >
> >
> > > and all they are looking
> > > for, is work that we don't want.
> >
> > --------! if that was all they wanted they wouldnt be bleeding our social
> > programs DRY!
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nathan W. Collier
> > http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> > http://7SlotGrille.com
> > http://InlineDiesel.com
> > http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> > http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
> >
> >
'your' US 9-11 terrorists came from Canada. He forgets about the
Florida flight schools, Good ol' Saudi Arabia that runs all your
shipping ports, etc... No wonder the local yokels have him hoodwinked.
Mike
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You really are stupid.
>
> Earle
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:xkR2g.32$pk2.1581@news.uswest.net...
> > "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:444b90b6$0$24427$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > > Pictures are subject to interpretation.
> >
> > bury your head in the sand earle. thats the irony of true
> > ignorance......you have no idea of your own.
> >
> >
> > > I recommend that you ask a
> > > reputable wildlife biologist, who has studied wolves
> >
> > you should hav read the links i provided where some of those same people
> > have spoken. i wont bother linking you again since you dismiss and make
> > excuses for any evidence which contradicts your beliefs.
> >
> >
> > > The people who OKed the wolf program in the States. Wildlife
> biologists,
> > > all of them. Just because they have degrees in the subject
> >
> > doesnt mean ----. any liberal can spend time in a classroom and think he
> > knows everything about anything. spend time living with them.
> >
> >
> > > You're a lot like my registered nurse friend, although apparently more
> > > stable. Screaming at me, in my own yard
> >
> > pick better friends. ;-)
> >
> >
> > > I see you didn't jump all over
> > > Bill when he called illegal immigrants criminals
> >
> > CLUE time earle......illegal immagrants ARE criminals! theyre violating
> the
> > written law that you cling to when it suits you, and you dismiss it when
> it
> > doesnt.
> >
> >
> > > and all they are looking
> > > for, is work that we don't want.
> >
> > --------! if that was all they wanted they wouldnt be bleeding our social
> > programs DRY!
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nathan W. Collier
> > http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> > http://7SlotGrille.com
> > http://InlineDiesel.com
> > http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> > http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
> >
> >
#966
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:lB53g.4428$P65.823@southeast.rr.com...
>
> "Earle Horton" wrote in message
> > He doesn't have strong convictions though! He goes with whatever way
the
> > wind blows, wherever he happens to be. This is not a bad way to be, if
> > you
> > want to go through life without the bother of moral convictions, but it
> > amuses me that he invokes "right" and "wrong" every time. All he cares
> > about, is convenience and his own temporary interest. I wish he would
> > just
> > admit it. He's not really any more righteous, nor does he have any
right
> > to
> > be, than the rest of us.
> >
> > I find his condemnation of illegal immigrants to be hypocritical too.
How
> > many HVAC contracts does he lose, every year, to illegal immigrants from
> > Saskatchawan?
> >
> > Earle
>
> Earle,
>
> A few of my own opinions / observations on the preceding arguments:
>
> I'd never presume to tell Nathan that I knew better than he how things
> are in his part of the country, any more than I would anyone else. What
> gives you or anyone else the right to do that?
>
> At some point, you have to say to yourself; "I don't actually live
> there, or, I've never actually done or experienced that myself, so I may
not
> be the best person to judge or offer up advice on that subject.
>
> I think you can disagree with a persons opinion or point of view
without
> making a personal attack of everything about them, that includes taking
past
> statements he may or may not have said about different subjects out of
> context.
>
> Bottom line: I think you are attacking him because his opinion differs
from
> yours.
>
> On the other hand:
>
> I think some folks in here would rather argue a point they have no
proof
> of, rather than to admit "they don't know", just for the sake of argument,
> or the need to always be right, I don't know which.
>
> Example: If I posted my experiences while in Bosnia in 1992-93, I'm
> sure of at least three in here (no names) who would dispute what I
> experienced first hand, because they read about it in some book somewhere.
I
> was told it says in books that the US wasn't even over there in 1992-93,
so,
> my scars on my knee, and the death of two of my closest buddies must not
> have happened.
>
> Some books are just someone else's opinion, or biased research, published.
>
> These, as previously stated, are just my opinions.
>
> Spdloader
>
Your opinions and experiences have some value, but there is such a thing as
"not seeing the forest for the trees". This is where I place Nathan, his
wolf poacher buddies, your Bosnia experiences, and people that were in
Vietnam. You don't know everything, just because "You were there". In
fact, "Because you were on the ground", you lack objectivity, that people
who have studied things from a distance will have.
