|
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2007
You stay a coward, I'll take them on.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||| mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:VMudnYIOx8sfa9_bnZ2dnUVZ_u2mnZ2d@comcast.com. .. > > As I found out a while ago. Bill's just not content to just report the > abuse, his ego has degraded to the point where he encourages it so he can > report it, and he posts his repeating trollbait to "prove" he his "helping." > If he merely reported the abuse, instead of escalate into flame wars, the > -------- wouldn't have followed him here from other forums. Reminds me of > the fireman who sets a house on fire so he can put it out and look like a > hero. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2007
This is that little coward too afraid to use it's name and address,
who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of it's self. With an obsession with goats, and other faggots, and writes via remailers, and cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme jealous ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness and super Southern California body. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican Chiwawa with its senseless barking, me too, me too. What a pity! And I have many replies saying they have closed the account. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message news:2b6743984kgafmkb46loka9mu8r0ea4unt@4ax.com > > I am a former ISP owner/operator and have worked an abuse desk. > > It doesn't matter if it is ---- or Llewdellen's cut and paste Screed. > it is abuse of the net. > > An ISP looks not at the content posted to an unmoderated group but > looks to see how often something is posted. > > If the BI exceeds a set level for a period, it is classed as > **abuse of the net**. The usual results is the spammer suffers loss > of his posting account. > > >I would rather read about ---- than continue to see you bait these > >school yard bully's with your blather about chiwawa's (SIC). > >In your email to me you proudly exclaimed how you have posted 20,000 > >postings to protect us all from ----. > >Well, what is protecting us from your 20,000 postings? > > 20,000 postings and 50% of them are cut and paste screed, what that > makes 10,000 pieces of spam. He isn't doing any sort of worthwhile > service. Llewdellen has zero evidence he has "killed" any accounts. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2007
This is that little coward too afraid to use it's name and address,
who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of it's self. With an obsession with goats, and other faggots, and writes via remailers, and cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme jealous ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness and super Southern California body. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican Chiwawa with its senseless barking, me too, me too. What a pity! And I have many replies saying they have closed the account. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message news:2b6743984kgafmkb46loka9mu8r0ea4unt@4ax.com > > I am a former ISP owner/operator and have worked an abuse desk. > > It doesn't matter if it is ---- or Llewdellen's cut and paste Screed. > it is abuse of the net. > > An ISP looks not at the content posted to an unmoderated group but > looks to see how often something is posted. > > If the BI exceeds a set level for a period, it is classed as > **abuse of the net**. The usual results is the spammer suffers loss > of his posting account. > > >I would rather read about ---- than continue to see you bait these > >school yard bully's with your blather about chiwawa's (SIC). > >In your email to me you proudly exclaimed how you have posted 20,000 > >postings to protect us all from ----. > >Well, what is protecting us from your 20,000 postings? > > 20,000 postings and 50% of them are cut and paste screed, what that > makes 10,000 pieces of spam. He isn't doing any sort of worthwhile > service. Llewdellen has zero evidence he has "killed" any accounts. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2007
This is that little coward too afraid to use it's name and address,
who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of it's self. With an obsession with goats, and other faggots, and writes via remailers, and cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme jealous ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness and super Southern California body. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican Chiwawa with its senseless barking, me too, me too. What a pity! And I have many replies saying they have closed the account. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message news:2b6743984kgafmkb46loka9mu8r0ea4unt@4ax.com > > I am a former ISP owner/operator and have worked an abuse desk. > > It doesn't matter if it is ---- or Llewdellen's cut and paste Screed. > it is abuse of the net. > > An ISP looks not at the content posted to an unmoderated group but > looks to see how often something is posted. > > If the BI exceeds a set level for a period, it is classed as > **abuse of the net**. The usual results is the spammer suffers loss > of his posting account. > > >I would rather read about ---- than continue to see you bait these > >school yard bully's with your blather about chiwawa's (SIC). > >In your email to me you proudly exclaimed how you have posted 20,000 > >postings to protect us all from ----. > >Well, what is protecting us from your 20,000 postings? > > 20,000 postings and 50% of them are cut and paste screed, what that > makes 10,000 pieces of spam. He isn't doing any sort of worthwhile > service. Llewdellen has zero evidence he has "killed" any accounts. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2007
