Why no fuel effecient Jeep?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Why no fuel effecient Jeep?
You are messing with the idle mix jets only. This affects anything
under about 1500 rpm, from there up, the main jets take over.
The idle mix jets are the important ones for off road though.
It also is pretty hard to get her too lean, you would have to have the
idle speed up over 1200 rpm.
The leanest you can get it while keeping a fairly stable 700 rpm or
whatever idle is called for is the way to go. I keep turning and
turning, a little lean, give it a shot of gas, a little more on the rpm
screw, give it a shot of gas, a little leaner, etc., etc.
Mike
twaldron wrote:
>
> Yeah, I was going to try that. It does smell of raw fuel sometimes. I
> just don't want to lean it out too much and cause it to run hot.
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
>
> > I was wondering that too.
> >
> > Then try running a leaner idle mix maybe and see what it smells like?
> >
> > I have to bump up the idle speed while leaning it to keep it running.
> > Something like a long six is supposed to have a bit of a rumble in it
> > for best lean. If you make it purr, it will be too rich and it will
> > stink.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > twaldron wrote:
> >
> >>Yeah, but it's a 1971. What smog crap?
> >>
> >>Mike Romain wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>That's the problem with all the smog crap. If it isn't working right,
> >>>then folks fiddle to make them run. Sure they run, but.....
> >>>
> >>>Getting the idle mix to 'best lean' does them wonders, but everything
> >>>has to be working to get there.
> >>>
> >>>Mike
> >>>
> >>>"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Give it a tune-up. That engine is so SMOGed it's pitiful.
> >>>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>twaldron wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I have a '71 Bronco that is that way. I even considered putting a
> >>>>>freeflow CAT on it to make it smell better but I'm not sure what that
> >>>>>would do to the engine.
> >>
> >>--
> >>________________________________________________ ___________
> >>tw
> >>
> >>71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> >>03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> >>01 XJ Sport
> >>
> >>There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> >>-- Dave Barry
> >>
> >>Pronunciation: 'jEp
> >>Function: noun
> >>Date: 1940
> >>
> >>Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> >>A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> >>1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> >>World War II.
> >>
> >>(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> >>________________________________________________ ___________
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
under about 1500 rpm, from there up, the main jets take over.
The idle mix jets are the important ones for off road though.
It also is pretty hard to get her too lean, you would have to have the
idle speed up over 1200 rpm.
The leanest you can get it while keeping a fairly stable 700 rpm or
whatever idle is called for is the way to go. I keep turning and
turning, a little lean, give it a shot of gas, a little more on the rpm
screw, give it a shot of gas, a little leaner, etc., etc.
Mike
twaldron wrote:
>
> Yeah, I was going to try that. It does smell of raw fuel sometimes. I
> just don't want to lean it out too much and cause it to run hot.
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
>
> > I was wondering that too.
> >
> > Then try running a leaner idle mix maybe and see what it smells like?
> >
> > I have to bump up the idle speed while leaning it to keep it running.
> > Something like a long six is supposed to have a bit of a rumble in it
> > for best lean. If you make it purr, it will be too rich and it will
> > stink.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > twaldron wrote:
> >
> >>Yeah, but it's a 1971. What smog crap?
> >>
> >>Mike Romain wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>That's the problem with all the smog crap. If it isn't working right,
> >>>then folks fiddle to make them run. Sure they run, but.....
> >>>
> >>>Getting the idle mix to 'best lean' does them wonders, but everything
> >>>has to be working to get there.
> >>>
> >>>Mike
> >>>
> >>>"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Give it a tune-up. That engine is so SMOGed it's pitiful.
> >>>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>twaldron wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I have a '71 Bronco that is that way. I even considered putting a
> >>>>>freeflow CAT on it to make it smell better but I'm not sure what that
> >>>>>would do to the engine.
> >>
> >>--
> >>________________________________________________ ___________
> >>tw
> >>
> >>71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> >>03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> >>01 XJ Sport
> >>
> >>There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> >>-- Dave Barry
> >>
> >>Pronunciation: 'jEp
> >>Function: noun
> >>Date: 1940
> >>
> >>Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> >>A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> >>1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> >>World War II.
> >>
> >>(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> >>________________________________________________ ___________
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Why no fuel effecient Jeep?
You are messing with the idle mix jets only. This affects anything
under about 1500 rpm, from there up, the main jets take over.
The idle mix jets are the important ones for off road though.
It also is pretty hard to get her too lean, you would have to have the
idle speed up over 1200 rpm.
The leanest you can get it while keeping a fairly stable 700 rpm or
whatever idle is called for is the way to go. I keep turning and
turning, a little lean, give it a shot of gas, a little more on the rpm
screw, give it a shot of gas, a little leaner, etc., etc.
