33s and 4.10s
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
Would these be the same engineers that OK'd the Dana 35c?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Nathan Otis wrote:
>
> FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
> only one we couldn't break"
> n.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Nathan Otis wrote:
>
> FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
> only one we couldn't break"
> n.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
Would these be the same engineers that OK'd the Dana 35c?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Nathan Otis wrote:
>
> FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
> only one we couldn't break"
> n.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Nathan Otis wrote:
>
> FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
> only one we couldn't break"
> n.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
Would these be the same engineers that OK'd the Dana 35c?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Nathan Otis wrote:
>
> FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
> only one we couldn't break"
> n.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Nathan Otis wrote:
>
> FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
> only one we couldn't break"
> n.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Would these be the same engineers that OK'd the Dana 35c?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Nathan Otis wrote:
>
>>FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
>>only one we couldn't break"
>>n.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Would these be the same engineers that OK'd the Dana 35c?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Nathan Otis wrote:
>
>>FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
>>only one we couldn't break"
>>n.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Would these be the same engineers that OK'd the Dana 35c?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Nathan Otis wrote:
>
>>FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
>>only one we couldn't break"
>>n.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Would these be the same engineers that OK'd the Dana 35c?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Nathan Otis wrote:
>
>>FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
>>only one we couldn't break"
>>n.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Would these be the same engineers that OK'd the Dana 35c?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Nathan Otis wrote:
>
>>FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
>>only one we couldn't break"
>>n.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Would these be the same engineers that OK'd the Dana 35c?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Nathan Otis wrote:
>
>>FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
>>only one we couldn't break"
>>n.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Would these be the same engineers that OK'd the Dana 35c?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Nathan Otis wrote:
>
>>FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
>>only one we couldn't break"
>>n.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Would these be the same engineers that OK'd the Dana 35c?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Nathan Otis wrote:
>
>>FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
>>only one we couldn't break"
>>n.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
American Motors Corp. didn't use "C" clips:
http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
> same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
> same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
American Motors Corp. didn't use "C" clips:
http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
> same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
> same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
American Motors Corp. didn't use "C" clips:
http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
> same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
> same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..