This is that little coward too afraid to use it's name and address,
who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of it's self. With an obsession with goats, and other faggots, and writes via remailers, and cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme jealous ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness and super Southern California body. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican Chiwawa with its senseless barking, me too, me too. What a pity! And I have many replies saying they have closed the account. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message news:2b6743984kgafmkb46loka9mu8r0ea4unt@4ax.com > > I am a former ISP owner/operator and have worked an abuse desk. > > It doesn't matter if it is ---- or Llewdellen's cut and paste Screed. > it is abuse of the net. > > An ISP looks not at the content posted to an unmoderated group but > looks to see how often something is posted. > > If the BI exceeds a set level for a period, it is classed as > **abuse of the net**. The usual results is the spammer suffers loss > of his posting account. > > >I would rather read about ---- than continue to see you bait these > >school yard bully's with your blather about chiwawa's (SIC). > >In your email to me you proudly exclaimed how you have posted 20,000 > >postings to protect us all from ----. > >Well, what is protecting us from your 20,000 postings? > > 20,000 postings and 50% of them are cut and paste screed, what that > makes 10,000 pieces of spam. He isn't doing any sort of worthwhile > service. Llewdellen has zero evidence he has "killed" any accounts. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2007
On Thu, 10 May 2007 22:01:44 -0700, L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> And I have many replies saying they have closed the account. Post a few. Just to prove what you say. > "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message > news:2b6743984kgafmkb46loka9mu8r0ea4unt@4ax.com >> >> I am a former ISP owner/operator and have worked an abuse desk. >> >> It doesn't matter if it is ---- or Llewdellen's cut and paste Screed. >> it is abuse of the net. >> >> An ISP looks not at the content posted to an unmoderated group but >> looks to see how often something is posted. >> >> If the BI exceeds a set level for a period, it is classed as >> **abuse of the net**. The usual results is the spammer suffers loss >> of his posting account. >> >> >I would rather read about ---- than continue to see you bait these >> >school yard bully's with your blather about chiwawa's (SIC). >> >In your email to me you proudly exclaimed how you have posted 20,000 >> >postings to protect us all from ----. >> >Well, what is protecting us from your 20,000 postings? >> >> 20,000 postings and 50% of them are cut and paste screed, what that >> makes 10,000 pieces of spam. He isn't doing any sort of worthwhile >> service. Llewdellen has zero evidence he has "killed" any accounts. |
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2007
On Thu, 10 May 2007 22:01:44 -0700, L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> And I have many replies saying they have closed the account. Post a few. Just to prove what you say. > "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message > news:2b6743984kgafmkb46loka9mu8r0ea4unt@4ax.com >> >> I am a former ISP owner/operator and have worked an abuse desk. >> >> It doesn't matter if it is ---- or Llewdellen's cut and paste Screed. >> it is abuse of the net. >> >> An ISP looks not at the content posted to an unmoderated group but >> looks to see how often something is posted. >> >> If the BI exceeds a set level for a period, it is classed as >> **abuse of the net**. The usual results is the spammer suffers loss >> of his posting account. >> >> >I would rather read about ---- than continue to see you bait these >> >school yard bully's with your blather about chiwawa's (SIC). >> >In your email to me you proudly exclaimed how you have posted 20,000 >> >postings to protect us all from ----. >> >Well, what is protecting us from your 20,000 postings? >> >> 20,000 postings and 50% of them are cut and paste screed, what that >> makes 10,000 pieces of spam. He isn't doing any sort of worthwhile >> service. Llewdellen has zero evidence he has "killed" any accounts. |
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2007
