OT BioDiesel
Guest
Posts: n/a
Maybe he means Argonne radiation. He tends to confuse the trivial
ability to google for keywords with actually being able to use those
keywords properly in a sentence.
jeff proclaimed:
> Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
> Radiation...
>
> http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
> Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
> emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>
jeff
L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> And coal releases argon radiation, far more dangerous than anything
> the nuclear plant could leak:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~bhoglund/...ion_Facts.html God
Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
>
>> Sure, but everyone has their own little soap box to stand on, don't
they?
>> ;^)
>>
>> Damn right I'm being sarcastic. Electricity in Colorado is made
from coal.
>> You want to drive by one of the power plants, when it is running
wide open
>> throttle to generate clean power for the sunny and unpolluted Rocky
Mountain
>> states. We had those commercials in New England too, set to music.
>>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Maybe he means Argonne radiation. He tends to confuse the trivial
ability to google for keywords with actually being able to use those
keywords properly in a sentence.
jeff proclaimed:
> Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
> Radiation...
>
> http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
> Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
> emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>
jeff
L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> And coal releases argon radiation, far more dangerous than anything
> the nuclear plant could leak:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~bhoglund/...ion_Facts.html God
Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
>
>> Sure, but everyone has their own little soap box to stand on, don't
they?
>> ;^)
>>
>> Damn right I'm being sarcastic. Electricity in Colorado is made
from coal.
>> You want to drive by one of the power plants, when it is running
wide open
>> throttle to generate clean power for the sunny and unpolluted Rocky
Mountain
>> states. We had those commercials in New England too, set to music.
>>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Yeah, except that burning coal doesn't transmute elements.
Earle Horton proclaimed:
> I think he is talking about radon. Radon is known to come out of the ground
> here. It makes sense that it would be in the coal too. It can be a problem
> if you decide to convert your basement into finished living quarters.
>
> Earle
>
> "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
> news:8kG8g.7971$0d3.7624@trnddc08...
>
>>Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
>>Radiation...
>>
>>http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
>>Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
>>emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
>>
>>
>>L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
>>
>>> And coal releases argon radiation, far more dangerous than anything
>>>the nuclear plant could leak:
>>>http://home.earthlink.net/~bhoglund/...ion_Facts.html
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>>Earle Horton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sure, but everyone has their own little soap box to stand on, don't
>
> they?
>
>>>>;^)
>>>>
>>>>Damn right I'm being sarcastic. Electricity in Colorado is made from
>
> coal.
>
>>>>You want to drive by one of the power plants, when it is running wide
>
> open
>
>>>>throttle to generate clean power for the sunny and unpolluted Rocky
>
> Mountain
>
>>>>states. We had those commercials in New England too, set to music.
>>>>
>>>>Earle
>
>
>
Earle Horton proclaimed:
> I think he is talking about radon. Radon is known to come out of the ground
> here. It makes sense that it would be in the coal too. It can be a problem
> if you decide to convert your basement into finished living quarters.
>
> Earle
>
> "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
> news:8kG8g.7971$0d3.7624@trnddc08...
>
>>Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
>>Radiation...
>>
>>http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
>>Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
>>emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
>>
>>
>>L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
>>
>>> And coal releases argon radiation, far more dangerous than anything
>>>the nuclear plant could leak:
>>>http://home.earthlink.net/~bhoglund/...ion_Facts.html
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>>Earle Horton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sure, but everyone has their own little soap box to stand on, don't
>
> they?
>
>>>>;^)
>>>>
>>>>Damn right I'm being sarcastic. Electricity in Colorado is made from
>
> coal.
>
>>>>You want to drive by one of the power plants, when it is running wide
>
> open
>
>>>>throttle to generate clean power for the sunny and unpolluted Rocky
>
> Mountain
>
>>>>states. We had those commercials in New England too, set to music.
>>>>
>>>>Earle
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Yeah, except that burning coal doesn't transmute elements.
Earle Horton proclaimed:
> I think he is talking about radon. Radon is known to come out of the ground
> here. It makes sense that it would be in the coal too. It can be a problem
> if you decide to convert your basement into finished living quarters.
>
> Earle
>
> "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
> news:8kG8g.7971$0d3.7624@trnddc08...
>
>>Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
>>Radiation...
>>
>>http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
>>Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
>>emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
>>
>>
>>L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
>>
>>> And coal releases argon radiation, far more dangerous than anything
>>>the nuclear plant could leak:
>>>http://home.earthlink.net/~bhoglund/...ion_Facts.html
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>>Earle Horton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sure, but everyone has their own little soap box to stand on, don't
>
> they?
>
>>>>;^)
>>>>
>>>>Damn right I'm being sarcastic. Electricity in Colorado is made from
>
> coal.
