Gas... Stick it to 'em
#211
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas... Stick it to 'em
Anyone that had the least little bit of knowledge about oil, and an
idea as to how to solve it would automatically think Alaskan shelf, no
matter what the bleeding heart liberals, YOU put out there.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Fred W." wrote:
> Cool. I had no problem reading that at all. But Acronyms can be a bit
> tough if the letters are wrong...
idea as to how to solve it would automatically think Alaskan shelf, no
matter what the bleeding heart liberals, YOU put out there.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Fred W." wrote:
> Cool. I had no problem reading that at all. But Acronyms can be a bit
> tough if the letters are wrong...
#212
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas... Stick it to 'em
Anyone that had the least little bit of knowledge about oil, and an
idea as to how to solve it would automatically think Alaskan shelf, no
matter what the bleeding heart liberals, YOU put out there.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Fred W." wrote:
> Cool. I had no problem reading that at all. But Acronyms can be a bit
> tough if the letters are wrong...
idea as to how to solve it would automatically think Alaskan shelf, no
matter what the bleeding heart liberals, YOU put out there.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Fred W." wrote:
> Cool. I had no problem reading that at all. But Acronyms can be a bit
> tough if the letters are wrong...
#213
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas... Stick it to 'em
Anyone that had the least little bit of knowledge about oil, and an
idea as to how to solve it would automatically think Alaskan shelf, no
matter what the bleeding heart liberals, YOU put out there.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Fred W." wrote:
> Cool. I had no problem reading that at all. But Acronyms can be a bit
> tough if the letters are wrong...
idea as to how to solve it would automatically think Alaskan shelf, no
matter what the bleeding heart liberals, YOU put out there.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Fred W." wrote:
> Cool. I had no problem reading that at all. But Acronyms can be a bit
> tough if the letters are wrong...
#214
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas... Stick it to 'em
>
> "Fred W." wrote:
> > Cool. I had no problem reading that at all. But Acronyms can be a bit
> > tough if the letters are wrong...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40AE5652.ABF39A6C@***.net...
> Anyone that had the least little bit of knowledge about oil, and an
> idea as to how to solve it would automatically think Alaskan shelf, no
> matter what the bleeding heart liberals, YOU put out there.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Huh? I don't know where this viscous rumor came from. I'm no liberal. In
fact, I'm a staunch NH republican. I just didn't understand the acronym...
-Fred W
(from the "Live Free or Die" state)
#215
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas... Stick it to 'em
>
> "Fred W." wrote:
> > Cool. I had no problem reading that at all. But Acronyms can be a bit
> > tough if the letters are wrong...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40AE5652.ABF39A6C@***.net...
> Anyone that had the least little bit of knowledge about oil, and an
> idea as to how to solve it would automatically think Alaskan shelf, no
> matter what the bleeding heart liberals, YOU put out there.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Huh? I don't know where this viscous rumor came from. I'm no liberal. In
fact, I'm a staunch NH republican. I just didn't understand the acronym...
-Fred W
(from the "Live Free or Die" state)
#216
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas... Stick it to 'em
>
> "Fred W." wrote:
> > Cool. I had no problem reading that at all. But Acronyms can be a bit
> > tough if the letters are wrong...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40AE5652.ABF39A6C@***.net...
> Anyone that had the least little bit of knowledge about oil, and an
> idea as to how to solve it would automatically think Alaskan shelf, no
> matter what the bleeding heart liberals, YOU put out there.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Huh? I don't know where this viscous rumor came from. I'm no liberal. In
fact, I'm a staunch NH republican. I just didn't understand the acronym...
-Fred W
(from the "Live Free or Die" state)
#217
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas... Stick it to 'em
>
> "Fred W." wrote:
> > Cool. I had no problem reading that at all. But Acronyms can be a bit
> > tough if the letters are wrong...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40AE5652.ABF39A6C@***.net...
> Anyone that had the least little bit of knowledge about oil, and an
> idea as to how to solve it would automatically think Alaskan shelf, no
> matter what the bleeding heart liberals, YOU put out there.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Huh? I don't know where this viscous rumor came from. I'm no liberal. In
fact, I'm a staunch NH republican. I just didn't understand the acronym...
