Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
03-31-2005, 02:22 AM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
wrote:
>Greetings everyone,
>
>So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
>my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
>others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
>Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
>
>I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
>it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
>fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
>it gives the Jeep.
>
>Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
>pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
>back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
>it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
>modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>
>Thanks in advance for your help, I'll let the group know how it turns
>out.
>
>Best,
> Kevin
wrote:
>Greetings everyone,
>
>So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
>my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
>others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
>Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
>
>I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
>it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
>fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
>it gives the Jeep.
>
>Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
>pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
>back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
>it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
>modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>
>Thanks in advance for your help, I'll let the group know how it turns
>out.
>
>Best,
> Kevin
03-31-2005, 02:22 AM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
wrote:
>Greetings everyone,
>
>So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
>my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
>others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
>Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
>
>I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
>it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
>fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
>it gives the Jeep.
>
>Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
>pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
>back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
>it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
>modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>
>Thanks in advance for your help, I'll let the group know how it turns
>out.
>
>Best,
> Kevin
wrote:
>Greetings everyone,
>
>So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
>my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
>others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
>Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
>
>I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
>it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
>fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
>it gives the Jeep.
>
>Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
>pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
>back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
>it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
>modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>
>Thanks in advance for your help, I'll let the group know how it turns
>out.
>
>Best,
> Kevin
03-31-2005, 02:22 AM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
wrote:
>Greetings everyone,
>
>So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
>my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
>others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
>Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
>
>I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
>it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
>fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
>it gives the Jeep.
>
>Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
>pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
>back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
>it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
>modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>
>Thanks in advance for your help, I'll let the group know how it turns
>out.
>
>Best,
> Kevin
wrote:
>Greetings everyone,
>
>So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
>my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
>others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
>Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
>
>I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
>it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
>fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
>it gives the Jeep.
>
>Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
>pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
>back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
>it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
>modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>
>Thanks in advance for your help, I'll let the group know how it turns
>out.
>
>Best,
> Kevin
03-31-2005, 09:04 AM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
bllsht wrote:
>
> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
> wrote:
>
> >Greetings everyone,
> >
> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
> >
> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
> >it gives the Jeep.
> >
> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
>
> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>
We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
clue in the world.
You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
tuck them into bed.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
> wrote:
>
> >Greetings everyone,
> >
> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
> >
> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
> >it gives the Jeep.
> >
> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
>
> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>
We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
clue in the world.
You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
tuck them into bed.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
03-31-2005, 09:04 AM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
bllsht wrote:
>
> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
> wrote:
>
> >Greetings everyone,
> >
> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
> >
> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
> >it gives the Jeep.
> >
> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
>
> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>
We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
clue in the world.
You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
tuck them into bed.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
> wrote:
>
> >Greetings everyone,
> >
> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
> >
> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
> >it gives the Jeep.
> >
> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
>
> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>
We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
clue in the world.
You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
tuck them into bed.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
03-31-2005, 09:04 AM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
bllsht wrote:
>
> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
> wrote:
>
> >Greetings everyone,
> >
> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
> >
> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
> >it gives the Jeep.
> >
> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
>
> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>
We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
clue in the world.
You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
tuck them into bed.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
> wrote:
>
> >Greetings everyone,
> >
> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
> >
> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
> >it gives the Jeep.
> >
> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
>
> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>
We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
clue in the world.
You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
tuck them into bed.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
04-02-2005, 04:36 AM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <424C035A.D6ACFE0@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Greetings everyone,
>> >
>> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
>> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
>> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
>> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
>> >
>> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
>> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
>> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
>> >it gives the Jeep.
>> >
>> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
>> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
>> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
>> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
>> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
>>
>> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
>> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
>> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>>
>
>We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
>and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
They may pass Canada's standards for NOx, but won't come close to passing
California's.
>
>I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
>controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
>clue in the world.
I've worked on vehicles with and without computers with the same success for
years. Somebody mentions computer in any context and the first thing you
recommend is getting rid of it. You don't understand computers so you fear
them. Face it, technology passed you by years ago. You, friend, are the one
that is clueless.
>
>You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
>years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
>tuck them into bed.
LOL! I bet you even consider yourself a 'real' mechanic. LOL!
'Real' mechanics don't lose sleep over computers. They learn, adapt and
appreciate what computers can do.
A wannabe will sit around and cry about them.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Greetings everyone,
>> >
>> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
>> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
>> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
>> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
>> >
>> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
>> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
>> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
>> >it gives the Jeep.
>> >
>> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
>> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
>> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
>> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
>> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
>>
>> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
>> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
>> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>>
>
>We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
>and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
They may pass Canada's standards for NOx, but won't come close to passing
California's.