>
>>>>You want to drive by one of the power plants, when it is running wide
>
> open
>
>>>>throttle to generate clean power for the sunny and unpolluted Rocky
>
> Mountain
>
>>>>states. We had those commercials in New England too, set to music.
>>>>
>>>>Earle
>
>
>
Earle Horton proclaimed:
> I think he is talking about radon. Radon is known to come out of the ground
> here. It makes sense that it would be in the coal too. It can be a problem
> if you decide to convert your basement into finished living quarters.
>
> Earle
>
> "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
> news:8kG8g.7971$0d3.7624@trnddc08...
>
>>Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
>>Radiation...
>>
>>http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
>>Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
>>emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
>>
>>
>>L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
>>
>>> And coal releases argon radiation, far more dangerous than anything
>>>the nuclear plant could leak:
>>>http://home.earthlink.net/~bhoglund/...ion_Facts.html
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>>Earle Horton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sure, but everyone has their own little soap box to stand on, don't
>
> they?
>
>>>>;^)
>>>>
>>>>Damn right I'm being sarcastic. Electricity in Colorado is made from
>
> coal.
>
>>>>You want to drive by one of the power plants, when it is running wide
>
> open
>
>>>>throttle to generate clean power for the sunny and unpolluted Rocky
>
> Mountain
>
>>>>states. We had those commercials in New England too, set to music.
>>>>
>>>>Earle
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Yeah, except that burning coal doesn't transmute elements.
Earle Horton proclaimed:
> I think he is talking about radon. Radon is known to come out of the ground
> here. It makes sense that it would be in the coal too. It can be a problem
> if you decide to convert your basement into finished living quarters.
>
> Earle
>
> "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
> news:8kG8g.7971$0d3.7624@trnddc08...
>
>>Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
>>Radiation...
>>
>>http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
>>Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
>>emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
>>
>>
>>L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
>>
>>> And coal releases argon radiation, far more dangerous than anything
>>>the nuclear plant could leak:
>>>http://home.earthlink.net/~bhoglund/...ion_Facts.html
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>>Earle Horton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sure, but everyone has their own little soap box to stand on, don't
>
> they?
>
>>>>;^)
>>>>
>>>>Damn right I'm being sarcastic. Electricity in Colorado is made from
>
> coal.
>
>>>>You want to drive by one of the power plants, when it is running wide
>
> open
>
>>>>throttle to generate clean power for the sunny and unpolluted Rocky
>
> Mountain
>
>>>>states. We had those commercials in New England too, set to music.
>>>>
>>>>Earle
>
>
>
Earle Horton proclaimed:
> I think he is talking about radon. Radon is known to come out of the ground
> here. It makes sense that it would be in the coal too. It can be a problem
> if you decide to convert your basement into finished living quarters.
>
> Earle
>
> "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
> news:8kG8g.7971$0d3.7624@trnddc08...
>
>>Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
>>Radiation...
>>
>>http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
>>Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
>>emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
>>
>>
>>L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
>>
>>> And coal releases argon radiation, far more dangerous than anything
>>>the nuclear plant could leak:
>>>http://home.earthlink.net/~bhoglund/...ion_Facts.html
>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>
>>>Earle Horton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sure, but everyone has their own little soap box to stand on, don't
>
> they?
>
>>>>;^)
>>>>
>>>>Damn right I'm being sarcastic. Electricity in Colorado is made from
>
> coal.
>
>>>>You want to drive by one of the power plants, when it is running wide
>
> open
>
>>>>throttle to generate clean power for the sunny and unpolluted Rocky
>
> Mountain
>
>>>>states. We had those commercials in New England too, set to music.
>>>>
>>>>Earle
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
You might want to read some of those links you post so quickly with no
comprehension.
"Radon has a half-life of only 3.8 days; consequently, most of the gas
decays harmlessly in the ground or atmosphere."
So if it WERE to magically appear in coal beds and somehow be absorbed
into the coal [neither of which is the case, but you'd need to be able
to read some of the rest of that page to see why not.] a coal burning
plant would be releasing this non-existent radon into the air where it
would dissipate. Except of course that storing the coal for a few days
would also get rid of this magical non-existent radon since there is
very little thorium, uranium, etc. in commercial coal.
You want radon, go to Grand Junction Colorado where the difference
between the entire housing development built on uranium mine tailings
and the natural radioactivity of the ground under most of the city is
quite tiny unless you have an axe to grind and presume your audience is
ignorant.
If you want high enough concentrations of radon that the decay results
in enough helium to raise your voice, next time you are in Moab, see if
any locals can tell you how to find the old Fowler mine up behind the
slick rock behind the old city dump.