-Fred W
(from the "Live Free or Die" state)
#218
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas... Stick it to 'em
On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:05:33 -0400, "Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam
myrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>"Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
>news:qc5qa0drf0mltq606h3i9koe3v0m6latch@4ax.com.. .
>> On Thu, 20 May 2004 15:25:36 -0400, "Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam
>> myrealbox.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >Ride a bicycle or walk.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I don't think it would be a good idea to do either for me. I live 20
>> >> miles from work and 95% of that distance is via a highway with 65 mph
>> >> speed limit, no bicycles allowed.
>> >
>> >I'll bet there are back roads you could take to cover that 20 miles.
>>
>> Sure, and then it woud be closer to 30 miles than 20.
>>
>> >Besides, 20 miles isn't all that far on a bike. Once you get in shape
>you
>> >should be able to cover it in a little over an hour...
>>
>> Get real. Ride a bike 60 miles a day round trip to work every day?
>> You're not very bright, are you?
>>
>> >
>> >Another idea... move closer to work?
>>
>> Hahahaha! You ain't from around here.
>>
>> >
>> >Nah! That would be unAmerican
>>
>> No, that would be stupid. You are obviously totally unfamiliar with
>> this area and a little thing we like to call "the real world." I
>> drive an economy car to work that gets about 35 mpg so it costs me
>> barely over $2 a day in gas to do the round trip. You know how stupid
>> it sounds when you say I should just pack up and move closer to work
>> to a house that costs 30-40% more than the one I have for the same
>> square footage just so I could ride a bike to work? Let me give you a
>> clue. It sounds VERY stupid. Because it IS. Don't call me
>> un-American because I drive to work, tree-hugger. I'm glad I could
>> clear that up for you.
>
>Shaggy Shagster! Simma-dow-now! I was only *kidding*!
Well I guess you're just not as funny as you think you are. There
was no way to tell from your post that you were kidding. I'm not
sure how you think anyone should know you were "kidding" when you say
stuff like "Ride a bicycle or walk." and "I'll bet there are back
roads you could take to cover that 20 miles." and "Besides, 20 miles
isn't all that far on a bike. Once you get in shape you should be
able to cover it in a little over an hour..." and "Another idea...
move closer to work? Nah! That would be unAmerican." Don't take any
of this personally. After all, I'm just *kidding*.
>
>It absolutely would not be impossible (or stupid) to ride a bike 30 miles to
>and from work. I know some guys that do that (when it's nice out) because
>they *enjoy* it. That doesn't mean I would expect anyone to do it to just
>to save gas. That *would* be stupid.
>
>Reread my message above. I said it would be unAmerican to *not* commute a
>long way to work. That means I was calling you *American*. Jeeze. You got
>a problem with that?
You should be a lawyer. :-)
>
>I have a zero mile commute, so I am the one that doesn't meet the American
>norm. But it's not because I'm a tree-hugger, far from it. Heck, I think I
>own almost every gasoline powered conveyance and toy available (and in
>numbers) and use them all regularly. It's because I could finagle a job
>where I don't have to waste the 2 hours a day driving to and from work that
>I used to. I value my time much more than $2.00 a gallon gasoline.
So you stuff envelopes for a living. Congratulations. Just kidding.
Hey, I like this kidding stuff! :-)
>
>By the way, about the only thing you "cleared up" in your reply was that you
>have a short fuse and can't derive the context of messages very well.
I'm glad you cleared that up for me. No go stuff an envelope. Just
kidding! heh heh
>
>Fred W
>
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
and furthermore always carry a small snake.
- W.C. Fields
myrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>"Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
>news:qc5qa0drf0mltq606h3i9koe3v0m6latch@4ax.com.. .
>> On Thu, 20 May 2004 15:25:36 -0400, "Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam
>> myrealbox.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >Ride a bicycle or walk.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I don't think it would be a good idea to do either for me. I live 20
>> >> miles from work and 95% of that distance is via a highway with 65 mph
>> >> speed limit, no bicycles allowed.
>> >
>> >I'll bet there are back roads you could take to cover that 20 miles.
>>
>> Sure, and then it woud be closer to 30 miles than 20.
