Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
04-09-2005, 01:23 AM
#121
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <4256A00F.FB0F246@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
><snip>
>> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>> >> >> >> >that says different.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
>> >> >> >
>
>> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
>> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
>> >
>> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
>> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
>> >
>> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
>> >
>> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>>
>> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
>> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>>
>
>Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
>pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
You just proved that the hack passes Canada's loose NOx standards for an 89 YJ.
The OP lives in California, and 1500 for NOx would be very close to being a
gross polluter here.
California pass/fail cutpoints for an 89 YJ would be:
5015 test - 1015ppm NOx
2525 test - 875ppm NOx
Once again, you are actually the fool.
>
>There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
>about and we all have passed emissions.
>
Once again, the OP is in California. It won't fly here.
>Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
>has a GVW of 4450.....
Still nearly 2000lb less than Bills 6400lb Bronco, which places it in a
different emissions category in California.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
><snip>
>> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>> >> >> >> >that says different.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
>> >> >> >
>
>> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
>> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
>> >
>> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
>> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
>> >
>> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
>> >
>> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>>
>> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
>> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>>
>
>Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
>pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
You just proved that the hack passes Canada's loose NOx standards for an 89 YJ.
The OP lives in California, and 1500 for NOx would be very close to being a
gross polluter here.
California pass/fail cutpoints for an 89 YJ would be:
5015 test - 1015ppm NOx
2525 test - 875ppm NOx
Once again, you are actually the fool.
>
>There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
>about and we all have passed emissions.
>
Once again, the OP is in California. It won't fly here.
>Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
>has a GVW of 4450.....
Still nearly 2000lb less than Bills 6400lb Bronco, which places it in a
different emissions category in California.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
04-09-2005, 01:23 AM
#122
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <4256A00F.FB0F246@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
><snip>
>> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>> >> >> >> >that says different.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
>> >> >> >
>
>> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
>> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
>> >
>> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
>> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
>> >
>> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
>> >
>> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>>
>> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
>> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>>
>
>Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
>pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
You just proved that the hack passes Canada's loose NOx standards for an 89 YJ.
The OP lives in California, and 1500 for NOx would be very close to being a
gross polluter here.
California pass/fail cutpoints for an 89 YJ would be:
5015 test - 1015ppm NOx
2525 test - 875ppm NOx
Once again, you are actually the fool.
>
>There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
>about and we all have passed emissions.
>
Once again, the OP is in California. It won't fly here.
>Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
>has a GVW of 4450.....
Still nearly 2000lb less than Bills 6400lb Bronco, which places it in a
different emissions category in California.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
><snip>
>> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>> >> >> >> >that says different.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
>> >> >> >
>
>> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
>> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
>> >
>> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
>> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
>> >
>> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
>> >
>> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>>
>> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
>> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>>
>
>Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
>pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
You just proved that the hack passes Canada's loose NOx standards for an 89 YJ.
The OP lives in California, and 1500 for NOx would be very close to being a
gross polluter here.
California pass/fail cutpoints for an 89 YJ would be:
5015 test - 1015ppm NOx
2525 test - 875ppm NOx
Once again, you are actually the fool.
>
>There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
>about and we all have passed emissions.
>
Once again, the OP is in California. It won't fly here.
>Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
>has a GVW of 4450.....
Still nearly 2000lb less than Bills 6400lb Bronco, which places it in a
different emissions category in California.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
04-09-2005, 01:23 AM
#123
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <4256A00F.FB0F246@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
><snip>
>> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>> >> >> >> >that says different.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
>> >> >> >
>
>> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
>> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
>> >
>> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
>> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
>> >
>> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
>> >
>> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>>
>> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
>> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>>
>
>Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
>pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
You just proved that the hack passes Canada's loose NOx standards for an 89 YJ.
The OP lives in California, and 1500 for NOx would be very close to being a
gross polluter here.
California pass/fail cutpoints for an 89 YJ would be:
5015 test - 1015ppm NOx
2525 test - 875ppm NOx
Once again, you are actually the fool.
>
>There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
>about and we all have passed emissions.
>
Once again, the OP is in California. It won't fly here.
>Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
>has a GVW of 4450.....
Still nearly 2000lb less than Bills 6400lb Bronco, which places it in a
different emissions category in California.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
><snip>
>> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>> >> >> >> >that says different.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
>> >> >> >
>
>> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
>> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
>> >
>> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
>> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
>> >
>> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
>> >
>> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>>
>> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
>> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>>
>
>Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
>pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
You just proved that the hack passes Canada's loose NOx standards for an 89 YJ.
The OP lives in California, and 1500 for NOx would be very close to being a
gross polluter here.
California pass/fail cutpoints for an 89 YJ would be:
5015 test - 1015ppm NOx
2525 test - 875ppm NOx
Once again, you are actually the fool.
>
>There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
>about and we all have passed emissions.
>
Once again, the OP is in California. It won't fly here.
>Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
>has a GVW of 4450.....
Still nearly 2000lb less than Bills 6400lb Bronco, which places it in a
different emissions category in California.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
04-09-2005, 01:23 AM
#124
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <4256A00F.FB0F246@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
><snip>
>> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>> >> >> >> >that says different.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
>> >> >> >
>
>> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
>> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
>> >
>> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
>> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
>> >
>> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
>> >
>> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>>
>> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
>> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>>
>
>Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
>pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
You just proved that the hack passes Canada's loose NOx standards for an 89 YJ.