On Thu, 10 May 2007 22:01:44 -0700, L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> And I have many replies saying they have closed the account. Post a few. Just to prove what you say. > "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message > news:2b6743984kgafmkb46loka9mu8r0ea4unt@4ax.com >> >> I am a former ISP owner/operator and have worked an abuse desk. >> >> It doesn't matter if it is ---- or Llewdellen's cut and paste Screed. >> it is abuse of the net. >> >> An ISP looks not at the content posted to an unmoderated group but >> looks to see how often something is posted. >> >> If the BI exceeds a set level for a period, it is classed as >> **abuse of the net**. The usual results is the spammer suffers loss >> of his posting account. >> >> >I would rather read about ---- than continue to see you bait these >> >school yard bully's with your blather about chiwawa's (SIC). >> >In your email to me you proudly exclaimed how you have posted 20,000 >> >postings to protect us all from ----. >> >Well, what is protecting us from your 20,000 postings? >> >> 20,000 postings and 50% of them are cut and paste screed, what that >> makes 10,000 pieces of spam. He isn't doing any sort of worthwhile >> service. Llewdellen has zero evidence he has "killed" any accounts. |
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2007
On Thu, 10 May 2007 22:01:44 -0700, L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> And I have many replies saying they have closed the account. Post a few. Just to prove what you say. > "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message > news:2b6743984kgafmkb46loka9mu8r0ea4unt@4ax.com >> >> I am a former ISP owner/operator and have worked an abuse desk. >> >> It doesn't matter if it is ---- or Llewdellen's cut and paste Screed. >> it is abuse of the net. >> >> An ISP looks not at the content posted to an unmoderated group but >> looks to see how often something is posted. >> >> If the BI exceeds a set level for a period, it is classed as >> **abuse of the net**. The usual results is the spammer suffers loss >> of his posting account. >> >> >I would rather read about ---- than continue to see you bait these >> >school yard bully's with your blather about chiwawa's (SIC). >> >In your email to me you proudly exclaimed how you have posted 20,000 >> >postings to protect us all from ----. >> >Well, what is protecting us from your 20,000 postings? >> >> 20,000 postings and 50% of them are cut and paste screed, what that >> makes 10,000 pieces of spam. He isn't doing any sort of worthwhile >> service. Llewdellen has zero evidence he has "killed" any accounts. |
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2007
On Thu, 10 May 2007 22:01:44 -0700, in rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys,
"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote: > This is that little coward too afraid to use it's name and address, Llewdellen, you have no reason or right to may real name or address. it seems you are sociopathic stalker, and can not understand your rights and what is not your right. >who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of it's self. With an At least I know what an TOS and AUP say and mean. You, however, seem to think you some sort of NetKKKop. >obsession with goats, and other faggots, and writes via remailers, and cross No, Llewdellen, you the homophobic closet case. >posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. I cross post, because I can. >With extreme jealous ranting Ranting? LOL... Your screed/rants are well known. PKB, Llewdellen... >over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness and super Southern Manliness? You have to be joking. You are nothing but a swaggering village idiot. the Laughing stock of multiple newsgroups. >California body. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican Chiwawa >with its senseless barking, me too, me too. What a pity! > And I have many replies saying they have closed the account. and you I bet you claim to have many supporters that e-mail you... What a moron! Go ahead and write my NSP a complaint. I am sure Chris need a laugh. > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O Go stick pins in your voodoo doll, hypocrite! >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > >"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message >news:2b6743984kgafmkb46loka9mu8r0ea4unt@4ax.com >> >> I am a former ISP owner/operator and have worked an abuse desk. >> >> It doesn't matter if it is ---- or Llewdellen's cut and paste Screed. >> it is abuse of the net. >> >> An ISP looks not at the content posted to an unmoderated group but >> looks to see how often something is posted. >> >> If the BI exceeds a set level for a period, it is classed as >> **abuse of the net**. The usual results is the spammer suffers loss >> of his posting account. >> >> >I would rather read about ---- than continue to see you bait these >> >school yard bully's with your blather about chiwawa's (SIC). >> >In your email to me you proudly exclaimed how you have posted 20,000 >> >postings to protect us all from ----. >> >Well, what is protecting us from your 20,000 postings? >> >> 20,000 postings and 50% of them are cut and paste screed, what that >> makes 10,000 pieces of spam. He isn't doing any sort of worthwhile >> service. Llewdellen has zero evidence he has "killed" any accounts. -- Ak'toh'di |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands