steering columns- cherokee to wrangler?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Power steering conversion
Both those ratios are about twice what a passenger car would use.
I don't think you'll find a choice of fittings, pretty much
everything converted to O rings because they're cheaper.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> I'm considering getting a new AGR steering gearbox. Does anybody have any
> good/bad experience with 'em? What's best for an on-road driver that gets
> off-road every week or so? Box 1 has 16:1 and box 2 has variable rate of
> 17:1 to 13:1. I don't understand which rate is which (17 on road to keep
> you from whipping across lanes inadvertently or off-road to give you power
> in terrain). Pretty sure that someone here's got one and might've wished
> they'd gotten the other.
> Also, thinking of getting an '80-'86 version instead for my '76 CJ-7
> maybe. The '80 and up version uses O-ring hoses (if that's better than
> flared). Also, since I'm dropping in a Chevy small block, maybe O-ring
> versions are more compatible.
> What say ye all?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
I don't think you'll find a choice of fittings, pretty much
everything converted to O rings because they're cheaper.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> I'm considering getting a new AGR steering gearbox. Does anybody have any
> good/bad experience with 'em? What's best for an on-road driver that gets
> off-road every week or so? Box 1 has 16:1 and box 2 has variable rate of
> 17:1 to 13:1. I don't understand which rate is which (17 on road to keep
> you from whipping across lanes inadvertently or off-road to give you power
> in terrain). Pretty sure that someone here's got one and might've wished
> they'd gotten the other.
> Also, thinking of getting an '80-'86 version instead for my '76 CJ-7
> maybe. The '80 and up version uses O-ring hoses (if that's better than
> flared). Also, since I'm dropping in a Chevy small block, maybe O-ring
> versions are more compatible.
> What say ye all?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Power steering conversion
Both those ratios are about twice what a passenger car would use.
I don't think you'll find a choice of fittings, pretty much
everything converted to O rings because they're cheaper.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> I'm considering getting a new AGR steering gearbox. Does anybody have any
> good/bad experience with 'em? What's best for an on-road driver that gets
> off-road every week or so? Box 1 has 16:1 and box 2 has variable rate of
> 17:1 to 13:1. I don't understand which rate is which (17 on road to keep
> you from whipping across lanes inadvertently or off-road to give you power
> in terrain). Pretty sure that someone here's got one and might've wished
> they'd gotten the other.
> Also, thinking of getting an '80-'86 version instead for my '76 CJ-7
> maybe. The '80 and up version uses O-ring hoses (if that's better than
> flared). Also, since I'm dropping in a Chevy small block, maybe O-ring
> versions are more compatible.
> What say ye all?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
I don't think you'll find a choice of fittings, pretty much
everything converted to O rings because they're cheaper.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> I'm considering getting a new AGR steering gearbox. Does anybody have any
> good/bad experience with 'em? What's best for an on-road driver that gets
> off-road every week or so? Box 1 has 16:1 and box 2 has variable rate of
> 17:1 to 13:1. I don't understand which rate is which (17 on road to keep
> you from whipping across lanes inadvertently or off-road to give you power
> in terrain). Pretty sure that someone here's got one and might've wished
> they'd gotten the other.
> Also, thinking of getting an '80-'86 version instead for my '76 CJ-7
> maybe. The '80 and up version uses O-ring hoses (if that's better than
> flared). Also, since I'm dropping in a Chevy small block, maybe O-ring
> versions are more compatible.
> What say ye all?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Power steering conversion
Both those ratios are about twice what a passenger car would use.
I don't think you'll find a choice of fittings, pretty much
everything converted to O rings because they're cheaper.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> I'm considering getting a new AGR steering gearbox. Does anybody have any
> good/bad experience with 'em? What's best for an on-road driver that gets
> off-road every week or so? Box 1 has 16:1 and box 2 has variable rate of
> 17:1 to 13:1. I don't understand which rate is which (17 on road to keep
> you from whipping across lanes inadvertently or off-road to give you power
> in terrain). Pretty sure that someone here's got one and might've wished
> they'd gotten the other.
> Also, thinking of getting an '80-'86 version instead for my '76 CJ-7
> maybe. The '80 and up version uses O-ring hoses (if that's better than
> flared). Also, since I'm dropping in a Chevy small block, maybe O-ring
> versions are more compatible.