You could also say that I can't judge Nathan's experiences fairly, because I
don't follow him around every day, every minute, and this point of view has
some value too. But Montana is a lot like Colorado, and Nathan has been a
volatile, expressive little fellow, hasn't he? The guy, is just typical, of
what you see on reality shows. No, I am not attacking him merely because
his opinion is different from mine. I am attacking him because he is
intolerant, and stupid, and he cannot abide the notion, that there are
different opinions from his. And because he chooses to make such a public
spectable of himself. He's asking for it. And because he **always** takes
things out of context, and denies it when you try to pin him down on any
issue. If you want to be taken seriously in life, then you don't act like
Nathan.
The ranchers he is talking about receive numerous kinds of government
assistance, including tax breaks, public lands leased for pennies, and
periodic special forms of relief, such as when cows on the range get snowed
in and can't get to food. The TV News always runs a special, on how hard
they have it, "out on the range". Now the federal government, is asking for
one little favor, that they share the **public** range with wolves, which a
very large segment of the voters, who admittedly may have never seen one,
want protected. It's a range management problem, and has nothing to do with
the wolves' alleged bloodthirsty nature. And because Nathan says that they
are evil, that makes me believe it even less.
Earle
#967
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:lB53g.4428$P65.823@southeast.rr.com...
>
> "Earle Horton" wrote in message
> > He doesn't have strong convictions though! He goes with whatever way
the
> > wind blows, wherever he happens to be. This is not a bad way to be, if
> > you
> > want to go through life without the bother of moral convictions, but it
> > amuses me that he invokes "right" and "wrong" every time. All he cares
> > about, is convenience and his own temporary interest. I wish he would
> > just
> > admit it. He's not really any more righteous, nor does he have any
right
> > to
> > be, than the rest of us.
> >
> > I find his condemnation of illegal immigrants to be hypocritical too.
How
> > many HVAC contracts does he lose, every year, to illegal immigrants from
> > Saskatchawan?
> >
> > Earle
>
> Earle,
>
> A few of my own opinions / observations on the preceding arguments:
>
> I'd never presume to tell Nathan that I knew better than he how things
> are in his part of the country, any more than I would anyone else. What
> gives you or anyone else the right to do that?
>
> At some point, you have to say to yourself; "I don't actually live
> there, or, I've never actually done or experienced that myself, so I may
not
> be the best person to judge or offer up advice on that subject.
>
> I think you can disagree with a persons opinion or point of view
without
> making a personal attack of everything about them, that includes taking
past
> statements he may or may not have said about different subjects out of
> context.
>
> Bottom line: I think you are attacking him because his opinion differs
from
> yours.
>
> On the other hand:
>
> I think some folks in here would rather argue a point they have no
proof
> of, rather than to admit "they don't know", just for the sake of argument,
> or the need to always be right, I don't know which.
>
> Example: If I posted my experiences while in Bosnia in 1992-93, I'm
> sure of at least three in here (no names) who would dispute what I
> experienced first hand, because they read about it in some book somewhere.
I
> was told it says in books that the US wasn't even over there in 1992-93,
so,
> my scars on my knee, and the death of two of my closest buddies must not
> have happened.
>
> Some books are just someone else's opinion, or biased research, published.
>
> These, as previously stated, are just my opinions.
>
> Spdloader
>
Your opinions and experiences have some value, but there is such a thing as
"not seeing the forest for the trees". This is where I place Nathan, his
wolf poacher buddies, your Bosnia experiences, and people that were in
Vietnam. You don't know everything, just because "You were there". In
fact, "Because you were on the ground", you lack objectivity, that people
who have studied things from a distance will have.
You could also say that I can't judge Nathan's experiences fairly, because I
don't follow him around every day, every minute, and this point of view has
some value too. But Montana is a lot like Colorado, and Nathan has been a
volatile, expressive little fellow, hasn't he? The guy, is just typical, of
what you see on reality shows. No, I am not attacking him merely because
his opinion is different from mine. I am attacking him because he is
intolerant, and stupid, and he cannot abide the notion, that there are
different opinions from his. And because he chooses to make such a public
spectable of himself. He's asking for it. And because he **always** takes
things out of context, and denies it when you try to pin him down on any
issue. If you want to be taken seriously in life, then you don't act like
Nathan.
