open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys
10-25-2004, 03:06 PM
#131
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
I'd agree Mr ------ is knowledgeable within his sphere but it's obvious he's
got a lot of agendae and is almost disturbed about some of them. Most of what
he's said about Jeeps is off the factory manuals or the Hollander interchange
book.
got a lot of agendae and is almost disturbed about some of them. Most of what
he's said about Jeeps is off the factory manuals or the Hollander interchange
book.
10-25-2004, 03:06 PM
#132
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
I'd agree Mr ------ is knowledgeable within his sphere but it's obvious he's
got a lot of agendae and is almost disturbed about some of them. Most of what
he's said about Jeeps is off the factory manuals or the Hollander interchange
book.
got a lot of agendae and is almost disturbed about some of them. Most of what
he's said about Jeeps is off the factory manuals or the Hollander interchange
book.
10-25-2004, 03:06 PM
#133
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
I'd agree Mr ------ is knowledgeable within his sphere but it's obvious he's
got a lot of agendae and is almost disturbed about some of them. Most of what
he's said about Jeeps is off the factory manuals or the Hollander interchange
book.
got a lot of agendae and is almost disturbed about some of them. Most of what
he's said about Jeeps is off the factory manuals or the Hollander interchange
book.
10-25-2004, 03:08 PM
#134
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Seems to me you launched on the suject of diesels and aircraft a while
back. I don't remember a single person agreeing with you. Nor any
willingness to see a speck of merit in anything anyone else had to say.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You can't give an example of me, Bill, changing the topic. I hit
> them head-on correcting lies about diesels, Daimler's C clip rear ends,
> or the effectiveness of ABS in off road condition, backing each of my
> statements with web sites.
> You're right I don't have a life, other than my Grandkids:
> http://www.----------.com/
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
> Generic wrote:
>
>>On balance he does more good than harm, but clearly has the need to rule the
>>roost. I think he'd have a coronary if anyone else cared to spend as much
>>time answering messages as he does.
>>
>>Yes, for unknown reasons he tags quite a few innocuous posts as trolling.
>>He'll also change the topic when he's wrong, seemingly to get in the last
>>word and somehow prove something.
>>
>>This group is obviously a large part of his life, so you'll probably be
>>disappointed if you expect him to change.
>>
>>-John
back. I don't remember a single person agreeing with you. Nor any
willingness to see a speck of merit in anything anyone else had to say.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You can't give an example of me, Bill, changing the topic. I hit
> them head-on correcting lies about diesels, Daimler's C clip rear ends,
> or the effectiveness of ABS in off road condition, backing each of my
> statements with web sites.
> You're right I don't have a life, other than my Grandkids:
> http://www.----------.com/
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
> Generic wrote:
>
>>On balance he does more good than harm, but clearly has the need to rule the
>>roost. I think he'd have a coronary if anyone else cared to spend as much
>>time answering messages as he does.
>>
>>Yes, for unknown reasons he tags quite a few innocuous posts as trolling.
>>He'll also change the topic when he's wrong, seemingly to get in the last
>>word and somehow prove something.
>>
>>This group is obviously a large part of his life, so you'll probably be
>>disappointed if you expect him to change.
>>
>>-John
10-25-2004, 03:08 PM
#135
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Seems to me you launched on the suject of diesels and aircraft a while
back. I don't remember a single person agreeing with you. Nor any
willingness to see a speck of merit in anything anyone else had to say.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You can't give an example of me, Bill, changing the topic. I hit
> them head-on correcting lies about diesels, Daimler's C clip rear ends,
> or the effectiveness of ABS in off road condition, backing each of my
> statements with web sites.
> You're right I don't have a life, other than my Grandkids:
> http://www.----------.com/
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
> Generic wrote:
>
>>On balance he does more good than harm, but clearly has the need to rule the
>>roost. I think he'd have a coronary if anyone else cared to spend as much
>>time answering messages as he does.
>>
>>Yes, for unknown reasons he tags quite a few innocuous posts as trolling.
>>He'll also change the topic when he's wrong, seemingly to get in the last
>>word and somehow prove something.
>>
>>This group is obviously a large part of his life, so you'll probably be
>>disappointed if you expect him to change.