> What say ye all?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
I don't think you'll find a choice of fittings, pretty much
everything converted to O rings because they're cheaper.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Drink wrote:
>
> I'm considering getting a new AGR steering gearbox. Does anybody have any
> good/bad experience with 'em? What's best for an on-road driver that gets
> off-road every week or so? Box 1 has 16:1 and box 2 has variable rate of
> 17:1 to 13:1. I don't understand which rate is which (17 on road to keep
> you from whipping across lanes inadvertently or off-road to give you power
> in terrain). Pretty sure that someone here's got one and might've wished
> they'd gotten the other.
> Also, thinking of getting an '80-'86 version instead for my '76 CJ-7
> maybe. The '80 and up version uses O-ring hoses (if that's better than
> flared). Also, since I'm dropping in a Chevy small block, maybe O-ring
> versions are more compatible.
> What say ye all?
> o_o_o_o
> Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Power steering conversion
Those would be for the complete 360, you probably only use about a
quarter of that, so your four turn would be 16:1
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> What do the ratios mean?
>
> Mine has 4 turns point to point, so 4:1?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
quarter of that, so your four turn would be 16:1
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> What do the ratios mean?
>
> Mine has 4 turns point to point, so 4:1?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Power steering conversion
Those would be for the complete 360, you probably only use about a
quarter of that, so your four turn would be 16:1
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> What do the ratios mean?
>
> Mine has 4 turns point to point, so 4:1?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
quarter of that, so your four turn would be 16:1
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> What do the ratios mean?
>
> Mine has 4 turns point to point, so 4:1?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Power steering conversion
Those would be for the complete 360, you probably only use about a
quarter of that, so your four turn would be 16:1
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> What do the ratios mean?
>
> Mine has 4 turns point to point, so 4:1?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
quarter of that, so your four turn would be 16:1
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> What do the ratios mean?
>
> Mine has 4 turns point to point, so 4:1?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Power steering conversion
Those would be for the complete 360, you probably only use about a
quarter of that, so your four turn would be 16:1
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> What do the ratios mean?
>
> Mine has 4 turns point to point, so 4:1?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
quarter of that, so your four turn would be 16:1
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> What do the ratios mean?
>
> Mine has 4 turns point to point, so 4:1?
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Power steering conversion
Do you think the O-ring style's better?
o_o_o_o
Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:408AF84D.7EC7AE18@***.net...
> Both those ratios are about twice what a passenger car would use.
> I don't think you'll find a choice of fittings, pretty much
> everything converted to O rings because they're cheaper.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Drink wrote:
> >
> > I'm considering getting a new AGR steering gearbox. Does anybody have
any
> > good/bad experience with 'em? What's best for an on-road driver that
gets
> > off-road every week or so? Box 1 has 16:1 and box 2 has variable rate
of
> > 17:1 to 13:1. I don't understand which rate is which (17 on road to
keep
> > you from whipping across lanes inadvertently or off-road to give you
power
> > in terrain). Pretty sure that someone here's got one and might've
wished
> > they'd gotten the other.
> > Also, thinking of getting an '80-'86 version instead for my '76 CJ-7
> > maybe. The '80 and up version uses O-ring hoses (if that's better than
> > flared). Also, since I'm dropping in a Chevy small block, maybe O-ring
> > versions are more compatible.
> > What say ye all?
> > o_o_o_o
> > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
o_o_o_o
Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:408AF84D.7EC7AE18@***.net...
> Both those ratios are about twice what a passenger car would use.
> I don't think you'll find a choice of fittings, pretty much
> everything converted to O rings because they're cheaper.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Drink wrote:
> >
> > I'm considering getting a new AGR steering gearbox. Does anybody have
any
> > good/bad experience with 'em? What's best for an on-road driver that
gets
> > off-road every week or so? Box 1 has 16:1 and box 2 has variable rate
of
> > 17:1 to 13:1. I don't understand which rate is which (17 on road to
keep
> > you from whipping across lanes inadvertently or off-road to give you
power
> > in terrain). Pretty sure that someone here's got one and might've
wished
> > they'd gotten the other.
> > Also, thinking of getting an '80-'86 version instead for my '76 CJ-7
> > maybe. The '80 and up version uses O-ring hoses (if that's better than
> > flared). Also, since I'm dropping in a Chevy small block, maybe O-ring
> > versions are more compatible.
> > What say ye all?
> > o_o_o_o
> > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Power steering conversion
Do you think the O-ring style's better?
o_o_o_o
Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:408AF84D.7EC7AE18@***.net...
