question on jeep dealer refusing service.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: question on jeep dealer refusing service.
In article <1088hj4amcul6da@corp.supernews.com>,
Sleestak <here@there.com> wrote:
>Sleestak wrote:
>
>> Mike, I hear ya man. Most people top post so I really don't make a big
>> deal
>> outta it. Bottom posting really can be better if done right, though. If
>> you are board, check out the following websites:
>
>Of course I meant "bored."
>
Of course it also the Windoze crapola software used which retards the user
to just a 5 year old with editing control. The good ol days of rn and trn
are gone where you had more control over editing.
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Sleestak <here@there.com> wrote:
>Sleestak wrote:
>
>> Mike, I hear ya man. Most people top post so I really don't make a big
>> deal
>> outta it. Bottom posting really can be better if done right, though. If
>> you are board, check out the following websites:
>
>Of course I meant "bored."
>
Of course it also the Windoze crapola software used which retards the user
to just a 5 year old with editing control. The good ol days of rn and trn
are gone where you had more control over editing.
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: question on jeep dealer refusing service.
In article <1088hj4amcul6da@corp.supernews.com>,
Sleestak <here@there.com> wrote:
>Sleestak wrote:
>
>> Mike, I hear ya man. Most people top post so I really don't make a big
>> deal
>> outta it. Bottom posting really can be better if done right, though. If
>> you are board, check out the following websites:
>
>Of course I meant "bored."
>
Of course it also the Windoze crapola software used which retards the user
to just a 5 year old with editing control. The good ol days of rn and trn
are gone where you had more control over editing.
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Sleestak <here@there.com> wrote:
>Sleestak wrote:
>
>> Mike, I hear ya man. Most people top post so I really don't make a big
>> deal
>> outta it. Bottom posting really can be better if done right, though. If
>> you are board, check out the following websites:
>
>Of course I meant "bored."
>
Of course it also the Windoze crapola software used which retards the user
to just a 5 year old with editing control. The good ol days of rn and trn
are gone where you had more control over editing.
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: question on jeep dealer refusing service.
In article <1088hj4amcul6da@corp.supernews.com>,
Sleestak <here@there.com> wrote:
>Sleestak wrote:
>
>> Mike, I hear ya man. Most people top post so I really don't make a big
>> deal
>> outta it. Bottom posting really can be better if done right, though. If
>> you are board, check out the following websites:
>
>Of course I meant "bored."
>
Of course it also the Windoze crapola software used which retards the user
to just a 5 year old with editing control. The good ol days of rn and trn
are gone where you had more control over editing.
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Sleestak <here@there.com> wrote:
>Sleestak wrote:
>
>> Mike, I hear ya man. Most people top post so I really don't make a big
>> deal
>> outta it. Bottom posting really can be better if done right, though. If
>> you are board, check out the following websites:
>
>Of course I meant "bored."
>
Of course it also the Windoze crapola software used which retards the user
to just a 5 year old with editing control. The good ol days of rn and trn
are gone where you had more control over editing.
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: question on jeep dealer refusing service.
Myself I hate it when I'm following a thread and people post at the
bottom, so I have to scroll down to see what they have to say, and I hate it
when people cut out parts in their reply, if I come in on a thread at mid
point I like to be able to read what it's all about.
"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.58.0404191724330.797@panix1.panix. com...
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Sleestak wrote:
>
> > > By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
> >
> > Amen! Wish everyone felt this way.
> >
>
> That's a subject that borders on a religion, with all that goes with it.
>
> I personally prefer posting styles that include bottom posting and
> trimming quoted material, with comments interleaved between points -- one
> advantage to that style is that the poster has to do some work so the
> reader doesn't have to, top-posting just means that nobody has to work,
> especially if your reader software dumps the cursor at the top of the
> page. But that's just me, and here the majority seem to like top-posting
> without interleaving responses.
>
> When I'm in Rome, I type with a Romish accent, unless I'm talking to
> another damned furriner.
>
> If the post I'm replying to is top-posted, I'll do the same. If I'm
> posting here and I've got a lot of comments that are best read with the
> material I'm responding to, I'll put a "Bottom posted with replies
> inserted into original text" note at the top, trim out the dead wood to
> make it easy on the reader and post away.
>
> But that's just me.
>
>
bottom, so I have to scroll down to see what they have to say, and I hate it
when people cut out parts in their reply, if I come in on a thread at mid
point I like to be able to read what it's all about.
"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.58.0404191724330.797@panix1.panix. com...
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Sleestak wrote:
>
> > > By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
> >
> > Amen! Wish everyone felt this way.
> >
>
> That's a subject that borders on a religion, with all that goes with it.
