Pink Kate
#1051
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:U773g.7074$Sa1.26@tornado.southeast.rr.com...
> I'll ignore the obvious insults, and say you are wrong to think you are
> the only one who is capable of objectivity, and you are foolish to think
> someone with first hand experience doesn't know what he's talking about.
aw c'mon....earle reads books. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:U773g.7074$Sa1.26@tornado.southeast.rr.com...
> I'll ignore the obvious insults, and say you are wrong to think you are
> the only one who is capable of objectivity, and you are foolish to think
> someone with first hand experience doesn't know what he's talking about.
aw c'mon....earle reads books. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#1052
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:U773g.7074$Sa1.26@tornado.southeast.rr.com...
> I'll ignore the obvious insults, and say you are wrong to think you are
> the only one who is capable of objectivity, and you are foolish to think
> someone with first hand experience doesn't know what he's talking about.
aw c'mon....earle reads books. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:U773g.7074$Sa1.26@tornado.southeast.rr.com...
> I'll ignore the obvious insults, and say you are wrong to think you are
> the only one who is capable of objectivity, and you are foolish to think
> someone with first hand experience doesn't know what he's talking about.
aw c'mon....earle reads books. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#1053
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:444d663d$0$24430$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> I did **not** say that "someone with
> first hand experience doesn't know what he's talking about".
in news:444cee68$0$14957$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om you said:
". You don't know everything, just because "You were there". In fact,
"Because you were on the ground", you lack objectivity"
sure sounds like you said he doesnt know what hes talking about to me. :-)
> They fixate on details, like a dead elk, and jump
> to the "obvious" conclusion, "Wolves did it!"
and what about when the wolves are shot dead when caught in the middle of
the act? why do you continue to avoid answering that?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:444d663d$0$24430$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> I did **not** say that "someone with
> first hand experience doesn't know what he's talking about".
in news:444cee68$0$14957$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om you said:
". You don't know everything, just because "You were there". In fact,
"Because you were on the ground", you lack objectivity"
sure sounds like you said he doesnt know what hes talking about to me. :-)
> They fixate on details, like a dead elk, and jump
> to the "obvious" conclusion, "Wolves did it!"
and what about when the wolves are shot dead when caught in the middle of
the act? why do you continue to avoid answering that?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#1054
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:444d663d$0$24430$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> I did **not** say that "someone with
> first hand experience doesn't know what he's talking about".
in news:444cee68$0$14957$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om you said:
". You don't know everything, just because "You were there". In fact,
"Because you were on the ground", you lack objectivity"
sure sounds like you said he doesnt know what hes talking about to me. :-)
> They fixate on details, like a dead elk, and jump
> to the "obvious" conclusion, "Wolves did it!"
and what about when the wolves are shot dead when caught in the middle of
the act? why do you continue to avoid answering that?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:444d663d$0$24430$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> I did **not** say that "someone with
> first hand experience doesn't know what he's talking about".
in news:444cee68$0$14957$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om you said:
". You don't know everything, just because "You were there". In fact,
"Because you were on the ground", you lack objectivity"
sure sounds like you said he doesnt know what hes talking about to me. :-)
> They fixate on details, like a dead elk, and jump
> to the "obvious" conclusion, "Wolves did it!"
and what about when the wolves are shot dead when caught in the middle of
the act? why do you continue to avoid answering that?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#1055
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:444d663d$0$24430$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> I did **not** say that "someone with
> first hand experience doesn't know what he's talking about".
in news:444cee68$0$14957$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om you said:
". You don't know everything, just because "You were there". In fact,
"Because you were on the ground", you lack objectivity"
sure sounds like you said he doesnt know what hes talking about to me. :-)
> They fixate on details, like a dead elk, and jump
> to the "obvious" conclusion, "Wolves did it!"
and what about when the wolves are shot dead when caught in the middle of
the act? why do you continue to avoid answering that?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:444d663d$0$24430$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> I did **not** say that "someone with
> first hand experience doesn't know what he's talking about".
in news:444cee68$0$14957$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om you said:
". You don't know everything, just because "You were there". In fact,
"Because you were on the ground", you lack objectivity"
sure sounds like you said he doesnt know what hes talking about to me. :-)
> They fixate on details, like a dead elk, and jump
> to the "obvious" conclusion, "Wolves did it!"
and what about when the wolves are shot dead when caught in the middle of
the act? why do you continue to avoid answering that?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#1056
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:maadnWvhMKoMztDZnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Title 17 of the US Code:
> http://www.copyright.gov/title17/
>
> In a nutshell
dont give me "in a nutshell" --------. here is what i found from your link:
"by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during
any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more
copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000,"
reproducing and distributing means UPLOADING. i asked you SPECIFICALLY for
a law that made me a criminal for downloading music and you have not
provided one. also, law is not retroactive, so find one that was in place
at the time i made the statement that you quoted. have fun looking, when
you realize that you can please have the integrity to admit to your error.
and then tell us that you never downloaded ANYTHING so that you dont appear
to be a hypocrite.
