Re: A case of death wobble today
 

Wait a second there, I take responsibility but use a fake email address. I
am not opposed to the discussion I generate, but I can't stand the spam that
I get when I use my real address.





"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:40393E8F.6C14577A@cox.net...
> AKA Roy, you haven't the balls to take this to a private e-mail. If you
> had, you would use a real address, Like Real men that take
> responsibility for their actions, do.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Roy J wrote:
> ><Snipped babble>

Re: A case of death wobble today
 

Wait a second there, I take responsibility but use a fake email address. I
am not opposed to the discussion I generate, but I can't stand the spam that
I get when I use my real address.





"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:40393E8F.6C14577A@cox.net...
> AKA Roy, you haven't the balls to take this to a private e-mail. If you
> had, you would use a real address, Like Real men that take
> responsibility for their actions, do.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Roy J wrote:
> ><Snipped babble>

Re: A case of death wobble today
 

It appears to have been an optional part as late as '81.

I happen to agree that the stabalizer is probably masking a more serious
problem that if it was not there, the DW symptoms would not be so severe.

If the steering stabalizer by itself fixes this problem, I'll be seriously
amazed. It could, I suppose. But I think there are underlying problems at
play here.



"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:40395AA8.F36B1FA@cox.net...
> Then remove the stabilizers for your TJ and WJ, if you truly
> believe their only reason for being installed is to mask the underlying
> problem.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
> >
> > Exactly.
> > --
> > Jerry Bransford
> > To email, remove 'me' from my email address
> > N6TAY, PP-ASEL
> > See the Geezer Jeep at
> > http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/

Re: A case of death wobble today
 

It appears to have been an optional part as late as '81.

I happen to agree that the stabalizer is probably masking a more serious
problem that if it was not there, the DW symptoms would not be so severe.

If the steering stabalizer by itself fixes this problem, I'll be seriously
amazed. It could, I suppose. But I think there are underlying problems at
play here.



"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:40395AA8.F36B1FA@cox.net...
> Then remove the stabilizers for your TJ and WJ, if you truly
> believe their only reason for being installed is to mask the underlying
> problem.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
> >
> > Exactly.
> > --
> > Jerry Bransford
> > To email, remove 'me' from my email address
> > N6TAY, PP-ASEL
> > See the Geezer Jeep at
> > http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/

Re: A case of death wobble today
 

It appears to have been an optional part as late as '81.

I happen to agree that the stabalizer is probably masking a more serious
problem that if it was not there, the DW symptoms would not be so severe.

If the steering stabalizer by itself fixes this problem, I'll be seriously
amazed. It could, I suppose. But I think there are underlying problems at
play here.



"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:40395AA8.F36B1FA@cox.net...
> Then remove the stabilizers for your TJ and WJ, if you truly
> believe their only reason for being installed is to mask the underlying
> problem.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
> >
> > Exactly.
> > --
> > Jerry Bransford
> > To email, remove 'me' from my email address
> > N6TAY, PP-ASEL
> > See the Geezer Jeep at
> > http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/

Re: A case of death wobble today
 

The spam you get is not from little people individually harvesting
the addresses from the news groups. Judging my My wife's address that is
used maybe once a year to test, I'd say COX.net is responsible for
selling that address. Almost nothing goes the the addresses in my
signature.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

CRWLR wrote:
>
> Wait a second there, I take responsibility but use a fake email address. I
> am not opposed to the discussion I generate, but I can't stand the spam that
> I get when I use my real address.

Re: A case of death wobble today
 

The spam you get is not from little people individually harvesting
the addresses from the news groups. Judging my My wife's address that is
used maybe once a year to test, I'd say COX.net is responsible for
selling that address. Almost nothing goes the the addresses in my
signature.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

CRWLR wrote:
>
> Wait a second there, I take responsibility but use a fake email address. I
> am not opposed to the discussion I generate, but I can't stand the spam that
> I get when I use my real address.

Re: A case of death wobble today
 

The spam you get is not from little people individually harvesting
the addresses from the news groups. Judging my My wife's address that is
used maybe once a year to test, I'd say COX.net is responsible for
selling that address. Almost nothing goes the the addresses in my
signature.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

CRWLR wrote:
>
> Wait a second there, I take responsibility but use a fake email address. I
> am not opposed to the discussion I generate, but I can't stand the spam that
> I get when I use my real address.

Re: A case of death wobble today
 

L.W. (ßill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
> The spam you get is not from little people individually harvesting
> the addresses from the news groups. Judging my My wife's address that is
> used maybe once a year to test, I'd say COX.net is responsible for
> selling that address. Almost nothing goes the the addresses in my
> signature.

That's because AOL uses some substantial spam blocking.

Cox OTOH doesn't seem to do squat, although they claim to
be doing some blocking and are gearing up to allow blocking
on a customer configured basis.

Odd are they will try to charge for the service. :/

--
DougW

Re: A case of death wobble today
 

L.W. (ßill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
> The spam you get is not from little people individually harvesting
> the addresses from the news groups. Judging my My wife's address that is
> used maybe once a year to test, I'd say COX.net is responsible for
> selling that address. Almost nothing goes the the addresses in my
> signature.

That's because AOL uses some substantial spam blocking.

Cox OTOH doesn't seem to do squat, although they claim to
be doing some blocking and are gearing up to allow blocking
on a customer configured basis.

Odd are they will try to charge for the service. :/

--
DougW