Trail(er) trash
06-05-2006, 12:21 AM
#451
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
http://www.ivaw.net/
http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
Earle
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
case'
> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
>
>
> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
> >
> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
> >
> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did, you
> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
> > entire argument.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
http://www.ivaw.net/
http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
Earle
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
case'
> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
>
>
> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
> >
> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
> >
> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did, you
> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
> > entire argument.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
06-05-2006, 12:30 AM
#452
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Lon,
The comment on agricultural zoning was only meant to show, that there is no
agricultural land here. The county's economy is based on tourism, ever
since the mines closed. There are a few salty old "miners", that drive
around in Sunnyside Gold Corporation Suburban, who apparently supervise
cleanup operations. I suspect that they, like everything else, are part of
the tourist show. A guy came walking down the sidewalk in front of my house
a couple of weeks ago, and asked me whether my house and those of my
neighbors were "real". ;^)
Here those "sociopathic delinquents" you are talking about will drive across
private land, and then claim it is a "historic mining road". The county is
trying to find out where the real roads are, but it is pretty hard given the
scarcity of reliable records. There is a notice up at the post office,
asking long time residents to bring in old photos, hand-drawn maps, diaries
or anything that might demonstrate the historical existence of any road.
Sometimes the county appears to help the "sociopathic delinquents" along, by
putting up county road signs on favorite Jeep trails. There is little
respect for the process of eminent domain. A friend who owns a patented
mining claim, states that the county recently moved one of these "roads" so
that it now crosses his property, with no notice to anyone.
The county seems to be more interested in protecting the public from
property owners, than the reverse. If someone drives a Jeep or Hummer
across your property, it's not a big deal. But God forbid you erect a
seasonal cabin, without all the necessary land use applications, building
permits, etc.
Earle
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:cKudnc58qOa3rh7ZnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Earle Horton proclaimed:
>
>
> >
> > There is no agricultural zoned land in San Juan County, CO. That could
be
> > the place you are thinking about. We have a private landowner, who
objects
> > to skiers from an adjacent ski area, leased from the BLM, skiing across
his
> > land. I just heard, that the county commissioners are initiating
> > condemnation proceedings against him. Recall the recent Supreme Court
> > decision, that made it legal, for local governments to step in, where
> > private landowners "interfere" with economic development. This isn't
quite
> > the same as what Mr. White is complaining about, but it does reflect the
> > same appalling lack of respect for the private property owner.
>
>
> Eminent domain has been around a long time. What waxes and wanes
> periodically is the willingness to use it or extend the privilege to
> areas that arguably were not in the original intent.
>
> As for needing to be zoned agricultural, that appears a bit quaint since
> I've had a neighbor get assistance for someone simply wandering thru
> private property in a rather large city and destroying plants.
>
>
> >
> > Civil or criminal? Depends on the jurisdiction.
>
> Ayup.
>
> > I would be consulting a
> > local lawyer, to see if there is any way to impound one of those
vehicles
> > legally. Act quickly, have the truck in a tow service yard with pit
bulls
> > sleeping in it, with a huge bill for towing and damages to the field
too,
> > and you might scare off some of these "geniuses".
>
> I believe you may have misspelled 'sociopathic delinquents" the
> existence of one or two apparently enough to engender the rabid postings
> of the original poster on this thread. I can just picture him, looking
> much like the Denver Broncos coach, foaming at the mouth at the mere
> sight of a vehicle able to make it over the speed bumps in a shopping
> mall.
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
The comment on agricultural zoning was only meant to show, that there is no
agricultural land here. The county's economy is based on tourism, ever
since the mines closed. There are a few salty old "miners", that drive
around in Sunnyside Gold Corporation Suburban, who apparently supervise
cleanup operations. I suspect that they, like everything else, are part of
the tourist show. A guy came walking down the sidewalk in front of my house
a couple of weeks ago, and asked me whether my house and those of my
neighbors were "real". ;^)
Here those "sociopathic delinquents" you are talking about will drive across
private land, and then claim it is a "historic mining road". The county is
trying to find out where the real roads are, but it is pretty hard given the
scarcity of reliable records. There is a notice up at the post office,
asking long time residents to bring in old photos, hand-drawn maps, diaries
or anything that might demonstrate the historical existence of any road.