Mike
twaldron wrote:
>
> Yeah, I was going to try that. It does smell of raw fuel sometimes. I
> just don't want to lean it out too much and cause it to run hot.
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
>
> > I was wondering that too.
> >
> > Then try running a leaner idle mix maybe and see what it smells like?
> >
> > I have to bump up the idle speed while leaning it to keep it running.
> > Something like a long six is supposed to have a bit of a rumble in it
> > for best lean. If you make it purr, it will be too rich and it will
> > stink.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > twaldron wrote:
> >
> >>Yeah, but it's a 1971. What smog crap?
> >>
> >>Mike Romain wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>That's the problem with all the smog crap. If it isn't working right,
> >>>then folks fiddle to make them run. Sure they run, but.....
> >>>
> >>>Getting the idle mix to 'best lean' does them wonders, but everything
> >>>has to be working to get there.
> >>>
> >>>Mike
> >>>
> >>>"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Give it a tune-up. That engine is so SMOGed it's pitiful.
> >>>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>twaldron wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I have a '71 Bronco that is that way. I even considered putting a
> >>>>>freeflow CAT on it to make it smell better but I'm not sure what that
> >>>>>would do to the engine.
> >>
> >>--
> >>________________________________________________ ___________
> >>tw
> >>
> >>71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> >>03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> >>01 XJ Sport
> >>
> >>There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> >>-- Dave Barry
> >>
> >>Pronunciation: 'jEp
> >>Function: noun
> >>Date: 1940
> >>
> >>Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> >>A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> >>1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> >>World War II.
> >>
> >>(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> >>________________________________________________ ___________
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
under about 1500 rpm, from there up, the main jets take over.
The idle mix jets are the important ones for off road though.
It also is pretty hard to get her too lean, you would have to have the
idle speed up over 1200 rpm.
The leanest you can get it while keeping a fairly stable 700 rpm or
whatever idle is called for is the way to go. I keep turning and
turning, a little lean, give it a shot of gas, a little more on the rpm
screw, give it a shot of gas, a little leaner, etc., etc.
Mike
twaldron wrote:
>
> Yeah, I was going to try that. It does smell of raw fuel sometimes. I
> just don't want to lean it out too much and cause it to run hot.
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
>
> > I was wondering that too.
> >
> > Then try running a leaner idle mix maybe and see what it smells like?
> >
> > I have to bump up the idle speed while leaning it to keep it running.
> > Something like a long six is supposed to have a bit of a rumble in it
> > for best lean. If you make it purr, it will be too rich and it will
> > stink.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > twaldron wrote:
> >
> >>Yeah, but it's a 1971. What smog crap?
> >>
> >>Mike Romain wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>That's the problem with all the smog crap. If it isn't working right,
> >>>then folks fiddle to make them run. Sure they run, but.....
> >>>
> >>>Getting the idle mix to 'best lean' does them wonders, but everything
> >>>has to be working to get there.
> >>>
> >>>Mike
> >>>
> >>>"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Give it a tune-up. That engine is so SMOGed it's pitiful.
> >>>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>twaldron wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I have a '71 Bronco that is that way. I even considered putting a
> >>>>>freeflow CAT on it to make it smell better but I'm not sure what that
> >>>>>would do to the engine.
> >>
> >>--
> >>________________________________________________ ___________
> >>tw
> >>
> >>71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> >>03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> >>01 XJ Sport
> >>
> >>There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> >>-- Dave Barry
> >>
> >>Pronunciation: 'jEp
> >>Function: noun
> >>Date: 1940
> >>
> >>Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> >>A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> >>1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> >>World War II.
> >>
> >>(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> >>________________________________________________ ___________
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Why no fuel effecient Jeep?
You are messing with the idle mix jets only. This affects anything
under about 1500 rpm, from there up, the main jets take over.
The idle mix jets are the important ones for off road though.
It also is pretty hard to get her too lean, you would have to have the
idle speed up over 1200 rpm.
The leanest you can get it while keeping a fairly stable 700 rpm or
whatever idle is called for is the way to go. I keep turning and
turning, a little lean, give it a shot of gas, a little more on the rpm
screw, give it a shot of gas, a little leaner, etc., etc.
Mike
twaldron wrote:
>
> Yeah, I was going to try that. It does smell of raw fuel sometimes. I
> just don't want to lean it out too much and cause it to run hot.
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
>
> > I was wondering that too.
> >
> > Then try running a leaner idle mix maybe and see what it smells like?
> >
> > I have to bump up the idle speed while leaning it to keep it running.
> > Something like a long six is supposed to have a bit of a rumble in it
> > for best lean. If you make it purr, it will be too rich and it will
> > stink.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > twaldron wrote:
> >
> >>Yeah, but it's a 1971. What smog crap?
