Pink Kate
#891
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:ZGX2g.4363$P65.728@southeast.rr.com...
> Who decided it was pick on Nathan day?
heh.....it happens from time to time, and usually follows pick on bill day.
:-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:ZGX2g.4363$P65.728@southeast.rr.com...
> Who decided it was pick on Nathan day?
heh.....it happens from time to time, and usually follows pick on bill day.
:-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#892
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:ZGX2g.4363$P65.728@southeast.rr.com...
> Who decided it was pick on Nathan day?
heh.....it happens from time to time, and usually follows pick on bill day.
:-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:ZGX2g.4363$P65.728@southeast.rr.com...
> Who decided it was pick on Nathan day?
heh.....it happens from time to time, and usually follows pick on bill day.
:-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#893
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:ZGX2g.4363$P65.728@southeast.rr.com...
> Who decided it was pick on Nathan day?
heh.....it happens from time to time, and usually follows pick on bill day.
:-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:ZGX2g.4363$P65.728@southeast.rr.com...
> Who decided it was pick on Nathan day?
heh.....it happens from time to time, and usually follows pick on bill day.
:-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#894
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:BfY2g.27901$ZB1.6987@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:oxU2g.81$KO6.14763@news.uswest.net...
> If you choose to do it, fine -- more power to you -- but
> don't try to prevent someone who is not as altruistic from cutting their
> losses when the test show that their future kid will have a significant
> handicap...
i havent argued against this. people can think what they will, most
everything i do is for my children. i am a daddy before anything else, and
do whatever i can to protect children whenever i can. my anit-abortion
stance concerns people who use abortion as a form of birth control.
> With regards to braindead, I'm referring to individuals who because of an
> accident, stroke, or whatever have managed to cease brain activity even
> though the heart and other organs might still be operating...
with or without the probability of recovery?
> If you don't
> believe in the concept of a soul, you are probably more likely to believe
> in
> the right of a woman to choose whether to terminate her pregnancy
i believe in neither. i do however, believe in childs right to LIVE.
> If you believe that it is acceptable to withhold life support from
> someone who is braindead, it seems to indicate to me that you believe that
> the soul is no longer there when there is no brain activity... This would
> imply to me that there might be a point during the gestation period when
> consciousness is achieved and as such, you should not have a problem with
> the pregnancy being terminated prior to that point... If you use one
> definition for the end of life, is it totally unreasonable to use the same
> definition for the start of life?
no. someone on life support that has little to no chance of survival isnt
comparable to a baby with a full expectation of a normal life.
> Personally, my philosophy is that life begins at birth
suppose a man assaults a woman who is 8 months preganant and her baby dies.
according to your logic, he is not guilty of murder. i feel that life
begins when you have a heartbeat.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:BfY2g.27901$ZB1.6987@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:oxU2g.81$KO6.14763@news.uswest.net...
> If you choose to do it, fine -- more power to you -- but
> don't try to prevent someone who is not as altruistic from cutting their
> losses when the test show that their future kid will have a significant
> handicap...
i havent argued against this. people can think what they will, most
everything i do is for my children. i am a daddy before anything else, and
do whatever i can to protect children whenever i can. my anit-abortion
stance concerns people who use abortion as a form of birth control.
> With regards to braindead, I'm referring to individuals who because of an
> accident, stroke, or whatever have managed to cease brain activity even
> though the heart and other organs might still be operating...
with or without the probability of recovery?
> If you don't
> believe in the concept of a soul, you are probably more likely to believe
> in
> the right of a woman to choose whether to terminate her pregnancy
i believe in neither. i do however, believe in childs right to LIVE.
> If you believe that it is acceptable to withhold life support from
> someone who is braindead, it seems to indicate to me that you believe that
> the soul is no longer there when there is no brain activity... This would
> imply to me that there might be a point during the gestation period when
> consciousness is achieved and as such, you should not have a problem with
> the pregnancy being terminated prior to that point... If you use one
> definition for the end of life, is it totally unreasonable to use the same
> definition for the start of life?
no. someone on life support that has little to no chance of survival isnt
comparable to a baby with a full expectation of a normal life.
> Personally, my philosophy is that life begins at birth
suppose a man assaults a woman who is 8 months preganant and her baby dies.
according to your logic, he is not guilty of murder. i feel that life
begins when you have a heartbeat.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#895
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:BfY2g.27901$ZB1.6987@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:oxU2g.81$KO6.14763@news.uswest.net...
