Pink Kate
#861
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Yes.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> heh.......treadwell got exactly what he deserved bill. have you seen his
> tapes where he brags about how "ANY other man would be killed"?
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> heh.......treadwell got exactly what he deserved bill. have you seen his
> tapes where he brags about how "ANY other man would be killed"?
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#862
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Yes.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> heh.......treadwell got exactly what he deserved bill. have you seen his
> tapes where he brags about how "ANY other man would be killed"?
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> heh.......treadwell got exactly what he deserved bill. have you seen his
> tapes where he brags about how "ANY other man would be killed"?
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#863
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Yes.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> heh.......treadwell got exactly what he deserved bill. have you seen his
> tapes where he brags about how "ANY other man would be killed"?
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> heh.......treadwell got exactly what he deserved bill. have you seen his
> tapes where he brags about how "ANY other man would be killed"?
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#864
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
I am not making anything up. You stated, that if you broke the law, that
you would not tell anyone about it. You're a hard guy to pin down, but "i
find fun in killing wolves" is at least suspect, that you are doing
something, that you are not telling us about.
So you are condemning wolf poachers now, for not following the law? It's
good to know, that despite all your talk of admiring them, at bottom you
think them criminals, just like I do.
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZrU2g.80$KO6.13944@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444c0d40$0$14947$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > Contrast honorable civil disobedience like this, with dishonest sneaky
> > taking the law into your own hands, which your Montana/Idaho wolf
poachers
> > practice, and which you claim you do not. (But you wouldn't tell anyone
> > if
> > you did.)
>
> your speech is pointless earle. ive stated that i do not break written
law,
> i simply support the efforts of some who do. there is NOTHING wrong with
> having my own opinion earle......its my ACTIONS that matter.
>
>
> > Libertarians believe, that government is a necessary evil. We have to
> > have
> > laws, because we just can't agree on everything. But laws should follow
> > the
> > constitution, and people who do not agree with any particular law, do
not
> > get a free ticket to disobey. That weakens the system, and we have to
> > have
> > a system to survive.
>
> agreed. i never suggested that laws should not be followed.
>
>
> > You obviously differentiate betwee "just" laws, which you consent to
obey,
> > and "unjust" laws, which you do not feel bound by.
>
> "obviously"? do show me earle, where i have broken ANY law. i follow the
> law, even if i dont always like it.
>
>
> > True Libertarians abide
> > by the laws, except when they practice honorable civil disobedience, as
> > described above.
>
> um, what you described earle, was someone BREAKING the law. how is it any
> different?
>
>
> > What you advocate, is that everyone in society, has to
> > conform to whatever Nathan happens to believe in at the moment.
>
> show me where i have suggested this. you cant. stop making ---- up
earle.
>
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>
you would not tell anyone about it. You're a hard guy to pin down, but "i
find fun in killing wolves" is at least suspect, that you are doing
something, that you are not telling us about.
So you are condemning wolf poachers now, for not following the law? It's
good to know, that despite all your talk of admiring them, at bottom you
think them criminals, just like I do.
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZrU2g.80$KO6.13944@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444c0d40$0$14947$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > Contrast honorable civil disobedience like this, with dishonest sneaky
> > taking the law into your own hands, which your Montana/Idaho wolf
poachers
> > practice, and which you claim you do not. (But you wouldn't tell anyone
> > if
> > you did.)
>
> your speech is pointless earle. ive stated that i do not break written
law,
> i simply support the efforts of some who do. there is NOTHING wrong with
> having my own opinion earle......its my ACTIONS that matter.
>
>
> > Libertarians believe, that government is a necessary evil. We have to
> > have
> > laws, because we just can't agree on everything. But laws should follow
> > the
> > constitution, and people who do not agree with any particular law, do
not
> > get a free ticket to disobey. That weakens the system, and we have to
> > have
> > a system to survive.
>
> agreed. i never suggested that laws should not be followed.
>
>
> > You obviously differentiate betwee "just" laws, which you consent to
obey,
> > and "unjust" laws, which you do not feel bound by.
>
> "obviously"? do show me earle, where i have broken ANY law. i follow the
> law, even if i dont always like it.
>
>
> > True Libertarians abide
> > by the laws, except when they practice honorable civil disobedience, as
> > described above.
>
> um, what you described earle, was someone BREAKING the law. how is it any
> different?
>
>
> > What you advocate, is that everyone in society, has to
> > conform to whatever Nathan happens to believe in at the moment.
>
> show me where i have suggested this. you cant. stop making ---- up
earle.
>
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>
#865
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
I am not making anything up. You stated, that if you broke the law, that
you would not tell anyone about it. You're a hard guy to pin down, but "i
find fun in killing wolves" is at least suspect, that you are doing
something, that you are not telling us about.
