Pink Kate
#941
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Earle Horton" wrote in message
> He doesn't have strong convictions though! He goes with whatever way the
> wind blows, wherever he happens to be. This is not a bad way to be, if
> you
> want to go through life without the bother of moral convictions, but it
> amuses me that he invokes "right" and "wrong" every time. All he cares
> about, is convenience and his own temporary interest. I wish he would
> just
> admit it. He's not really any more righteous, nor does he have any right
> to
> be, than the rest of us.
>
> I find his condemnation of illegal immigrants to be hypocritical too. How
> many HVAC contracts does he lose, every year, to illegal immigrants from
> Saskatchawan?
>
> Earle
Earle,
A few of my own opinions / observations on the preceding arguments:
I'd never presume to tell Nathan that I knew better than he how things
are in his part of the country, any more than I would anyone else. What
gives you or anyone else the right to do that?
At some point, you have to say to yourself; "I don't actually live
there, or, I've never actually done or experienced that myself, so I may not
be the best person to judge or offer up advice on that subject.
I think you can disagree with a persons opinion or point of view without
making a personal attack of everything about them, that includes taking past
statements he may or may not have said about different subjects out of
context.
Bottom line: I think you are attacking him because his opinion differs from
yours.
On the other hand:
I think some folks in here would rather argue a point they have no proof
of, rather than to admit "they don't know", just for the sake of argument,
or the need to always be right, I don't know which.
Example: If I posted my experiences while in Bosnia in 1992-93, I'm
sure of at least three in here (no names) who would dispute what I
experienced first hand, because they read about it in some book somewhere. I
was told it says in books that the US wasn't even over there in 1992-93, so,
my scars on my knee, and the death of two of my closest buddies must not
have happened.
Some books are just someone else's opinion, or biased research, published.
These, as previously stated, are just my opinions.
Spdloader
#942
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
In article <444ce12c_3@newsfeed.slurp.net>,
"Seahag" <Seahag@toadymail.net> wrote:
> One time some teenagers found the body and were using it to
> skeer their girlfriends! Grampa used to throw the heads off
> into the scrub where people weren't able to get to it.
>
> Seahag
My granpma always said to bury the head.
--
Member AAAAAAAA
American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.
"Seahag" <Seahag@toadymail.net> wrote:
> One time some teenagers found the body and were using it to
> skeer their girlfriends! Grampa used to throw the heads off
> into the scrub where people weren't able to get to it.
>
> Seahag
My granpma always said to bury the head.
--
Member AAAAAAAA
American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.
#943
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
In article <444ce12c_3@newsfeed.slurp.net>,
"Seahag" <Seahag@toadymail.net> wrote:
> One time some teenagers found the body and were using it to
> skeer their girlfriends! Grampa used to throw the heads off
> into the scrub where people weren't able to get to it.
>
> Seahag
My granpma always said to bury the head.
--
Member AAAAAAAA
American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.
"Seahag" <Seahag@toadymail.net> wrote:
> One time some teenagers found the body and were using it to
> skeer their girlfriends! Grampa used to throw the heads off
> into the scrub where people weren't able to get to it.
>
> Seahag
My granpma always said to bury the head.
--
Member AAAAAAAA
American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.
#944
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
In article <444ce12c_3@newsfeed.slurp.net>,
"Seahag" <Seahag@toadymail.net> wrote:
> One time some teenagers found the body and were using it to
> skeer their girlfriends! Grampa used to throw the heads off
> into the scrub where people weren't able to get to it.
>
> Seahag
My granpma always said to bury the head.
--
Member AAAAAAAA
American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.
"Seahag" <Seahag@toadymail.net> wrote:
> One time some teenagers found the body and were using it to
> skeer their girlfriends! Grampa used to throw the heads off
> into the scrub where people weren't able to get to it.
>
> Seahag
My granpma always said to bury the head.
--
Member AAAAAAAA
American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.
#945
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:3uqdnWjS-f1BAdHZRVn-vA@comcast.com...
> Yes, but you said you do not break written law, you didn't qualify which
> law. Law is law, is it not?
we're discussing CRIMINAL law and youre trying to spin it in another
direction.
> Illegally downloading music:
> http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm " ...downloading
> copyrighted material without expressed permission is illegal. Such music
> must be purchased in order to be legal."
>
> Interesting how you pick and choose which laws you think are OK to break,
> after saying you don't break written law. Reminds me of Bill Clinton
> arguing about the definition of the word "is."
