Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
04-04-2005, 03:33 PM
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
Like yours, my '78 Bronco only has a spark brain box, no other
computers to bypass: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
> proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
> it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
> there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
> Mike
computers to bypass: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
> proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
> it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
> there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
> Mike
04-04-2005, 03:33 PM
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
Like yours, my '78 Bronco only has a spark brain box, no other
computers to bypass: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
> proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
> it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
> there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
> Mike
computers to bypass: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
> proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
> it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
> there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
> Mike
04-04-2005, 03:33 PM
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
Like yours, my '78 Bronco only has a spark brain box, no other
computers to bypass: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
> proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
> it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
> there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
> Mike
computers to bypass: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
> proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
> it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
> there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
> Mike
04-04-2005, 03:33 PM
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
Like yours, my '78 Bronco only has a spark brain box, no other
computers to bypass: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
> proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
> it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
> there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
> Mike
computers to bypass: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
> proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
> it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
> there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
> Mike
04-05-2005, 12:47 AM
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <42513AE3.A39A2BCC@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <424EA779.BA298F23@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>>
>> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> twice what California's are.
>>
>
>Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
>proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
>it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
>there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
>Mike
The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <424EA779.BA298F23@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>>
>> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> twice what California's are.
>>
>
>Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
>proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
>it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
>there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
>Mike
The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
04-05-2005, 12:47 AM
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <42513AE3.A39A2BCC@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <424EA779.BA298F23@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>>
>> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> twice what California's are.
>>
>
>Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
>proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
>it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
>there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
>Mike
The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <424EA779.BA298F23@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>>
>> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> twice what California's are.
>>
>
>Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
>proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
>it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
>there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
>Mike
The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
04-05-2005, 12:47 AM
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <42513AE3.A39A2BCC@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <424EA779.BA298F23@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>>
>> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> twice what California's are.
>>
>
>Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
>proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
>it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
>there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
>Mike
The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <424EA779.BA298F23@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>>
>> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> twice what California's are.
>>
>
>Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
>proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
>it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
>there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
>Mike
The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
04-05-2005, 12:47 AM
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <42513AE3.A39A2BCC@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <424EA779.BA298F23@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>>
>> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> twice what California's are.
>>
>
>Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
>proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
>it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
>there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
>Mike
The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <424EA779.BA298F23@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>>
>> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> twice what California's are.
>>
>
>Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>that says different. You are like a broken record and I don't feel like
>proving you wrong with the exact same info 'once again'. We have posted
>it several times, but I guess with all that computer learning you got,
>there is nothing left over for real facts eh.
>
>Mike
The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
04-05-2005, 01:09 AM
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
When the going gets tough, change the subject, eh?
I'll disregard the fact that your comments had NOTHING to do with my reply and
address what you just posted...
1. It appears that you're saying that you don't want full vacuum advance when
cold? If that's what you're saying, you're wrong again. You want MORE advance
for cold running.
2. There is no class A license anymore. They went away not long after they did
away with road draft tubes. There is EB for basic area technicians and EA for
advanced emission specialist. Since you asked, I have an EA license.
In message <4250D8E9.259A1DF0@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> We eliminate full vacuum advance for cold running only. Remember I
>had a class A license, do you?
>http://www.----------.com/oscilloscope.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:--------------------
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> I am familiar with the Nutter hack. Maybe you should have another look. The
>> ignition module is just a driver for the coil. The computer that your pal
>> recommends bypassing controls the timing. That is why the ignition wiring is
>> modified.
I'll disregard the fact that your comments had NOTHING to do with my reply and
address what you just posted...
1. It appears that you're saying that you don't want full vacuum advance when
cold? If that's what you're saying, you're wrong again. You want MORE advance
for cold running.
2. There is no class A license anymore. They went away not long after they did
away with road draft tubes. There is EB for basic area technicians and EA for
advanced emission specialist. Since you asked, I have an EA license.
In message <4250D8E9.259A1DF0@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> We eliminate full vacuum advance for cold running only. Remember I
>had a class A license, do you?
>http://www.----------.com/oscilloscope.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:--------------------
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> I am familiar with the Nutter hack. Maybe you should have another look. The
>> ignition module is just a driver for the coil. The computer that your pal
>> recommends bypassing controls the timing. That is why the ignition wiring is
>> modified.
04-05-2005, 01:09 AM
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
When the going gets tough, change the subject, eh?
I'll disregard the fact that your comments had NOTHING to do with my reply and
address what you just posted...
1. It appears that you're saying that you don't want full vacuum advance when
cold? If that's what you're saying, you're wrong again. You want MORE advance
for cold running.
2. There is no class A license anymore. They went away not long after they did
away with road draft tubes. There is EB for basic area technicians and EA for
advanced emission specialist. Since you asked, I have an EA license.
In message <4250D8E9.259A1DF0@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> We eliminate full vacuum advance for cold running only. Remember I
>had a class A license, do you?
>http://www.----------.com/oscilloscope.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:--------------------
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> I am familiar with the Nutter hack. Maybe you should have another look. The
>> ignition module is just a driver for the coil. The computer that your pal
>> recommends bypassing controls the timing. That is why the ignition wiring is
>> modified.
I'll disregard the fact that your comments had NOTHING to do with my reply and
address what you just posted...
1. It appears that you're saying that you don't want full vacuum advance when
cold? If that's what you're saying, you're wrong again. You want MORE advance
for cold running.
2. There is no class A license anymore. They went away not long after they did
away with road draft tubes. There is EB for basic area technicians and EA for
advanced emission specialist. Since you asked, I have an EA license.
In message <4250D8E9.259A1DF0@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> We eliminate full vacuum advance for cold running only. Remember I
>had a class A license, do you?
>http://www.----------.com/oscilloscope.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:--------------------
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> I am familiar with the Nutter hack. Maybe you should have another look. The
>> ignition module is just a driver for the coil. The computer that your pal
>> recommends bypassing controls the timing. That is why the ignition wiring is
>> modified.