So you are condemning wolf poachers now, for not following the law? It's
good to know, that despite all your talk of admiring them, at bottom you
think them criminals, just like I do.
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZrU2g.80$KO6.13944@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444c0d40$0$14947$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > Contrast honorable civil disobedience like this, with dishonest sneaky
> > taking the law into your own hands, which your Montana/Idaho wolf
poachers
> > practice, and which you claim you do not. (But you wouldn't tell anyone
> > if
> > you did.)
>
> your speech is pointless earle. ive stated that i do not break written
law,
> i simply support the efforts of some who do. there is NOTHING wrong with
> having my own opinion earle......its my ACTIONS that matter.
>
>
> > Libertarians believe, that government is a necessary evil. We have to
> > have
> > laws, because we just can't agree on everything. But laws should follow
> > the
> > constitution, and people who do not agree with any particular law, do
not
> > get a free ticket to disobey. That weakens the system, and we have to
> > have
> > a system to survive.
>
> agreed. i never suggested that laws should not be followed.
>
>
> > You obviously differentiate betwee "just" laws, which you consent to
obey,
> > and "unjust" laws, which you do not feel bound by.
>
> "obviously"? do show me earle, where i have broken ANY law. i follow the
> law, even if i dont always like it.
>
>
> > True Libertarians abide
> > by the laws, except when they practice honorable civil disobedience, as
> > described above.
>
> um, what you described earle, was someone BREAKING the law. how is it any
> different?
>
>
> > What you advocate, is that everyone in society, has to
> > conform to whatever Nathan happens to believe in at the moment.
>
> show me where i have suggested this. you cant. stop making ---- up
earle.
>
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>
you would not tell anyone about it. You're a hard guy to pin down, but "i
find fun in killing wolves" is at least suspect, that you are doing
something, that you are not telling us about.
So you are condemning wolf poachers now, for not following the law? It's
good to know, that despite all your talk of admiring them, at bottom you
think them criminals, just like I do.
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZrU2g.80$KO6.13944@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444c0d40$0$14947$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > Contrast honorable civil disobedience like this, with dishonest sneaky
> > taking the law into your own hands, which your Montana/Idaho wolf
poachers
> > practice, and which you claim you do not. (But you wouldn't tell anyone
> > if
> > you did.)
>
> your speech is pointless earle. ive stated that i do not break written
law,
> i simply support the efforts of some who do. there is NOTHING wrong with
> having my own opinion earle......its my ACTIONS that matter.
>
>
> > Libertarians believe, that government is a necessary evil. We have to
> > have
> > laws, because we just can't agree on everything. But laws should follow
> > the
> > constitution, and people who do not agree with any particular law, do
not
> > get a free ticket to disobey. That weakens the system, and we have to
> > have
> > a system to survive.
>
> agreed. i never suggested that laws should not be followed.
>
>
> > You obviously differentiate betwee "just" laws, which you consent to
obey,
> > and "unjust" laws, which you do not feel bound by.
>
> "obviously"? do show me earle, where i have broken ANY law. i follow the
> law, even if i dont always like it.
>
>
> > True Libertarians abide
> > by the laws, except when they practice honorable civil disobedience, as
> > described above.
>
> um, what you described earle, was someone BREAKING the law. how is it any
> different?
>
>
> > What you advocate, is that everyone in society, has to
> > conform to whatever Nathan happens to believe in at the moment.
>
> show me where i have suggested this. you cant. stop making ---- up
earle.
>
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>
#866
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
I am not making anything up. You stated, that if you broke the law, that
you would not tell anyone about it. You're a hard guy to pin down, but "i
find fun in killing wolves" is at least suspect, that you are doing
something, that you are not telling us about.
So you are condemning wolf poachers now, for not following the law? It's
good to know, that despite all your talk of admiring them, at bottom you
think them criminals, just like I do.
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZrU2g.80$KO6.13944@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444c0d40$0$14947$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > Contrast honorable civil disobedience like this, with dishonest sneaky
> > taking the law into your own hands, which your Montana/Idaho wolf
poachers
> > practice, and which you claim you do not. (But you wouldn't tell anyone
> > if
> > you did.)
>
> your speech is pointless earle. ive stated that i do not break written
law,
> i simply support the efforts of some who do. there is NOTHING wrong with
> having my own opinion earle......its my ACTIONS that matter.
>
>
> > Libertarians believe, that government is a necessary evil. We have to
> > have
> > laws, because we just can't agree on everything. But laws should follow
> > the
> > constitution, and people who do not agree with any particular law, do
not
> > get a free ticket to disobey. That weakens the system, and we have to
> > have
> > a system to survive.
>
> agreed. i never suggested that laws should not be followed.
>
>
> > You obviously differentiate betwee "just" laws, which you consent to
obey,
> > and "unjust" laws, which you do not feel bound by.