The ranchers he is talking about receive numerous kinds of government
assistance, including tax breaks, public lands leased for pennies, and
periodic special forms of relief, such as when cows on the range get snowed
in and can't get to food. The TV News always runs a special, on how hard
they have it, "out on the range". Now the federal government, is asking for
one little favor, that they share the **public** range with wolves, which a
very large segment of the voters, who admittedly may have never seen one,
want protected. It's a range management problem, and has nothing to do with
the wolves' alleged bloodthirsty nature. And because Nathan says that they
are evil, that makes me believe it even less.
Earle
#968
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:lB53g.4428$P65.823@southeast.rr.com...
>
> "Earle Horton" wrote in message
> > He doesn't have strong convictions though! He goes with whatever way
the
> > wind blows, wherever he happens to be. This is not a bad way to be, if
> > you
> > want to go through life without the bother of moral convictions, but it
> > amuses me that he invokes "right" and "wrong" every time. All he cares
> > about, is convenience and his own temporary interest. I wish he would
> > just
> > admit it. He's not really any more righteous, nor does he have any
right
> > to
> > be, than the rest of us.
> >
> > I find his condemnation of illegal immigrants to be hypocritical too.
How
> > many HVAC contracts does he lose, every year, to illegal immigrants from
> > Saskatchawan?
> >
> > Earle
>
> Earle,
>
> A few of my own opinions / observations on the preceding arguments:
>
> I'd never presume to tell Nathan that I knew better than he how things
> are in his part of the country, any more than I would anyone else. What
> gives you or anyone else the right to do that?
>
> At some point, you have to say to yourself; "I don't actually live
> there, or, I've never actually done or experienced that myself, so I may
not
> be the best person to judge or offer up advice on that subject.
>
> I think you can disagree with a persons opinion or point of view
without
> making a personal attack of everything about them, that includes taking
past
> statements he may or may not have said about different subjects out of
> context.
>
> Bottom line: I think you are attacking him because his opinion differs
from
> yours.
>
> On the other hand:
>
> I think some folks in here would rather argue a point they have no
proof
> of, rather than to admit "they don't know", just for the sake of argument,
> or the need to always be right, I don't know which.
>
> Example: If I posted my experiences while in Bosnia in 1992-93, I'm
> sure of at least three in here (no names) who would dispute what I
> experienced first hand, because they read about it in some book somewhere.
I
> was told it says in books that the US wasn't even over there in 1992-93,
so,
> my scars on my knee, and the death of two of my closest buddies must not
> have happened.
>
> Some books are just someone else's opinion, or biased research, published.
>
> These, as previously stated, are just my opinions.
>
> Spdloader
>
Your opinions and experiences have some value, but there is such a thing as
"not seeing the forest for the trees". This is where I place Nathan, his
wolf poacher buddies, your Bosnia experiences, and people that were in
Vietnam. You don't know everything, just because "You were there". In
fact, "Because you were on the ground", you lack objectivity, that people
who have studied things from a distance will have.
You could also say that I can't judge Nathan's experiences fairly, because I
don't follow him around every day, every minute, and this point of view has
some value too. But Montana is a lot like Colorado, and Nathan has been a
volatile, expressive little fellow, hasn't he? The guy, is just typical, of
what you see on reality shows. No, I am not attacking him merely because
his opinion is different from mine. I am attacking him because he is
intolerant, and stupid, and he cannot abide the notion, that there are
different opinions from his. And because he chooses to make such a public
spectable of himself. He's asking for it. And because he **always** takes
things out of context, and denies it when you try to pin him down on any
issue. If you want to be taken seriously in life, then you don't act like
Nathan.
The ranchers he is talking about receive numerous kinds of government
assistance, including tax breaks, public lands leased for pennies, and
periodic special forms of relief, such as when cows on the range get snowed
in and can't get to food. The TV News always runs a special, on how hard
they have it, "out on the range". Now the federal government, is asking for
one little favor, that they share the **public** range with wolves, which a
very large segment of the voters, who admittedly may have never seen one,
want protected. It's a range management problem, and has nothing to do with
the wolves' alleged bloodthirsty nature. And because Nathan says that they
are evil, that makes me believe it even less.
Earle
#969
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Not sure what a pack of hounds are doing in
the field in January. Deer season is way over
by then. I can see maybe one or two, who got lost
and was never found. but a pack running at deer
after deer season is not right and should be shot on sight.
