98 Jeep Wrangler and E85 fuel
#261
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 98 Jeep Wrangler and E85 fuel
I *think* the Jags had this up to at least the '61 3.8S model, after
that stopped paying attention to Jag sedans, as they were all slightly
less reliable than a teenage mistress.
L.W. (Bill) ------ III proclaimed:
> LOL, new it should of had, like every truck I've driven an equalizing
> hose between the to distribute the weight.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> "Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:fPWdnZYsVuqugNjbnZ2dnUVZ_v7inZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>
>>This was the old twin tank Jags that had the valve just to the rear of
>>the right hand side of the drivers seat [left hand drive models].
>>
>>You normally ran the thing on one tank, and that valve was how you
>>selected the other tank. Looked exactly like a chrome plated water
>>faucet wheel type valve.
>>
>>Didn't take much to mod the vehicle so turning the valve mixed the two
>>tanks, one normally used for fuel, the other for the shine.
>
>
>
>
that stopped paying attention to Jag sedans, as they were all slightly
less reliable than a teenage mistress.
L.W. (Bill) ------ III proclaimed:
> LOL, new it should of had, like every truck I've driven an equalizing
> hose between the to distribute the weight.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> "Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:fPWdnZYsVuqugNjbnZ2dnUVZ_v7inZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>
>>This was the old twin tank Jags that had the valve just to the rear of
>>the right hand side of the drivers seat [left hand drive models].
>>
>>You normally ran the thing on one tank, and that valve was how you
>>selected the other tank. Looked exactly like a chrome plated water
>>faucet wheel type valve.
>>
>>Didn't take much to mod the vehicle so turning the valve mixed the two
>>tanks, one normally used for fuel, the other for the shine.
>
>
>
>
#262
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 98 Jeep Wrangler and E85 fuel
On Sat, 12 May 2007 18:50:48 -0700, Lon wrote:
> c proclaimed:
>
>> On Fri, 11 May 2007 18:47:12 -0700, Lon wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lets just note that Bill is smarter than you and leave it at that.
>>
>>
>> Nah, let's not.
>>
>> Billy is not smarter than anyone who's not challenged.
>>
>> And being a long-term Mensa member, I don't think that quite
>> describes me.
>
> Whoopee freaking mensa doo. You aren't the only mensa qualified lurker
> here, as I know at least two others--both of whom wouldn't join that
> outfit on a bet as it is overrun with folks who may test well on *some*
> intelligence tests but couldn't find their rear with both hands if you
> spotted them two cheeks and the smell. i.e. too many jerkwads like you
> far too overestimating of their own intellect to actually have any.
>
> Nor do you know what you are talking about regarding cold fusion.
>
>>>He might have failed to note the sarcasm in the original comment, but at
>>>least he knew about cold fusion.
>>
>>
>> Just as you know more than 90+% of the world's scientists.
>
> Yeah, so how are Fleischmann and Pons doing lately? Working on the Dean
> Drive perhaps?
Well, you certainly showed /me/, didn't you? (rhetorical)
Quit Mensa, but for far better reasons than you so eloquently cited.
I don't even think about whatever intelligence I have; I leave that to
others far brighter than you to comment on. And they do.
Cold fusion? It will happen. I don't know when, and frankly, I don't much
care, I won't be around to see it.
F & P? Nice to see you picked from the minority opinion.
Like any doorknob, you may be brighter than Billy, but man, you are
/really/ dull.
We'll chat again, Lonnie; maybe some time next century.
> c proclaimed:
>
>> On Fri, 11 May 2007 18:47:12 -0700, Lon wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lets just note that Bill is smarter than you and leave it at that.
>>
>>
>> Nah, let's not.
>>
>> Billy is not smarter than anyone who's not challenged.
>>
>> And being a long-term Mensa member, I don't think that quite
>> describes me.