>
> I personally prefer posting styles that include bottom posting and
> trimming quoted material, with comments interleaved between points -- one
> advantage to that style is that the poster has to do some work so the
> reader doesn't have to, top-posting just means that nobody has to work,
> especially if your reader software dumps the cursor at the top of the
> page. But that's just me, and here the majority seem to like top-posting
> without interleaving responses.
>
> When I'm in Rome, I type with a Romish accent, unless I'm talking to
> another damned furriner.
>
> If the post I'm replying to is top-posted, I'll do the same. If I'm
> posting here and I've got a lot of comments that are best read with the
> material I'm responding to, I'll put a "Bottom posted with replies
> inserted into original text" note at the top, trim out the dead wood to
> make it easy on the reader and post away.
>
> But that's just me.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: question on jeep dealer refusing service.
Myself I hate it when I'm following a thread and people post at the
bottom, so I have to scroll down to see what they have to say, and I hate it
when people cut out parts in their reply, if I come in on a thread at mid
point I like to be able to read what it's all about.
"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.58.0404191724330.797@panix1.panix. com...
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Sleestak wrote:
>
> > > By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
> >
> > Amen! Wish everyone felt this way.
> >
>
> That's a subject that borders on a religion, with all that goes with it.
>
> I personally prefer posting styles that include bottom posting and
> trimming quoted material, with comments interleaved between points -- one
> advantage to that style is that the poster has to do some work so the
> reader doesn't have to, top-posting just means that nobody has to work,
> especially if your reader software dumps the cursor at the top of the
> page. But that's just me, and here the majority seem to like top-posting
> without interleaving responses.
>
> When I'm in Rome, I type with a Romish accent, unless I'm talking to
> another damned furriner.
>
> If the post I'm replying to is top-posted, I'll do the same. If I'm
> posting here and I've got a lot of comments that are best read with the
> material I'm responding to, I'll put a "Bottom posted with replies
> inserted into original text" note at the top, trim out the dead wood to
> make it easy on the reader and post away.
>
> But that's just me.
>
>
bottom, so I have to scroll down to see what they have to say, and I hate it
when people cut out parts in their reply, if I come in on a thread at mid
point I like to be able to read what it's all about.
"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.58.0404191724330.797@panix1.panix. com...
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Sleestak wrote:
>
> > > By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
> >
> > Amen! Wish everyone felt this way.
> >
>
> That's a subject that borders on a religion, with all that goes with it.
>
> I personally prefer posting styles that include bottom posting and
> trimming quoted material, with comments interleaved between points -- one
> advantage to that style is that the poster has to do some work so the
> reader doesn't have to, top-posting just means that nobody has to work,
> especially if your reader software dumps the cursor at the top of the
> page. But that's just me, and here the majority seem to like top-posting
> without interleaving responses.
>
> When I'm in Rome, I type with a Romish accent, unless I'm talking to
> another damned furriner.
>
> If the post I'm replying to is top-posted, I'll do the same. If I'm
> posting here and I've got a lot of comments that are best read with the
> material I'm responding to, I'll put a "Bottom posted with replies
> inserted into original text" note at the top, trim out the dead wood to
> make it easy on the reader and post away.
>
> But that's just me.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: question on jeep dealer refusing service.
Myself I hate it when I'm following a thread and people post at the
bottom, so I have to scroll down to see what they have to say, and I hate it
when people cut out parts in their reply, if I come in on a thread at mid
point I like to be able to read what it's all about.
"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.58.0404191724330.797@panix1.panix. com...
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Sleestak wrote:
>
> > > By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
> >
> > Amen! Wish everyone felt this way.
> >
>
> That's a subject that borders on a religion, with all that goes with it.
>
> I personally prefer posting styles that include bottom posting and
> trimming quoted material, with comments interleaved between points -- one
> advantage to that style is that the poster has to do some work so the
> reader doesn't have to, top-posting just means that nobody has to work,
> especially if your reader software dumps the cursor at the top of the
> page. But that's just me, and here the majority seem to like top-posting
> without interleaving responses.
>
> When I'm in Rome, I type with a Romish accent, unless I'm talking to
> another damned furriner.
>
> If the post I'm replying to is top-posted, I'll do the same. If I'm
> posting here and I've got a lot of comments that are best read with the
> material I'm responding to, I'll put a "Bottom posted with replies
> inserted into original text" note at the top, trim out the dead wood to
> make it easy on the reader and post away.
>
> But that's just me.
>
>
bottom, so I have to scroll down to see what they have to say, and I hate it
when people cut out parts in their reply, if I come in on a thread at mid
point I like to be able to read what it's all about.
"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.58.0404191724330.797@panix1.panix. com...