> If you choose to do it, fine -- more power to you -- but
> don't try to prevent someone who is not as altruistic from cutting their
> losses when the test show that their future kid will have a significant
> handicap...
i havent argued against this. people can think what they will, most
everything i do is for my children. i am a daddy before anything else, and
do whatever i can to protect children whenever i can. my anit-abortion
stance concerns people who use abortion as a form of birth control.
> With regards to braindead, I'm referring to individuals who because of an
> accident, stroke, or whatever have managed to cease brain activity even
> though the heart and other organs might still be operating...
with or without the probability of recovery?
> If you don't
> believe in the concept of a soul, you are probably more likely to believe
> in
> the right of a woman to choose whether to terminate her pregnancy
i believe in neither. i do however, believe in childs right to LIVE.
> If you believe that it is acceptable to withhold life support from
> someone who is braindead, it seems to indicate to me that you believe that
> the soul is no longer there when there is no brain activity... This would
> imply to me that there might be a point during the gestation period when
> consciousness is achieved and as such, you should not have a problem with
> the pregnancy being terminated prior to that point... If you use one
> definition for the end of life, is it totally unreasonable to use the same
> definition for the start of life?
no. someone on life support that has little to no chance of survival isnt
comparable to a baby with a full expectation of a normal life.
> Personally, my philosophy is that life begins at birth
suppose a man assaults a woman who is 8 months preganant and her baby dies.
according to your logic, he is not guilty of murder. i feel that life
begins when you have a heartbeat.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:BfY2g.27901$ZB1.6987@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:oxU2g.81$KO6.14763@news.uswest.net...
> If you choose to do it, fine -- more power to you -- but
> don't try to prevent someone who is not as altruistic from cutting their
> losses when the test show that their future kid will have a significant
> handicap...
i havent argued against this. people can think what they will, most
everything i do is for my children. i am a daddy before anything else, and
do whatever i can to protect children whenever i can. my anit-abortion
stance concerns people who use abortion as a form of birth control.
> With regards to braindead, I'm referring to individuals who because of an
> accident, stroke, or whatever have managed to cease brain activity even
> though the heart and other organs might still be operating...
with or without the probability of recovery?
> If you don't
> believe in the concept of a soul, you are probably more likely to believe
> in
> the right of a woman to choose whether to terminate her pregnancy
i believe in neither. i do however, believe in childs right to LIVE.
> If you believe that it is acceptable to withhold life support from
> someone who is braindead, it seems to indicate to me that you believe that
> the soul is no longer there when there is no brain activity... This would
> imply to me that there might be a point during the gestation period when
> consciousness is achieved and as such, you should not have a problem with
> the pregnancy being terminated prior to that point... If you use one
> definition for the end of life, is it totally unreasonable to use the same
> definition for the start of life?
no. someone on life support that has little to no chance of survival isnt
comparable to a baby with a full expectation of a normal life.
> Personally, my philosophy is that life begins at birth
suppose a man assaults a woman who is 8 months preganant and her baby dies.
according to your logic, he is not guilty of murder. i feel that life
begins when you have a heartbeat.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#896
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:BfY2g.27901$ZB1.6987@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:oxU2g.81$KO6.14763@news.uswest.net...
> If you choose to do it, fine -- more power to you -- but
> don't try to prevent someone who is not as altruistic from cutting their
> losses when the test show that their future kid will have a significant
> handicap...
i havent argued against this. people can think what they will, most
everything i do is for my children. i am a daddy before anything else, and
do whatever i can to protect children whenever i can. my anit-abortion
stance concerns people who use abortion as a form of birth control.
> With regards to braindead, I'm referring to individuals who because of an
> accident, stroke, or whatever have managed to cease brain activity even
> though the heart and other organs might still be operating...
with or without the probability of recovery?
> If you don't
> believe in the concept of a soul, you are probably more likely to believe
> in
> the right of a woman to choose whether to terminate her pregnancy
i believe in neither. i do however, believe in childs right to LIVE.
> If you believe that it is acceptable to withhold life support from
> someone who is braindead, it seems to indicate to me that you believe that
> the soul is no longer there when there is no brain activity... This would
> imply to me that there might be a point during the gestation period when
> consciousness is achieved and as such, you should not have a problem with
> the pregnancy being terminated prior to that point... If you use one
> definition for the end of life, is it totally unreasonable to use the same
> definition for the start of life?
no. someone on life support that has little to no chance of survival isnt
comparable to a baby with a full expectation of a normal life.