BZZZT! i asked you for LAW, not some reporters interpretation of law. i
also said i downloaded music, not that i shared it (uploaded). you show me
written law applicable to me making DOWNLOADING music a CRIMINAL act, or you
admit to your mistake. otherwise youre blowing hot air, trying to spin
another issue entirely.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:3uqdnWjS-f1BAdHZRVn-vA@comcast.com...
> Yes, but you said you do not break written law, you didn't qualify which
> law. Law is law, is it not?
we're discussing CRIMINAL law and youre trying to spin it in another
direction.
> Illegally downloading music:
> http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm " ...downloading
> copyrighted material without expressed permission is illegal. Such music
> must be purchased in order to be legal."
>
> Interesting how you pick and choose which laws you think are OK to break,
> after saying you don't break written law. Reminds me of Bill Clinton
> arguing about the definition of the word "is."
BZZZT! i asked you for LAW, not some reporters interpretation of law. i
also said i downloaded music, not that i shared it (uploaded). you show me
written law applicable to me making DOWNLOADING music a CRIMINAL act, or you
admit to your mistake. otherwise youre blowing hot air, trying to spin
another issue entirely.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#946
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:3uqdnWjS-f1BAdHZRVn-vA@comcast.com...
> Yes, but you said you do not break written law, you didn't qualify which
> law. Law is law, is it not?
we're discussing CRIMINAL law and youre trying to spin it in another
direction.
> Illegally downloading music:
> http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm " ...downloading
> copyrighted material without expressed permission is illegal. Such music
> must be purchased in order to be legal."
>
> Interesting how you pick and choose which laws you think are OK to break,
> after saying you don't break written law. Reminds me of Bill Clinton
> arguing about the definition of the word "is."
BZZZT! i asked you for LAW, not some reporters interpretation of law. i
also said i downloaded music, not that i shared it (uploaded). you show me
written law applicable to me making DOWNLOADING music a CRIMINAL act, or you
admit to your mistake. otherwise youre blowing hot air, trying to spin
another issue entirely.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:3uqdnWjS-f1BAdHZRVn-vA@comcast.com...
> Yes, but you said you do not break written law, you didn't qualify which
> law. Law is law, is it not?
we're discussing CRIMINAL law and youre trying to spin it in another
direction.
> Illegally downloading music:
> http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm " ...downloading
> copyrighted material without expressed permission is illegal. Such music
> must be purchased in order to be legal."
>
> Interesting how you pick and choose which laws you think are OK to break,
> after saying you don't break written law. Reminds me of Bill Clinton
> arguing about the definition of the word "is."
BZZZT! i asked you for LAW, not some reporters interpretation of law. i
also said i downloaded music, not that i shared it (uploaded). you show me
written law applicable to me making DOWNLOADING music a CRIMINAL act, or you
admit to your mistake. otherwise youre blowing hot air, trying to spin
another issue entirely.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#947
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:3uqdnWjS-f1BAdHZRVn-vA@comcast.com...
> Yes, but you said you do not break written law, you didn't qualify which
> law. Law is law, is it not?
we're discussing CRIMINAL law and youre trying to spin it in another
direction.
> Illegally downloading music:
> http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm " ...downloading
> copyrighted material without expressed permission is illegal. Such music
> must be purchased in order to be legal."
>
> Interesting how you pick and choose which laws you think are OK to break,
> after saying you don't break written law. Reminds me of Bill Clinton
> arguing about the definition of the word "is."
BZZZT! i asked you for LAW, not some reporters interpretation of law. i
also said i downloaded music, not that i shared it (uploaded). you show me
written law applicable to me making DOWNLOADING music a CRIMINAL act, or you
admit to your mistake. otherwise youre blowing hot air, trying to spin
another issue entirely.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:3uqdnWjS-f1BAdHZRVn-vA@comcast.com...
> Yes, but you said you do not break written law, you didn't qualify which
> law. Law is law, is it not?
we're discussing CRIMINAL law and youre trying to spin it in another
direction.
> Illegally downloading music:
> http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm " ...downloading
> copyrighted material without expressed permission is illegal. Such music
> must be purchased in order to be legal."
>
> Interesting how you pick and choose which laws you think are OK to break,
> after saying you don't break written law. Reminds me of Bill Clinton
> arguing about the definition of the word "is."