> >>
> >>Mike Romain wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>That's the problem with all the smog crap. If it isn't working right,
> >>>then folks fiddle to make them run. Sure they run, but.....
> >>>
> >>>Getting the idle mix to 'best lean' does them wonders, but everything
> >>>has to be working to get there.
> >>>
> >>>Mike
> >>>
> >>>"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Give it a tune-up. That engine is so SMOGed it's pitiful.
> >>>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>twaldron wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I have a '71 Bronco that is that way. I even considered putting a
> >>>>>freeflow CAT on it to make it smell better but I'm not sure what that
> >>>>>would do to the engine.
> >>
> >>--
> >>________________________________________________ ___________
> >>tw
> >>
> >>71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> >>03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> >>01 XJ Sport
> >>
> >>There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> >>-- Dave Barry
> >>
> >>Pronunciation: 'jEp
> >>Function: noun
> >>Date: 1940
> >>
> >>Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> >>A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> >>1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> >>World War II.
> >>
> >>(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> >>________________________________________________ ___________
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
under about 1500 rpm, from there up, the main jets take over.
The idle mix jets are the important ones for off road though.
It also is pretty hard to get her too lean, you would have to have the
idle speed up over 1200 rpm.
The leanest you can get it while keeping a fairly stable 700 rpm or
whatever idle is called for is the way to go. I keep turning and
turning, a little lean, give it a shot of gas, a little more on the rpm
screw, give it a shot of gas, a little leaner, etc., etc.
Mike
twaldron wrote:
>
> Yeah, I was going to try that. It does smell of raw fuel sometimes. I
> just don't want to lean it out too much and cause it to run hot.
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
>
> > I was wondering that too.
> >
> > Then try running a leaner idle mix maybe and see what it smells like?
> >
> > I have to bump up the idle speed while leaning it to keep it running.
> > Something like a long six is supposed to have a bit of a rumble in it
> > for best lean. If you make it purr, it will be too rich and it will
> > stink.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > twaldron wrote:
> >
> >>Yeah, but it's a 1971. What smog crap?
> >>
> >>Mike Romain wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>That's the problem with all the smog crap. If it isn't working right,
> >>>then folks fiddle to make them run. Sure they run, but.....
> >>>
> >>>Getting the idle mix to 'best lean' does them wonders, but everything
> >>>has to be working to get there.
> >>>
> >>>Mike
> >>>
> >>>"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Give it a tune-up. That engine is so SMOGed it's pitiful.
> >>>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>twaldron wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I have a '71 Bronco that is that way. I even considered putting a
> >>>>>freeflow CAT on it to make it smell better but I'm not sure what that
> >>>>>would do to the engine.
> >>
> >>--
> >>________________________________________________ ___________
> >>tw
> >>
> >>71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> >>03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> >>01 XJ Sport
> >>
> >>There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> >>-- Dave Barry
> >>
> >>Pronunciation: 'jEp
> >>Function: noun
> >>Date: 1940
> >>
> >>Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> >>A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> >>1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> >>World War II.
> >>
> >>(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> >>________________________________________________ ___________
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Why no fuel effecient Jeep?
My brother's '70 Torino (which I also drove through high school) had no smog
equipment that I can remember, just a vacuum advance on the distributor...
http://home.triad.rr.com/redsled/torinohome.html
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4186CCC3.397C3A3C@***.net...
> The only thing that Kalifornia car's missing is the catalytic
> convert, and that's only because it's a utility vehicle, you may see the
> remains of the trap door in the gas tank filler tube, and written on the
> gas gauge it's an unleaded fuel only car. Look at a 70 Ford engine, you
> may just see the air injection and vapor recovery, a multitude of vacuum
> hoses controlling the distributor:
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...item=793067932
4&category=33615&sspagename=WDVW
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> twaldron wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, but it's a 1971. What smog crap?
equipment that I can remember, just a vacuum advance on the distributor...
http://home.triad.rr.com/redsled/torinohome.html
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4186CCC3.397C3A3C@***.net...
> The only thing that Kalifornia car's missing is the catalytic
> convert, and that's only because it's a utility vehicle, you may see the
> remains of the trap door in the gas tank filler tube, and written on the
> gas gauge it's an unleaded fuel only car. Look at a 70 Ford engine, you
> may just see the air injection and vapor recovery, a multitude of vacuum
> hoses controlling the distributor:
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...item=793067932
4&category=33615&sspagename=WDVW
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> twaldron wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, but it's a 1971. What smog crap?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Why no fuel effecient Jeep?
My brother's '70 Torino (which I also drove through high school) had no smog
equipment that I can remember, just a vacuum advance on the distributor...
http://home.triad.rr.com/redsled/torinohome.html
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4186CCC3.397C3A3C@***.net...