>>
>>-John
back. I don't remember a single person agreeing with you. Nor any
willingness to see a speck of merit in anything anyone else had to say.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You can't give an example of me, Bill, changing the topic. I hit
> them head-on correcting lies about diesels, Daimler's C clip rear ends,
> or the effectiveness of ABS in off road condition, backing each of my
> statements with web sites.
> You're right I don't have a life, other than my Grandkids:
> http://www.----------.com/
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
> Generic wrote:
>
>>On balance he does more good than harm, but clearly has the need to rule the
>>roost. I think he'd have a coronary if anyone else cared to spend as much
>>time answering messages as he does.
>>
>>Yes, for unknown reasons he tags quite a few innocuous posts as trolling.
>>He'll also change the topic when he's wrong, seemingly to get in the last
>>word and somehow prove something.
>>
>>This group is obviously a large part of his life, so you'll probably be
>>disappointed if you expect him to change.
>>
>>-John
10-25-2004, 03:08 PM
#136
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Seems to me you launched on the suject of diesels and aircraft a while
back. I don't remember a single person agreeing with you. Nor any
willingness to see a speck of merit in anything anyone else had to say.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You can't give an example of me, Bill, changing the topic. I hit
> them head-on correcting lies about diesels, Daimler's C clip rear ends,
> or the effectiveness of ABS in off road condition, backing each of my
> statements with web sites.
> You're right I don't have a life, other than my Grandkids:
> http://www.----------.com/
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
> Generic wrote:
>
>>On balance he does more good than harm, but clearly has the need to rule the
>>roost. I think he'd have a coronary if anyone else cared to spend as much
>>time answering messages as he does.
>>
>>Yes, for unknown reasons he tags quite a few innocuous posts as trolling.
>>He'll also change the topic when he's wrong, seemingly to get in the last
>>word and somehow prove something.
>>
>>This group is obviously a large part of his life, so you'll probably be
>>disappointed if you expect him to change.
>>
>>-John
back. I don't remember a single person agreeing with you. Nor any
willingness to see a speck of merit in anything anyone else had to say.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You can't give an example of me, Bill, changing the topic. I hit
> them head-on correcting lies about diesels, Daimler's C clip rear ends,
> or the effectiveness of ABS in off road condition, backing each of my
> statements with web sites.
> You're right I don't have a life, other than my Grandkids:
> http://www.----------.com/
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
> Generic wrote:
>
>>On balance he does more good than harm, but clearly has the need to rule the
>>roost. I think he'd have a coronary if anyone else cared to spend as much
>>time answering messages as he does.
>>
>>Yes, for unknown reasons he tags quite a few innocuous posts as trolling.
>>He'll also change the topic when he's wrong, seemingly to get in the last
>>word and somehow prove something.
>>
>>This group is obviously a large part of his life, so you'll probably be
>>disappointed if you expect him to change.
>>
>>-John
10-25-2004, 04:43 PM
#137
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Maybe not a change in topic i.e. what's on the header but it's a good
example of changing the parameters of the subject when they didn't fit with
what you believed...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417D4D8B.B447F1D2@***.net...
> Matt, that was an example of what? It's definitely not of a change of
> topic, as that was argument over what type of ABS were available for the
> Dana 44, knowing Daimler make none. And I was point out the only one was
> especially made for Dean. How, what's you problem?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > This thread is replete with such examples:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/4egc4
> >
> > You can't give an example of me, Bill, changing the topic. I hit
> > > >them head-on correcting lies about diesels, Daimler's C clip rear
ends,
> > > >or the effectiveness of ABS in off road condition, backing each of my
> > > >statements with web sites.
> > >
example of changing the parameters of the subject when they didn't fit with
what you believed...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417D4D8B.B447F1D2@***.net...
> Matt, that was an example of what? It's definitely not of a change of
> topic, as that was argument over what type of ABS were available for the
> Dana 44, knowing Daimler make none. And I was point out the only one was
> especially made for Dean. How, what's you problem?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > This thread is replete with such examples:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/4egc4
> >
> > You can't give an example of me, Bill, changing the topic. I hit
> > > >them head-on correcting lies about diesels, Daimler's C clip rear
ends,
> > > >or the effectiveness of ABS in off road condition, backing each of my
> > > >statements with web sites.