BZZZT! i asked you for LAW, not some reporters interpretation of law. i
also said i downloaded music, not that i shared it (uploaded). you show me
written law applicable to me making DOWNLOADING music a CRIMINAL act, or you
admit to your mistake. otherwise youre blowing hot air, trying to spin
another issue entirely.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#948
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:444cd755$0$14877$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> You stole something.
show me written law applicable to me making DOWNLOADING music a CRIMINAL act
or shut up about it because youre just blowing hot air in a pitiful cling
for SOMETHING because you cant find anything of substance to gig me on. try
again earle.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
It doesn't matter whether you were prosecuted or not.
> You say that illegal immigrants are criminals too, but they aren't
> prosecuted either. They are just deported, to try again later. They must
> not be doing anything wrong then.
>
> If you want to have a discussion, you should try using logical arguments,
> rather than shooting from the hip every time. It is so easy to get you to
> contradict yourself, and then you make up some argument, to prove that you
> really didn't do so. You are ridiculous, Nathan.
>
> Earle
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:3uqdnWjS-f1BAdHZRVn-vA@comcast.com...
>>
>>
>> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
>> news:5vY2g.128$KO6.21658@news.uswest.net...
>> > "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> > news:lu2dnfFHec2S2dHZnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>> >> Trademark disputes are based on trademark law.
>> >
>> > we arent discussing trademak law. we are discussing CRIMINAL law.
> there
>> > is a distinct difference. earle labelled me a "criminal" which
>> > requires
> a
>> > violation of CRIMINAL law.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, but you said you do not break written law, you didn't qualify which
>> law. Law is law, is it not?
>>
>> >>Yes it was a civil matter but that's how trademark cases are handled.
> You
>> >>use someone else's trademark, that's a violation of the law.
>> >>
>> >> How about your admitted theft of intellectual property?
>> >
>> > show me any case anywhere that a person was prosecuted for downloading
>> > music. otherwise youre blowing hot air. hell yes ive downloaded music
>> > off the internet. show me where that is CRIMINAL, or admit to your
>> > mistake.
>> >
>>
>> Illegally downloading music:
>> http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm " ...downloading
>> copyrighted material without expressed permission is illegal. Such music
>> must be purchased in order to be legal."
>>
>> Interesting how you pick and choose which laws you think are OK to break,
>> after saying you don't break written law. Reminds me of Bill Clinton
> arguing
>> about the definition of the word "is."
>>
>>
>
>
news:444cd755$0$14877$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> You stole something.
show me written law applicable to me making DOWNLOADING music a CRIMINAL act
or shut up about it because youre just blowing hot air in a pitiful cling
for SOMETHING because you cant find anything of substance to gig me on. try
again earle.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
It doesn't matter whether you were prosecuted or not.
> You say that illegal immigrants are criminals too, but they aren't
> prosecuted either. They are just deported, to try again later. They must
> not be doing anything wrong then.
>
> If you want to have a discussion, you should try using logical arguments,
> rather than shooting from the hip every time. It is so easy to get you to
> contradict yourself, and then you make up some argument, to prove that you
> really didn't do so. You are ridiculous, Nathan.
>
> Earle
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:3uqdnWjS-f1BAdHZRVn-vA@comcast.com...
>>
>>
>> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
>> news:5vY2g.128$KO6.21658@news.uswest.net...
>> > "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> > news:lu2dnfFHec2S2dHZnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>> >> Trademark disputes are based on trademark law.
>> >
>> > we arent discussing trademak law. we are discussing CRIMINAL law.
> there
>> > is a distinct difference. earle labelled me a "criminal" which
>> > requires
> a
>> > violation of CRIMINAL law.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, but you said you do not break written law, you didn't qualify which
>> law. Law is law, is it not?
>>
>> >>Yes it was a civil matter but that's how trademark cases are handled.
> You
>> >>use someone else's trademark, that's a violation of the law.
>> >>
>> >> How about your admitted theft of intellectual property?
>> >
>> > show me any case anywhere that a person was prosecuted for downloading
>> > music. otherwise youre blowing hot air. hell yes ive downloaded music
>> > off the internet. show me where that is CRIMINAL, or admit to your
>> > mistake.
>> >
>>
>> Illegally downloading music:
>> http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm " ...downloading
>> copyrighted material without expressed permission is illegal. Such music
>> must be purchased in order to be legal."
