Uh oh, Here We Go Again!
06-26-2006, 10:00 PM
#281
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Uh oh, Here We Go Again!
My Dad was getting over a hundred and seventy five bucks a cord,
eucalyptus, over twenty years ago, San Diego.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Frank_v7.0" wrote:
>
> Over $90 per cord and that's a face cord. Or cut your own and pay for
> gas, oil. chainsaw maintainence, splitter and plus hours of labor. Rule
> of thumb in Vermont was you needed at least a 10 acre woodlot to be self
> sustaining. And that's a decent woodlot not just 10 acres of land. And I
> almost forgot, the clean-up after loading the inside wood racks. On the
> plus side it was good exercise and kept you warm while doing it.
>
> --
> FRH
eucalyptus, over twenty years ago, San Diego.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Frank_v7.0" wrote:
>
> Over $90 per cord and that's a face cord. Or cut your own and pay for
> gas, oil. chainsaw maintainence, splitter and plus hours of labor. Rule
> of thumb in Vermont was you needed at least a 10 acre woodlot to be self
> sustaining. And that's a decent woodlot not just 10 acres of land. And I
> almost forgot, the clean-up after loading the inside wood racks. On the
> plus side it was good exercise and kept you warm while doing it.
>
> --
> FRH
06-26-2006, 10:00 PM
#282
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Uh oh, Here We Go Again!
My Dad was getting over a hundred and seventy five bucks a cord,
eucalyptus, over twenty years ago, San Diego.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Frank_v7.0" wrote:
>
> Over $90 per cord and that's a face cord. Or cut your own and pay for
> gas, oil. chainsaw maintainence, splitter and plus hours of labor. Rule
> of thumb in Vermont was you needed at least a 10 acre woodlot to be self
> sustaining. And that's a decent woodlot not just 10 acres of land. And I
> almost forgot, the clean-up after loading the inside wood racks. On the
> plus side it was good exercise and kept you warm while doing it.
>
> --
> FRH
eucalyptus, over twenty years ago, San Diego.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Frank_v7.0" wrote:
>
> Over $90 per cord and that's a face cord. Or cut your own and pay for
> gas, oil. chainsaw maintainence, splitter and plus hours of labor. Rule
> of thumb in Vermont was you needed at least a 10 acre woodlot to be self
> sustaining. And that's a decent woodlot not just 10 acres of land. And I
> almost forgot, the clean-up after loading the inside wood racks. On the
> plus side it was good exercise and kept you warm while doing it.
>
> --
> FRH
06-26-2006, 10:00 PM
#283
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Uh oh, Here We Go Again!
My Dad was getting over a hundred and seventy five bucks a cord,
eucalyptus, over twenty years ago, San Diego.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Frank_v7.0" wrote:
>
> Over $90 per cord and that's a face cord. Or cut your own and pay for
> gas, oil. chainsaw maintainence, splitter and plus hours of labor. Rule
> of thumb in Vermont was you needed at least a 10 acre woodlot to be self
> sustaining. And that's a decent woodlot not just 10 acres of land. And I
> almost forgot, the clean-up after loading the inside wood racks. On the
> plus side it was good exercise and kept you warm while doing it.
>
> --
> FRH
eucalyptus, over twenty years ago, San Diego.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Frank_v7.0" wrote:
>
> Over $90 per cord and that's a face cord. Or cut your own and pay for
> gas, oil. chainsaw maintainence, splitter and plus hours of labor. Rule
> of thumb in Vermont was you needed at least a 10 acre woodlot to be self
> sustaining. And that's a decent woodlot not just 10 acres of land. And I
> almost forgot, the clean-up after loading the inside wood racks. On the
> plus side it was good exercise and kept you warm while doing it.
>
> --
> FRH
06-26-2006, 10:06 PM
#284
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Uh oh, Here We Go Again!
"From what products do you believe Mobil 1 is refined?" Then we
agree Mobil 1 is made from one hundred percent petroleum.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Not that it matters but I'm quite a bit right of center, and I didn't
> know anything about your spelling history.
>
> Your question is pointless and not worth evading, in fact the person you
> asked ALREADY answered it before you asked (in the post you clearly
> didn't read all the way through).
