OT New Orleans
#91
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT New Orleans
Which of course you know is less than six percent gross profit.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> What? And then lower prices so it's harder for Exxon-Mobil to reap
> single-quarter profits of over 7 billion dollars?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> What? And then lower prices so it's harder for Exxon-Mobil to reap
> single-quarter profits of over 7 billion dollars?
#92
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT New Orleans
Which of course you know is less than six percent gross profit.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> What? And then lower prices so it's harder for Exxon-Mobil to reap
> single-quarter profits of over 7 billion dollars?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> What? And then lower prices so it's harder for Exxon-Mobil to reap
> single-quarter profits of over 7 billion dollars?
#93
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT New Orleans
Which of course you know is less than six percent gross profit.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> What? And then lower prices so it's harder for Exxon-Mobil to reap
> single-quarter profits of over 7 billion dollars?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> What? And then lower prices so it's harder for Exxon-Mobil to reap
> single-quarter profits of over 7 billion dollars?
#94
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT New Orleans
<Matt Osborn> wrote in message
news:ed96i1tle7q5kk3pbmpb22j9etm5vbcsel@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:09:15 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>>The failures of government in this disaster aren't recent, they are a
>>culmination of the last 30 years or so, inasmuch as recognizing the need
>>for
>>building a levee to withstand a Cat 5 storm, competent evacuation
>>planning,
>>and the lack of motivation for federal response.
>
> Building the levees to protect against a cat 5 hurricane are a state
> responsibility. I believe the Federal government has been more than
> generous in providing assistance in this regard. New Orleans is not,
> and should not be, a federal responsibility. In any case, the levees
> will not protect against the damage caused by a cat5 hurricane. The
> city would have flooded from the rain, even had the levees held.
Never said building the levees were a federal responsibility, please re-read
my post.
>
> The Feds delivered seven trailers of food and water to the Superdome
> the day the hurricane hit and seven more trailers the very next day.
According to a DHS spokesman, I suppose the people there who were there
dying of thirst were lying?
#95
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT New Orleans
<Matt Osborn> wrote in message
news:ed96i1tle7q5kk3pbmpb22j9etm5vbcsel@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:09:15 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>>The failures of government in this disaster aren't recent, they are a
>>culmination of the last 30 years or so, inasmuch as recognizing the need
>>for
>>building a levee to withstand a Cat 5 storm, competent evacuation
>>planning,
>>and the lack of motivation for federal response.
>
> Building the levees to protect against a cat 5 hurricane are a state
> responsibility. I believe the Federal government has been more than
> generous in providing assistance in this regard. New Orleans is not,
> and should not be, a federal responsibility. In any case, the levees
> will not protect against the damage caused by a cat5 hurricane. The
> city would have flooded from the rain, even had the levees held.
Never said building the levees were a federal responsibility, please re-read
my post.
>
> The Feds delivered seven trailers of food and water to the Superdome
> the day the hurricane hit and seven more trailers the very next day.
According to a DHS spokesman, I suppose the people there who were there
dying of thirst were lying?
#96
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT New Orleans
<Matt Osborn> wrote in message
news:ed96i1tle7q5kk3pbmpb22j9etm5vbcsel@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:09:15 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>>The failures of government in this disaster aren't recent, they are a
>>culmination of the last 30 years or so, inasmuch as recognizing the need
>>for
>>building a levee to withstand a Cat 5 storm, competent evacuation
>>planning,
>>and the lack of motivation for federal response.
>
> Building the levees to protect against a cat 5 hurricane are a state
> responsibility. I believe the Federal government has been more than
> generous in providing assistance in this regard. New Orleans is not,
> and should not be, a federal responsibility. In any case, the levees
> will not protect against the damage caused by a cat5 hurricane. The
> city would have flooded from the rain, even had the levees held.
Never said building the levees were a federal responsibility, please re-read
my post.
>
> The Feds delivered seven trailers of food and water to the Superdome
> the day the hurricane hit and seven more trailers the very next day.
According to a DHS spokesman, I suppose the people there who were there
dying of thirst were lying?
#97
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT New Orleans
<Matt Osborn> wrote in message
news:ed96i1tle7q5kk3pbmpb22j9etm5vbcsel@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:09:15 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>>The failures of government in this disaster aren't recent, they are a
>>culmination of the last 30 years or so, inasmuch as recognizing the need
>>for
>>building a levee to withstand a Cat 5 storm, competent evacuation
>>planning,
>>and the lack of motivation for federal response.
>
> Building the levees to protect against a cat 5 hurricane are a state
> responsibility. I believe the Federal government has been more than
> generous in providing assistance in this regard. New Orleans is not,
> and should not be, a federal responsibility. In any case, the levees
> will not protect against the damage caused by a cat5 hurricane. The
> city would have flooded from the rain, even had the levees held.
Never said building the levees were a federal responsibility, please re-read
my post.
>
> The Feds delivered seven trailers of food and water to the Superdome
> the day the hurricane hit and seven more trailers the very next day.
According to a DHS spokesman, I suppose the people there who were there
dying of thirst were lying?
#98
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT New Orleans
Would you being a true liberal stayed to die of thrust?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> According to a DHS spokesman, I suppose the people there who were there
> dying of thirst were lying?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> According to a DHS spokesman, I suppose the people there who were there
> dying of thirst were lying?
#99
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT New Orleans
Would you being a true liberal stayed to die of thrust?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> According to a DHS spokesman, I suppose the people there who were there
> dying of thirst were lying?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> According to a DHS spokesman, I suppose the people there who were there
> dying of thirst were lying?
#100
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT New Orleans
Would you being a true liberal stayed to die of thrust?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> According to a DHS spokesman, I suppose the people there who were there
> dying of thirst were lying?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> According to a DHS spokesman, I suppose the people there who were there
> dying of thirst were lying?