open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys
#191
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417DBE58.ACB3BEEA@***.net...
> Yup, and except for Dean's axle I was correct, remember?
No Bill, you were still wrong, you do not have to convert to disks for
Dynatrac's ABS Dana 44, the sensors are not mounted inside the axletubes,
et. al. This is an old argument, and I shan't post further on this after
this message.
Out of
and only after many of our letter did the offered a Dana 44 disk
> brake, ABS for four thousand bucks.
They offered ABS-supporting Dana 44's way before the discussion, and without
the need for a disk brake conversion.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...91%40netzone.c
om
And it still means "no one makes a Dana 44 with ABS" is wrong.
Looking through their sites looks
> like they've removed all reference to it, good they'll probably kill
> someone.
Really? http://www.dynatrac.com/pro44-rear-options.htm
BTW when are you going get rid of that that thing, and get a
> Real Jeep rear end?
When it breaks, and when I can afford it, which hopefully will be around the
same time.
news:417DBE58.ACB3BEEA@***.net...
> Yup, and except for Dean's axle I was correct, remember?
No Bill, you were still wrong, you do not have to convert to disks for
Dynatrac's ABS Dana 44, the sensors are not mounted inside the axletubes,
et. al. This is an old argument, and I shan't post further on this after
this message.
Out of
and only after many of our letter did the offered a Dana 44 disk
> brake, ABS for four thousand bucks.
They offered ABS-supporting Dana 44's way before the discussion, and without
the need for a disk brake conversion.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...91%40netzone.c
om
And it still means "no one makes a Dana 44 with ABS" is wrong.
Looking through their sites looks
> like they've removed all reference to it, good they'll probably kill
> someone.
Really? http://www.dynatrac.com/pro44-rear-options.htm
BTW when are you going get rid of that that thing, and get a
> Real Jeep rear end?
When it breaks, and when I can afford it, which hopefully will be around the
same time.
#192
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417DBE58.ACB3BEEA@***.net...
> Yup, and except for Dean's axle I was correct, remember?
No Bill, you were still wrong, you do not have to convert to disks for
Dynatrac's ABS Dana 44, the sensors are not mounted inside the axletubes,
et. al. This is an old argument, and I shan't post further on this after
this message.
Out of
and only after many of our letter did the offered a Dana 44 disk
> brake, ABS for four thousand bucks.
They offered ABS-supporting Dana 44's way before the discussion, and without
the need for a disk brake conversion.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...91%40netzone.c
om
And it still means "no one makes a Dana 44 with ABS" is wrong.
Looking through their sites looks
> like they've removed all reference to it, good they'll probably kill
> someone.
Really? http://www.dynatrac.com/pro44-rear-options.htm
BTW when are you going get rid of that that thing, and get a
> Real Jeep rear end?
When it breaks, and when I can afford it, which hopefully will be around the
same time.
news:417DBE58.ACB3BEEA@***.net...
> Yup, and except for Dean's axle I was correct, remember?
No Bill, you were still wrong, you do not have to convert to disks for
Dynatrac's ABS Dana 44, the sensors are not mounted inside the axletubes,
et. al. This is an old argument, and I shan't post further on this after
this message.
Out of
and only after many of our letter did the offered a Dana 44 disk
> brake, ABS for four thousand bucks.
They offered ABS-supporting Dana 44's way before the discussion, and without
the need for a disk brake conversion.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...91%40netzone.c
om
And it still means "no one makes a Dana 44 with ABS" is wrong.
Looking through their sites looks
> like they've removed all reference to it, good they'll probably kill
> someone.
Really? http://www.dynatrac.com/pro44-rear-options.htm
BTW when are you going get rid of that that thing, and get a
> Real Jeep rear end?
When it breaks, and when I can afford it, which hopefully will be around the
same time.
#193
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417DBE58.ACB3BEEA@***.net...
> Yup, and except for Dean's axle I was correct, remember?
No Bill, you were still wrong, you do not have to convert to disks for
Dynatrac's ABS Dana 44, the sensors are not mounted inside the axletubes,
et. al. This is an old argument, and I shan't post further on this after
this message.
Out of
and only after many of our letter did the offered a Dana 44 disk
> brake, ABS for four thousand bucks.
They offered ABS-supporting Dana 44's way before the discussion, and without
the need for a disk brake conversion.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...91%40netzone.c
om
And it still means "no one makes a Dana 44 with ABS" is wrong.