> Both those ratios are about twice what a passenger car would use.
> I don't think you'll find a choice of fittings, pretty much
> everything converted to O rings because they're cheaper.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Drink wrote:
> >
> > I'm considering getting a new AGR steering gearbox. Does anybody have
any
> > good/bad experience with 'em? What's best for an on-road driver that
gets
> > off-road every week or so? Box 1 has 16:1 and box 2 has variable rate
of
> > 17:1 to 13:1. I don't understand which rate is which (17 on road to
keep
> > you from whipping across lanes inadvertently or off-road to give you
power
> > in terrain). Pretty sure that someone here's got one and might've
wished
> > they'd gotten the other.
> > Also, thinking of getting an '80-'86 version instead for my '76 CJ-7
> > maybe. The '80 and up version uses O-ring hoses (if that's better than
> > flared). Also, since I'm dropping in a Chevy small block, maybe O-ring
> > versions are more compatible.
> > What say ye all?
> > o_o_o_o
> > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
o_o_o_o
Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:408AF84D.7EC7AE18@***.net...
> Both those ratios are about twice what a passenger car would use.
> I don't think you'll find a choice of fittings, pretty much
> everything converted to O rings because they're cheaper.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Drink wrote:
> >
> > I'm considering getting a new AGR steering gearbox. Does anybody have
any
> > good/bad experience with 'em? What's best for an on-road driver that
gets
> > off-road every week or so? Box 1 has 16:1 and box 2 has variable rate
of
> > 17:1 to 13:1. I don't understand which rate is which (17 on road to
keep
> > you from whipping across lanes inadvertently or off-road to give you
power
> > in terrain). Pretty sure that someone here's got one and might've
wished
> > they'd gotten the other.
> > Also, thinking of getting an '80-'86 version instead for my '76 CJ-7
> > maybe. The '80 and up version uses O-ring hoses (if that's better than
> > flared). Also, since I'm dropping in a Chevy small block, maybe O-ring
> > versions are more compatible.
> > What say ye all?
> > o_o_o_o
> > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Power steering conversion
Do you think the O-ring style's better?
o_o_o_o
Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:408AF84D.7EC7AE18@***.net...
> Both those ratios are about twice what a passenger car would use.
> I don't think you'll find a choice of fittings, pretty much
> everything converted to O rings because they're cheaper.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Drink wrote:
> >
> > I'm considering getting a new AGR steering gearbox. Does anybody have
any
> > good/bad experience with 'em? What's best for an on-road driver that
gets
> > off-road every week or so? Box 1 has 16:1 and box 2 has variable rate
of
> > 17:1 to 13:1. I don't understand which rate is which (17 on road to
keep
> > you from whipping across lanes inadvertently or off-road to give you
power
> > in terrain). Pretty sure that someone here's got one and might've
wished
> > they'd gotten the other.
> > Also, thinking of getting an '80-'86 version instead for my '76 CJ-7
> > maybe. The '80 and up version uses O-ring hoses (if that's better than
> > flared). Also, since I'm dropping in a Chevy small block, maybe O-ring
> > versions are more compatible.
> > What say ye all?
> > o_o_o_o
> > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
o_o_o_o
Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:408AF84D.7EC7AE18@***.net...
> Both those ratios are about twice what a passenger car would use.
> I don't think you'll find a choice of fittings, pretty much
> everything converted to O rings because they're cheaper.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Drink wrote:
> >
> > I'm considering getting a new AGR steering gearbox. Does anybody have
any
> > good/bad experience with 'em? What's best for an on-road driver that
gets
> > off-road every week or so? Box 1 has 16:1 and box 2 has variable rate
of
> > 17:1 to 13:1. I don't understand which rate is which (17 on road to
keep
> > you from whipping across lanes inadvertently or off-road to give you
power
> > in terrain). Pretty sure that someone here's got one and might've
wished
> > they'd gotten the other.
> > Also, thinking of getting an '80-'86 version instead for my '76 CJ-7
> > maybe. The '80 and up version uses O-ring hoses (if that's better than
> > flared). Also, since I'm dropping in a Chevy small block, maybe O-ring
> > versions are more compatible.
> > What say ye all?
> > o_o_o_o
> > Best Regards, /| ,[_____],
> > Jim, WP3JQ |¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
> > ()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
> > EM60qk 30.447439N 086.628959W