>
> Whoopee freaking mensa doo. You aren't the only mensa qualified lurker
> here, as I know at least two others--both of whom wouldn't join that
> outfit on a bet as it is overrun with folks who may test well on *some*
> intelligence tests but couldn't find their rear with both hands if you
> spotted them two cheeks and the smell. i.e. too many jerkwads like you
> far too overestimating of their own intellect to actually have any.
>
> Nor do you know what you are talking about regarding cold fusion.
>
>>>He might have failed to note the sarcasm in the original comment, but at
>>>least he knew about cold fusion.
>>
>>
>> Just as you know more than 90+% of the world's scientists.
>
> Yeah, so how are Fleischmann and Pons doing lately? Working on the Dean
> Drive perhaps?
Well, you certainly showed /me/, didn't you? (rhetorical)
Quit Mensa, but for far better reasons than you so eloquently cited.
I don't even think about whatever intelligence I have; I leave that to
others far brighter than you to comment on. And they do.
Cold fusion? It will happen. I don't know when, and frankly, I don't much
care, I won't be around to see it.
F & P? Nice to see you picked from the minority opinion.
Like any doorknob, you may be brighter than Billy, but man, you are
/really/ dull.
We'll chat again, Lonnie; maybe some time next century.
#263
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 98 Jeep Wrangler and E85 fuel
On Sat, 12 May 2007 18:50:48 -0700, Lon wrote:
> c proclaimed:
>
>> On Fri, 11 May 2007 18:47:12 -0700, Lon wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lets just note that Bill is smarter than you and leave it at that.
>>
>>
>> Nah, let's not.
>>
>> Billy is not smarter than anyone who's not challenged.
>>
>> And being a long-term Mensa member, I don't think that quite
>> describes me.
>
> Whoopee freaking mensa doo. You aren't the only mensa qualified lurker
> here, as I know at least two others--both of whom wouldn't join that
> outfit on a bet as it is overrun with folks who may test well on *some*
> intelligence tests but couldn't find their rear with both hands if you
> spotted them two cheeks and the smell. i.e. too many jerkwads like you
> far too overestimating of their own intellect to actually have any.
>
> Nor do you know what you are talking about regarding cold fusion.
>
>>>He might have failed to note the sarcasm in the original comment, but at
>>>least he knew about cold fusion.
>>
>>
>> Just as you know more than 90+% of the world's scientists.
>
> Yeah, so how are Fleischmann and Pons doing lately? Working on the Dean
> Drive perhaps?
Well, you certainly showed /me/, didn't you? (rhetorical)
Quit Mensa, but for far better reasons than you so eloquently cited.
I don't even think about whatever intelligence I have; I leave that to
others far brighter than you to comment on. And they do.
Cold fusion? It will happen. I don't know when, and frankly, I don't much
care, I won't be around to see it.
F & P? Nice to see you picked from the minority opinion.
Like any doorknob, you may be brighter than Billy, but man, you are
/really/ dull.
We'll chat again, Lonnie; maybe some time next century.
> c proclaimed:
>
>> On Fri, 11 May 2007 18:47:12 -0700, Lon wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lets just note that Bill is smarter than you and leave it at that.
>>
>>
>> Nah, let's not.
>>
>> Billy is not smarter than anyone who's not challenged.
>>
>> And being a long-term Mensa member, I don't think that quite
>> describes me.
>
> Whoopee freaking mensa doo. You aren't the only mensa qualified lurker
> here, as I know at least two others--both of whom wouldn't join that
> outfit on a bet as it is overrun with folks who may test well on *some*
> intelligence tests but couldn't find their rear with both hands if you
> spotted them two cheeks and the smell. i.e. too many jerkwads like you
> far too overestimating of their own intellect to actually have any.
>
> Nor do you know what you are talking about regarding cold fusion.
>
>>>He might have failed to note the sarcasm in the original comment, but at
>>>least he knew about cold fusion.
>>
>>
>> Just as you know more than 90+% of the world's scientists.