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Sleestak wrote:
>
> > > By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
> >
> > Amen! Wish everyone felt this way.
> >
>
> That's a subject that borders on a religion, with all that goes with it.
>
> I personally prefer posting styles that include bottom posting and
> trimming quoted material, with comments interleaved between points -- one
> advantage to that style is that the poster has to do some work so the
> reader doesn't have to, top-posting just means that nobody has to work,
> especially if your reader software dumps the cursor at the top of the
> page. But that's just me, and here the majority seem to like top-posting
> without interleaving responses.
>
> When I'm in Rome, I type with a Romish accent, unless I'm talking to
> another damned furriner.
>
> If the post I'm replying to is top-posted, I'll do the same. If I'm
> posting here and I've got a lot of comments that are best read with the
> material I'm responding to, I'll put a "Bottom posted with replies
> inserted into original text" note at the top, trim out the dead wood to
> make it easy on the reader and post away.
>
> But that's just me.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: question on jeep dealer refusing service.
Myself I hate it when I'm following a thread and people post at the
bottom, so I have to scroll down to see what they have to say, and I hate it
when people cut out parts in their reply, if I come in on a thread at mid
point I like to be able to read what it's all about.
"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.58.0404191724330.797@panix1.panix. com...
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Sleestak wrote:
>
> > > By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
> >
> > Amen! Wish everyone felt this way.
> >
>
> That's a subject that borders on a religion, with all that goes with it.
>
> I personally prefer posting styles that include bottom posting and
> trimming quoted material, with comments interleaved between points -- one
> advantage to that style is that the poster has to do some work so the
> reader doesn't have to, top-posting just means that nobody has to work,
> especially if your reader software dumps the cursor at the top of the
> page. But that's just me, and here the majority seem to like top-posting
> without interleaving responses.
>
> When I'm in Rome, I type with a Romish accent, unless I'm talking to
> another damned furriner.
>
> If the post I'm replying to is top-posted, I'll do the same. If I'm
> posting here and I've got a lot of comments that are best read with the
> material I'm responding to, I'll put a "Bottom posted with replies
> inserted into original text" note at the top, trim out the dead wood to
> make it easy on the reader and post away.
>
> But that's just me.
>
>
bottom, so I have to scroll down to see what they have to say, and I hate it
when people cut out parts in their reply, if I come in on a thread at mid
point I like to be able to read what it's all about.
"Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.58.0404191724330.797@panix1.panix. com...
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Sleestak wrote:
>
> > > By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
> >
> > Amen! Wish everyone felt this way.
> >
>
> That's a subject that borders on a religion, with all that goes with it.
>
> I personally prefer posting styles that include bottom posting and
> trimming quoted material, with comments interleaved between points -- one
> advantage to that style is that the poster has to do some work so the
> reader doesn't have to, top-posting just means that nobody has to work,
> especially if your reader software dumps the cursor at the top of the
> page. But that's just me, and here the majority seem to like top-posting
> without interleaving responses.
>
> When I'm in Rome, I type with a Romish accent, unless I'm talking to
> another damned furriner.
>
> If the post I'm replying to is top-posted, I'll do the same. If I'm
> posting here and I've got a lot of comments that are best read with the
> material I'm responding to, I'll put a "Bottom posted with replies
> inserted into original text" note at the top, trim out the dead wood to
> make it easy on the reader and post away.
>
> But that's just me.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: question on jeep dealer refusing service.
Roughly 4/19/04 16:02, DougW's monkeys randomly typed:
> Matt Osborn did pass the time by typing:
>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:07:16 -0400, "cooper" <noone@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My negotiation skills suck. I don't think I _have_ to be skilled in
>>> negotiating to spend thousands of my dollars at a dealership. I'm one of
>>> those people that just can't seem to say what they need to say, or have the
>>> directness needed to be a 'negotiator'. I HATE trying to buy a new car, and
>>> it's why I passed on an 02 and bought my 94 YJ from a private sale.
>>
>> The biggest problem with negotiating is not knowing what to negotiate.
>> How in the hell do we know what the dealer makes, what the
>> manufacturer makes and what to negotiate.
>>
>> Negotiating for a car is having an emotional argument with yourself.
>> How bad do you want the car? That's no basis for negotiation.
>
> Negotiation is like a paint job. 90% of a proper job is prep work.
>
And learning to spot the Earl Schieb class salestypes...altho it is
fun screwing with them every now and then if you're bored.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
> Matt Osborn did pass the time by typing:
>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:07:16 -0400, "cooper" <noone@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My negotiation skills suck. I don't think I _have_ to be skilled in
>>> negotiating to spend thousands of my dollars at a dealership. I'm one of
>>> those people that just can't seem to say what they need to say, or have the
>>> directness needed to be a 'negotiator'. I HATE trying to buy a new car, and
>>> it's why I passed on an 02 and bought my 94 YJ from a private sale.