Looking through their sites looks
> like they've removed all reference to it, good they'll probably kill
> someone.
Really? http://www.dynatrac.com/pro44-rear-options.htm
BTW when are you going get rid of that that thing, and get a
> Real Jeep rear end?
When it breaks, and when I can afford it, which hopefully will be around the
same time.
news:417DBE58.ACB3BEEA@***.net...
> Yup, and except for Dean's axle I was correct, remember?
No Bill, you were still wrong, you do not have to convert to disks for
Dynatrac's ABS Dana 44, the sensors are not mounted inside the axletubes,
et. al. This is an old argument, and I shan't post further on this after
this message.
Out of
and only after many of our letter did the offered a Dana 44 disk
> brake, ABS for four thousand bucks.
They offered ABS-supporting Dana 44's way before the discussion, and without
the need for a disk brake conversion.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...91%40netzone.c
om
And it still means "no one makes a Dana 44 with ABS" is wrong.
Looking through their sites looks
> like they've removed all reference to it, good they'll probably kill
> someone.
Really? http://www.dynatrac.com/pro44-rear-options.htm
BTW when are you going get rid of that that thing, and get a
> Real Jeep rear end?
When it breaks, and when I can afford it, which hopefully will be around the
same time.
#194
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Matt, if you could remember, I was lead to believe that via a letter
from Dynatrac, that said they would put the sensor inside the axle tube,
like their Dana 60. Your Ford may be wired the same way as this Dodge:
http://www.marksmark.net/srpics/bad184.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> No Bill, you were still wrong, you do not have to convert to disks for
> Dynatrac's ABS Dana 44, the sensors are not mounted inside the axletubes,
> et. al. This is an old argument, and I shan't post further on this after
> this message.
>
> They offered ABS-supporting Dana 44's way before the discussion, and without
> the need for a disk brake conversion.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...91%40netzone.c
> om
>
> And it still means "no one makes a Dana 44 with ABS" is wrong.
>
> Really? http://www.dynatrac.com/pro44-rear-options.htm
>
> When it breaks, and when I can afford it, which hopefully will be around the
> same time.
from Dynatrac, that said they would put the sensor inside the axle tube,
like their Dana 60. Your Ford may be wired the same way as this Dodge:
http://www.marksmark.net/srpics/bad184.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> No Bill, you were still wrong, you do not have to convert to disks for
> Dynatrac's ABS Dana 44, the sensors are not mounted inside the axletubes,
> et. al. This is an old argument, and I shan't post further on this after
> this message.
>
> They offered ABS-supporting Dana 44's way before the discussion, and without
> the need for a disk brake conversion.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...91%40netzone.c
> om
>
> And it still means "no one makes a Dana 44 with ABS" is wrong.
>
> Really? http://www.dynatrac.com/pro44-rear-options.htm
>
> When it breaks, and when I can afford it, which hopefully will be around the
> same time.
#195
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Matt, if you could remember, I was lead to believe that via a letter
from Dynatrac, that said they would put the sensor inside the axle tube,
like their Dana 60. Your Ford may be wired the same way as this Dodge:
http://www.marksmark.net/srpics/bad184.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> No Bill, you were still wrong, you do not have to convert to disks for
> Dynatrac's ABS Dana 44, the sensors are not mounted inside the axletubes,
> et. al. This is an old argument, and I shan't post further on this after
> this message.
>
> They offered ABS-supporting Dana 44's way before the discussion, and without
> the need for a disk brake conversion.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...91%40netzone.c
> om
>
> And it still means "no one makes a Dana 44 with ABS" is wrong.
>
> Really? http://www.dynatrac.com/pro44-rear-options.htm
>
> When it breaks, and when I can afford it, which hopefully will be around the
> same time.
from Dynatrac, that said they would put the sensor inside the axle tube,
like their Dana 60. Your Ford may be wired the same way as this Dodge:
http://www.marksmark.net/srpics/bad184.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> No Bill, you were still wrong, you do not have to convert to disks for
> Dynatrac's ABS Dana 44, the sensors are not mounted inside the axletubes,
> et. al. This is an old argument, and I shan't post further on this after
> this message.
>
> They offered ABS-supporting Dana 44's way before the discussion, and without
> the need for a disk brake conversion.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...91%40netzone.c
> om
>
> And it still means "no one makes a Dana 44 with ABS" is wrong.
