Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bnmoah$12evp5$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:vpters43g2722a@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> ---snippy---
> > Perhaps if you had both intelligence and an open mind we could have
> > an intelligent conversation. However you are to stupid to realize how
> > ignorant you are. A PHd does not make you intelligent LP, nor is one
> > required to have an informed discussion about any topic you care to
> > name. I would bet hard money my IQ is far greater than yours, care
> > to post yours?
> >
> Please, let's not descend to the level of posting IQ scores on the
Internet.
> That would be really crass.
If Lloyd claims an IQ higher than 80 no one will believe him anyway.
>
> Earle
> http://earleh.tripod.com/w2.html
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bnmoah$12evp5$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:vpters43g2722a@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> ---snippy---
> > Perhaps if you had both intelligence and an open mind we could have
> > an intelligent conversation. However you are to stupid to realize how
> > ignorant you are. A PHd does not make you intelligent LP, nor is one
> > required to have an informed discussion about any topic you care to
> > name. I would bet hard money my IQ is far greater than yours, care
> > to post yours?
> >
> Please, let's not descend to the level of posting IQ scores on the
Internet.
> That would be really crass.
If Lloyd claims an IQ higher than 80 no one will believe him anyway.
>
> Earle
> http://earleh.tripod.com/w2.html
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bnmoah$12evp5$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:vpters43g2722a@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> ---snippy---
> > Perhaps if you had both intelligence and an open mind we could have
> > an intelligent conversation. However you are to stupid to realize how
> > ignorant you are. A PHd does not make you intelligent LP, nor is one
> > required to have an informed discussion about any topic you care to
> > name. I would bet hard money my IQ is far greater than yours, care
> > to post yours?
> >
> Please, let's not descend to the level of posting IQ scores on the
Internet.
> That would be really crass.
If Lloyd claims an IQ higher than 80 no one will believe him anyway.
>
> Earle
> http://earleh.tripod.com/w2.html
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
"The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote in message
news:vpu30r4o2ksq3f@corp.supernews.com...
---snippy---
> If Lloyd claims an IQ higher than 80 no one will believe him
> anyway.
>
Lloyd, no one will believe that it's that HIGH, get it?
Earle
news:vpu30r4o2ksq3f@corp.supernews.com...
---snippy---
> If Lloyd claims an IQ higher than 80 no one will believe him
> anyway.
>
Lloyd, no one will believe that it's that HIGH, get it?
Earle
Guest
Posts: n/a
"The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote in message
news:vpu30r4o2ksq3f@corp.supernews.com...
---snippy---
> If Lloyd claims an IQ higher than 80 no one will believe him
> anyway.
>
Lloyd, no one will believe that it's that HIGH, get it?
Earle
news:vpu30r4o2ksq3f@corp.supernews.com...
---snippy---
> If Lloyd claims an IQ higher than 80 no one will believe him
> anyway.
>
Lloyd, no one will believe that it's that HIGH, get it?
Earle
Guest
Posts: n/a
"The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote in message
news:vpu30r4o2ksq3f@corp.supernews.com...
---snippy---
> If Lloyd claims an IQ higher than 80 no one will believe him
> anyway.
>
Lloyd, no one will believe that it's that HIGH, get it?
Earle
news:vpu30r4o2ksq3f@corp.supernews.com...
---snippy---
> If Lloyd claims an IQ higher than 80 no one will believe him
> anyway.
>
Lloyd, no one will believe that it's that HIGH, get it?
Earle
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <bnn0hd01qbc@enews4.newsguy.com>, Gerald G. McGeorge wrote:
> I will point out that Mr Parker has conveniently ignored my point re: the
> Sahara's transformation from a lush, green oasis into a desert some 7 - 10k
> years ago. The Sahara was created by totally naturally occuring changes in
> weather patterns that had NOTHING to do with the insignificant effects of
> man. It just must be really hard for people like this to grasp that in the
> total scheme of things, man and his puny, insignificant activities really
> don't matter at all.