The OP lives in California, and 1500 for NOx would be very close to being a
gross polluter here.
California pass/fail cutpoints for an 89 YJ would be:
5015 test - 1015ppm NOx
2525 test - 875ppm NOx
Once again, you are actually the fool.
>
>There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
>about and we all have passed emissions.
>
Once again, the OP is in California. It won't fly here.
>Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
>has a GVW of 4450.....
Still nearly 2000lb less than Bills 6400lb Bronco, which places it in a
different emissions category in California.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
><snip>
>> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
>> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
>> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
>> >> >> >> >that says different.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
>> >> >> >
>
>> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
>> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
>> >
>> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
>> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
>> >
>> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
>> >
>> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>>
>> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
>> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>>
>
>Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
>pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
You just proved that the hack passes Canada's loose NOx standards for an 89 YJ.
The OP lives in California, and 1500 for NOx would be very close to being a
gross polluter here.
California pass/fail cutpoints for an 89 YJ would be:
5015 test - 1015ppm NOx
2525 test - 875ppm NOx
Once again, you are actually the fool.
>
>There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
>about and we all have passed emissions.
>
Once again, the OP is in California. It won't fly here.
>Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
>has a GVW of 4450.....
Still nearly 2000lb less than Bills 6400lb Bronco, which places it in a
different emissions category in California.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
04-09-2005, 01:28 AM
#125
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
You're obviously confused, so I'll make it simple for you.
You said they stopped using EGR 20 years ago...
Not true!!!
In message <42562316.34FA8B15@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
>broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
> And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> So your claim, as quoted here:
>>
>> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
You said they stopped using EGR 20 years ago...
Not true!!!
In message <42562316.34FA8B15@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
>broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
> And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> So your claim, as quoted here:
>>
>> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
04-09-2005, 01:28 AM
#126
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
You're obviously confused, so I'll make it simple for you.
You said they stopped using EGR 20 years ago...
Not true!!!
In message <42562316.34FA8B15@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
>broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
> And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> So your claim, as quoted here:
>>
>> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
You said they stopped using EGR 20 years ago...
Not true!!!
In message <42562316.34FA8B15@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
>broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
> And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> So your claim, as quoted here:
>>
>> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
04-09-2005, 01:28 AM
#127
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
You're obviously confused, so I'll make it simple for you.
You said they stopped using EGR 20 years ago...
Not true!!!
In message <42562316.34FA8B15@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
>broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
> And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> So your claim, as quoted here:
>>
>> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
You said they stopped using EGR 20 years ago...
Not true!!!
In message <42562316.34FA8B15@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
>broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
> And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> So your claim, as quoted here:
>>
>> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
04-09-2005, 01:28 AM
#128
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
You're obviously confused, so I'll make it simple for you.
You said they stopped using EGR 20 years ago...
Not true!!!
In message <42562316.34FA8B15@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
>broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
> And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> So your claim, as quoted here:
>>
>> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
You said they stopped using EGR 20 years ago...
Not true!!!
In message <42562316.34FA8B15@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
>broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
> And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> So your claim, as quoted here:
>>
>> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
04-09-2005, 03:02 AM
#129
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
Like, can you find an "Exhaust Gas Recirculation" valve in the TJ
index?
http://www.----------.com/97TJindex.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
bllsht wrote:
>
> You're obviously confused, so I'll make it simple for you.
>
> You said they stopped using EGR 20 years ago...
>
> Not true!!!
>
> In message <42562316.34FA8B15@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
>
> > You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
> >broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
> > And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >bllsht wrote:
> >>
> >> So your claim, as quoted here:
> >>
> >> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
index?
http://www.----------.com/97TJindex.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
bllsht wrote:
>
> You're obviously confused, so I'll make it simple for you.
>
> You said they stopped using EGR 20 years ago...
>
> Not true!!!
>
> In message <42562316.34FA8B15@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
>
> > You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
> >broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
> > And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >bllsht wrote:
> >>
> >> So your claim, as quoted here:
> >>
> >> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
04-09-2005, 03:02 AM
#130
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
Like, can you find an "Exhaust Gas Recirculation" valve in the TJ
index?
http://www.----------.com/97TJindex.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
bllsht wrote:
>
> You're obviously confused, so I'll make it simple for you.
>
> You said they stopped using EGR 20 years ago...
>
> Not true!!!
>
> In message <42562316.34FA8B15@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
>
> > You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
> >broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
> > And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >bllsht wrote:
> >>
> >> So your claim, as quoted here:
> >>
> >> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
index?
http://www.----------.com/97TJindex.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
bllsht wrote:
>
> You're obviously confused, so I'll make it simple for you.
>
> You said they stopped using EGR 20 years ago...
>
> Not true!!!
>
> In message <42562316.34FA8B15@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
>
> > You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
> >broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
> > And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >bllsht wrote:
> >>
> >> So your claim, as quoted here:
> >>
> >> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!