>
> Really? http://www.dynatrac.com/pro44-rear-options.htm
>
> When it breaks, and when I can afford it, which hopefully will be around the
> same time.
#196
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Matt, if you could remember, I was lead to believe that via a letter
from Dynatrac, that said they would put the sensor inside the axle tube,
like their Dana 60. Your Ford may be wired the same way as this Dodge:
http://www.marksmark.net/srpics/bad184.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> No Bill, you were still wrong, you do not have to convert to disks for
> Dynatrac's ABS Dana 44, the sensors are not mounted inside the axletubes,
> et. al. This is an old argument, and I shan't post further on this after
> this message.
>
> They offered ABS-supporting Dana 44's way before the discussion, and without
> the need for a disk brake conversion.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...91%40netzone.c
> om
>
> And it still means "no one makes a Dana 44 with ABS" is wrong.
>
> Really? http://www.dynatrac.com/pro44-rear-options.htm
>
> When it breaks, and when I can afford it, which hopefully will be around the
> same time.
from Dynatrac, that said they would put the sensor inside the axle tube,
like their Dana 60. Your Ford may be wired the same way as this Dodge:
http://www.marksmark.net/srpics/bad184.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> No Bill, you were still wrong, you do not have to convert to disks for
> Dynatrac's ABS Dana 44, the sensors are not mounted inside the axletubes,
> et. al. This is an old argument, and I shan't post further on this after
> this message.
>
> They offered ABS-supporting Dana 44's way before the discussion, and without
> the need for a disk brake conversion.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...91%40netzone.c
> om
>
> And it still means "no one makes a Dana 44 with ABS" is wrong.
>
> Really? http://www.dynatrac.com/pro44-rear-options.htm
>
> When it breaks, and when I can afford it, which hopefully will be around the
> same time.
#197
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Here's what you said about the Hemi:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...9FC2%40cox.net
To see the context and my reply click on "complete thread" on the top right.
The other thread is perfectly understandable, just pointlessly hostile.
-John
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417DE14D.ABAA8631@***.net...
> I said no such thing, about the new Hemi! The only thing I can find
> in that tread that tell us the differences, may this reply from Generic:
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ntpservers.com
> Get your facts straight!
> And what don't you understand from this tread?
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Generic wrote:
> >
> > Here are a couple personal examples.
> >
> > 1. You disputed claims (from me and others) that the new "Hemi" engine
was
> > not a Hemi at all, and posted links to pages about (irrelevant) ancient
> > Hemis and marketing garbage stamped on the heads. When I posted
up-to-date
> > info you moved on to irrelevant points about performance engines.
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/5amve
> >
> > It's just as easy to google modern and accurate info as to rely on old
> > assumptions then dig up irrelevant stuff.
> >
> > 2. In this thread you accused a poor first-time poster who wanted
better
> > mileage of being a troll (WHY?????) then went off topic. You claimed
> > "Because most of the TJs we see on the road weigh in at two tons, it's
> > physically impossible to get better mileage." When I posted a message
> > directly comparing the Wrangler SEs mileage and power vs. the Honda CR-V
(at
> > similar weights) you said "I've never seen a Honda off road further than
a
> > dirt parking lot, have you?"
> >
> > Who cares? The OP wondered about the potential to improve MPG in a
heavy
> > vehicle with high drag...and all signs say it's possible to some degree
with
> > modern engines...
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/5cw5s
> >
> > In my experience you get best answers when you mix experience with fresh
> > research. No offense meant, but then many people don't deserve "TROLL"
> > messages either.
> >
> > -John
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...9FC2%40cox.net
To see the context and my reply click on "complete thread" on the top right.
The other thread is perfectly understandable, just pointlessly hostile.
-John
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417DE14D.ABAA8631@***.net...
> I said no such thing, about the new Hemi! The only thing I can find
> in that tread that tell us the differences, may this reply from Generic:
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ntpservers.com
> Get your facts straight!
> And what don't you understand from this tread?
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Generic wrote:
> >
> > Here are a couple personal examples.
> >
> > 1. You disputed claims (from me and others) that the new "Hemi" engine
was
> > not a Hemi at all, and posted links to pages about (irrelevant) ancient
> > Hemis and marketing garbage stamped on the heads. When I posted
up-to-date
> > info you moved on to irrelevant points about performance engines.