Something amiss here. Good deer dogs are not normally left abandoned
But then it's all moot as the MNR can't get enough hunters to cull
the deer herd in Southern Ontario. They're like pests now, too many of them.
Mike Romain wrote:
> I saw hounds gutting deer around the north boundary to Bon Echo Park,
> north of Kingston the first week of January this year. It 'sure' looked
> like the hounds brought him down.
>
> Mike
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>>Hi Mike.
>>You can only use hounds to hunt deer and bear.
>>They can never outrun or catch up to a deer or bear.
>>Now wild dogs like a shepard...etc
>>They can do alot of damage to the deer herd.
>>FYI. Wolf hunting season is all year long in Ontario.
>>In some counties/townships they even have a bounty on them.
>>
>>Mike Romain wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It was legal where I grew up... Not where I live now, they train dogs
>>>to run deer here.....
>>>
>>>Mike
>>>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>>>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>>>Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
>>>Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
>>>(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
the field in January. Deer season is way over
by then. I can see maybe one or two, who got lost
and was never found. but a pack running at deer
after deer season is not right and should be shot on sight.
Something amiss here. Good deer dogs are not normally left abandoned
But then it's all moot as the MNR can't get enough hunters to cull
the deer herd in Southern Ontario. They're like pests now, too many of them.
Mike Romain wrote:
> I saw hounds gutting deer around the north boundary to Bon Echo Park,
> north of Kingston the first week of January this year. It 'sure' looked
> like the hounds brought him down.
>
> Mike
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>>Hi Mike.
>>You can only use hounds to hunt deer and bear.
>>They can never outrun or catch up to a deer or bear.
>>Now wild dogs like a shepard...etc
>>They can do alot of damage to the deer herd.
>>FYI. Wolf hunting season is all year long in Ontario.
>>In some counties/townships they even have a bounty on them.
>>
>>Mike Romain wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It was legal where I grew up... Not where I live now, they train dogs
>>>to run deer here.....
>>>
>>>Mike
>>>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>>>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>>>Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
>>>Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
>>>(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
#970
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Not sure what a pack of hounds are doing in
the field in January. Deer season is way over
by then. I can see maybe one or two, who got lost
and was never found. but a pack running at deer
after deer season is not right and should be shot on sight.
Something amiss here. Good deer dogs are not normally left abandoned
But then it's all moot as the MNR can't get enough hunters to cull
the deer herd in Southern Ontario. They're like pests now, too many of them.
Mike Romain wrote:
> I saw hounds gutting deer around the north boundary to Bon Echo Park,
> north of Kingston the first week of January this year. It 'sure' looked
> like the hounds brought him down.
>
> Mike
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>>Hi Mike.
>>You can only use hounds to hunt deer and bear.
>>They can never outrun or catch up to a deer or bear.
>>Now wild dogs like a shepard...etc
>>They can do alot of damage to the deer herd.
>>FYI. Wolf hunting season is all year long in Ontario.
>>In some counties/townships they even have a bounty on them.
>>
>>Mike Romain wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It was legal where I grew up... Not where I live now, they train dogs
>>>to run deer here.....
>>>
>>>Mike
>>>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>>>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>>>Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
>>>Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
>>>(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
the field in January. Deer season is way over
by then. I can see maybe one or two, who got lost
and was never found. but a pack running at deer
after deer season is not right and should be shot on sight.
Something amiss here. Good deer dogs are not normally left abandoned
But then it's all moot as the MNR can't get enough hunters to cull
the deer herd in Southern Ontario. They're like pests now, too many of them.
Mike Romain wrote:
> I saw hounds gutting deer around the north boundary to Bon Echo Park,
> north of Kingston the first week of January this year. It 'sure' looked
> like the hounds brought him down.
>
> Mike
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>>Hi Mike.
>>You can only use hounds to hunt deer and bear.
>>They can never outrun or catch up to a deer or bear.
>>Now wild dogs like a shepard...etc
>>They can do alot of damage to the deer herd.
>>FYI. Wolf hunting season is all year long in Ontario.
>>In some counties/townships they even have a bounty on them.
>>
>>Mike Romain wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It was legal where I grew up... Not where I live now, they train dogs
>>>to run deer here.....
>>>
>>>Mike
>>>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>>>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>>>Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
>>>Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
>>>(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)