> Why don't you tell Kate why DC threatened you with a lawsuit?
um, i did several posts up. i was out earning a living and couldnt respond
every 5 minutes.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:maadnWvhMKoMztDZnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Title 17 of the US Code:
> http://www.copyright.gov/title17/
>
> In a nutshell
dont give me "in a nutshell" --------. here is what i found from your link:
"by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during
any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more
copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000,"
reproducing and distributing means UPLOADING. i asked you SPECIFICALLY for
a law that made me a criminal for downloading music and you have not
provided one. also, law is not retroactive, so find one that was in place
at the time i made the statement that you quoted. have fun looking, when
you realize that you can please have the integrity to admit to your error.
and then tell us that you never downloaded ANYTHING so that you dont appear
to be a hypocrite.
> Why don't you tell Kate why DC threatened you with a lawsuit?
um, i did several posts up. i was out earning a living and couldnt respond
every 5 minutes.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#1057
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:maadnWvhMKoMztDZnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Title 17 of the US Code:
> http://www.copyright.gov/title17/
>
> In a nutshell
dont give me "in a nutshell" --------. here is what i found from your link:
"by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during
any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more
copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000,"
reproducing and distributing means UPLOADING. i asked you SPECIFICALLY for
a law that made me a criminal for downloading music and you have not
provided one. also, law is not retroactive, so find one that was in place
at the time i made the statement that you quoted. have fun looking, when
you realize that you can please have the integrity to admit to your error.
and then tell us that you never downloaded ANYTHING so that you dont appear
to be a hypocrite.
> Why don't you tell Kate why DC threatened you with a lawsuit?
um, i did several posts up. i was out earning a living and couldnt respond
every 5 minutes.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:maadnWvhMKoMztDZnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Title 17 of the US Code:
> http://www.copyright.gov/title17/
>
> In a nutshell
dont give me "in a nutshell" --------. here is what i found from your link:
"by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during
any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more
copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000,"
reproducing and distributing means UPLOADING. i asked you SPECIFICALLY for
a law that made me a criminal for downloading music and you have not
provided one. also, law is not retroactive, so find one that was in place
at the time i made the statement that you quoted. have fun looking, when
you realize that you can please have the integrity to admit to your error.
and then tell us that you never downloaded ANYTHING so that you dont appear
to be a hypocrite.
> Why don't you tell Kate why DC threatened you with a lawsuit?
um, i did several posts up. i was out earning a living and couldnt respond
every 5 minutes.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#1058
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:maadnWvhMKoMztDZnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Title 17 of the US Code:
> http://www.copyright.gov/title17/
>
> In a nutshell
dont give me "in a nutshell" --------. here is what i found from your link:
"by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during
any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more
copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000,"
reproducing and distributing means UPLOADING. i asked you SPECIFICALLY for
a law that made me a criminal for downloading music and you have not
provided one. also, law is not retroactive, so find one that was in place
at the time i made the statement that you quoted. have fun looking, when
you realize that you can please have the integrity to admit to your error.
and then tell us that you never downloaded ANYTHING so that you dont appear
to be a hypocrite.
> Why don't you tell Kate why DC threatened you with a lawsuit?
um, i did several posts up. i was out earning a living and couldnt respond
every 5 minutes.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:maadnWvhMKoMztDZnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Title 17 of the US Code:
> http://www.copyright.gov/title17/
>
> In a nutshell
dont give me "in a nutshell" --------. here is what i found from your link:
"by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during
any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more
copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000,"
reproducing and distributing means UPLOADING. i asked you SPECIFICALLY for
a law that made me a criminal for downloading music and you have not
provided one. also, law is not retroactive, so find one that was in place
at the time i made the statement that you quoted. have fun looking, when
you realize that you can please have the integrity to admit to your error.
and then tell us that you never downloaded ANYTHING so that you dont appear
to be a hypocrite.
> Why don't you tell Kate why DC threatened you with a lawsuit?
um, i did several posts up. i was out earning a living and couldnt respond
every 5 minutes.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#1059
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:loydnXTNXsWl8tDZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
> permission and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing
> programs like the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright
> infringement, which is illegal.
downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. now please
quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music that was
in place at the time i made the statement that you quoted.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:loydnXTNXsWl8tDZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
> permission and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing
> programs like the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright
> infringement, which is illegal.
downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. now please
quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music that was
in place at the time i made the statement that you quoted.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
#1060
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:loydnXTNXsWl8tDZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
> permission and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing
> programs like the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright
> infringement, which is illegal.
downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. now please
quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music that was
in place at the time i made the statement that you quoted.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:loydnXTNXsWl8tDZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
> permission and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing
> programs like the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright
> infringement, which is illegal.
downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. now please
quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music that was
in place at the time i made the statement that you quoted.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com