Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
#81
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
I can see that. They are in the opposite order when going to 2 WD from
4x4, stock the t-case shifts first both ways followed by the vacuum
signal to the axle.
Mike
Steve wrote:
>
> Ah yes, of course.
>
> Don't know why, but I've always pushed or pulled the cable while still
> in 4x4. Maybe it comes from my first test run with the cable when I
> stupidly pulled to engage while driving in 2HI. Grrrrunch.
>
> Steve
> http://xjeep.dyndns.org
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > Once the shift is made the driveshaft is no longer under engine power.
> >
> > Steve wrote:
> >>
> >>I presume you don't resort to the brute force 3000 rpm vacuum method
> >>until after trying to feather the gas to release pressure on the splined
> >>collar.
4x4, stock the t-case shifts first both ways followed by the vacuum
signal to the axle.
Mike
Steve wrote:
>
> Ah yes, of course.
>
> Don't know why, but I've always pushed or pulled the cable while still
> in 4x4. Maybe it comes from my first test run with the cable when I
> stupidly pulled to engage while driving in 2HI. Grrrrunch.
>
> Steve
> http://xjeep.dyndns.org
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > Once the shift is made the driveshaft is no longer under engine power.
> >
> > Steve wrote:
> >>
> >>I presume you don't resort to the brute force 3000 rpm vacuum method
> >>until after trying to feather the gas to release pressure on the splined
> >>collar.
#82
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
I can see that. They are in the opposite order when going to 2 WD from
4x4, stock the t-case shifts first both ways followed by the vacuum
signal to the axle.
Mike
Steve wrote:
>
> Ah yes, of course.
>
> Don't know why, but I've always pushed or pulled the cable while still
> in 4x4. Maybe it comes from my first test run with the cable when I
> stupidly pulled to engage while driving in 2HI. Grrrrunch.
>
> Steve
> http://xjeep.dyndns.org
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > Once the shift is made the driveshaft is no longer under engine power.
> >
> > Steve wrote:
> >>
> >>I presume you don't resort to the brute force 3000 rpm vacuum method
> >>until after trying to feather the gas to release pressure on the splined
> >>collar.
4x4, stock the t-case shifts first both ways followed by the vacuum
signal to the axle.
Mike
Steve wrote:
>
> Ah yes, of course.
>
> Don't know why, but I've always pushed or pulled the cable while still
> in 4x4. Maybe it comes from my first test run with the cable when I
> stupidly pulled to engage while driving in 2HI. Grrrrunch.
>
> Steve
> http://xjeep.dyndns.org
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > Once the shift is made the driveshaft is no longer under engine power.
> >
> > Steve wrote:
> >>
> >>I presume you don't resort to the brute force 3000 rpm vacuum method
> >>until after trying to feather the gas to release pressure on the splined
> >>collar.
#86
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
Nope, my '93 had a non-disconnect axle. They started with the non-disconnect
axle with the full time Tcases, and I'm guessing they decided to drop the
vacuum disconnect so they wouldn't need two different axke systems for the
same vehicle.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:rtidnXLXHrceFYLfRVn-iQ@ez2.net...
>
> "Steve" <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message
> news:3898hnF5hhebpU2@individual.net...
>
> I thought the Cherokee in '94 would have the same system as the YJ of the
> same year.
>
>
>
>
>
axle with the full time Tcases, and I'm guessing they decided to drop the
vacuum disconnect so they wouldn't need two different axke systems for the
same vehicle.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:rtidnXLXHrceFYLfRVn-iQ@ez2.net...
>
> "Steve" <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message
> news:3898hnF5hhebpU2@individual.net...
>
> I thought the Cherokee in '94 would have the same system as the YJ of the
> same year.
>
>
>
>
>
#87
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
Nope, my '93 had a non-disconnect axle. They started with the non-disconnect
axle with the full time Tcases, and I'm guessing they decided to drop the
vacuum disconnect so they wouldn't need two different axke systems for the
same vehicle.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:rtidnXLXHrceFYLfRVn-iQ@ez2.net...
>
> "Steve" <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message
> news:3898hnF5hhebpU2@individual.net...
>
> I thought the Cherokee in '94 would have the same system as the YJ of the
> same year.
>
>
>
>
>
axle with the full time Tcases, and I'm guessing they decided to drop the
vacuum disconnect so they wouldn't need two different axke systems for the
same vehicle.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:rtidnXLXHrceFYLfRVn-iQ@ez2.net...
>
> "Steve" <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message
> news:3898hnF5hhebpU2@individual.net...
>
> I thought the Cherokee in '94 would have the same system as the YJ of the
> same year.
>
>
>
>
>
#88
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
Nope, my '93 had a non-disconnect axle. They started with the non-disconnect
axle with the full time Tcases, and I'm guessing they decided to drop the
vacuum disconnect so they wouldn't need two different axke systems for the
same vehicle.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:rtidnXLXHrceFYLfRVn-iQ@ez2.net...
>
> "Steve" <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message
> news:3898hnF5hhebpU2@individual.net...
>
> I thought the Cherokee in '94 would have the same system as the YJ of the
> same year.
>
>
>
>
>
axle with the full time Tcases, and I'm guessing they decided to drop the
vacuum disconnect so they wouldn't need two different axke systems for the
same vehicle.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:rtidnXLXHrceFYLfRVn-iQ@ez2.net...
>
> "Steve" <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message
> news:3898hnF5hhebpU2@individual.net...
>
> I thought the Cherokee in '94 would have the same system as the YJ of the
> same year.
>
>
>
>
>
#89
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
You notice that with year they get a little cheaper?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nope, my '93 had a non-disconnect axle. They started with the non-disconnect
> axle with the full time Tcases, and I'm guessing they decided to drop the
> vacuum disconnect so they wouldn't need two different axke systems for the
> same vehicle.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nope, my '93 had a non-disconnect axle. They started with the non-disconnect
> axle with the full time Tcases, and I'm guessing they decided to drop the
> vacuum disconnect so they wouldn't need two different axke systems for the
> same vehicle.
#90
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlock hubs in 94 Cherokee
You notice that with year they get a little cheaper?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nope, my '93 had a non-disconnect axle. They started with the non-disconnect
> axle with the full time Tcases, and I'm guessing they decided to drop the
> vacuum disconnect so they wouldn't need two different axke systems for the
> same vehicle.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Nope, my '93 had a non-disconnect axle. They started with the non-disconnect
> axle with the full time Tcases, and I'm guessing they decided to drop the
> vacuum disconnect so they wouldn't need two different axke systems for the
> same vehicle.