Sometimes the county appears to help the "sociopathic delinquents" along, by
putting up county road signs on favorite Jeep trails. There is little
respect for the process of eminent domain. A friend who owns a patented
mining claim, states that the county recently moved one of these "roads" so
that it now crosses his property, with no notice to anyone.
The county seems to be more interested in protecting the public from
property owners, than the reverse. If someone drives a Jeep or Hummer
across your property, it's not a big deal. But God forbid you erect a
seasonal cabin, without all the necessary land use applications, building
permits, etc.
Earle
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:cKudnc58qOa3rh7ZnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Earle Horton proclaimed:
>
>
> >
> > There is no agricultural zoned land in San Juan County, CO. That could
be
> > the place you are thinking about. We have a private landowner, who
objects
> > to skiers from an adjacent ski area, leased from the BLM, skiing across
his
> > land. I just heard, that the county commissioners are initiating
> > condemnation proceedings against him. Recall the recent Supreme Court
> > decision, that made it legal, for local governments to step in, where
> > private landowners "interfere" with economic development. This isn't
quite
> > the same as what Mr. White is complaining about, but it does reflect the
> > same appalling lack of respect for the private property owner.
>
>
> Eminent domain has been around a long time. What waxes and wanes
> periodically is the willingness to use it or extend the privilege to
> areas that arguably were not in the original intent.
>
> As for needing to be zoned agricultural, that appears a bit quaint since
> I've had a neighbor get assistance for someone simply wandering thru
> private property in a rather large city and destroying plants.
>
>
> >
> > Civil or criminal? Depends on the jurisdiction.
>
> Ayup.
>
> > I would be consulting a
> > local lawyer, to see if there is any way to impound one of those
vehicles
> > legally. Act quickly, have the truck in a tow service yard with pit
bulls
> > sleeping in it, with a huge bill for towing and damages to the field
too,
> > and you might scare off some of these "geniuses".
>
> I believe you may have misspelled 'sociopathic delinquents" the
> existence of one or two apparently enough to engender the rabid postings
> of the original poster on this thread. I can just picture him, looking
> much like the Denver Broncos coach, foaming at the mouth at the mere
> sight of a vehicle able to make it over the speed bumps in a shopping
> mall.
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
06-05-2006, 12:30 AM
#453
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Lon,
The comment on agricultural zoning was only meant to show, that there is no
agricultural land here. The county's economy is based on tourism, ever
since the mines closed. There are a few salty old "miners", that drive
around in Sunnyside Gold Corporation Suburban, who apparently supervise
cleanup operations. I suspect that they, like everything else, are part of
the tourist show. A guy came walking down the sidewalk in front of my house
a couple of weeks ago, and asked me whether my house and those of my
neighbors were "real". ;^)
Here those "sociopathic delinquents" you are talking about will drive across
private land, and then claim it is a "historic mining road". The county is
trying to find out where the real roads are, but it is pretty hard given the
scarcity of reliable records. There is a notice up at the post office,
asking long time residents to bring in old photos, hand-drawn maps, diaries
or anything that might demonstrate the historical existence of any road.
Sometimes the county appears to help the "sociopathic delinquents" along, by
putting up county road signs on favorite Jeep trails. There is little
respect for the process of eminent domain. A friend who owns a patented
mining claim, states that the county recently moved one of these "roads" so
that it now crosses his property, with no notice to anyone.
The county seems to be more interested in protecting the public from
property owners, than the reverse. If someone drives a Jeep or Hummer
across your property, it's not a big deal. But God forbid you erect a
seasonal cabin, without all the necessary land use applications, building
permits, etc.