>
> Yeah, so how are Fleischmann and Pons doing lately? Working on the Dean
> Drive perhaps?
Well, you certainly showed /me/, didn't you? (rhetorical)
Quit Mensa, but for far better reasons than you so eloquently cited.
I don't even think about whatever intelligence I have; I leave that to
others far brighter than you to comment on. And they do.
Cold fusion? It will happen. I don't know when, and frankly, I don't much
care, I won't be around to see it.
F & P? Nice to see you picked from the minority opinion.
Like any doorknob, you may be brighter than Billy, but man, you are
/really/ dull.
We'll chat again, Lonnie; maybe some time next century.
#264
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 98 Jeep Wrangler and E85 fuel
On Sat, 12 May 2007 18:50:48 -0700, Lon wrote:
> c proclaimed:
>
>> On Fri, 11 May 2007 18:47:12 -0700, Lon wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lets just note that Bill is smarter than you and leave it at that.
>>
>>
>> Nah, let's not.
>>
>> Billy is not smarter than anyone who's not challenged.
>>
>> And being a long-term Mensa member, I don't think that quite
>> describes me.
>
> Whoopee freaking mensa doo. You aren't the only mensa qualified lurker
> here, as I know at least two others--both of whom wouldn't join that
> outfit on a bet as it is overrun with folks who may test well on *some*
> intelligence tests but couldn't find their rear with both hands if you
> spotted them two cheeks and the smell. i.e. too many jerkwads like you
> far too overestimating of their own intellect to actually have any.
>
> Nor do you know what you are talking about regarding cold fusion.
>
>>>He might have failed to note the sarcasm in the original comment, but at
>>>least he knew about cold fusion.
>>
>>
>> Just as you know more than 90+% of the world's scientists.
>
> Yeah, so how are Fleischmann and Pons doing lately? Working on the Dean
> Drive perhaps?
Well, you certainly showed /me/, didn't you? (rhetorical)
Quit Mensa, but for far better reasons than you so eloquently cited.
I don't even think about whatever intelligence I have; I leave that to
others far brighter than you to comment on. And they do.
Cold fusion? It will happen. I don't know when, and frankly, I don't much
care, I won't be around to see it.
F & P? Nice to see you picked from the minority opinion.
Like any doorknob, you may be brighter than Billy, but man, you are
/really/ dull.
We'll chat again, Lonnie; maybe some time next century.
> c proclaimed:
>
>> On Fri, 11 May 2007 18:47:12 -0700, Lon wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lets just note that Bill is smarter than you and leave it at that.
>>
>>
>> Nah, let's not.
>>
>> Billy is not smarter than anyone who's not challenged.
>>
>> And being a long-term Mensa member, I don't think that quite
>> describes me.
>
> Whoopee freaking mensa doo. You aren't the only mensa qualified lurker
> here, as I know at least two others--both of whom wouldn't join that
> outfit on a bet as it is overrun with folks who may test well on *some*
> intelligence tests but couldn't find their rear with both hands if you
> spotted them two cheeks and the smell. i.e. too many jerkwads like you
> far too overestimating of their own intellect to actually have any.
>
> Nor do you know what you are talking about regarding cold fusion.
>
>>>He might have failed to note the sarcasm in the original comment, but at
>>>least he knew about cold fusion.
>>
>>
>> Just as you know more than 90+% of the world's scientists.
>
> Yeah, so how are Fleischmann and Pons doing lately? Working on the Dean
> Drive perhaps?
Well, you certainly showed /me/, didn't you? (rhetorical)
Quit Mensa, but for far better reasons than you so eloquently cited.
I don't even think about whatever intelligence I have; I leave that to
others far brighter than you to comment on. And they do.
Cold fusion? It will happen. I don't know when, and frankly, I don't much
care, I won't be around to see it.
F & P? Nice to see you picked from the minority opinion.
Like any doorknob, you may be brighter than Billy, but man, you are
/really/ dull.