>
>I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
>controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
>clue in the world.
I've worked on vehicles with and without computers with the same success for
years. Somebody mentions computer in any context and the first thing you
recommend is getting rid of it. You don't understand computers so you fear
them. Face it, technology passed you by years ago. You, friend, are the one
that is clueless.
>
>You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
>years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
>tuck them into bed.
LOL! I bet you even consider yourself a 'real' mechanic. LOL!
'Real' mechanics don't lose sleep over computers. They learn, adapt and
appreciate what computers can do.
A wannabe will sit around and cry about them.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
04-02-2005, 04:36 AM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <424C035A.D6ACFE0@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Greetings everyone,
>> >
>> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
>> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
>> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
>> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
>> >
>> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
>> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
>> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
>> >it gives the Jeep.
>> >
>> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
>> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
>> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
>> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
>> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
>>
>> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
>> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
>> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>>
>
>We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
>and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
They may pass Canada's standards for NOx, but won't come close to passing
California's.
>
>I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
>controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
>clue in the world.
I've worked on vehicles with and without computers with the same success for
years. Somebody mentions computer in any context and the first thing you
recommend is getting rid of it. You don't understand computers so you fear
them. Face it, technology passed you by years ago. You, friend, are the one
that is clueless.
>
>You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
>years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
>tuck them into bed.
LOL! I bet you even consider yourself a 'real' mechanic. LOL!
'Real' mechanics don't lose sleep over computers. They learn, adapt and
appreciate what computers can do.
A wannabe will sit around and cry about them.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Greetings everyone,
>> >
>> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
>> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
>> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
>> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
>> >
>> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
>> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
>> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
>> >it gives the Jeep.
>> >
>> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
>> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
>> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
>> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
>> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
>>
>> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
>> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
>> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>>
>
>We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
>and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
They may pass Canada's standards for NOx, but won't come close to passing
California's.
>
>I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
>controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
>clue in the world.
I've worked on vehicles with and without computers with the same success for
years. Somebody mentions computer in any context and the first thing you
recommend is getting rid of it. You don't understand computers so you fear
them. Face it, technology passed you by years ago. You, friend, are the one
that is clueless.
>
>You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
>years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
>tuck them into bed.
LOL! I bet you even consider yourself a 'real' mechanic. LOL!
'Real' mechanics don't lose sleep over computers. They learn, adapt and
appreciate what computers can do.
A wannabe will sit around and cry about them.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
04-02-2005, 04:36 AM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <424C035A.D6ACFE0@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Greetings everyone,
>> >
>> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
>> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
>> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
>> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
>> >
>> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
>> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
>> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
>> >it gives the Jeep.
>> >
>> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
>> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
>> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
>> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
>> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
>>
>> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
>> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
>> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>>
>
>We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
>and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
They may pass Canada's standards for NOx, but won't come close to passing
California's.
>
>I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
>controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
>clue in the world.
I've worked on vehicles with and without computers with the same success for
years. Somebody mentions computer in any context and the first thing you
recommend is getting rid of it. You don't understand computers so you fear
them. Face it, technology passed you by years ago. You, friend, are the one
that is clueless.
>
>You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
>years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
>tuck them into bed.
LOL! I bet you even consider yourself a 'real' mechanic. LOL!
'Real' mechanics don't lose sleep over computers. They learn, adapt and
appreciate what computers can do.
A wannabe will sit around and cry about them.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Greetings everyone,
>> >
>> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
>> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
>> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
>> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
>> >
>> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
>> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
>> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
>> >it gives the Jeep.
>> >
>> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
>> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
>> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
>> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
>> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
>>
>> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
>> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
>> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
>>
>
>We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
>and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
They may pass Canada's standards for NOx, but won't come close to passing
California's.
>
>I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
>controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
>clue in the world.
I've worked on vehicles with and without computers with the same success for
years. Somebody mentions computer in any context and the first thing you
recommend is getting rid of it. You don't understand computers so you fear
them. Face it, technology passed you by years ago. You, friend, are the one
that is clueless.
>
>You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
>years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
>tuck them into bed.
LOL! I bet you even consider yourself a 'real' mechanic. LOL!
'Real' mechanics don't lose sleep over computers. They learn, adapt and
appreciate what computers can do.
A wannabe will sit around and cry about them.
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
04-02-2005, 09:08 AM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
bllsht wrote:
>
> In message <424C035A.D6ACFE0@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>
> >bllsht wrote:
> >>
> >> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Greetings everyone,
> >> >
> >> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
> >> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
> >> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
> >> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
> >> >
> >> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
> >> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
> >> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
> >> >it gives the Jeep.
> >> >
> >> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
> >> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
> >> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
> >> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
> >> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
> >>
> >> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
> >> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
> >> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
> >>
> >
> >We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
> >and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
>
> They may pass Canada's standards for NOx, but won't come close to passing
> California's.
Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
online several times and we have higher standards here.
>
> >
> >I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
> >controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
> >clue in the world.
>
> I've worked on vehicles with and without computers with the same success for
> years. Somebody mentions computer in any context and the first thing you
> recommend is getting rid of it. You don't understand computers so you fear
> them. Face it, technology passed you by years ago. You, friend, are the > one that is clueless.
ROTFLMAO!
I only made my living off designing custom and repairing circuits for
mobile data communication systems for 9 years or so, yup don't have any
clue about them thar eeelectronic bits and pieces whatsoever...
>
> >
> >You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
> >years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
> >tuck them into bed.
>
> LOL! I bet you even consider yourself a 'real' mechanic. LOL!
I am 'not' the one here who 'claims' to be a mechanic, real or
otherwise....
>
> 'Real' mechanics don't lose sleep over computers. They learn, adapt and
> appreciate what computers can do.
Yup, too bad it doesn't leave enough room in their brains to remember
how mechanical systems work.
>
> A wannabe will sit around and cry about them.
Well you do enough of that for all of us, that's for sure.... It.. it..
it.. just 'can't' work without a computer, shuudddeeerrr....
Mike
>
> >
> >Mike
> >86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> >88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> In message <424C035A.D6ACFE0@sympatico.ca>, "Mike Romain" wrote:
>
> >bllsht wrote:
> >>
> >> In message <1112043242.526340.142120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, "Kevin"
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Greetings everyone,
> >> >
> >> >So I'm getting ready to give this Nutter Ignition Modification a try on
> >> >my 1987 Wrangler I6 258 with the Carter BBD, but I was curious if
> >> >others had gone with the replacement ECU as suggested on the Off-Road
> >> >Jeep Tech site or if they stuck with their stock ECU?
> >> >
> >> >I am also curious as to the effects of this on your fuel economy. Did
> >> >it get better or worse? I am interested in doing this more for better
> >> >fuel economy and smoother operation than I am about the power increase
> >> >it gives the Jeep.
> >> >
> >> >Lastly, I do live in California and just spent 6 months getting it to
> >> >pass Smog but it did squeak by, so after I do this I plan on taking it
> >> >back to a Pre-test smog station just to get an accurate comparison of
> >> >it's affects on my smog readings. Anyhelp on how to disguise the
> >> >modification from the smog cops would be greatly appreciated as well.
> >>
> >> Hiding the evidence will be the least of your worries. If you live in an area
> >> where loaded mode testing is done, you will fail the NOx portion of the
> >> emissions test miserably. Can you say "Gross Polluter"?
> >>
> >
> >We have to pass NOx under load on a dyno up here in Canada if it is a YJ
> >and guess what bllsht, We Pass!!!! Every 'Nutter' I have seen passes!
>
> They may pass Canada's standards for NOx, but won't come close to passing
> California's.
Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
online several times and we have higher standards here.
>
> >
> >I don't get you new so called 'mechanics'. If it isn't computer
> >controlled or the computer doesn't talk to you you have absolutely 'no'
> >clue in the world.
>
> I've worked on vehicles with and without computers with the same success for
> years. Somebody mentions computer in any context and the first thing you
> recommend is getting rid of it. You don't understand computers so you fear
> them. Face it, technology passed you by years ago. You, friend, are the > one that is clueless.
ROTFLMAO!
I only made my living off designing custom and repairing circuits for
mobile data communication systems for 9 years or so, yup don't have any
clue about them thar eeelectronic bits and pieces whatsoever...
>
> >
> >You forget that 'real' mechanics have been tuning up carburetors for
> >years with great success. 'Real' mechanics don't need no computer to
> >tuck them into bed.
>
> LOL! I bet you even consider yourself a 'real' mechanic. LOL!
I am 'not' the one here who 'claims' to be a mechanic, real or
otherwise....
>
> 'Real' mechanics don't lose sleep over computers. They learn, adapt and
> appreciate what computers can do.
Yup, too bad it doesn't leave enough room in their brains to remember
how mechanical systems work.
>
> A wannabe will sit around and cry about them.
Well you do enough of that for all of us, that's for sure.... It.. it..
it.. just 'can't' work without a computer, shuudddeeerrr....
Mike
>
> >
> >Mike
> >86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> >88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's