Earle
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:cKudnc58qOa3rh7ZnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Earle Horton proclaimed:
>
>
> >
> > There is no agricultural zoned land in San Juan County, CO. That could
be
> > the place you are thinking about. We have a private landowner, who
objects
> > to skiers from an adjacent ski area, leased from the BLM, skiing across
his
> > land. I just heard, that the county commissioners are initiating
> > condemnation proceedings against him. Recall the recent Supreme Court
> > decision, that made it legal, for local governments to step in, where
> > private landowners "interfere" with economic development. This isn't
quite
> > the same as what Mr. White is complaining about, but it does reflect the
> > same appalling lack of respect for the private property owner.
>
>
> Eminent domain has been around a long time. What waxes and wanes
> periodically is the willingness to use it or extend the privilege to
> areas that arguably were not in the original intent.
>
> As for needing to be zoned agricultural, that appears a bit quaint since
> I've had a neighbor get assistance for someone simply wandering thru
> private property in a rather large city and destroying plants.
>
>
> >
> > Civil or criminal? Depends on the jurisdiction.
>
> Ayup.
>
> > I would be consulting a
> > local lawyer, to see if there is any way to impound one of those
vehicles
> > legally. Act quickly, have the truck in a tow service yard with pit
bulls
> > sleeping in it, with a huge bill for towing and damages to the field
too,
> > and you might scare off some of these "geniuses".
>
> I believe you may have misspelled 'sociopathic delinquents" the
> existence of one or two apparently enough to engender the rabid postings
> of the original poster on this thread. I can just picture him, looking
> much like the Denver Broncos coach, foaming at the mouth at the mere
> sight of a vehicle able to make it over the speed bumps in a shopping
> mall.
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
The comment on agricultural zoning was only meant to show, that there is no
agricultural land here. The county's economy is based on tourism, ever
since the mines closed. There are a few salty old "miners", that drive
around in Sunnyside Gold Corporation Suburban, who apparently supervise
cleanup operations. I suspect that they, like everything else, are part of
the tourist show. A guy came walking down the sidewalk in front of my house
a couple of weeks ago, and asked me whether my house and those of my
neighbors were "real". ;^)
Here those "sociopathic delinquents" you are talking about will drive across
private land, and then claim it is a "historic mining road". The county is
trying to find out where the real roads are, but it is pretty hard given the
scarcity of reliable records. There is a notice up at the post office,
asking long time residents to bring in old photos, hand-drawn maps, diaries
or anything that might demonstrate the historical existence of any road.
Sometimes the county appears to help the "sociopathic delinquents" along, by
putting up county road signs on favorite Jeep trails. There is little
respect for the process of eminent domain. A friend who owns a patented
mining claim, states that the county recently moved one of these "roads" so
that it now crosses his property, with no notice to anyone.
The county seems to be more interested in protecting the public from
property owners, than the reverse. If someone drives a Jeep or Hummer
across your property, it's not a big deal. But God forbid you erect a
seasonal cabin, without all the necessary land use applications, building
permits, etc.
Earle
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:cKudnc58qOa3rh7ZnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Earle Horton proclaimed:
>
>
> >
> > There is no agricultural zoned land in San Juan County, CO. That could
be
> > the place you are thinking about. We have a private landowner, who
objects
> > to skiers from an adjacent ski area, leased from the BLM, skiing across
his
> > land. I just heard, that the county commissioners are initiating
> > condemnation proceedings against him. Recall the recent Supreme Court
> > decision, that made it legal, for local governments to step in, where
> > private landowners "interfere" with economic development. This isn't
quite
> > the same as what Mr. White is complaining about, but it does reflect the
> > same appalling lack of respect for the private property owner.
>
>
> Eminent domain has been around a long time. What waxes and wanes
> periodically is the willingness to use it or extend the privilege to
> areas that arguably were not in the original intent.
>
> As for needing to be zoned agricultural, that appears a bit quaint since
> I've had a neighbor get assistance for someone simply wandering thru
> private property in a rather large city and destroying plants.
>
>
> >
> > Civil or criminal? Depends on the jurisdiction.
>
> Ayup.