We'll chat again, Lonnie; maybe some time next century.
#265
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 98 Jeep Wrangler and E85 fuel
On Sat, 12 May 2007 18:50:48 -0700, Lon wrote:
> c proclaimed:
>
>> On Fri, 11 May 2007 18:47:12 -0700, Lon wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lets just note that Bill is smarter than you and leave it at that.
>>
>>
>> Nah, let's not.
>>
>> Billy is not smarter than anyone who's not challenged.
>>
>> And being a long-term Mensa member, I don't think that quite
>> describes me.
>
> Whoopee freaking mensa doo. You aren't the only mensa qualified lurker
> here, as I know at least two others--both of whom wouldn't join that
> outfit on a bet as it is overrun with folks who may test well on *some*
> intelligence tests but couldn't find their rear with both hands if you
> spotted them two cheeks and the smell. i.e. too many jerkwads like you
> far too overestimating of their own intellect to actually have any.
>
> Nor do you know what you are talking about regarding cold fusion.
>
>>>He might have failed to note the sarcasm in the original comment, but at
>>>least he knew about cold fusion.
>>
>>
>> Just as you know more than 90+% of the world's scientists.
>
> Yeah, so how are Fleischmann and Pons doing lately? Working on the Dean
> Drive perhaps?
Well, you certainly showed /me/, didn't you? (rhetorical)
Quit Mensa, but for far better reasons than you so eloquently cited.
I don't even think about whatever intelligence I have; I leave that to
others far brighter than you to comment on. And they do.
Cold fusion? It will happen. I don't know when, and frankly, I don't much
care, I won't be around to see it.
F & P? Nice to see you picked from the minority opinion.
Like any doorknob, you may be brighter than Billy, but man, you are
/really/ dull.
We'll chat again, Lonnie; maybe some time next century.
> c proclaimed:
>
>> On Fri, 11 May 2007 18:47:12 -0700, Lon wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lets just note that Bill is smarter than you and leave it at that.
>>
>>
>> Nah, let's not.
>>
>> Billy is not smarter than anyone who's not challenged.
>>
>> And being a long-term Mensa member, I don't think that quite
>> describes me.
>
> Whoopee freaking mensa doo. You aren't the only mensa qualified lurker
> here, as I know at least two others--both of whom wouldn't join that
> outfit on a bet as it is overrun with folks who may test well on *some*
> intelligence tests but couldn't find their rear with both hands if you
> spotted them two cheeks and the smell. i.e. too many jerkwads like you
> far too overestimating of their own intellect to actually have any.
>
> Nor do you know what you are talking about regarding cold fusion.
>
>>>He might have failed to note the sarcasm in the original comment, but at
>>>least he knew about cold fusion.
>>
>>
>> Just as you know more than 90+% of the world's scientists.
>
> Yeah, so how are Fleischmann and Pons doing lately? Working on the Dean
> Drive perhaps?
Well, you certainly showed /me/, didn't you? (rhetorical)
Quit Mensa, but for far better reasons than you so eloquently cited.
I don't even think about whatever intelligence I have; I leave that to
others far brighter than you to comment on. And they do.
Cold fusion? It will happen. I don't know when, and frankly, I don't much
care, I won't be around to see it.
F & P? Nice to see you picked from the minority opinion.
Like any doorknob, you may be brighter than Billy, but man, you are
/really/ dull.
We'll chat again, Lonnie; maybe some time next century.
#266
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 98 Jeep Wrangler and E85 fuel
In article <1178731433.061923.236850@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups. com>,
nrs <neale_rs@yahoo.com> wrote:
#2) if it is obtained by separating from oxygen in water, then it takes
#more energy to seperate than you get back by burning.
Yes. That means you need a super-cheap source of electricity.
While solar panels are expensive, they are cheap to run (mostly
free--some soap and water to keep it clean and a regular going
over by the owner).