Coal fired plants have radioactive emissions, but radon ain't one of
them. Particularly compared to the more dangerous radioactives that
your body will absorb and imbed quite readily.
L.W.(Bill) ------ III proclaimed:
> You should have been able to guess I meant radon:
> http://www.mgs.md.gov/esic/brochures/radon.html Rather than Argon the
> trade name for the additive I sold in Chevron.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
>>Radiation...
>>
>>http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
>>Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
>>emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
comprehension.
"Radon has a half-life of only 3.8 days; consequently, most of the gas
decays harmlessly in the ground or atmosphere."
So if it WERE to magically appear in coal beds and somehow be absorbed
into the coal [neither of which is the case, but you'd need to be able
to read some of the rest of that page to see why not.] a coal burning
plant would be releasing this non-existent radon into the air where it
would dissipate. Except of course that storing the coal for a few days
would also get rid of this magical non-existent radon since there is
very little thorium, uranium, etc. in commercial coal.
You want radon, go to Grand Junction Colorado where the difference
between the entire housing development built on uranium mine tailings
and the natural radioactivity of the ground under most of the city is
quite tiny unless you have an axe to grind and presume your audience is
ignorant.
If you want high enough concentrations of radon that the decay results
in enough helium to raise your voice, next time you are in Moab, see if
any locals can tell you how to find the old Fowler mine up behind the
slick rock behind the old city dump.
Coal fired plants have radioactive emissions, but radon ain't one of
them. Particularly compared to the more dangerous radioactives that
your body will absorb and imbed quite readily.
L.W.(Bill) ------ III proclaimed:
> You should have been able to guess I meant radon:
> http://www.mgs.md.gov/esic/brochures/radon.html Rather than Argon the
> trade name for the additive I sold in Chevron.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
>>Radiation...
>>
>>http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
>>Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
>>emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
Guest
Posts: n/a
You might want to read some of those links you post so quickly with no
comprehension.
"Radon has a half-life of only 3.8 days; consequently, most of the gas
decays harmlessly in the ground or atmosphere."
So if it WERE to magically appear in coal beds and somehow be absorbed
into the coal [neither of which is the case, but you'd need to be able
to read some of the rest of that page to see why not.] a coal burning
plant would be releasing this non-existent radon into the air where it
would dissipate. Except of course that storing the coal for a few days
would also get rid of this magical non-existent radon since there is
very little thorium, uranium, etc. in commercial coal.
You want radon, go to Grand Junction Colorado where the difference
between the entire housing development built on uranium mine tailings
and the natural radioactivity of the ground under most of the city is
quite tiny unless you have an axe to grind and presume your audience is
ignorant.
If you want high enough concentrations of radon that the decay results
in enough helium to raise your voice, next time you are in Moab, see if
any locals can tell you how to find the old Fowler mine up behind the
slick rock behind the old city dump.
Coal fired plants have radioactive emissions, but radon ain't one of
them. Particularly compared to the more dangerous radioactives that
your body will absorb and imbed quite readily.
L.W.(Bill) ------ III proclaimed:
> You should have been able to guess I meant radon:
> http://www.mgs.md.gov/esic/brochures/radon.html Rather than Argon the
> trade name for the additive I sold in Chevron.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
>>Radiation...
>>
>>http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
>>Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
>>emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
comprehension.
"Radon has a half-life of only 3.8 days; consequently, most of the gas
decays harmlessly in the ground or atmosphere."
So if it WERE to magically appear in coal beds and somehow be absorbed
into the coal [neither of which is the case, but you'd need to be able
to read some of the rest of that page to see why not.] a coal burning
plant would be releasing this non-existent radon into the air where it
would dissipate. Except of course that storing the coal for a few days
would also get rid of this magical non-existent radon since there is
very little thorium, uranium, etc. in commercial coal.
You want radon, go to Grand Junction Colorado where the difference
between the entire housing development built on uranium mine tailings
and the natural radioactivity of the ground under most of the city is
quite tiny unless you have an axe to grind and presume your audience is
ignorant.
If you want high enough concentrations of radon that the decay results
in enough helium to raise your voice, next time you are in Moab, see if
any locals can tell you how to find the old Fowler mine up behind the
slick rock behind the old city dump.
Coal fired plants have radioactive emissions, but radon ain't one of
them. Particularly compared to the more dangerous radioactives that
your body will absorb and imbed quite readily.
L.W.(Bill) ------ III proclaimed:
> You should have been able to guess I meant radon:
> http://www.mgs.md.gov/esic/brochures/radon.html Rather than Argon the
> trade name for the additive I sold in Chevron.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
>>Radiation...
>>
>>http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
>>Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
>>emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
Guest
Posts: n/a
You might want to read some of those links you post so quickly with no
comprehension.
