A case of death wobble today
#221
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A case of death wobble today
I always was told that there are spambots that search Usenet to harvest
email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address was
harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In any
case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40397246.DC22F645@***.net...
> The spam you get is not from little people individually harvesting
> the addresses from the news groups. Judging my My wife's address that is
> used maybe once a year to test, I'd say ***.net is responsible for
> selling that address. Almost nothing goes the the addresses in my
> signature.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > Wait a second there, I take responsibility but use a fake email address.
I
> > am not opposed to the discussion I generate, but I can't stand the spam
that
> > I get when I use my real address.
email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address was
harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In any
case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40397246.DC22F645@***.net...
> The spam you get is not from little people individually harvesting
> the addresses from the news groups. Judging my My wife's address that is
> used maybe once a year to test, I'd say ***.net is responsible for
> selling that address. Almost nothing goes the the addresses in my
> signature.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > Wait a second there, I take responsibility but use a fake email address.
I
> > am not opposed to the discussion I generate, but I can't stand the spam
that
> > I get when I use my real address.
#222
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A case of death wobble today
I always was told that there are spambots that search Usenet to harvest
email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address was
harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In any
case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40397246.DC22F645@***.net...
> The spam you get is not from little people individually harvesting
> the addresses from the news groups. Judging my My wife's address that is
> used maybe once a year to test, I'd say ***.net is responsible for
> selling that address. Almost nothing goes the the addresses in my
> signature.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > Wait a second there, I take responsibility but use a fake email address.
I
> > am not opposed to the discussion I generate, but I can't stand the spam
that
> > I get when I use my real address.
email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address was
harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In any
case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40397246.DC22F645@***.net...
> The spam you get is not from little people individually harvesting
> the addresses from the news groups. Judging my My wife's address that is
> used maybe once a year to test, I'd say ***.net is responsible for
> selling that address. Almost nothing goes the the addresses in my
> signature.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > Wait a second there, I take responsibility but use a fake email address.
I
> > am not opposed to the discussion I generate, but I can't stand the spam
that
> > I get when I use my real address.
#223
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A case of death wobble today
I always was told that there are spambots that search Usenet to harvest
email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address was
harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In any
case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40397246.DC22F645@***.net...
> The spam you get is not from little people individually harvesting
> the addresses from the news groups. Judging my My wife's address that is
> used maybe once a year to test, I'd say ***.net is responsible for
> selling that address. Almost nothing goes the the addresses in my
> signature.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > Wait a second there, I take responsibility but use a fake email address.
I
> > am not opposed to the discussion I generate, but I can't stand the spam
that
> > I get when I use my real address.
email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address was
harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In any
case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40397246.DC22F645@***.net...
> The spam you get is not from little people individually harvesting
> the addresses from the news groups. Judging my My wife's address that is
> used maybe once a year to test, I'd say ***.net is responsible for
> selling that address. Almost nothing goes the the addresses in my
> signature.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > Wait a second there, I take responsibility but use a fake email address.
I
> > am not opposed to the discussion I generate, but I can't stand the spam
that
> > I get when I use my real address.
#224
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A case of death wobble today
Hi Jeff,
Probably, the previous owner did move the dampener for you, as I
did on my '78 Bronco, but I left the stock one in the stock position and
just added one to the position where is will do some good, just like
Daimler moved it to the axle, tie rod position:
http://www.----------.com/JWStabalizer.jpg from the drag link.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> My '81 FSM makes it look as though the CJs that year made the stabalizer an
> option. Mine is certainly NOT installed in the same manner as the manual
> suggests it should be, therefore my guess is that one of the POs installed
> it.
Probably, the previous owner did move the dampener for you, as I
did on my '78 Bronco, but I left the stock one in the stock position and
just added one to the position where is will do some good, just like
Daimler moved it to the axle, tie rod position:
http://www.----------.com/JWStabalizer.jpg from the drag link.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> My '81 FSM makes it look as though the CJs that year made the stabalizer an
> option. Mine is certainly NOT installed in the same manner as the manual
> suggests it should be, therefore my guess is that one of the POs installed
> it.
#225
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A case of death wobble today
Hi Jeff,
Probably, the previous owner did move the dampener for you, as I
did on my '78 Bronco, but I left the stock one in the stock position and
just added one to the position where is will do some good, just like
Daimler moved it to the axle, tie rod position:
http://www.----------.com/JWStabalizer.jpg from the drag link.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> My '81 FSM makes it look as though the CJs that year made the stabalizer an
> option. Mine is certainly NOT installed in the same manner as the manual
> suggests it should be, therefore my guess is that one of the POs installed
> it.
Probably, the previous owner did move the dampener for you, as I
did on my '78 Bronco, but I left the stock one in the stock position and
just added one to the position where is will do some good, just like
Daimler moved it to the axle, tie rod position:
http://www.----------.com/JWStabalizer.jpg from the drag link.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> My '81 FSM makes it look as though the CJs that year made the stabalizer an
> option. Mine is certainly NOT installed in the same manner as the manual
> suggests it should be, therefore my guess is that one of the POs installed
> it.
#226
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A case of death wobble today
Hi Jeff,
Probably, the previous owner did move the dampener for you, as I
did on my '78 Bronco, but I left the stock one in the stock position and
just added one to the position where is will do some good, just like
Daimler moved it to the axle, tie rod position:
http://www.----------.com/JWStabalizer.jpg from the drag link.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> My '81 FSM makes it look as though the CJs that year made the stabalizer an
> option. Mine is certainly NOT installed in the same manner as the manual
> suggests it should be, therefore my guess is that one of the POs installed
> it.
Probably, the previous owner did move the dampener for you, as I
did on my '78 Bronco, but I left the stock one in the stock position and
just added one to the position where is will do some good, just like
Daimler moved it to the axle, tie rod position:
http://www.----------.com/JWStabalizer.jpg from the drag link.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> My '81 FSM makes it look as though the CJs that year made the stabalizer an
> option. Mine is certainly NOT installed in the same manner as the manual
> suggests it should be, therefore my guess is that one of the POs installed
> it.
#227
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A case of death wobble today
Good luck.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I always was told that there are spambots that search Usenet to harvest
> email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address was
> harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In any
> case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
> effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I always was told that there are spambots that search Usenet to harvest
> email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address was
> harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In any
> case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
> effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.
#228
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A case of death wobble today
Good luck.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I always was told that there are spambots that search Usenet to harvest
> email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address was
> harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In any
> case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
> effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I always was told that there are spambots that search Usenet to harvest
> email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address was
> harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In any
> case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
> effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.
#229
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A case of death wobble today
Good luck.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I always was told that there are spambots that search Usenet to harvest
> email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address was
> harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In any
> case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
> effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I always was told that there are spambots that search Usenet to harvest
> email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address was
> harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In any
> case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
> effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.
#230
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A case of death wobble today
It worked, except that my address has already been sold at least once, and
probably thousands of times. I get more spam from Korea ...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:403A612D.9544C785@***.net...
> Good luck.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > I always was told that there are spambots that search Usenet to harvest
> > email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address
was
> > harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In
any
> > case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
> > effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.
probably thousands of times. I get more spam from Korea ...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:403A612D.9544C785@***.net...
> Good luck.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > I always was told that there are spambots that search Usenet to harvest
> > email address that reside in the headers. I am convinced that my address
was
> > harvested, probably only once, and then was sold on the open market. In
any
> > case, I was forced to put a fake address in my newsgroup headers in the
> > effort to hope that the spambots would be rendered harmless to me.