>
> --
> Simon
agree Mobil 1 is made from one hundred percent petroleum.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Not that it matters but I'm quite a bit right of center, and I didn't
> know anything about your spelling history.
>
> Your question is pointless and not worth evading, in fact the person you
> asked ALREADY answered it before you asked (in the post you clearly
> didn't read all the way through).
>
> --
> Simon
06-26-2006, 10:06 PM
#285
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Uh oh, Here We Go Again!
"From what products do you believe Mobil 1 is refined?" Then we
agree Mobil 1 is made from one hundred percent petroleum.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Not that it matters but I'm quite a bit right of center, and I didn't
> know anything about your spelling history.
>
> Your question is pointless and not worth evading, in fact the person you
> asked ALREADY answered it before you asked (in the post you clearly
> didn't read all the way through).
>
> --
> Simon
agree Mobil 1 is made from one hundred percent petroleum.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Not that it matters but I'm quite a bit right of center, and I didn't
> know anything about your spelling history.
>
> Your question is pointless and not worth evading, in fact the person you
> asked ALREADY answered it before you asked (in the post you clearly
> didn't read all the way through).
>
> --
> Simon
06-26-2006, 10:06 PM
#286
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Uh oh, Here We Go Again!
"From what products do you believe Mobil 1 is refined?" Then we
agree Mobil 1 is made from one hundred percent petroleum.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Not that it matters but I'm quite a bit right of center, and I didn't
> know anything about your spelling history.
>
> Your question is pointless and not worth evading, in fact the person you
> asked ALREADY answered it before you asked (in the post you clearly
> didn't read all the way through).
>
> --
> Simon
agree Mobil 1 is made from one hundred percent petroleum.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> Not that it matters but I'm quite a bit right of center, and I didn't
> know anything about your spelling history.
>
> Your question is pointless and not worth evading, in fact the person you
> asked ALREADY answered it before you asked (in the post you clearly
> didn't read all the way through).
>
> --
> Simon
06-26-2006, 10:39 PM
#287
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Uh oh, Here We Go Again!
Waiting for Bill to post pictures of his Doble. . .
Coasty proclaimed:
> Or coal fired steam because the US has 2/3 of the worlds coal reserves,
> maybe we are saving it for a rainy day.
> Coasty
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:mYCdnSEyUMam_z3ZnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>
>>I think the only way our fuel will be non-tax subsidized (even petroleum is
>>to a point, look at all the tax breaks the oil producers are getting) is if
>>we revert back to wood-fired steam.
>>
>>"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>news:449F32B4.8DF4C041@***.net...
>>
>>> I want our fuel to be non tax subsidized. Petroleum, will always be
>>>the cheapest energy we may buy!
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>
>>>>Bill, you don't have your gas station, why do you remain a shill for the
>>>>petroleum industry?
>>
>>
>
>
Coasty proclaimed:
> Or coal fired steam because the US has 2/3 of the worlds coal reserves,
> maybe we are saving it for a rainy day.
> Coasty
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:mYCdnSEyUMam_z3ZnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>
>>I think the only way our fuel will be non-tax subsidized (even petroleum is
>>to a point, look at all the tax breaks the oil producers are getting) is if
>>we revert back to wood-fired steam.
>>
>>"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>news:449F32B4.8DF4C041@***.net...
>>
>>> I want our fuel to be non tax subsidized. Petroleum, will always be
>>>the cheapest energy we may buy!
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>
>>>>Bill, you don't have your gas station, why do you remain a shill for the
>>>>petroleum industry?
>>
>>
>
>
06-26-2006, 10:39 PM
#288
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Uh oh, Here We Go Again!
Waiting for Bill to post pictures of his Doble. . .
Coasty proclaimed:
> Or coal fired steam because the US has 2/3 of the worlds coal reserves,
> maybe we are saving it for a rainy day.
> Coasty
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:mYCdnSEyUMam_z3ZnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>
>>I think the only way our fuel will be non-tax subsidized (even petroleum is
>>to a point, look at all the tax breaks the oil producers are getting) is if
>>we revert back to wood-fired steam.