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/5amve
> >
> > It's just as easy to google modern and accurate info as to rely on old
> > assumptions then dig up irrelevant stuff.
> >
> > 2. In this thread you accused a poor first-time poster who wanted
better
> > mileage of being a troll (WHY?????) then went off topic. You claimed
> > "Because most of the TJs we see on the road weigh in at two tons, it's
> > physically impossible to get better mileage." When I posted a message
> > directly comparing the Wrangler SEs mileage and power vs. the Honda CR-V
(at
> > similar weights) you said "I've never seen a Honda off road further than
a
> > dirt parking lot, have you?"
> >
> > Who cares? The OP wondered about the potential to improve MPG in a
heavy
> > vehicle with high drag...and all signs say it's possible to some degree
with
> > modern engines...
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/5cw5s
> >
> > In my experience you get best answers when you mix experience with fresh
> > research. No offense meant, but then many people don't deserve "TROLL"
> > messages either.
> >
> > -John
#198
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Here's what you said about the Hemi:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...9FC2%40cox.net
To see the context and my reply click on "complete thread" on the top right.
The other thread is perfectly understandable, just pointlessly hostile.
-John
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417DE14D.ABAA8631@***.net...
> I said no such thing, about the new Hemi! The only thing I can find
> in that tread that tell us the differences, may this reply from Generic:
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ntpservers.com
> Get your facts straight!
> And what don't you understand from this tread?
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Generic wrote:
> >
> > Here are a couple personal examples.
> >
> > 1. You disputed claims (from me and others) that the new "Hemi" engine
was
> > not a Hemi at all, and posted links to pages about (irrelevant) ancient
> > Hemis and marketing garbage stamped on the heads. When I posted
up-to-date
> > info you moved on to irrelevant points about performance engines.
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/5amve
> >
> > It's just as easy to google modern and accurate info as to rely on old
> > assumptions then dig up irrelevant stuff.
> >
> > 2. In this thread you accused a poor first-time poster who wanted
better
> > mileage of being a troll (WHY?????) then went off topic. You claimed
> > "Because most of the TJs we see on the road weigh in at two tons, it's
> > physically impossible to get better mileage." When I posted a message
> > directly comparing the Wrangler SEs mileage and power vs. the Honda CR-V
(at
> > similar weights) you said "I've never seen a Honda off road further than
a
> > dirt parking lot, have you?"
> >
> > Who cares? The OP wondered about the potential to improve MPG in a
heavy
> > vehicle with high drag...and all signs say it's possible to some degree
with
> > modern engines...
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/5cw5s
> >
> > In my experience you get best answers when you mix experience with fresh
> > research. No offense meant, but then many people don't deserve "TROLL"
> > messages either.
> >
> > -John
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...9FC2%40cox.net
To see the context and my reply click on "complete thread" on the top right.
The other thread is perfectly understandable, just pointlessly hostile.
-John
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417DE14D.ABAA8631@***.net...
> I said no such thing, about the new Hemi! The only thing I can find
> in that tread that tell us the differences, may this reply from Generic:
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ntpservers.com
> Get your facts straight!
> And what don't you understand from this tread?
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Generic wrote:
> >
> > Here are a couple personal examples.
> >
> > 1. You disputed claims (from me and others) that the new "Hemi" engine
was
> > not a Hemi at all, and posted links to pages about (irrelevant) ancient
> > Hemis and marketing garbage stamped on the heads. When I posted
up-to-date
> > info you moved on to irrelevant points about performance engines.
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/5amve
> >
> > It's just as easy to google modern and accurate info as to rely on old
> > assumptions then dig up irrelevant stuff.
> >
> > 2. In this thread you accused a poor first-time poster who wanted
better
> > mileage of being a troll (WHY?????) then went off topic. You claimed
> > "Because most of the TJs we see on the road weigh in at two tons, it's
> > physically impossible to get better mileage." When I posted a message
> > directly comparing the Wrangler SEs mileage and power vs. the Honda CR-V
(at
> > similar weights) you said "I've never seen a Honda off road further than
a
> > dirt parking lot, have you?"
> >
> > Who cares? The OP wondered about the potential to improve MPG in a
heavy
> > vehicle with high drag...and all signs say it's possible to some degree
with
> > modern engines...
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/5cw5s
> >
> > In my experience you get best answers when you mix experience with fresh
> > research. No offense meant, but then many people don't deserve "TROLL"
> > messages either.