"Radon has a half-life of only 3.8 days; consequently, most of the gas
decays harmlessly in the ground or atmosphere."
So if it WERE to magically appear in coal beds and somehow be absorbed
into the coal [neither of which is the case, but you'd need to be able
to read some of the rest of that page to see why not.] a coal burning
plant would be releasing this non-existent radon into the air where it
would dissipate. Except of course that storing the coal for a few days
would also get rid of this magical non-existent radon since there is
very little thorium, uranium, etc. in commercial coal.
You want radon, go to Grand Junction Colorado where the difference
between the entire housing development built on uranium mine tailings
and the natural radioactivity of the ground under most of the city is
quite tiny unless you have an axe to grind and presume your audience is
ignorant.
If you want high enough concentrations of radon that the decay results
in enough helium to raise your voice, next time you are in Moab, see if
any locals can tell you how to find the old Fowler mine up behind the
slick rock behind the old city dump.
Coal fired plants have radioactive emissions, but radon ain't one of
them. Particularly compared to the more dangerous radioactives that
your body will absorb and imbed quite readily.
L.W.(Bill) ------ III proclaimed:
> You should have been able to guess I meant radon:
> http://www.mgs.md.gov/esic/brochures/radon.html Rather than Argon the
> trade name for the additive I sold in Chevron.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
>>Radiation...
>>
>>http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
>>Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
>>emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
comprehension.
"Radon has a half-life of only 3.8 days; consequently, most of the gas
decays harmlessly in the ground or atmosphere."
So if it WERE to magically appear in coal beds and somehow be absorbed
into the coal [neither of which is the case, but you'd need to be able
to read some of the rest of that page to see why not.] a coal burning
plant would be releasing this non-existent radon into the air where it
would dissipate. Except of course that storing the coal for a few days
would also get rid of this magical non-existent radon since there is
very little thorium, uranium, etc. in commercial coal.
You want radon, go to Grand Junction Colorado where the difference
between the entire housing development built on uranium mine tailings
and the natural radioactivity of the ground under most of the city is
quite tiny unless you have an axe to grind and presume your audience is
ignorant.
If you want high enough concentrations of radon that the decay results
in enough helium to raise your voice, next time you are in Moab, see if
any locals can tell you how to find the old Fowler mine up behind the
slick rock behind the old city dump.
Coal fired plants have radioactive emissions, but radon ain't one of
them. Particularly compared to the more dangerous radioactives that
your body will absorb and imbed quite readily.
L.W.(Bill) ------ III proclaimed:
> You should have been able to guess I meant radon:
> http://www.mgs.md.gov/esic/brochures/radon.html Rather than Argon the
> trade name for the additive I sold in Chevron.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Tell the truth Bill, You make this ---- up don't you. LMAO: Argon
>>Radiation...
>>
>>http://environmentalchemistry.com/yo....html#Nuclides
>>Only a few relatively short lived synthetic nuclides, and mostly beta
>>emitters at that. No gamma emitters.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:u_idnS-Jqp7fmPnZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com...
---snippy---
> You want radon, go to Grand Junction Colorado where the difference
> between the entire housing development built on uranium mine tailings
> and the natural radioactivity of the ground under most of the city is
> quite tiny unless you have an axe to grind and presume your audience is
> ignorant.
---snippy---
In Grand Junction, in fact anywhere in Colorado it would be quite natural to
presume so. ;^)
Earle
news:u_idnS-Jqp7fmPnZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com...
---snippy---
> You want radon, go to Grand Junction Colorado where the difference
> between the entire housing development built on uranium mine tailings
> and the natural radioactivity of the ground under most of the city is
> quite tiny unless you have an axe to grind and presume your audience is
> ignorant.
---snippy---
In Grand Junction, in fact anywhere in Colorado it would be quite natural to
presume so. ;^)
Earle
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:u_idnS-Jqp7fmPnZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com...
---snippy---
> You want radon, go to Grand Junction Colorado where the difference
> between the entire housing development built on uranium mine tailings
> and the natural radioactivity of the ground under most of the city is
> quite tiny unless you have an axe to grind and presume your audience is
> ignorant.
---snippy---
In Grand Junction, in fact anywhere in Colorado it would be quite natural to
presume so. ;^)
Earle
news:u_idnS-Jqp7fmPnZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com...
---snippy---
> You want radon, go to Grand Junction Colorado where the difference
> between the entire housing development built on uranium mine tailings
> and the natural radioactivity of the ground under most of the city is
> quite tiny unless you have an axe to grind and presume your audience is
> ignorant.
---snippy---
In Grand Junction, in fact anywhere in Colorado it would be quite natural to
presume so. ;^)
Earle