>>
>> >Besides, 20 miles isn't all that far on a bike. Once you get in shape
>you
>> >should be able to cover it in a little over an hour...
>>
>> Get real. Ride a bike 60 miles a day round trip to work every day?
>> You're not very bright, are you?
>>
>> >
>> >Another idea... move closer to work?
>>
>> Hahahaha! You ain't from around here.
>>
>> >
>> >Nah! That would be unAmerican
>>
>> No, that would be stupid. You are obviously totally unfamiliar with
>> this area and a little thing we like to call "the real world." I
>> drive an economy car to work that gets about 35 mpg so it costs me
>> barely over $2 a day in gas to do the round trip. You know how stupid
>> it sounds when you say I should just pack up and move closer to work
>> to a house that costs 30-40% more than the one I have for the same
>> square footage just so I could ride a bike to work? Let me give you a
>> clue. It sounds VERY stupid. Because it IS. Don't call me
>> un-American because I drive to work, tree-hugger. I'm glad I could
>> clear that up for you.
>
>Shaggy Shagster! Simma-dow-now! I was only *kidding*!
Well I guess you're just not as funny as you think you are. There
was no way to tell from your post that you were kidding. I'm not
sure how you think anyone should know you were "kidding" when you say
stuff like "Ride a bicycle or walk." and "I'll bet there are back
roads you could take to cover that 20 miles." and "Besides, 20 miles
isn't all that far on a bike. Once you get in shape you should be
able to cover it in a little over an hour..." and "Another idea...
move closer to work? Nah! That would be unAmerican." Don't take any
of this personally. After all, I'm just *kidding*.
>
>It absolutely would not be impossible (or stupid) to ride a bike 30 miles to
>and from work. I know some guys that do that (when it's nice out) because
>they *enjoy* it. That doesn't mean I would expect anyone to do it to just
>to save gas. That *would* be stupid.
>
>Reread my message above. I said it would be unAmerican to *not* commute a
>long way to work. That means I was calling you *American*. Jeeze. You got
>a problem with that?
You should be a lawyer. :-)
>
>I have a zero mile commute, so I am the one that doesn't meet the American
>norm. But it's not because I'm a tree-hugger, far from it. Heck, I think I
>own almost every gasoline powered conveyance and toy available (and in
>numbers) and use them all regularly. It's because I could finagle a job
>where I don't have to waste the 2 hours a day driving to and from work that
>I used to. I value my time much more than $2.00 a gallon gasoline.
So you stuff envelopes for a living. Congratulations. Just kidding.
Hey, I like this kidding stuff! :-)
>
>By the way, about the only thing you "cleared up" in your reply was that you
>have a short fuse and can't derive the context of messages very well.
I'm glad you cleared that up for me. No go stuff an envelope. Just
kidding! heh heh
>
>Fred W
>
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
and furthermore always carry a small snake.
- W.C. Fields
#219
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas... Stick it to 'em
On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:05:33 -0400, "Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam
myrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>"Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
>news:qc5qa0drf0mltq606h3i9koe3v0m6latch@4ax.com.. .
>> On Thu, 20 May 2004 15:25:36 -0400, "Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam
>> myrealbox.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >Ride a bicycle or walk.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I don't think it would be a good idea to do either for me. I live 20
>> >> miles from work and 95% of that distance is via a highway with 65 mph
>> >> speed limit, no bicycles allowed.
>> >
>> >I'll bet there are back roads you could take to cover that 20 miles.
>>
>> Sure, and then it woud be closer to 30 miles than 20.
>>
>> >Besides, 20 miles isn't all that far on a bike. Once you get in shape
>you
>> >should be able to cover it in a little over an hour...
>>
>> Get real. Ride a bike 60 miles a day round trip to work every day?
>> You're not very bright, are you?
>>
>> >
>> >Another idea... move closer to work?
>>
>> Hahahaha! You ain't from around here.
>>
>> >
>> >Nah! That would be unAmerican
>>
>> No, that would be stupid. You are obviously totally unfamiliar with
>> this area and a little thing we like to call "the real world." I
>> drive an economy car to work that gets about 35 mpg so it costs me
>> barely over $2 a day in gas to do the round trip. You know how stupid
>> it sounds when you say I should just pack up and move closer to work
>> to a house that costs 30-40% more than the one I have for the same
>> square footage just so I could ride a bike to work? Let me give you a
>> clue. It sounds VERY stupid. Because it IS. Don't call me
>> un-American because I drive to work, tree-hugger. I'm glad I could
>> clear that up for you.
