Difference between Jasper engines and rebuilt-jeep-engines
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between Jasper engines and rebuilt-jeep-engines
"Busahaulic" <pearson.d@worldnetobvious.att.net> wrote in message
news:xbAVb.2519$fV5.79479@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Also make a mental note if one or
> two take a lot longer to pump up, but get up to a relatively high value.
> Hope I've helped!
What would it mean when one or two take a lot longer to pump up but get to a
relatively high value?
thanks,
Bill
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between Jasper engines and rebuilt-jeep-engines
if you end up getting a remanufactured engine go with grooms... i
replaced mine with one of their 4.0's... runs like a champ. everyone
i've talked to has had good experiences with them. plus $90 gets you a
lifetime warranty. a bit pricey but worth it i think.
http://www.groomsengines.com/g-catalog.html#AMC
replaced mine with one of their 4.0's... runs like a champ. everyone
i've talked to has had good experiences with them. plus $90 gets you a
lifetime warranty. a bit pricey but worth it i think.
http://www.groomsengines.com/g-catalog.html#AMC
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between Jasper engines and rebuilt-jeep-engines
if you end up getting a remanufactured engine go with grooms... i
replaced mine with one of their 4.0's... runs like a champ. everyone
i've talked to has had good experiences with them. plus $90 gets you a
lifetime warranty. a bit pricey but worth it i think.
http://www.groomsengines.com/g-catalog.html#AMC
replaced mine with one of their 4.0's... runs like a champ. everyone
i've talked to has had good experiences with them. plus $90 gets you a
lifetime warranty. a bit pricey but worth it i think.
http://www.groomsengines.com/g-catalog.html#AMC
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between Jasper engines and rebuilt-jeep-engines
if you end up getting a remanufactured engine go with grooms... i
replaced mine with one of their 4.0's... runs like a champ. everyone
i've talked to has had good experiences with them. plus $90 gets you a
lifetime warranty. a bit pricey but worth it i think.
http://www.groomsengines.com/g-catalog.html#AMC
replaced mine with one of their 4.0's... runs like a champ. everyone
i've talked to has had good experiences with them. plus $90 gets you a
lifetime warranty. a bit pricey but worth it i think.
http://www.groomsengines.com/g-catalog.html#AMC
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between Jasper engines and rebuilt-jeep-engines
Y'know, I almost deleted that part cuz I got to thinking
about it and I guess I really don't know. It could mean that
the rings are a little sluggishdue to having gunk all over
them (sticky gunk!) Or it could mean that a valve has an
area where it doesn't seal well, but if it's a bit loose in
the guide, maybe it seals sometimes. Good question - I have
no definite answer, but for some reason I always count the
revolutions and compare. If you run into that and then end
up taking the head off, see if you can identify a possible
cause. Maybe somebody else has the right answer?
I wonder what the actual compression is in PSI while the
engine is running with the pistons doing 100 strokes a
second! I used to run single ring pistons with the ring "L"
shaped and right at the top of the piston, so the pressure
caused the "L" to rock outward and seal even better. Very
poor compression at cranking speed but it sealed better than
anything else at 12,000rpm (yeah, a small 2-stroke!)
William Oliveri <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c06m33$1379k9$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Busahaulic" <pearson.d@worldnetobvious.att.net> wrote in
message
>
news:xbAVb.2519$fV5.79479@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
....
> Also make a mental note if one or
> > two take a lot longer to pump up, but get up to a
relatively high value.
> > Hope I've helped!
>
>
> What would it mean when one or two take a lot longer to
pump up but get to a
> relatively high value?
>
> thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
about it and I guess I really don't know. It could mean that
the rings are a little sluggishdue to having gunk all over
them (sticky gunk!) Or it could mean that a valve has an
area where it doesn't seal well, but if it's a bit loose in
the guide, maybe it seals sometimes. Good question - I have
no definite answer, but for some reason I always count the
revolutions and compare. If you run into that and then end
up taking the head off, see if you can identify a possible
cause. Maybe somebody else has the right answer?
I wonder what the actual compression is in PSI while the
engine is running with the pistons doing 100 strokes a
second! I used to run single ring pistons with the ring "L"
shaped and right at the top of the piston, so the pressure
caused the "L" to rock outward and seal even better. Very
poor compression at cranking speed but it sealed better than
anything else at 12,000rpm (yeah, a small 2-stroke!)
William Oliveri <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c06m33$1379k9$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Busahaulic" <pearson.d@worldnetobvious.att.net> wrote in
message
>
news:xbAVb.2519$fV5.79479@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
....
> Also make a mental note if one or
> > two take a lot longer to pump up, but get up to a
relatively high value.
> > Hope I've helped!
>
>
> What would it mean when one or two take a lot longer to
pump up but get to a
> relatively high value?
>
> thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between Jasper engines and rebuilt-jeep-engines
Y'know, I almost deleted that part cuz I got to thinking
about it and I guess I really don't know. It could mean that
the rings are a little sluggishdue to having gunk all over
them (sticky gunk!) Or it could mean that a valve has an
area where it doesn't seal well, but if it's a bit loose in
the guide, maybe it seals sometimes. Good question - I have
no definite answer, but for some reason I always count the
revolutions and compare. If you run into that and then end
up taking the head off, see if you can identify a possible
cause. Maybe somebody else has the right answer?