>>
>>"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>news:449F32B4.8DF4C041@***.net...
>>
>>> I want our fuel to be non tax subsidized. Petroleum, will always be
>>>the cheapest energy we may buy!
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>
>>>>Bill, you don't have your gas station, why do you remain a shill for the
>>>>petroleum industry?
>>
>>
>
>
Coasty proclaimed:
> Or coal fired steam because the US has 2/3 of the worlds coal reserves,
> maybe we are saving it for a rainy day.
> Coasty
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:mYCdnSEyUMam_z3ZnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>
>>I think the only way our fuel will be non-tax subsidized (even petroleum is
>>to a point, look at all the tax breaks the oil producers are getting) is if
>>we revert back to wood-fired steam.
>>
>>"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>news:449F32B4.8DF4C041@***.net...
>>
>>> I want our fuel to be non tax subsidized. Petroleum, will always be
>>>the cheapest energy we may buy!
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>
>>>>Bill, you don't have your gas station, why do you remain a shill for the
>>>>petroleum industry?
>>
>>
>
>
06-26-2006, 10:39 PM
#289
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Uh oh, Here We Go Again!
Waiting for Bill to post pictures of his Doble. . .
Coasty proclaimed:
> Or coal fired steam because the US has 2/3 of the worlds coal reserves,
> maybe we are saving it for a rainy day.
> Coasty
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:mYCdnSEyUMam_z3ZnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>
>>I think the only way our fuel will be non-tax subsidized (even petroleum is
>>to a point, look at all the tax breaks the oil producers are getting) is if
>>we revert back to wood-fired steam.
>>
>>"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>news:449F32B4.8DF4C041@***.net...
>>
>>> I want our fuel to be non tax subsidized. Petroleum, will always be
>>>the cheapest energy we may buy!
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>
>>>>Bill, you don't have your gas station, why do you remain a shill for the
>>>>petroleum industry?
>>
>>
>
>
Coasty proclaimed:
> Or coal fired steam because the US has 2/3 of the worlds coal reserves,
> maybe we are saving it for a rainy day.
> Coasty
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:mYCdnSEyUMam_z3ZnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>
>>I think the only way our fuel will be non-tax subsidized (even petroleum is
>>to a point, look at all the tax breaks the oil producers are getting) is if
>>we revert back to wood-fired steam.
>>
>>"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>news:449F32B4.8DF4C041@***.net...
>>
>>> I want our fuel to be non tax subsidized. Petroleum, will always be
>>>the cheapest energy we may buy!
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>
>>>>Bill, you don't have your gas station, why do you remain a shill for the
>>>>petroleum industry?
>>
>>
>
>
06-26-2006, 10:55 PM
#290
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Uh oh, Here We Go Again!
L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> My Dad was getting over a hundred and seventy five bucks a cord,
> eucalyptus, over twenty years ago, San Diego.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "Frank_v7.0" wrote:
>> Over $90 per cord and that's a face cord. Or cut your own and pay for
>> gas, oil. chainsaw maintainence, splitter and plus hours of labor. Rule
>> of thumb in Vermont was you needed at least a 10 acre woodlot to be self
>> sustaining. And that's a decent woodlot not just 10 acres of land. And I
>> almost forgot, the clean-up after loading the inside wood racks. On the
>> plus side it was good exercise and kept you warm while doing it.
>>
>> --
>> FRH
So thats what happened to the San Diego Forrest. :-)
--
FRH
> My Dad was getting over a hundred and seventy five bucks a cord,
> eucalyptus, over twenty years ago, San Diego.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "Frank_v7.0" wrote:
>> Over $90 per cord and that's a face cord. Or cut your own and pay for
>> gas, oil. chainsaw maintainence, splitter and plus hours of labor. Rule
>> of thumb in Vermont was you needed at least a 10 acre woodlot to be self
>> sustaining. And that's a decent woodlot not just 10 acres of land. And I
>> almost forgot, the clean-up after loading the inside wood racks. On the
>> plus side it was good exercise and kept you warm while doing it.
>>
>> --
>> FRH
So thats what happened to the San Diego Forrest. :-)
--
FRH