> >
> > -John
#199
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Here's what you said about the Hemi:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...9FC2%40cox.net
To see the context and my reply click on "complete thread" on the top right.
The other thread is perfectly understandable, just pointlessly hostile.
-John
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417DE14D.ABAA8631@***.net...
> I said no such thing, about the new Hemi! The only thing I can find
> in that tread that tell us the differences, may this reply from Generic:
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ntpservers.com
> Get your facts straight!
> And what don't you understand from this tread?
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Generic wrote:
> >
> > Here are a couple personal examples.
> >
> > 1. You disputed claims (from me and others) that the new "Hemi" engine
was
> > not a Hemi at all, and posted links to pages about (irrelevant) ancient
> > Hemis and marketing garbage stamped on the heads. When I posted
up-to-date
> > info you moved on to irrelevant points about performance engines.
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/5amve
> >
> > It's just as easy to google modern and accurate info as to rely on old
> > assumptions then dig up irrelevant stuff.
> >
> > 2. In this thread you accused a poor first-time poster who wanted
better
> > mileage of being a troll (WHY?????) then went off topic. You claimed
> > "Because most of the TJs we see on the road weigh in at two tons, it's
> > physically impossible to get better mileage." When I posted a message
> > directly comparing the Wrangler SEs mileage and power vs. the Honda CR-V
(at
> > similar weights) you said "I've never seen a Honda off road further than
a
> > dirt parking lot, have you?"
> >
> > Who cares? The OP wondered about the potential to improve MPG in a
heavy
> > vehicle with high drag...and all signs say it's possible to some degree
with
> > modern engines...
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/5cw5s
> >
> > In my experience you get best answers when you mix experience with fresh
> > research. No offense meant, but then many people don't deserve "TROLL"
> > messages either.
> >
> > -John
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...9FC2%40cox.net
To see the context and my reply click on "complete thread" on the top right.
The other thread is perfectly understandable, just pointlessly hostile.
-John
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417DE14D.ABAA8631@***.net...
> I said no such thing, about the new Hemi! The only thing I can find
> in that tread that tell us the differences, may this reply from Generic:
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ntpservers.com
> Get your facts straight!
> And what don't you understand from this tread?
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Generic wrote:
> >
> > Here are a couple personal examples.
> >
> > 1. You disputed claims (from me and others) that the new "Hemi" engine
was
> > not a Hemi at all, and posted links to pages about (irrelevant) ancient
> > Hemis and marketing garbage stamped on the heads. When I posted
up-to-date
> > info you moved on to irrelevant points about performance engines.
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/5amve
> >
> > It's just as easy to google modern and accurate info as to rely on old
> > assumptions then dig up irrelevant stuff.
> >
> > 2. In this thread you accused a poor first-time poster who wanted
better
> > mileage of being a troll (WHY?????) then went off topic. You claimed
> > "Because most of the TJs we see on the road weigh in at two tons, it's
> > physically impossible to get better mileage." When I posted a message
> > directly comparing the Wrangler SEs mileage and power vs. the Honda CR-V
(at
> > similar weights) you said "I've never seen a Honda off road further than
a
> > dirt parking lot, have you?"
> >
> > Who cares? The OP wondered about the potential to improve MPG in a
heavy
> > vehicle with high drag...and all signs say it's possible to some degree
with
> > modern engines...
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/5cw5s
> >
> > In my experience you get best answers when you mix experience with fresh
> > research. No offense meant, but then many people don't deserve "TROLL"
> > messages either.
> >
> > -John
#200
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417ED12A.D94CE1AF@***.net...
> Matt, if you could remember, I was lead to believe that via a letter
> from Dynatrac, that said they would put the sensor inside the axle tube,
> like their Dana 60.
Nope. You misunderstood. The sensor is not inside the axletube on their 60,
either. http://dynatrac.com/pro60-SF-options.htm. it's either on the
pumpkin, sensing a ring gear tone wheel, or on the brake backing
plate/caliper bracket, sensing an axle tone wheel.
Your Ford may be wired the same way as this Dodge:
> http://www.marksmark.net/srpics/bad184.jpg
My Ford uses a ring gear sensor, mounted on the pumpkin. Thank you for
providing yet another irrelevent change of subject that you challenged the
group to find.
I'm done discussing Dynatrac axles, I just was giving you the example that
you asked for.