I gotta tell you Bill, if you had heard of Hollander you probably could have
cut that fifty years of trial and error down to about 30, and had the other
as 20 years of trial and success. <G>
--
Jeff

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417D6910.FBD3C514@***.net...
> Hollander? Never heard of it.
> And I thought it was fifty years of trail and error, building hot
> rods: http://www.----------.com/dragster.jpg
> http://www.----------.com/thunderb.htm Although, I mostly spectate now,
> with friends that are still active last weekend:
> http://www.----------.com/drags102404.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steelgtr62 wrote:
> >
> > I'd agree Mr ------ is knowledgeable within his sphere but it's obvious
he's
> > got a lot of agendae and is almost disturbed about some of them. Most of
what
> > he's said about Jeeps is off the factory manuals or the Hollander
interchange
> > book.
> >
> >

 

not trying to be a smart ****, but fwiw agenda is the plural.

Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

"Steelgtr62" <steelgtr62@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041025150601.15823.00002878@mb-m28.aol.com...
> I'd agree Mr ------ is knowledgeable within his sphere but it's obvious
he's
> got a lot of agendae and is almost disturbed about some of them. Most of
what
> he's said about Jeeps is off the factory manuals or the Hollander
interchange
> book.
>
>

 

not trying to be a smart ****, but fwiw agenda is the plural.

Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

"Steelgtr62" <steelgtr62@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041025150601.15823.00002878@mb-m28.aol.com...
> I'd agree Mr ------ is knowledgeable within his sphere but it's obvious
he's
> got a lot of agendae and is almost disturbed about some of them. Most of
what
> he's said about Jeeps is off the factory manuals or the Hollander
interchange
> book.
>
>

 

not trying to be a smart ****, but fwiw agenda is the plural.

Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

"Steelgtr62" <steelgtr62@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041025150601.15823.00002878@mb-m28.aol.com...
> I'd agree Mr ------ is knowledgeable within his sphere but it's obvious
he's
> got a lot of agendae and is almost disturbed about some of them. Most of
what
> he's said about Jeeps is off the factory manuals or the Hollander
interchange
> book.
>
>

 

Hi Jeff,
Maybe, that's what the junk yard man used to tell me the the '96
4.0 Ranger V6 was a direct bolt-in to my 78 Mustang II:
http://www.hollander-auto-parts.com/about/ after changing the timing
chain cover and pan. But then, I have the internet now.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

jeff wrote:
>
> I gotta tell you Bill, if you had heard of Hollander you probably could have
> cut that fifty years of trial and error down to about 30, and had the other
> as 20 years of trial and success. <G>
> --
> Jeff

 

Hi Jeff,
Maybe, that's what the junk yard man used to tell me the the '96
4.0 Ranger V6 was a direct bolt-in to my 78 Mustang II:
http://www.hollander-auto-parts.com/about/ after changing the timing
chain cover and pan. But then, I have the internet now.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

jeff wrote:
>
> I gotta tell you Bill, if you had heard of Hollander you probably could have
> cut that fifty years of trial and error down to about 30, and had the other
> as 20 years of trial and success. <G>
> --
> Jeff

 

Hi Jeff,
Maybe, that's what the junk yard man used to tell me the the '96
4.0 Ranger V6 was a direct bolt-in to my 78 Mustang II:
http://www.hollander-auto-parts.com/about/ after changing the timing
chain cover and pan. But then, I have the internet now.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

jeff wrote:
>
> I gotta tell you Bill, if you had heard of Hollander you probably could have
> cut that fifty years of trial and error down to about 30, and had the other
> as 20 years of trial and success. <G>
> --
> Jeff

 

There were a couple more threads that involved that discussion. At the risk
of rehash, first you said not just D-C, but no one makes a D44 that supports
ABS, evidence was presented that in the aftermarket, at least one
manufacturer did, then since you didn't believe that you presented challenge
after challenge, spin after spin to that fact..."you could only have ABS on
that axle if you convert to disk brakes," "tone rings are mounted inside the
axletube," "tone ring was welded on," all seemingly in an effort to save
face when presented with facts that show you were fundamentally incorrect in
your original assumption.

It's OK, though, those of us that know you know what to expect :-)

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417D6990.149B15EE@***.net...
> Like what? I was a straight forward rebuttal.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Maybe not a change in topic i.e. what's on the header but it's a good
> > example of changing the parameters of the subject when they didn't fit
with
> > what you believed...

 

There were a couple more threads that involved that discussion. At the risk
of rehash, first you said not just D-C, but no one makes a D44 that supports
ABS, evidence was presented that in the aftermarket, at least one
manufacturer did, then since you didn't believe that you presented challenge
after challenge, spin after spin to that fact..."you could only have ABS on
that axle if you convert to disk brakes," "tone rings are mounted inside the
axletube," "tone ring was welded on," all seemingly in an effort to save
face when presented with facts that show you were fundamentally incorrect in
your original assumption.

It's OK, though, those of us that know you know what to expect :-)

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417D6990.149B15EE@***.net...
> Like what? I was a straight forward rebuttal.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Maybe not a change in topic i.e. what's on the header but it's a good
> > example of changing the parameters of the subject when they didn't fit
with
> > what you believed...

 

There were a couple more threads that involved that discussion. At the risk
of rehash, first you said not just D-C, but no one makes a D44 that supports
ABS, evidence was presented that in the aftermarket, at least one
manufacturer did, then since you didn't believe that you presented challenge
after challenge, spin after spin to that fact..."you could only have ABS on
that axle if you convert to disk brakes," "tone rings are mounted inside the
axletube," "tone ring was welded on," all seemingly in an effort to save
face when presented with facts that show you were fundamentally incorrect in
your original assumption.

It's OK, though, those of us that know you know what to expect :-)

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:417D6990.149B15EE@***.net...
> Like what? I was a straight forward rebuttal.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Maybe not a change in topic i.e. what's on the header but it's a good
> > example of changing the parameters of the subject when they didn't fit
with
> > what you believed...