>
>Shaggy Shagster! Simma-dow-now! I was only *kidding*!
Well I guess you're just not as funny as you think you are. There
was no way to tell from your post that you were kidding. I'm not
sure how you think anyone should know you were "kidding" when you say
stuff like "Ride a bicycle or walk." and "I'll bet there are back
roads you could take to cover that 20 miles." and "Besides, 20 miles
isn't all that far on a bike. Once you get in shape you should be
able to cover it in a little over an hour..." and "Another idea...
move closer to work? Nah! That would be unAmerican." Don't take any
of this personally. After all, I'm just *kidding*.
>
>It absolutely would not be impossible (or stupid) to ride a bike 30 miles to
>and from work. I know some guys that do that (when it's nice out) because
>they *enjoy* it. That doesn't mean I would expect anyone to do it to just
>to save gas. That *would* be stupid.
>
>Reread my message above. I said it would be unAmerican to *not* commute a
>long way to work. That means I was calling you *American*. Jeeze. You got
>a problem with that?
You should be a lawyer. :-)
>
>I have a zero mile commute, so I am the one that doesn't meet the American
>norm. But it's not because I'm a tree-hugger, far from it. Heck, I think I
>own almost every gasoline powered conveyance and toy available (and in
>numbers) and use them all regularly. It's because I could finagle a job
>where I don't have to waste the 2 hours a day driving to and from work that
>I used to. I value my time much more than $2.00 a gallon gasoline.
So you stuff envelopes for a living. Congratulations. Just kidding.
Hey, I like this kidding stuff! :-)
>
>By the way, about the only thing you "cleared up" in your reply was that you
>have a short fuse and can't derive the context of messages very well.
I'm glad you cleared that up for me. No go stuff an envelope. Just
kidding! heh heh
>
>Fred W
>
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
and furthermore always carry a small snake.
- W.C. Fields
myrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>"Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
>news:qc5qa0drf0mltq606h3i9koe3v0m6latch@4ax.com.. .
>> On Thu, 20 May 2004 15:25:36 -0400, "Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam
>> myrealbox.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >Ride a bicycle or walk.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I don't think it would be a good idea to do either for me. I live 20
>> >> miles from work and 95% of that distance is via a highway with 65 mph
>> >> speed limit, no bicycles allowed.
>> >
>> >I'll bet there are back roads you could take to cover that 20 miles.
>>
>> Sure, and then it woud be closer to 30 miles than 20.
>>
>> >Besides, 20 miles isn't all that far on a bike. Once you get in shape
>you
>> >should be able to cover it in a little over an hour...
>>
>> Get real. Ride a bike 60 miles a day round trip to work every day?
>> You're not very bright, are you?
>>
>> >
>> >Another idea... move closer to work?
>>
>> Hahahaha! You ain't from around here.
>>
>> >
>> >Nah! That would be unAmerican
>>
>> No, that would be stupid. You are obviously totally unfamiliar with
>> this area and a little thing we like to call "the real world." I
>> drive an economy car to work that gets about 35 mpg so it costs me
>> barely over $2 a day in gas to do the round trip. You know how stupid
>> it sounds when you say I should just pack up and move closer to work
>> to a house that costs 30-40% more than the one I have for the same
>> square footage just so I could ride a bike to work? Let me give you a
>> clue. It sounds VERY stupid. Because it IS. Don't call me
>> un-American because I drive to work, tree-hugger. I'm glad I could
>> clear that up for you.
>
>Shaggy Shagster! Simma-dow-now! I was only *kidding*!
Well I guess you're just not as funny as you think you are. There
was no way to tell from your post that you were kidding. I'm not
sure how you think anyone should know you were "kidding" when you say
stuff like "Ride a bicycle or walk." and "I'll bet there are back
roads you could take to cover that 20 miles." and "Besides, 20 miles
isn't all that far on a bike. Once you get in shape you should be
able to cover it in a little over an hour..." and "Another idea...
move closer to work? Nah! That would be unAmerican." Don't take any
of this personally. After all, I'm just *kidding*.