>>
>> Interesting how you pick and choose which laws you think are OK to break,
>> after saying you don't break written law. Reminds me of Bill Clinton
> arguing
>> about the definition of the word "is."
>>
>>
>
>
#949
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:444cd755$0$14877$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> You stole something.
show me written law applicable to me making DOWNLOADING music a CRIMINAL act
or shut up about it because youre just blowing hot air in a pitiful cling
for SOMETHING because you cant find anything of substance to gig me on. try
again earle.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
It doesn't matter whether you were prosecuted or not.
> You say that illegal immigrants are criminals too, but they aren't
> prosecuted either. They are just deported, to try again later. They must
> not be doing anything wrong then.
>
> If you want to have a discussion, you should try using logical arguments,
> rather than shooting from the hip every time. It is so easy to get you to
> contradict yourself, and then you make up some argument, to prove that you
> really didn't do so. You are ridiculous, Nathan.
>
> Earle
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:3uqdnWjS-f1BAdHZRVn-vA@comcast.com...
>>
>>
>> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
>> news:5vY2g.128$KO6.21658@news.uswest.net...
>> > "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> > news:lu2dnfFHec2S2dHZnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>> >> Trademark disputes are based on trademark law.
>> >
>> > we arent discussing trademak law. we are discussing CRIMINAL law.
> there
>> > is a distinct difference. earle labelled me a "criminal" which
>> > requires
> a
>> > violation of CRIMINAL law.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, but you said you do not break written law, you didn't qualify which
>> law. Law is law, is it not?
>>
>> >>Yes it was a civil matter but that's how trademark cases are handled.
> You
>> >>use someone else's trademark, that's a violation of the law.
>> >>
>> >> How about your admitted theft of intellectual property?
>> >
>> > show me any case anywhere that a person was prosecuted for downloading
>> > music. otherwise youre blowing hot air. hell yes ive downloaded music
>> > off the internet. show me where that is CRIMINAL, or admit to your
>> > mistake.
>> >
>>
>> Illegally downloading music:
>> http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm " ...downloading
>> copyrighted material without expressed permission is illegal. Such music
>> must be purchased in order to be legal."
>>
>> Interesting how you pick and choose which laws you think are OK to break,
>> after saying you don't break written law. Reminds me of Bill Clinton
> arguing
>> about the definition of the word "is."
>>
>>
>
>
news:444cd755$0$14877$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> You stole something.
show me written law applicable to me making DOWNLOADING music a CRIMINAL act
or shut up about it because youre just blowing hot air in a pitiful cling
for SOMETHING because you cant find anything of substance to gig me on. try
again earle.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
It doesn't matter whether you were prosecuted or not.
> You say that illegal immigrants are criminals too, but they aren't
> prosecuted either. They are just deported, to try again later. They must
> not be doing anything wrong then.
>
> If you want to have a discussion, you should try using logical arguments,
> rather than shooting from the hip every time. It is so easy to get you to
> contradict yourself, and then you make up some argument, to prove that you
> really didn't do so. You are ridiculous, Nathan.
>
> Earle
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:3uqdnWjS-f1BAdHZRVn-vA@comcast.com...
>>
>>
>> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
>> news:5vY2g.128$KO6.21658@news.uswest.net...
>> > "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> > news:lu2dnfFHec2S2dHZnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>> >> Trademark disputes are based on trademark law.
>> >
>> > we arent discussing trademak law. we are discussing CRIMINAL law.
> there
>> > is a distinct difference. earle labelled me a "criminal" which
>> > requires
> a
>> > violation of CRIMINAL law.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, but you said you do not break written law, you didn't qualify which
>> law. Law is law, is it not?
>>
>> >>Yes it was a civil matter but that's how trademark cases are handled.
> You
>> >>use someone else's trademark, that's a violation of the law.
>> >>
>> >> How about your admitted theft of intellectual property?
>> >
>> > show me any case anywhere that a person was prosecuted for downloading
>> > music. otherwise youre blowing hot air. hell yes ive downloaded music
>> > off the internet. show me where that is CRIMINAL, or admit to your
>> > mistake.
>> >
>>
>> Illegally downloading music:
>> http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm " ...downloading
>> copyrighted material without expressed permission is illegal. Such music
>> must be purchased in order to be legal."
>>
>> Interesting how you pick and choose which laws you think are OK to break,
>> after saying you don't break written law. Reminds me of Bill Clinton
> arguing
>> about the definition of the word "is."