>
> "obviously"? do show me earle, where i have broken ANY law. i follow the
> law, even if i dont always like it.
>
>
> > True Libertarians abide
> > by the laws, except when they practice honorable civil disobedience, as
> > described above.
>
> um, what you described earle, was someone BREAKING the law. how is it any
> different?
>
>
> > What you advocate, is that everyone in society, has to
> > conform to whatever Nathan happens to believe in at the moment.
>
> show me where i have suggested this. you cant. stop making ---- up
earle.
>
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>
you would not tell anyone about it. You're a hard guy to pin down, but "i
find fun in killing wolves" is at least suspect, that you are doing
something, that you are not telling us about.
So you are condemning wolf poachers now, for not following the law? It's
good to know, that despite all your talk of admiring them, at bottom you
think them criminals, just like I do.
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZrU2g.80$KO6.13944@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444c0d40$0$14947$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > Contrast honorable civil disobedience like this, with dishonest sneaky
> > taking the law into your own hands, which your Montana/Idaho wolf
poachers
> > practice, and which you claim you do not. (But you wouldn't tell anyone
> > if
> > you did.)
>
> your speech is pointless earle. ive stated that i do not break written
law,
> i simply support the efforts of some who do. there is NOTHING wrong with
> having my own opinion earle......its my ACTIONS that matter.
>
>
> > Libertarians believe, that government is a necessary evil. We have to
> > have
> > laws, because we just can't agree on everything. But laws should follow
> > the
> > constitution, and people who do not agree with any particular law, do
not
> > get a free ticket to disobey. That weakens the system, and we have to
> > have
> > a system to survive.
>
> agreed. i never suggested that laws should not be followed.
>
>
> > You obviously differentiate betwee "just" laws, which you consent to
obey,
> > and "unjust" laws, which you do not feel bound by.
>
> "obviously"? do show me earle, where i have broken ANY law. i follow the
> law, even if i dont always like it.
>
>
> > True Libertarians abide
> > by the laws, except when they practice honorable civil disobedience, as
> > described above.
>
> um, what you described earle, was someone BREAKING the law. how is it any
> different?
>
>
> > What you advocate, is that everyone in society, has to
> > conform to whatever Nathan happens to believe in at the moment.
>
> show me where i have suggested this. you cant. stop making ---- up
earle.
>
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>
#867
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
I don't mean to butt in here, but....
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZrU2g.80$KO6.13944@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444c0d40$0$14947$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
First:
> ive stated that i do not break written law,
> i simply support the efforts of some who do.
Then:
> i never suggested that laws should not be followed.
Am I the only one who sees the irony?
>do show me earle, where i have broken ANY law. i follow the
> law, even if i dont always like it.
How about that little trademark dispute you had with D-C a few years ago?
Does this ring a bell:
>>Michael A. Cochran" <cochr...@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:JHan6.6933$gc7.503356@bgtnsc07-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Part of being an ethical and moral person includes following the laws of
> the community you live in.
lol......so judge me any way you care to, i really dont care. :-)
> Sorry sandman, you are way off base on this one. Taking someone elses
work
> without paying for it or by their agreement is common theivery.
in the words of marshal mathers (eminem, which i also downloaded for free
off napster and burned onto cd) "i am whatever you say i am". so long as
the material is available i will continue to download and burn my own cd's.
and guess what.......luckily im sure that i am the only one here that does
that. <wink> <wink>.
>>>
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZrU2g.80$KO6.13944@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444c0d40$0$14947$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
First:
> ive stated that i do not break written law,
> i simply support the efforts of some who do.
Then:
> i never suggested that laws should not be followed.
Am I the only one who sees the irony?
>do show me earle, where i have broken ANY law. i follow the
> law, even if i dont always like it.
How about that little trademark dispute you had with D-C a few years ago?
Does this ring a bell:
>>Michael A. Cochran" <cochr...@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:JHan6.6933$gc7.503356@bgtnsc07-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Part of being an ethical and moral person includes following the laws of
> the community you live in.
lol......so judge me any way you care to, i really dont care. :-)
> Sorry sandman, you are way off base on this one. Taking someone elses
work
> without paying for it or by their agreement is common theivery.
in the words of marshal mathers (eminem, which i also downloaded for free
off napster and burned onto cd) "i am whatever you say i am". so long as
the material is available i will continue to download and burn my own cd's.
and guess what.......luckily im sure that i am the only one here that does
that. <wink> <wink>.
>>>
#868
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
I don't mean to butt in here, but....
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZrU2g.80$KO6.13944@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444c0d40$0$14947$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
First:
> ive stated that i do not break written law,
> i simply support the efforts of some who do.
Then:
> i never suggested that laws should not be followed.
Am I the only one who sees the irony?
>do show me earle, where i have broken ANY law. i follow the
> law, even if i dont always like it.
How about that little trademark dispute you had with D-C a few years ago?
Does this ring a bell:
>>Michael A. Cochran" <cochr...@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:JHan6.6933$gc7.503356@bgtnsc07-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Part of being an ethical and moral person includes following the laws of
> the community you live in.
lol......so judge me any way you care to, i really dont care. :-)
> Sorry sandman, you are way off base on this one. Taking someone elses
work
> without paying for it or by their agreement is common theivery.
in the words of marshal mathers (eminem, which i also downloaded for free
off napster and burned onto cd) "i am whatever you say i am". so long as
the material is available i will continue to download and burn my own cd's.
and guess what.......luckily im sure that i am the only one here that does
that. <wink> <wink>.
>>>
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZrU2g.80$KO6.13944@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444c0d40$0$14947$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
First:
> ive stated that i do not break written law,
> i simply support the efforts of some who do.
Then:
> i never suggested that laws should not be followed.
Am I the only one who sees the irony?
>do show me earle, where i have broken ANY law. i follow the
> law, even if i dont always like it.
How about that little trademark dispute you had with D-C a few years ago?
Does this ring a bell:
>>Michael A. Cochran" <cochr...@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:JHan6.6933$gc7.503356@bgtnsc07-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Part of being an ethical and moral person includes following the laws of
> the community you live in.
lol......so judge me any way you care to, i really dont care. :-)
> Sorry sandman, you are way off base on this one. Taking someone elses
work
> without paying for it or by their agreement is common theivery.
in the words of marshal mathers (eminem, which i also downloaded for free
off napster and burned onto cd) "i am whatever you say i am". so long as
the material is available i will continue to download and burn my own cd's.
and guess what.......luckily im sure that i am the only one here that does
that. <wink> <wink>.
>>>
#869
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
I don't mean to butt in here, but....
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZrU2g.80$KO6.13944@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444c0d40$0$14947$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
First:
> ive stated that i do not break written law,
> i simply support the efforts of some who do.
Then:
> i never suggested that laws should not be followed.
Am I the only one who sees the irony?
>do show me earle, where i have broken ANY law. i follow the
> law, even if i dont always like it.
How about that little trademark dispute you had with D-C a few years ago?
Does this ring a bell:
>>Michael A. Cochran" <cochr...@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:JHan6.6933$gc7.503356@bgtnsc07-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Part of being an ethical and moral person includes following the laws of
> the community you live in.
lol......so judge me any way you care to, i really dont care. :-)
> Sorry sandman, you are way off base on this one. Taking someone elses
work
> without paying for it or by their agreement is common theivery.
in the words of marshal mathers (eminem, which i also downloaded for free
off napster and burned onto cd) "i am whatever you say i am". so long as
the material is available i will continue to download and burn my own cd's.
and guess what.......luckily im sure that i am the only one here that does
that. <wink> <wink>.
>>>
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZrU2g.80$KO6.13944@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444c0d40$0$14947$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
First:
> ive stated that i do not break written law,
> i simply support the efforts of some who do.
Then:
> i never suggested that laws should not be followed.
Am I the only one who sees the irony?
>do show me earle, where i have broken ANY law. i follow the
> law, even if i dont always like it.
How about that little trademark dispute you had with D-C a few years ago?
Does this ring a bell:
>>Michael A. Cochran" <cochr...@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:JHan6.6933$gc7.503356@bgtnsc07-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Part of being an ethical and moral person includes following the laws of
> the community you live in.
lol......so judge me any way you care to, i really dont care. :-)
> Sorry sandman, you are way off base on this one. Taking someone elses
work
> without paying for it or by their agreement is common theivery.
in the words of marshal mathers (eminem, which i also downloaded for free
off napster and burned onto cd) "i am whatever you say i am". so long as
the material is available i will continue to download and burn my own cd's.
and guess what.......luckily im sure that i am the only one here that does
that. <wink> <wink>.
>>>
#870
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:444c2801$0$14914$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
>I am not making anything up. You stated, that if you broke the law, that
> you would not tell anyone about it.
that is NOT an admission of any guilt. thats simply saying that if i were i
wouldnt admit it. you read more into it than what was placed.
> So you are condemning wolf poachers now, for not following the law?
no. i recognize that they are breaking the law. i simply have respect for
their reasons for doing so, and wish them the best of luck.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:444c2801$0$14914$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
>I am not making anything up. You stated, that if you broke the law, that
> you would not tell anyone about it.
that is NOT an admission of any guilt. thats simply saying that if i were i
wouldnt admit it. you read more into it than what was placed.
> So you are condemning wolf poachers now, for not following the law?
no. i recognize that they are breaking the law. i simply have respect for
their reasons for doing so, and wish them the best of luck.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com