>
>It absolutely would not be impossible (or stupid) to ride a bike 30 miles to
>and from work. I know some guys that do that (when it's nice out) because
>they *enjoy* it. That doesn't mean I would expect anyone to do it to just
>to save gas. That *would* be stupid.
>
>Reread my message above. I said it would be unAmerican to *not* commute a
>long way to work. That means I was calling you *American*. Jeeze. You got
>a problem with that?
You should be a lawyer. :-)
>
>I have a zero mile commute, so I am the one that doesn't meet the American
>norm. But it's not because I'm a tree-hugger, far from it. Heck, I think I
>own almost every gasoline powered conveyance and toy available (and in
>numbers) and use them all regularly. It's because I could finagle a job
>where I don't have to waste the 2 hours a day driving to and from work that
>I used to. I value my time much more than $2.00 a gallon gasoline.
So you stuff envelopes for a living. Congratulations. Just kidding.
Hey, I like this kidding stuff! :-)
>
>By the way, about the only thing you "cleared up" in your reply was that you
>have a short fuse and can't derive the context of messages very well.
I'm glad you cleared that up for me. No go stuff an envelope. Just
kidding! heh heh
>
>Fred W
>
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
and furthermore always carry a small snake.
- W.C. Fields
#220
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas... Stick it to 'em
On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:05:33 -0400, "Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam
myrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>"Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
>news:qc5qa0drf0mltq606h3i9koe3v0m6latch@4ax.com.. .
>> On Thu, 20 May 2004 15:25:36 -0400, "Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam
>> myrealbox.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >Ride a bicycle or walk.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I don't think it would be a good idea to do either for me. I live 20
>> >> miles from work and 95% of that distance is via a highway with 65 mph
>> >> speed limit, no bicycles allowed.
>> >
>> >I'll bet there are back roads you could take to cover that 20 miles.
>>
>> Sure, and then it woud be closer to 30 miles than 20.
>>
>> >Besides, 20 miles isn't all that far on a bike. Once you get in shape
>you
>> >should be able to cover it in a little over an hour...
>>
>> Get real. Ride a bike 60 miles a day round trip to work every day?
>> You're not very bright, are you?
>>
>> >
>> >Another idea... move closer to work?
>>
>> Hahahaha! You ain't from around here.
>>
>> >
>> >Nah! That would be unAmerican
>>
>> No, that would be stupid. You are obviously totally unfamiliar with
>> this area and a little thing we like to call "the real world." I
>> drive an economy car to work that gets about 35 mpg so it costs me
>> barely over $2 a day in gas to do the round trip. You know how stupid
>> it sounds when you say I should just pack up and move closer to work
>> to a house that costs 30-40% more than the one I have for the same
>> square footage just so I could ride a bike to work? Let me give you a
>> clue. It sounds VERY stupid. Because it IS. Don't call me
>> un-American because I drive to work, tree-hugger. I'm glad I could
>> clear that up for you.
>
>Shaggy Shagster! Simma-dow-now! I was only *kidding*!
Well I guess you're just not as funny as you think you are. There
was no way to tell from your post that you were kidding. I'm not
sure how you think anyone should know you were "kidding" when you say
stuff like "Ride a bicycle or walk." and "I'll bet there are back
roads you could take to cover that 20 miles." and "Besides, 20 miles
isn't all that far on a bike. Once you get in shape you should be
able to cover it in a little over an hour..." and "Another idea...
move closer to work? Nah! That would be unAmerican." Don't take any
of this personally. After all, I'm just *kidding*.
>
>It absolutely would not be impossible (or stupid) to ride a bike 30 miles to
>and from work. I know some guys that do that (when it's nice out) because
>they *enjoy* it. That doesn't mean I would expect anyone to do it to just
>to save gas. That *would* be stupid.
>
>Reread my message above. I said it would be unAmerican to *not* commute a
>long way to work. That means I was calling you *American*. Jeeze. You got
>a problem with that?