>>
>>
>
>
#950
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:444cd755$0$14877$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> You stole something.
show me written law applicable to me making DOWNLOADING music a CRIMINAL act
or shut up about it because youre just blowing hot air in a pitiful cling
for SOMETHING because you cant find anything of substance to gig me on. try
again earle.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
It doesn't matter whether you were prosecuted or not.
> You say that illegal immigrants are criminals too, but they aren't
> prosecuted either. They are just deported, to try again later. They must
> not be doing anything wrong then.
>
> If you want to have a discussion, you should try using logical arguments,
> rather than shooting from the hip every time. It is so easy to get you to
> contradict yourself, and then you make up some argument, to prove that you
> really didn't do so. You are ridiculous, Nathan.
>
> Earle
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:3uqdnWjS-f1BAdHZRVn-vA@comcast.com...
>>
>>
>> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
>> news:5vY2g.128$KO6.21658@news.uswest.net...
>> > "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> > news:lu2dnfFHec2S2dHZnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>> >> Trademark disputes are based on trademark law.
>> >
>> > we arent discussing trademak law. we are discussing CRIMINAL law.
> there
>> > is a distinct difference. earle labelled me a "criminal" which
>> > requires
> a
>> > violation of CRIMINAL law.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, but you said you do not break written law, you didn't qualify which
>> law. Law is law, is it not?
>>
>> >>Yes it was a civil matter but that's how trademark cases are handled.
> You
>> >>use someone else's trademark, that's a violation of the law.
>> >>
>> >> How about your admitted theft of intellectual property?
>> >
>> > show me any case anywhere that a person was prosecuted for downloading
>> > music. otherwise youre blowing hot air. hell yes ive downloaded music
>> > off the internet. show me where that is CRIMINAL, or admit to your
>> > mistake.
>> >
>>
>> Illegally downloading music:
>> http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm " ...downloading
>> copyrighted material without expressed permission is illegal. Such music
>> must be purchased in order to be legal."
>>
>> Interesting how you pick and choose which laws you think are OK to break,
>> after saying you don't break written law. Reminds me of Bill Clinton
> arguing
>> about the definition of the word "is."
>>
>>
>
>
news:444cd755$0$14877$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> You stole something.
show me written law applicable to me making DOWNLOADING music a CRIMINAL act
or shut up about it because youre just blowing hot air in a pitiful cling
for SOMETHING because you cant find anything of substance to gig me on. try
again earle.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
It doesn't matter whether you were prosecuted or not.
> You say that illegal immigrants are criminals too, but they aren't
> prosecuted either. They are just deported, to try again later. They must
> not be doing anything wrong then.
>
> If you want to have a discussion, you should try using logical arguments,
> rather than shooting from the hip every time. It is so easy to get you to
> contradict yourself, and then you make up some argument, to prove that you
> really didn't do so. You are ridiculous, Nathan.
>
> Earle
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:3uqdnWjS-f1BAdHZRVn-vA@comcast.com...
>>
>>
>> "Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
>> news:5vY2g.128$KO6.21658@news.uswest.net...
>> > "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> > news:lu2dnfFHec2S2dHZnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>> >> Trademark disputes are based on trademark law.
>> >
>> > we arent discussing trademak law. we are discussing CRIMINAL law.
> there
>> > is a distinct difference. earle labelled me a "criminal" which
>> > requires
> a
>> > violation of CRIMINAL law.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, but you said you do not break written law, you didn't qualify which
>> law. Law is law, is it not?
>>
>> >>Yes it was a civil matter but that's how trademark cases are handled.
> You
>> >>use someone else's trademark, that's a violation of the law.
>> >>
>> >> How about your admitted theft of intellectual property?
>> >
>> > show me any case anywhere that a person was prosecuted for downloading
>> > music. otherwise youre blowing hot air. hell yes ive downloaded music
>> > off the internet. show me where that is CRIMINAL, or admit to your
>> > mistake.
>> >
>>
>> Illegally downloading music:
>> http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm " ...downloading
>> copyrighted material without expressed permission is illegal. Such music
>> must be purchased in order to be legal."
>>
>> Interesting how you pick and choose which laws you think are OK to break,
>> after saying you don't break written law. Reminds me of Bill Clinton
> arguing
>> about the definition of the word "is."
>>
>>
>
>