>>
>> The biggest problem with negotiating is not knowing what to negotiate.
>> How in the hell do we know what the dealer makes, what the
>> manufacturer makes and what to negotiate.
>>
>> Negotiating for a car is having an emotional argument with yourself.
>> How bad do you want the car? That's no basis for negotiation.
>
> Negotiation is like a paint job. 90% of a proper job is prep work.
>
And learning to spot the Earl Schieb class salestypes...altho it is
fun screwing with them every now and then if you're bored.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: question on jeep dealer refusing service.
Roughly 4/19/04 16:02, DougW's monkeys randomly typed:
> Matt Osborn did pass the time by typing:
>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:07:16 -0400, "cooper" <noone@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My negotiation skills suck. I don't think I _have_ to be skilled in
>>> negotiating to spend thousands of my dollars at a dealership. I'm one of
>>> those people that just can't seem to say what they need to say, or have the
>>> directness needed to be a 'negotiator'. I HATE trying to buy a new car, and
>>> it's why I passed on an 02 and bought my 94 YJ from a private sale.
>>
>> The biggest problem with negotiating is not knowing what to negotiate.
>> How in the hell do we know what the dealer makes, what the
>> manufacturer makes and what to negotiate.
>>
>> Negotiating for a car is having an emotional argument with yourself.
>> How bad do you want the car? That's no basis for negotiation.
>
> Negotiation is like a paint job. 90% of a proper job is prep work.
>
And learning to spot the Earl Schieb class salestypes...altho it is
fun screwing with them every now and then if you're bored.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
> Matt Osborn did pass the time by typing:
>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:07:16 -0400, "cooper" <noone@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My negotiation skills suck. I don't think I _have_ to be skilled in
>>> negotiating to spend thousands of my dollars at a dealership. I'm one of
>>> those people that just can't seem to say what they need to say, or have the
>>> directness needed to be a 'negotiator'. I HATE trying to buy a new car, and
>>> it's why I passed on an 02 and bought my 94 YJ from a private sale.
>>
>> The biggest problem with negotiating is not knowing what to negotiate.
>> How in the hell do we know what the dealer makes, what the
>> manufacturer makes and what to negotiate.
>>
>> Negotiating for a car is having an emotional argument with yourself.
>> How bad do you want the car? That's no basis for negotiation.
>
> Negotiation is like a paint job. 90% of a proper job is prep work.
>
And learning to spot the Earl Schieb class salestypes...altho it is
fun screwing with them every now and then if you're bored.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: question on jeep dealer refusing service.
Roughly 4/19/04 16:02, DougW's monkeys randomly typed:
> Matt Osborn did pass the time by typing:
>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:07:16 -0400, "cooper" <noone@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My negotiation skills suck. I don't think I _have_ to be skilled in
>>> negotiating to spend thousands of my dollars at a dealership. I'm one of
>>> those people that just can't seem to say what they need to say, or have the
>>> directness needed to be a 'negotiator'. I HATE trying to buy a new car, and
>>> it's why I passed on an 02 and bought my 94 YJ from a private sale.
>>
>> The biggest problem with negotiating is not knowing what to negotiate.
>> How in the hell do we know what the dealer makes, what the
>> manufacturer makes and what to negotiate.
>>
>> Negotiating for a car is having an emotional argument with yourself.
>> How bad do you want the car? That's no basis for negotiation.
>
> Negotiation is like a paint job. 90% of a proper job is prep work.
>
And learning to spot the Earl Schieb class salestypes...altho it is
fun screwing with them every now and then if you're bored.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
> Matt Osborn did pass the time by typing:
>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:07:16 -0400, "cooper" <noone@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My negotiation skills suck. I don't think I _have_ to be skilled in
>>> negotiating to spend thousands of my dollars at a dealership. I'm one of
>>> those people that just can't seem to say what they need to say, or have the
>>> directness needed to be a 'negotiator'. I HATE trying to buy a new car, and
>>> it's why I passed on an 02 and bought my 94 YJ from a private sale.
>>
>> The biggest problem with negotiating is not knowing what to negotiate.
>> How in the hell do we know what the dealer makes, what the
>> manufacturer makes and what to negotiate.
>>
>> Negotiating for a car is having an emotional argument with yourself.
>> How bad do you want the car? That's no basis for negotiation.
>
> Negotiation is like a paint job. 90% of a proper job is prep work.
>
And learning to spot the Earl Schieb class salestypes...altho it is
fun screwing with them every now and then if you're bored.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