> Personally, my philosophy is that life begins at birth
suppose a man assaults a woman who is 8 months preganant and her baby dies.
according to your logic, he is not guilty of murder. i feel that life
begins when you have a heartbeat.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:BfY2g.27901$ZB1.6987@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:oxU2g.81$KO6.14763@news.uswest.net...
> If you choose to do it, fine -- more power to you -- but
> don't try to prevent someone who is not as altruistic from cutting their
> losses when the test show that their future kid will have a significant
> handicap...
i havent argued against this. people can think what they will, most
everything i do is for my children. i am a daddy before anything else, and
do whatever i can to protect children whenever i can. my anit-abortion
stance concerns people who use abortion as a form of birth control.
> With regards to braindead, I'm referring to individuals who because of an
> accident, stroke, or whatever have managed to cease brain activity even
> though the heart and other organs might still be operating...
with or without the probability of recovery?
> If you don't
> believe in the concept of a soul, you are probably more likely to believe
> in
> the right of a woman to choose whether to terminate her pregnancy
i believe in neither. i do however, believe in childs right to LIVE.
> If you believe that it is acceptable to withhold life support from
> someone who is braindead, it seems to indicate to me that you believe that
> the soul is no longer there when there is no brain activity... This would
> imply to me that there might be a point during the gestation period when
> consciousness is achieved and as such, you should not have a problem with
> the pregnancy being terminated prior to that point... If you use one
> definition for the end of life, is it totally unreasonable to use the same
> definition for the start of life?
no. someone on life support that has little to no chance of survival isnt
comparable to a baby with a full expectation of a normal life.
> Personally, my philosophy is that life begins at birth
suppose a man assaults a woman who is 8 months preganant and her baby dies.
according to your logic, he is not guilty of murder. i feel that life
begins when you have a heartbeat.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#897
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:eEY2g.130$KO6.22030@news.uswest.net...
> i havent argued against this. people can think what they will, most
> everything i do is for my children. i am a daddy before anything else,
and
> do whatever i can to protect children whenever i can. my anit-abortion
> stance concerns people who use abortion as a form of birth control.
I think you would be better off taking a stance that it is not the most
economically feasible means of birth control and other alternatives should
be considered... When you come out completely against abortion, you'll just
get dismissed as some sort of religious kook...
> with or without the probability of recovery?
Perhaps someone with more medical knowledge than I can correct me, but I was
under the impression that once you've become a flatliner, you do not have a
chance at recovery...
> i believe in neither. i do however, believe in childs right to LIVE.
So, you're saying that you're an athiest / agnostic and against abortions?
Interesting... I don't think that I've ever encountered such a person... I
left open the possibility that they might exist, just like Bigfoot and the
Nessie... <grin>
> no. someone on life support that has little to no chance of survival isnt
> comparable to a baby with a full expectation of a normal life.
So, at what point do you consider it a 'life'? At the moment of conception
even before the zygote forms? While it is still a zygote and has not passed
through the fallopian tubes?
> suppose a man assaults a woman who is 8 months preganant and her baby
dies.
> according to your logic, he is not guilty of murder.
Correct, by my definition, he would not be guilty of murder... Now, on the
other hand, if the woman or her husband / SO then killed the man who
assaulted her and I was on the jury, I would not find her/him guilty...
> i feel that life begins when you have a heartbeat.
So, you're saying that abortion earlier than about 24 days after conception
is acceptable? OK, that's a start, I guess... You've now said that you
approve of RU-486 for termination of pregnancies... Personlly, I prefer the
shop vac approach...
news:eEY2g.130$KO6.22030@news.uswest.net...
> i havent argued against this. people can think what they will, most
> everything i do is for my children. i am a daddy before anything else,
and
> do whatever i can to protect children whenever i can. my anit-abortion
> stance concerns people who use abortion as a form of birth control.
I think you would be better off taking a stance that it is not the most
economically feasible means of birth control and other alternatives should
be considered... When you come out completely against abortion, you'll just
get dismissed as some sort of religious kook...
> with or without the probability of recovery?
Perhaps someone with more medical knowledge than I can correct me, but I was
under the impression that once you've become a flatliner, you do not have a
chance at recovery...
> i believe in neither. i do however, believe in childs right to LIVE.
So, you're saying that you're an athiest / agnostic and against abortions?
Interesting... I don't think that I've ever encountered such a person... I
left open the possibility that they might exist, just like Bigfoot and the
Nessie... <grin>
> no. someone on life support that has little to no chance of survival isnt
> comparable to a baby with a full expectation of a normal life.
So, at what point do you consider it a 'life'? At the moment of conception
even before the zygote forms? While it is still a zygote and has not passed
through the fallopian tubes?
> suppose a man assaults a woman who is 8 months preganant and her baby
dies.
> according to your logic, he is not guilty of murder.
Correct, by my definition, he would not be guilty of murder... Now, on the
other hand, if the woman or her husband / SO then killed the man who
assaulted her and I was on the jury, I would not find her/him guilty...
> i feel that life begins when you have a heartbeat.
So, you're saying that abortion earlier than about 24 days after conception
is acceptable? OK, that's a start, I guess... You've now said that you
approve of RU-486 for termination of pregnancies... Personlly, I prefer the
shop vac approach...
#898
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:eEY2g.130$KO6.22030@news.uswest.net...
> i havent argued against this. people can think what they will, most
> everything i do is for my children. i am a daddy before anything else,
and
> do whatever i can to protect children whenever i can. my anit-abortion
> stance concerns people who use abortion as a form of birth control.
I think you would be better off taking a stance that it is not the most
economically feasible means of birth control and other alternatives should
be considered... When you come out completely against abortion, you'll just
get dismissed as some sort of religious kook...
> with or without the probability of recovery?
Perhaps someone with more medical knowledge than I can correct me, but I was
under the impression that once you've become a flatliner, you do not have a
chance at recovery...
> i believe in neither. i do however, believe in childs right to LIVE.
So, you're saying that you're an athiest / agnostic and against abortions?
Interesting... I don't think that I've ever encountered such a person... I
left open the possibility that they might exist, just like Bigfoot and the
Nessie... <grin>
> no. someone on life support that has little to no chance of survival isnt
> comparable to a baby with a full expectation of a normal life.
So, at what point do you consider it a 'life'? At the moment of conception
even before the zygote forms? While it is still a zygote and has not passed
through the fallopian tubes?
> suppose a man assaults a woman who is 8 months preganant and her baby
dies.
> according to your logic, he is not guilty of murder.
Correct, by my definition, he would not be guilty of murder... Now, on the
other hand, if the woman or her husband / SO then killed the man who
assaulted her and I was on the jury, I would not find her/him guilty...
> i feel that life begins when you have a heartbeat.
So, you're saying that abortion earlier than about 24 days after conception
is acceptable? OK, that's a start, I guess... You've now said that you
approve of RU-486 for termination of pregnancies... Personlly, I prefer the
shop vac approach...
news:eEY2g.130$KO6.22030@news.uswest.net...
> i havent argued against this. people can think what they will, most
> everything i do is for my children. i am a daddy before anything else,
and
> do whatever i can to protect children whenever i can. my anit-abortion
> stance concerns people who use abortion as a form of birth control.
I think you would be better off taking a stance that it is not the most
economically feasible means of birth control and other alternatives should
be considered... When you come out completely against abortion, you'll just
get dismissed as some sort of religious kook...
> with or without the probability of recovery?
Perhaps someone with more medical knowledge than I can correct me, but I was
under the impression that once you've become a flatliner, you do not have a
chance at recovery...
> i believe in neither. i do however, believe in childs right to LIVE.
So, you're saying that you're an athiest / agnostic and against abortions?
Interesting... I don't think that I've ever encountered such a person... I
left open the possibility that they might exist, just like Bigfoot and the
Nessie... <grin>
> no. someone on life support that has little to no chance of survival isnt
> comparable to a baby with a full expectation of a normal life.
So, at what point do you consider it a 'life'? At the moment of conception
even before the zygote forms? While it is still a zygote and has not passed
through the fallopian tubes?
> suppose a man assaults a woman who is 8 months preganant and her baby
dies.
> according to your logic, he is not guilty of murder.
Correct, by my definition, he would not be guilty of murder... Now, on the
other hand, if the woman or her husband / SO then killed the man who
assaulted her and I was on the jury, I would not find her/him guilty...
> i feel that life begins when you have a heartbeat.
So, you're saying that abortion earlier than about 24 days after conception
is acceptable? OK, that's a start, I guess... You've now said that you
approve of RU-486 for termination of pregnancies... Personlly, I prefer the
shop vac approach...
#899
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:eEY2g.130$KO6.22030@news.uswest.net...
> i havent argued against this. people can think what they will, most
> everything i do is for my children. i am a daddy before anything else,
and
> do whatever i can to protect children whenever i can. my anit-abortion
> stance concerns people who use abortion as a form of birth control.
I think you would be better off taking a stance that it is not the most
economically feasible means of birth control and other alternatives should
be considered... When you come out completely against abortion, you'll just
get dismissed as some sort of religious kook...
> with or without the probability of recovery?
Perhaps someone with more medical knowledge than I can correct me, but I was
under the impression that once you've become a flatliner, you do not have a
chance at recovery...
> i believe in neither. i do however, believe in childs right to LIVE.
So, you're saying that you're an athiest / agnostic and against abortions?
Interesting... I don't think that I've ever encountered such a person... I
left open the possibility that they might exist, just like Bigfoot and the
Nessie... <grin>
> no. someone on life support that has little to no chance of survival isnt
> comparable to a baby with a full expectation of a normal life.
So, at what point do you consider it a 'life'? At the moment of conception
even before the zygote forms? While it is still a zygote and has not passed
through the fallopian tubes?
> suppose a man assaults a woman who is 8 months preganant and her baby
dies.
> according to your logic, he is not guilty of murder.
Correct, by my definition, he would not be guilty of murder... Now, on the
other hand, if the woman or her husband / SO then killed the man who
assaulted her and I was on the jury, I would not find her/him guilty...
> i feel that life begins when you have a heartbeat.
So, you're saying that abortion earlier than about 24 days after conception
is acceptable? OK, that's a start, I guess... You've now said that you
approve of RU-486 for termination of pregnancies... Personlly, I prefer the
shop vac approach...
news:eEY2g.130$KO6.22030@news.uswest.net...
> i havent argued against this. people can think what they will, most
> everything i do is for my children. i am a daddy before anything else,
and
> do whatever i can to protect children whenever i can. my anit-abortion
> stance concerns people who use abortion as a form of birth control.
I think you would be better off taking a stance that it is not the most
economically feasible means of birth control and other alternatives should
be considered... When you come out completely against abortion, you'll just
get dismissed as some sort of religious kook...
> with or without the probability of recovery?
Perhaps someone with more medical knowledge than I can correct me, but I was
under the impression that once you've become a flatliner, you do not have a
chance at recovery...
> i believe in neither. i do however, believe in childs right to LIVE.
So, you're saying that you're an athiest / agnostic and against abortions?
Interesting... I don't think that I've ever encountered such a person... I
left open the possibility that they might exist, just like Bigfoot and the
Nessie... <grin>
> no. someone on life support that has little to no chance of survival isnt
> comparable to a baby with a full expectation of a normal life.
So, at what point do you consider it a 'life'? At the moment of conception
even before the zygote forms? While it is still a zygote and has not passed
through the fallopian tubes?
> suppose a man assaults a woman who is 8 months preganant and her baby
dies.
> according to your logic, he is not guilty of murder.
Correct, by my definition, he would not be guilty of murder... Now, on the
other hand, if the woman or her husband / SO then killed the man who
assaulted her and I was on the jury, I would not find her/him guilty...
> i feel that life begins when you have a heartbeat.
So, you're saying that abortion earlier than about 24 days after conception
is acceptable? OK, that's a start, I guess... You've now said that you
approve of RU-486 for termination of pregnancies... Personlly, I prefer the
shop vac approach...
#900
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Agreed, but I don't have a problem with that. I deny plenty of things the
right to life by eating them, and I don't produce a child every time I have
--- either.
This isn't like your attitude to wolves where I'm advocating extincting the
whole species :-)
Dave Milne, Scotland
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:uaR2g.28$pk2.1397@news.uswest.net...
> "Dave Milne" <whoneeds@toknow.com> wrote in message
> news:klG2g.57912$wl.34015@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> > I'm all in favour of abortion ; probably better to kill it rather than
> > have
> > yet another addition to our 6 billion population that you probably
aren't
> > prepared to look after properly
>
> you are still denying that child its most basic right......the right to
> life.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>
right to life by eating them, and I don't produce a child every time I have
--- either.
This isn't like your attitude to wolves where I'm advocating extincting the
whole species :-)
Dave Milne, Scotland
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:uaR2g.28$pk2.1397@news.uswest.net...
> "Dave Milne" <whoneeds@toknow.com> wrote in message
> news:klG2g.57912$wl.34015@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> > I'm all in favour of abortion ; probably better to kill it rather than
> > have
> > yet another addition to our 6 billion population that you probably
aren't
> > prepared to look after properly
>
> you are still denying that child its most basic right......the right to
> life.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>