Man is however a factor and alot mismangement of natural resources and
spewing of toxins hasn't done any good. And sum total of all people
is not without some effect. The question is wether or not this is
significant in the face of stronger factors such as the sun and the
earth itself that have resulted in countless climate changes throughout
the history of the planet. That question is unanswered.
> I will point out that Mr Parker has conveniently ignored my point re: the
> Sahara's transformation from a lush, green oasis into a desert some 7 - 10k
> years ago. The Sahara was created by totally naturally occuring changes in
> weather patterns that had NOTHING to do with the insignificant effects of
> man. It just must be really hard for people like this to grasp that in the
> total scheme of things, man and his puny, insignificant activities really
> don't matter at all.
Man is however a factor and alot mismangement of natural resources and
spewing of toxins hasn't done any good. And sum total of all people
is not without some effect. The question is wether or not this is
significant in the face of stronger factors such as the sun and the
earth itself that have resulted in countless climate changes throughout
the history of the planet. That question is unanswered.
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <bnn0hd01qbc@enews4.newsguy.com>, Gerald G. McGeorge wrote:
> I will point out that Mr Parker has conveniently ignored my point re: the
> Sahara's transformation from a lush, green oasis into a desert some 7 - 10k
> years ago. The Sahara was created by totally naturally occuring changes in
> weather patterns that had NOTHING to do with the insignificant effects of
> man. It just must be really hard for people like this to grasp that in the
> total scheme of things, man and his puny, insignificant activities really
> don't matter at all.
Man is however a factor and alot mismangement of natural resources and
spewing of toxins hasn't done any good. And sum total of all people
is not without some effect. The question is wether or not this is
significant in the face of stronger factors such as the sun and the
earth itself that have resulted in countless climate changes throughout
the history of the planet. That question is unanswered.
> I will point out that Mr Parker has conveniently ignored my point re: the
> Sahara's transformation from a lush, green oasis into a desert some 7 - 10k
> years ago. The Sahara was created by totally naturally occuring changes in
> weather patterns that had NOTHING to do with the insignificant effects of
> man. It just must be really hard for people like this to grasp that in the
> total scheme of things, man and his puny, insignificant activities really
> don't matter at all.
Man is however a factor and alot mismangement of natural resources and
spewing of toxins hasn't done any good. And sum total of all people
is not without some effect. The question is wether or not this is
significant in the face of stronger factors such as the sun and the
earth itself that have resulted in countless climate changes throughout
the history of the planet. That question is unanswered.
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <bnn0hd01qbc@enews4.newsguy.com>, Gerald G. McGeorge wrote:
> I will point out that Mr Parker has conveniently ignored my point re: the
> Sahara's transformation from a lush, green oasis into a desert some 7 - 10k
> years ago. The Sahara was created by totally naturally occuring changes in
> weather patterns that had NOTHING to do with the insignificant effects of
> man. It just must be really hard for people like this to grasp that in the
> total scheme of things, man and his puny, insignificant activities really
> don't matter at all.
Man is however a factor and alot mismangement of natural resources and
spewing of toxins hasn't done any good. And sum total of all people
is not without some effect. The question is wether or not this is
significant in the face of stronger factors such as the sun and the
earth itself that have resulted in countless climate changes throughout
the history of the planet. That question is unanswered.
> I will point out that Mr Parker has conveniently ignored my point re: the
> Sahara's transformation from a lush, green oasis into a desert some 7 - 10k
> years ago. The Sahara was created by totally naturally occuring changes in
> weather patterns that had NOTHING to do with the insignificant effects of
> man. It just must be really hard for people like this to grasp that in the
> total scheme of things, man and his puny, insignificant activities really
> don't matter at all.
Man is however a factor and alot mismangement of natural resources and
spewing of toxins hasn't done any good. And sum total of all people
is not without some effect. The question is wether or not this is
significant in the face of stronger factors such as the sun and the
earth itself that have resulted in countless climate changes throughout
the history of the planet. That question is unanswered.


