33s and 4.10s
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> I wouldn't remember saying anything about the thickness of the ring
> gear, that's the way the old Chevys made up their differences, too.
> Maybe, to tweak you a little.
> I believe the bigger problem will be the fewer teeth, even though
> it on the same diameter pinion will prove weaker than their forties'
> design. But probably only behind a V8 like a it's use in the old Ford,
> Chevy and Dodge pickups
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
>
>>Hi Bill,
>>
>>Only the TruLok is Japanese. The gears are genuine Dana Spicer.
>>
>>I don't think the TruLok is 'crap'. In the past year I logged thousands
>>of road miles and hundreds of trail hours on the one I put in my XJ,
>>sometimes stressing it to the point of snapping ujoints, with no
>>differential problems whatsoever.
>>
>>I recall you predicted extra leverage on the taller ring gear would
>>cause the carrier to bend or 'crack like an egg' and that the 'bones
>>of the Rubicon will litter the trail' (great imagery). I haven't heard
>>of chronic diff failures in Rubicons. Have you?
>>
>>Steve
>>http://xjeep.dyndns.org
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> I wouldn't remember saying anything about the thickness of the ring
> gear, that's the way the old Chevys made up their differences, too.
> Maybe, to tweak you a little.
> I believe the bigger problem will be the fewer teeth, even though
> it on the same diameter pinion will prove weaker than their forties'
> design. But probably only behind a V8 like a it's use in the old Ford,
> Chevy and Dodge pickups
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
>
>>Hi Bill,
>>
>>Only the TruLok is Japanese. The gears are genuine Dana Spicer.
>>
>>I don't think the TruLok is 'crap'. In the past year I logged thousands
>>of road miles and hundreds of trail hours on the one I put in my XJ,
>>sometimes stressing it to the point of snapping ujoints, with no
>>differential problems whatsoever.
>>
>>I recall you predicted extra leverage on the taller ring gear would
>>cause the carrier to bend or 'crack like an egg' and that the 'bones
>>of the Rubicon will litter the trail' (great imagery). I haven't heard
>>of chronic diff failures in Rubicons. Have you?
>>
>>Steve
>>http://xjeep.dyndns.org
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> I wouldn't remember saying anything about the thickness of the ring
> gear, that's the way the old Chevys made up their differences, too.
> Maybe, to tweak you a little.
> I believe the bigger problem will be the fewer teeth, even though
> it on the same diameter pinion will prove weaker than their forties'
> design. But probably only behind a V8 like a it's use in the old Ford,
> Chevy and Dodge pickups
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
>
>>Hi Bill,
>>
>>Only the TruLok is Japanese. The gears are genuine Dana Spicer.
>>
>>I don't think the TruLok is 'crap'. In the past year I logged thousands
>>of road miles and hundreds of trail hours on the one I put in my XJ,
>>sometimes stressing it to the point of snapping ujoints, with no
>>differential problems whatsoever.
>>
>>I recall you predicted extra leverage on the taller ring gear would
>>cause the carrier to bend or 'crack like an egg' and that the 'bones
>>of the Rubicon will litter the trail' (great imagery). I haven't heard
>>of chronic diff failures in Rubicons. Have you?
>>
>>Steve
>>http://xjeep.dyndns.org
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> I wouldn't remember saying anything about the thickness of the ring
> gear, that's the way the old Chevys made up their differences, too.
> Maybe, to tweak you a little.
> I believe the bigger problem will be the fewer teeth, even though
> it on the same diameter pinion will prove weaker than their forties'
> design. But probably only behind a V8 like a it's use in the old Ford,
> Chevy and Dodge pickups
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
>
>>Hi Bill,
>>
>>Only the TruLok is Japanese. The gears are genuine Dana Spicer.
>>
>>I don't think the TruLok is 'crap'. In the past year I logged thousands
>>of road miles and hundreds of trail hours on the one I put in my XJ,
>>sometimes stressing it to the point of snapping ujoints, with no
>>differential problems whatsoever.
>>
>>I recall you predicted extra leverage on the taller ring gear would
>>cause the carrier to bend or 'crack like an egg' and that the 'bones
>>of the Rubicon will litter the trail' (great imagery). I haven't heard
>>of chronic diff failures in Rubicons. Have you?
>>
>>Steve
>>http://xjeep.dyndns.org
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> I wouldn't remember saying anything about the thickness of the ring
> gear, that's the way the old Chevys made up their differences, too.
> Maybe, to tweak you a little.
> I believe the bigger problem will be the fewer teeth, even though
> it on the same diameter pinion will prove weaker than their forties'
> design. But probably only behind a V8 like a it's use in the old Ford,
> Chevy and Dodge pickups
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
>
>>Hi Bill,
>>
>>Only the TruLok is Japanese. The gears are genuine Dana Spicer.
>>
>>I don't think the TruLok is 'crap'. In the past year I logged thousands
>>of road miles and hundreds of trail hours on the one I put in my XJ,
>>sometimes stressing it to the point of snapping ujoints, with no
>>differential problems whatsoever.
>>
>>I recall you predicted extra leverage on the taller ring gear would
>>cause the carrier to bend or 'crack like an egg' and that the 'bones
>>of the Rubicon will litter the trail' (great imagery). I haven't heard
>>of chronic diff failures in Rubicons. Have you?
>>
>>Steve
>>http://xjeep.dyndns.org
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> I wouldn't remember saying anything about the thickness of the ring
> gear, that's the way the old Chevys made up their differences, too.
> Maybe, to tweak you a little.
> I believe the bigger problem will be the fewer teeth, even though
> it on the same diameter pinion will prove weaker than their forties'
> design. But probably only behind a V8 like a it's use in the old Ford,
> Chevy and Dodge pickups
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
>
>>Hi Bill,
>>
>>Only the TruLok is Japanese. The gears are genuine Dana Spicer.
>>
>>I don't think the TruLok is 'crap'. In the past year I logged thousands
>>of road miles and hundreds of trail hours on the one I put in my XJ,
>>sometimes stressing it to the point of snapping ujoints, with no
>>differential problems whatsoever.
>>
>>I recall you predicted extra leverage on the taller ring gear would
>>cause the carrier to bend or 'crack like an egg' and that the 'bones
>>of the Rubicon will litter the trail' (great imagery). I haven't heard
>>of chronic diff failures in Rubicons. Have you?
>>
>>Steve
>>http://xjeep.dyndns.org
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
So did it tweak you?
Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
44.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve wrote:
> http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
44.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve wrote:
> http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
So did it tweak you?
Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
44.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve wrote:
> http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
44.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve wrote:
> http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
So did it tweak you?
Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
44.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve wrote:
> http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
44.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve wrote:
> http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
So did it tweak you?
Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
44.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve wrote:
> http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
44.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve wrote:
> http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
Probably is, war steel was pretty crap.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42E566F2.287EB637@***.net...
> So did it tweak you?
> Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
> 44.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
> >
http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42E566F2.287EB637@***.net...
> So did it tweak you?
> Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
> 44.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
> >
http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
Probably is, war steel was pretty crap.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42E566F2.287EB637@***.net...
> So did it tweak you?
> Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
> 44.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
> >
http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42E566F2.287EB637@***.net...
> So did it tweak you?
> Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
> 44.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
> >
http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
Probably is, war steel was pretty crap.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42E566F2.287EB637@***.net...
> So did it tweak you?
> Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
> 44.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
> >
http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42E566F2.287EB637@***.net...
> So did it tweak you?
> Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
> 44.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
> >
http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f