> > >
10-25-2004, 04:43 PM
#138
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Maybe not a change in topic i.e. what's on the header but it's a good
example of changing the parameters of the subject when they didn't fit with
what you believed...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417D4D8B.B447F1D2@***.net...
> Matt, that was an example of what? It's definitely not of a change of
> topic, as that was argument over what type of ABS were available for the
> Dana 44, knowing Daimler make none. And I was point out the only one was
> especially made for Dean. How, what's you problem?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > This thread is replete with such examples:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/4egc4
> >
> > You can't give an example of me, Bill, changing the topic. I hit
> > > >them head-on correcting lies about diesels, Daimler's C clip rear
ends,
> > > >or the effectiveness of ABS in off road condition, backing each of my
> > > >statements with web sites.
> > >
example of changing the parameters of the subject when they didn't fit with
what you believed...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417D4D8B.B447F1D2@***.net...
> Matt, that was an example of what? It's definitely not of a change of
> topic, as that was argument over what type of ABS were available for the
> Dana 44, knowing Daimler make none. And I was point out the only one was
> especially made for Dean. How, what's you problem?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > This thread is replete with such examples:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/4egc4
> >
> > You can't give an example of me, Bill, changing the topic. I hit
> > > >them head-on correcting lies about diesels, Daimler's C clip rear
ends,
> > > >or the effectiveness of ABS in off road condition, backing each of my
> > > >statements with web sites.
> > >
10-25-2004, 04:43 PM
#139
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Maybe not a change in topic i.e. what's on the header but it's a good
example of changing the parameters of the subject when they didn't fit with
what you believed...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417D4D8B.B447F1D2@***.net...
> Matt, that was an example of what? It's definitely not of a change of
> topic, as that was argument over what type of ABS were available for the
> Dana 44, knowing Daimler make none. And I was point out the only one was
> especially made for Dean. How, what's you problem?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > This thread is replete with such examples:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/4egc4
> >
> > You can't give an example of me, Bill, changing the topic. I hit
> > > >them head-on correcting lies about diesels, Daimler's C clip rear
ends,
> > > >or the effectiveness of ABS in off road condition, backing each of my
> > > >statements with web sites.
> > >
example of changing the parameters of the subject when they didn't fit with
what you believed...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417D4D8B.B447F1D2@***.net...
> Matt, that was an example of what? It's definitely not of a change of
> topic, as that was argument over what type of ABS were available for the
> Dana 44, knowing Daimler make none. And I was point out the only one was
> especially made for Dean. How, what's you problem?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > This thread is replete with such examples:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/4egc4
> >
> > You can't give an example of me, Bill, changing the topic. I hit
> > > >them head-on correcting lies about diesels, Daimler's C clip rear
ends,
> > > >or the effectiveness of ABS in off road condition, backing each of my
> > > >statements with web sites.
> > >
10-25-2004, 04:58 PM
#140
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: open letter to rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Hollander? Never heard of it.
And I thought it was fifty years of trail and error, building hot
rods: http://www.----------.com/dragster.jpg
http://www.----------.com/thunderb.htm Although, I mostly spectate now,
with friends that are still active last weekend:
http://www.----------.com/drags102404.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steelgtr62 wrote:
>
> I'd agree Mr ------ is knowledgeable within his sphere but it's obvious he's
> got a lot of agendae and is almost disturbed about some of them. Most of what
> he's said about Jeeps is off the factory manuals or the Hollander interchange
> book.
>
>
And I thought it was fifty years of trail and error, building hot
rods: http://www.----------.com/dragster.jpg
http://www.----------.com/thunderb.htm Although, I mostly spectate now,
with friends that are still active last weekend:
http://www.----------.com/drags102404.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steelgtr62 wrote:
>
> I'd agree Mr ------ is knowledgeable within his sphere but it's obvious he's
> got a lot of agendae and is almost disturbed about some of them. Most of what
> he's said about Jeeps is off the factory manuals or the Hollander interchange
> book.
>
>