> The only thing that Kalifornia car's missing is the catalytic
> convert, and that's only because it's a utility vehicle, you may see the
> remains of the trap door in the gas tank filler tube, and written on the
> gas gauge it's an unleaded fuel only car. Look at a 70 Ford engine, you
> may just see the air injection and vapor recovery, a multitude of vacuum
> hoses controlling the distributor:
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...item=793067932
4&category=33615&sspagename=WDVW
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> twaldron wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, but it's a 1971. What smog crap?
equipment that I can remember, just a vacuum advance on the distributor...
http://home.triad.rr.com/redsled/torinohome.html
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4186CCC3.397C3A3C@***.net...
> The only thing that Kalifornia car's missing is the catalytic
> convert, and that's only because it's a utility vehicle, you may see the
> remains of the trap door in the gas tank filler tube, and written on the
> gas gauge it's an unleaded fuel only car. Look at a 70 Ford engine, you
> may just see the air injection and vapor recovery, a multitude of vacuum
> hoses controlling the distributor:
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...item=793067932
4&category=33615&sspagename=WDVW
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> twaldron wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, but it's a 1971. What smog crap?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Why no fuel effecient Jeep?
My brother's '70 Torino (which I also drove through high school) had no smog
equipment that I can remember, just a vacuum advance on the distributor...
http://home.triad.rr.com/redsled/torinohome.html
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4186CCC3.397C3A3C@***.net...
> The only thing that Kalifornia car's missing is the catalytic
> convert, and that's only because it's a utility vehicle, you may see the
> remains of the trap door in the gas tank filler tube, and written on the
> gas gauge it's an unleaded fuel only car. Look at a 70 Ford engine, you
> may just see the air injection and vapor recovery, a multitude of vacuum
> hoses controlling the distributor:
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...item=793067932
4&category=33615&sspagename=WDVW
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> twaldron wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, but it's a 1971. What smog crap?
equipment that I can remember, just a vacuum advance on the distributor...
http://home.triad.rr.com/redsled/torinohome.html
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4186CCC3.397C3A3C@***.net...
> The only thing that Kalifornia car's missing is the catalytic
> convert, and that's only because it's a utility vehicle, you may see the
> remains of the trap door in the gas tank filler tube, and written on the
> gas gauge it's an unleaded fuel only car. Look at a 70 Ford engine, you
> may just see the air injection and vapor recovery, a multitude of vacuum
> hoses controlling the distributor:
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...item=793067932
4&category=33615&sspagename=WDVW
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> twaldron wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, but it's a 1971. What smog crap?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Why no fuel effecient Jeep?
unless you agree with Bill and Mike R. :-)
"jeff" <jalowe44.del.ete.this@hotmail..com.invaid> wrote in message
news:yByhd.723$7W.464@trnddc08...
> Sorry Peter, when you come here you are not entitled to an opinion.<g>
"jeff" <jalowe44.del.ete.this@hotmail..com.invaid> wrote in message
news:yByhd.723$7W.464@trnddc08...
> Sorry Peter, when you come here you are not entitled to an opinion.<g>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Why no fuel effecient Jeep?
unless you agree with Bill and Mike R. :-)
"jeff" <jalowe44.del.ete.this@hotmail..com.invaid> wrote in message
news:yByhd.723$7W.464@trnddc08...
> Sorry Peter, when you come here you are not entitled to an opinion.<g>
"jeff" <jalowe44.del.ete.this@hotmail..com.invaid> wrote in message
news:yByhd.723$7W.464@trnddc08...
> Sorry Peter, when you come here you are not entitled to an opinion.<g>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Why no fuel effecient Jeep?
unless you agree with Bill and Mike R. :-)
"jeff" <jalowe44.del.ete.this@hotmail..com.invaid> wrote in message
news:yByhd.723$7W.464@trnddc08...
> Sorry Peter, when you come here you are not entitled to an opinion.<g>
"jeff" <jalowe44.del.ete.this@hotmail..com.invaid> wrote in message
news:yByhd.723$7W.464@trnddc08...
> Sorry Peter, when you come here you are not entitled to an opinion.<g>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Why no fuel effecient Jeep?
Hey now, I give mine as free as Bill does.... well...
;-)
Mike
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> unless you agree with Bill and Mike R. :-)
>
> "jeff" <jalowe44.del.ete.this@hotmail..com.invaid> wrote in message
> news:yByhd.723$7W.464@trnddc08...
> > Sorry Peter, when you come here you are not entitled to an opinion.<g>
;-)
Mike
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> unless you agree with Bill and Mike R. :-)
>
> "jeff" <jalowe44.del.ete.this@hotmail..com.invaid> wrote in message
> news:yByhd.723$7W.464@trnddc08...
> > Sorry Peter, when you come here you are not entitled to an opinion.<g>