I wonder what the actual compression is in PSI while the
engine is running with the pistons doing 100 strokes a
second! I used to run single ring pistons with the ring "L"
shaped and right at the top of the piston, so the pressure
caused the "L" to rock outward and seal even better. Very
poor compression at cranking speed but it sealed better than
anything else at 12,000rpm (yeah, a small 2-stroke!)
William Oliveri <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c06m33$1379k9$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Busahaulic" <pearson.d@worldnetobvious.att.net> wrote in
message
>
news:xbAVb.2519$fV5.79479@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
....
> Also make a mental note if one or
> > two take a lot longer to pump up, but get up to a
relatively high value.
> > Hope I've helped!
>
>
> What would it mean when one or two take a lot longer to
pump up but get to a
> relatively high value?
>
> thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
about it and I guess I really don't know. It could mean that
the rings are a little sluggishdue to having gunk all over
them (sticky gunk!) Or it could mean that a valve has an
area where it doesn't seal well, but if it's a bit loose in
the guide, maybe it seals sometimes. Good question - I have
no definite answer, but for some reason I always count the
revolutions and compare. If you run into that and then end
up taking the head off, see if you can identify a possible
cause. Maybe somebody else has the right answer?
I wonder what the actual compression is in PSI while the
engine is running with the pistons doing 100 strokes a
second! I used to run single ring pistons with the ring "L"
shaped and right at the top of the piston, so the pressure
caused the "L" to rock outward and seal even better. Very
poor compression at cranking speed but it sealed better than
anything else at 12,000rpm (yeah, a small 2-stroke!)
William Oliveri <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c06m33$1379k9$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Busahaulic" <pearson.d@worldnetobvious.att.net> wrote in
message
>
news:xbAVb.2519$fV5.79479@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
....
> Also make a mental note if one or
> > two take a lot longer to pump up, but get up to a
relatively high value.
> > Hope I've helped!
>
>
> What would it mean when one or two take a lot longer to
pump up but get to a
> relatively high value?
>
> thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Difference between Jasper engines and rebuilt-jeep-engines
Y'know, I almost deleted that part cuz I got to thinking
about it and I guess I really don't know. It could mean that
the rings are a little sluggishdue to having gunk all over
them (sticky gunk!) Or it could mean that a valve has an
area where it doesn't seal well, but if it's a bit loose in
the guide, maybe it seals sometimes. Good question - I have
no definite answer, but for some reason I always count the
revolutions and compare. If you run into that and then end
up taking the head off, see if you can identify a possible
cause. Maybe somebody else has the right answer?
I wonder what the actual compression is in PSI while the
engine is running with the pistons doing 100 strokes a
second! I used to run single ring pistons with the ring "L"
shaped and right at the top of the piston, so the pressure
caused the "L" to rock outward and seal even better. Very
poor compression at cranking speed but it sealed better than
anything else at 12,000rpm (yeah, a small 2-stroke!)
William Oliveri <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c06m33$1379k9$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Busahaulic" <pearson.d@worldnetobvious.att.net> wrote in
message
>
news:xbAVb.2519$fV5.79479@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
....
> Also make a mental note if one or
> > two take a lot longer to pump up, but get up to a
relatively high value.
> > Hope I've helped!
>
>
> What would it mean when one or two take a lot longer to
pump up but get to a
> relatively high value?
>
> thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
about it and I guess I really don't know. It could mean that
the rings are a little sluggishdue to having gunk all over
them (sticky gunk!) Or it could mean that a valve has an
area where it doesn't seal well, but if it's a bit loose in
the guide, maybe it seals sometimes. Good question - I have
no definite answer, but for some reason I always count the
revolutions and compare. If you run into that and then end
up taking the head off, see if you can identify a possible
cause. Maybe somebody else has the right answer?
I wonder what the actual compression is in PSI while the
engine is running with the pistons doing 100 strokes a
second! I used to run single ring pistons with the ring "L"
shaped and right at the top of the piston, so the pressure
caused the "L" to rock outward and seal even better. Very
poor compression at cranking speed but it sealed better than
anything else at 12,000rpm (yeah, a small 2-stroke!)
William Oliveri <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c06m33$1379k9$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Busahaulic" <pearson.d@worldnetobvious.att.net> wrote in
message
>
news:xbAVb.2519$fV5.79479@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
....
> Also make a mental note if one or
> > two take a lot longer to pump up, but get up to a
relatively high value.
> > Hope I've helped!
>
>
> What would it mean when one or two take a lot longer to
pump up but get to a
> relatively high value?
>
> thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
E. Jason Brooks
Jeep Mailing List
3
10-25-2004 07:01 PM
Muuurgh
Jeep Mailing List
40
06-17-2004 09:58 AM
William Oliveri
Jeep Mailing List
33
01-12-2004 10:07 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)