>
> > I would be consulting a
> > local lawyer, to see if there is any way to impound one of those
vehicles
> > legally. Act quickly, have the truck in a tow service yard with pit
bulls
> > sleeping in it, with a huge bill for towing and damages to the field
too,
> > and you might scare off some of these "geniuses".
>
> I believe you may have misspelled 'sociopathic delinquents" the
> existence of one or two apparently enough to engender the rabid postings
> of the original poster on this thread. I can just picture him, looking
> much like the Denver Broncos coach, foaming at the mouth at the mere
> sight of a vehicle able to make it over the speed bumps in a shopping
> mall.
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
06-05-2006, 12:30 AM
#454
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Lon,
The comment on agricultural zoning was only meant to show, that there is no
agricultural land here. The county's economy is based on tourism, ever
since the mines closed. There are a few salty old "miners", that drive
around in Sunnyside Gold Corporation Suburban, who apparently supervise
cleanup operations. I suspect that they, like everything else, are part of
the tourist show. A guy came walking down the sidewalk in front of my house
a couple of weeks ago, and asked me whether my house and those of my
neighbors were "real". ;^)
Here those "sociopathic delinquents" you are talking about will drive across
private land, and then claim it is a "historic mining road". The county is
trying to find out where the real roads are, but it is pretty hard given the
scarcity of reliable records. There is a notice up at the post office,
asking long time residents to bring in old photos, hand-drawn maps, diaries
or anything that might demonstrate the historical existence of any road.
Sometimes the county appears to help the "sociopathic delinquents" along, by
putting up county road signs on favorite Jeep trails. There is little
respect for the process of eminent domain. A friend who owns a patented
mining claim, states that the county recently moved one of these "roads" so
that it now crosses his property, with no notice to anyone.
The county seems to be more interested in protecting the public from
property owners, than the reverse. If someone drives a Jeep or Hummer
across your property, it's not a big deal. But God forbid you erect a
seasonal cabin, without all the necessary land use applications, building
permits, etc.
Earle
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:cKudnc58qOa3rh7ZnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Earle Horton proclaimed:
>
>
> >
> > There is no agricultural zoned land in San Juan County, CO. That could
be
> > the place you are thinking about. We have a private landowner, who
objects
> > to skiers from an adjacent ski area, leased from the BLM, skiing across
his
> > land. I just heard, that the county commissioners are initiating
> > condemnation proceedings against him. Recall the recent Supreme Court
> > decision, that made it legal, for local governments to step in, where
> > private landowners "interfere" with economic development. This isn't
quite
> > the same as what Mr. White is complaining about, but it does reflect the
> > same appalling lack of respect for the private property owner.
>
>
> Eminent domain has been around a long time. What waxes and wanes
> periodically is the willingness to use it or extend the privilege to
> areas that arguably were not in the original intent.
>
> As for needing to be zoned agricultural, that appears a bit quaint since
> I've had a neighbor get assistance for someone simply wandering thru
> private property in a rather large city and destroying plants.
>
>
> >
> > Civil or criminal? Depends on the jurisdiction.
>
> Ayup.
>
> > I would be consulting a
> > local lawyer, to see if there is any way to impound one of those
vehicles
> > legally. Act quickly, have the truck in a tow service yard with pit
bulls
> > sleeping in it, with a huge bill for towing and damages to the field
too,
> > and you might scare off some of these "geniuses".
>
> I believe you may have misspelled 'sociopathic delinquents" the
> existence of one or two apparently enough to engender the rabid postings
> of the original poster on this thread. I can just picture him, looking
> much like the Denver Broncos coach, foaming at the mouth at the mere
> sight of a vehicle able to make it over the speed bumps in a shopping
> mall.