You should be a lawyer. :-)
>
>I have a zero mile commute, so I am the one that doesn't meet the American
>norm. But it's not because I'm a tree-hugger, far from it. Heck, I think I
>own almost every gasoline powered conveyance and toy available (and in
>numbers) and use them all regularly. It's because I could finagle a job
>where I don't have to waste the 2 hours a day driving to and from work that
>I used to. I value my time much more than $2.00 a gallon gasoline.
So you stuff envelopes for a living. Congratulations. Just kidding.
Hey, I like this kidding stuff! :-)
>
>By the way, about the only thing you "cleared up" in your reply was that you
>have a short fuse and can't derive the context of messages very well.
I'm glad you cleared that up for me. No go stuff an envelope. Just
kidding! heh heh
>
>Fred W
>
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
and furthermore always carry a small snake.
- W.C. Fields
myrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>"Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
>news:qc5qa0drf0mltq606h3i9koe3v0m6latch@4ax.com.. .
>> On Thu, 20 May 2004 15:25:36 -0400, "Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam
>> myrealbox.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >Ride a bicycle or walk.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I don't think it would be a good idea to do either for me. I live 20
>> >> miles from work and 95% of that distance is via a highway with 65 mph
>> >> speed limit, no bicycles allowed.
>> >
>> >I'll bet there are back roads you could take to cover that 20 miles.
>>
>> Sure, and then it woud be closer to 30 miles than 20.
>>
>> >Besides, 20 miles isn't all that far on a bike. Once you get in shape
>you
>> >should be able to cover it in a little over an hour...
>>
>> Get real. Ride a bike 60 miles a day round trip to work every day?
>> You're not very bright, are you?
>>
>> >
>> >Another idea... move closer to work?
>>
>> Hahahaha! You ain't from around here.
>>
>> >
>> >Nah! That would be unAmerican
>>
>> No, that would be stupid. You are obviously totally unfamiliar with
>> this area and a little thing we like to call "the real world." I
>> drive an economy car to work that gets about 35 mpg so it costs me
>> barely over $2 a day in gas to do the round trip. You know how stupid
>> it sounds when you say I should just pack up and move closer to work
>> to a house that costs 30-40% more than the one I have for the same
>> square footage just so I could ride a bike to work? Let me give you a
>> clue. It sounds VERY stupid. Because it IS. Don't call me
>> un-American because I drive to work, tree-hugger. I'm glad I could
>> clear that up for you.
>
>Shaggy Shagster! Simma-dow-now! I was only *kidding*!
Well I guess you're just not as funny as you think you are. There
was no way to tell from your post that you were kidding. I'm not
sure how you think anyone should know you were "kidding" when you say
stuff like "Ride a bicycle or walk." and "I'll bet there are back
roads you could take to cover that 20 miles." and "Besides, 20 miles
isn't all that far on a bike. Once you get in shape you should be
able to cover it in a little over an hour..." and "Another idea...
move closer to work? Nah! That would be unAmerican." Don't take any
of this personally. After all, I'm just *kidding*.
>
>It absolutely would not be impossible (or stupid) to ride a bike 30 miles to
>and from work. I know some guys that do that (when it's nice out) because
>they *enjoy* it. That doesn't mean I would expect anyone to do it to just
>to save gas. That *would* be stupid.
>
>Reread my message above. I said it would be unAmerican to *not* commute a
>long way to work. That means I was calling you *American*. Jeeze. You got
>a problem with that?
You should be a lawyer. :-)
>
>I have a zero mile commute, so I am the one that doesn't meet the American
>norm. But it's not because I'm a tree-hugger, far from it. Heck, I think I
>own almost every gasoline powered conveyance and toy available (and in
>numbers) and use them all regularly. It's because I could finagle a job
>where I don't have to waste the 2 hours a day driving to and from work that
>I used to. I value my time much more than $2.00 a gallon gasoline.
So you stuff envelopes for a living. Congratulations. Just kidding.
Hey, I like this kidding stuff! :-)
>
>By the way, about the only thing you "cleared up" in your reply was that you
>have a short fuse and can't derive the context of messages very well.
I'm glad you cleared that up for me. No go stuff an envelope. Just
kidding! heh heh
>
>Fred W
>
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite,
and furthermore always carry a small snake.
- W.C. Fields