/herb
nrs <neale_rs@yahoo.com> wrote:
#2) if it is obtained by separating from oxygen in water, then it takes
#more energy to seperate than you get back by burning.
Yes. That means you need a super-cheap source of electricity.
While solar panels are expensive, they are cheap to run (mostly
free--some soap and water to keep it clean and a regular going
over by the owner).
/herb
#267
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 98 Jeep Wrangler and E85 fuel
In article <1178731433.061923.236850@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups. com>,
nrs <neale_rs@yahoo.com> wrote:
#2) if it is obtained by separating from oxygen in water, then it takes
#more energy to seperate than you get back by burning.
Yes. That means you need a super-cheap source of electricity.
While solar panels are expensive, they are cheap to run (mostly
free--some soap and water to keep it clean and a regular going
over by the owner).
/herb
nrs <neale_rs@yahoo.com> wrote:
#2) if it is obtained by separating from oxygen in water, then it takes
#more energy to seperate than you get back by burning.
Yes. That means you need a super-cheap source of electricity.
While solar panels are expensive, they are cheap to run (mostly
free--some soap and water to keep it clean and a regular going
over by the owner).
/herb
#268
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 98 Jeep Wrangler and E85 fuel
In article <1178731433.061923.236850@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups. com>,
nrs <neale_rs@yahoo.com> wrote:
#2) if it is obtained by separating from oxygen in water, then it takes
#more energy to seperate than you get back by burning.
Yes. That means you need a super-cheap source of electricity.
While solar panels are expensive, they are cheap to run (mostly
free--some soap and water to keep it clean and a regular going
over by the owner).
/herb
nrs <neale_rs@yahoo.com> wrote:
#2) if it is obtained by separating from oxygen in water, then it takes
#more energy to seperate than you get back by burning.
Yes. That means you need a super-cheap source of electricity.
While solar panels are expensive, they are cheap to run (mostly
free--some soap and water to keep it clean and a regular going
over by the owner).
/herb
#269
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 98 Jeep Wrangler and E85 fuel
In article <1178731433.061923.236850@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups. com>,
nrs <neale_rs@yahoo.com> wrote:
#2) if it is obtained by separating from oxygen in water, then it takes
#more energy to seperate than you get back by burning.
Yes. That means you need a super-cheap source of electricity.
While solar panels are expensive, they are cheap to run (mostly
free--some soap and water to keep it clean and a regular going
over by the owner).
/herb
nrs <neale_rs@yahoo.com> wrote:
#2) if it is obtained by separating from oxygen in water, then it takes
#more energy to seperate than you get back by burning.
Yes. That means you need a super-cheap source of electricity.
While solar panels are expensive, they are cheap to run (mostly
free--some soap and water to keep it clean and a regular going
over by the owner).
/herb
#270
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 98 Jeep Wrangler and E85 fuel
herb@urusei.net (Herb Leong) wrote:
> In article <1178731433.061923.236850@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups. com>,
> nrs <neale_rs@yahoo.com> wrote:
> #2) if it is obtained by separating from oxygen in water, then it
> takes #more energy to seperate than you get back by burning.
> Yes. That means you need a super-cheap source of electricity.
> While solar panels are expensive, they are cheap to run (mostly
> free--some soap and water to keep it clean and a regular going
> over by the owner).
I don't know for sure, but I've heard that solar panels require more
energy to manufacture than they can produce over their entire life
span.
Anyone know if that's true or not?
> In article <1178731433.061923.236850@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups. com>,
> nrs <neale_rs@yahoo.com> wrote:
> #2) if it is obtained by separating from oxygen in water, then it
> takes #more energy to seperate than you get back by burning.
> Yes. That means you need a super-cheap source of electricity.
> While solar panels are expensive, they are cheap to run (mostly
> free--some soap and water to keep it clean and a regular going
> over by the owner).
I don't know for sure, but I've heard that solar panels require more
energy to manufacture than they can produce over their entire life
span.
Anyone know if that's true or not?