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
The comment on agricultural zoning was only meant to show, that there is no
agricultural land here. The county's economy is based on tourism, ever
since the mines closed. There are a few salty old "miners", that drive
around in Sunnyside Gold Corporation Suburban, who apparently supervise
cleanup operations. I suspect that they, like everything else, are part of
the tourist show. A guy came walking down the sidewalk in front of my house
a couple of weeks ago, and asked me whether my house and those of my
neighbors were "real". ;^)
Here those "sociopathic delinquents" you are talking about will drive across
private land, and then claim it is a "historic mining road". The county is
trying to find out where the real roads are, but it is pretty hard given the
scarcity of reliable records. There is a notice up at the post office,
asking long time residents to bring in old photos, hand-drawn maps, diaries
or anything that might demonstrate the historical existence of any road.
Sometimes the county appears to help the "sociopathic delinquents" along, by
putting up county road signs on favorite Jeep trails. There is little
respect for the process of eminent domain. A friend who owns a patented
mining claim, states that the county recently moved one of these "roads" so
that it now crosses his property, with no notice to anyone.
The county seems to be more interested in protecting the public from
property owners, than the reverse. If someone drives a Jeep or Hummer
across your property, it's not a big deal. But God forbid you erect a
seasonal cabin, without all the necessary land use applications, building
permits, etc.
Earle
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:cKudnc58qOa3rh7ZnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Earle Horton proclaimed:
>
>
> >
> > There is no agricultural zoned land in San Juan County, CO. That could
be
> > the place you are thinking about. We have a private landowner, who
objects
> > to skiers from an adjacent ski area, leased from the BLM, skiing across
his
> > land. I just heard, that the county commissioners are initiating
> > condemnation proceedings against him. Recall the recent Supreme Court
> > decision, that made it legal, for local governments to step in, where
> > private landowners "interfere" with economic development. This isn't
quite
> > the same as what Mr. White is complaining about, but it does reflect the
> > same appalling lack of respect for the private property owner.
>
>
> Eminent domain has been around a long time. What waxes and wanes
> periodically is the willingness to use it or extend the privilege to
> areas that arguably were not in the original intent.
>
> As for needing to be zoned agricultural, that appears a bit quaint since
> I've had a neighbor get assistance for someone simply wandering thru
> private property in a rather large city and destroying plants.
>
>
> >
> > Civil or criminal? Depends on the jurisdiction.
>
> Ayup.
>
> > I would be consulting a
> > local lawyer, to see if there is any way to impound one of those
vehicles
> > legally. Act quickly, have the truck in a tow service yard with pit
bulls
> > sleeping in it, with a huge bill for towing and damages to the field
too,
> > and you might scare off some of these "geniuses".
>
> I believe you may have misspelled 'sociopathic delinquents" the
> existence of one or two apparently enough to engender the rabid postings
> of the original poster on this thread. I can just picture him, looking
> much like the Denver Broncos coach, foaming at the mouth at the mere
> sight of a vehicle able to make it over the speed bumps in a shopping
> mall.
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
06-05-2006, 12:33 AM
#455
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Only because the electorate was wise enough to deny him the authority to do
so.
"Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
news:4483a2fe$0$26755$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
>
> http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> http://www.ivaw.net/
> http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
>
> Earle
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
>> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
> case'
>> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
>>
>>
>> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
>> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
>> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
>> >
>> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
>> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
>> >
>> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did, you
>> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
>> > entire argument.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
so.
"Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
news:4483a2fe$0$26755$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
>
> http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> http://www.ivaw.net/
> http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
>
> Earle
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
>> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
> case'
>> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
>>
>>
>> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
>> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
>> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
>> >
>> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
>> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
>> >
>> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did, you
>> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
>> > entire argument.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
06-05-2006, 12:33 AM
#456
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Only because the electorate was wise enough to deny him the authority to do
so.
"Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
news:4483a2fe$0$26755$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
>
> http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> http://www.ivaw.net/
> http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
>
> Earle
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
>> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
> case'
>> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
>>
>>
>> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
>> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
>> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
>> >
>> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
>> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
>> >
>> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did, you
>> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
>> > entire argument.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
so.
"Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
news:4483a2fe$0$26755$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
>
> http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> http://www.ivaw.net/
> http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
>
> Earle
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
>> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
> case'
>> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
>>
>>
>> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
>> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
>> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
>> >
>> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
>> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
>> >
>> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did, you
>> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
>> > entire argument.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
06-05-2006, 12:33 AM
#457
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Only because the electorate was wise enough to deny him the authority to do
so.
"Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
news:4483a2fe$0$26755$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
>
> http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> http://www.ivaw.net/
> http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
>
> Earle
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
>> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
> case'
>> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
>>
>>
>> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
>> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
>> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
>> >
>> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
>> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
>> >
>> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did, you
>> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
>> > entire argument.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
so.
"Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
news:4483a2fe$0$26755$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
>
> http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> http://www.ivaw.net/
> http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
>
> Earle
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
>> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
> case'
>> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
>>
>>
>> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
>> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
>> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
>> >
>> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
>> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
>> >
>> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did, you
>> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
>> > entire argument.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
06-05-2006, 12:52 AM
#458
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
;^)
Earle
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6580d$4483b47a$48311525$32656@FUSE.NET...
> Only because the electorate was wise enough to deny him the authority to
do
> so.
>
>
> "Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:4483a2fe$0$26755$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> > To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
> >
> > http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> > http://www.ivaw.net/
> > http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> > http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> > news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
> >> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
> > case'
> >> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
> >>
> >>
> >> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
> >> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
> >> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
> >> >
> >> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
> >> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
> >> >
> >> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did,
you
> >> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
> >> > entire argument.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Earle
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6580d$4483b47a$48311525$32656@FUSE.NET...
> Only because the electorate was wise enough to deny him the authority to
do
> so.
>
>
> "Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:4483a2fe$0$26755$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> > To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
> >
> > http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> > http://www.ivaw.net/
> > http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> > http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> > news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
> >> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
> > case'
> >> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
> >>
> >>
> >> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
> >> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
> >> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
> >> >
> >> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
> >> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
> >> >
> >> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did,
you
> >> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
> >> > entire argument.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
06-05-2006, 12:52 AM
#459
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
;^)
Earle
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6580d$4483b47a$48311525$32656@FUSE.NET...
> Only because the electorate was wise enough to deny him the authority to
do
> so.
>
>
> "Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:4483a2fe$0$26755$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> > To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
> >
> > http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> > http://www.ivaw.net/
> > http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> > http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> > news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
> >> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
> > case'
> >> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
> >>
> >>
> >> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
> >> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
> >> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
> >> >
> >> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
> >> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
> >> >
> >> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did,
you
> >> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
> >> > entire argument.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Earle
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6580d$4483b47a$48311525$32656@FUSE.NET...
> Only because the electorate was wise enough to deny him the authority to
do
> so.
>
>
> "Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:4483a2fe$0$26755$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> > To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
> >
> > http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> > http://www.ivaw.net/
> > http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> > http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> > news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
> >> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
> > case'
> >> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
> >>
> >>
> >> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
> >> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
> >> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
> >> >
> >> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
> >> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
> >> >
> >> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did,
you
> >> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
> >> > entire argument.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
06-05-2006, 12:52 AM
#460
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
;^)
Earle
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6580d$4483b47a$48311525$32656@FUSE.NET...
> Only because the electorate was wise enough to deny him the authority to
do
> so.
>
>
> "Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:4483a2fe$0$26755$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> > To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
> >
> > http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> > http://www.ivaw.net/
> > http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> > http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> > news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
> >> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
> > case'
> >> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
> >>
> >>
> >> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
> >> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
> >> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
> >> >
> >> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
> >> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
> >> >
> >> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did,
you
> >> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
> >> > entire argument.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Earle
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6580d$4483b47a$48311525$32656@FUSE.NET...
> Only because the electorate was wise enough to deny him the authority to
do
> so.
>
>
> "Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:4483a2fe$0$26755$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> > To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
> >
> > http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> > http://www.ivaw.net/
> > http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> > http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> > news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
> >> There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
> > case'
> >> although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
> >>
> >>
> >> "XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36...
> >> > Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
> >> > news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr.com :
> >> >
> >> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
> >> >> unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
> >> >
> >> > When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did,
you
> >> > weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
> >> > entire argument.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
